Do Not Question the Morelli
Whether or not Anthony Morelli is a smart quarterback is still up for debate. Similarly, his ability to handle questions from the media is still up for debate as well.
He became agitated during a conference call with reporters when it was pointed out that some critics believe the Nittany Lions beat Notre Dame, 31-10, Saturday at Beaver Stadium despite his play.
"I don't know how I didn't have a good game," Morelli said. "We won the football game. So many people are so caught up on stats. Stats are so overrated. I'm so tired of hearing about it. It's so ridiculous. It's just unbelievable. No one's ever satisfied with a victory."
Not true! 26% of the people were satisfied. But enough about stats since they are apparently overrated.
Anthony, let me tell you how you didn't have a good game. Your second pass of the game was intercepted and returned for a touchdown to put your team down early. Then with 0:50 seconds left in the first half you scrambled on first down. Instead of just running out of bounds to stop the clock you chose to dive for the first down even though you were three yards short. Instead of stopping the clock and giving your team a 2nd and five you fumbled the ball and gave Notre Dame the ball in Penn State territory.
Now, you made some nice plays. In fairness, the interception was a nice read. You had single coverage on Williams. It was just a bad throw. But the 51 yard strike to Chris Bell was a thing of beauty. And the touchdown to Jordan Norwood was a great read and reaction. But you have to realize that people don't remember these things.
Ask the average college football fan to remember the top three plays you remember about Anthony Morelli last year. 99% of the people would say the errant toss to Tom Zbikowski and the two pick sixes against Ohio State. Now name the top three memories of Michael Robinson in 2005. For me it's the throw to Derrick Williams to beat Northwestern, his total annihilation of the Minnesota safety, and the late fourth quarter drive against Michigan.
Michael Robinson was a special player that could strap a team on his back and carry them to victory. Anthony Morelli, to this point, isn't. Nobody remembers mistake free blowouts against Florida International. What matters as a quarterback is making plays when the chips are down. Until Morelli comes through in the clutch this will be his legacy as a Penn State quarterback. So he better get used to hearing more of these questions if he's going to make mistakes in big games.
0 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Morelli
I could be totally off base here because I am in fact an idiot but I'm just sayin.
Just something I've been thinking about lately. Any thoughts?
by nittanyroar on Sep 13, 2007 9:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Think.........
by ech2os on Sep 13, 2007 9:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1982 champs
by M1EK on Sep 13, 2007 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WFY
by WFY on Sep 13, 2007 9:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is he really a dumbass?
That kind of non-stop crap has to get to you. Now, every error is spotlighted and pointed to as proof of his boneheadedness. Morelli's probably still sensitive about it, but I was hoping his tirade last December got it out of his system. I'm sure a win and a decent game against Michigan would do wonders for both his peace of mind, and for putting these comments to rest.
Is he All-American material? Certainly not yet. But I actually agree with him: keep the stats, and give me a damn win. I personally don't care if he's got a 40% completion rate, a 1:1 TD/INT ratio, and fumbles twice a game as long as he keeps putting W's up.
by Pete the Streak on Sep 13, 2007 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably not
by WFY on Sep 13, 2007 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hindsight must be 20/20
Morelli has 2 in the first half but didn't blow a lead.
I'm not seeing how the top one is any better than the bottom one.
by stonewall435 on Sep 13, 2007 11:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
MROb vs. Morelli
Having said that, I think the pass to Bell was a clutch play. It set up the score that put ND away for good.
He does need a media coach though.
by speedomike02 on Sep 13, 2007 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As I see it...
I'm not sure that Anthony's tantrum is a bad thing - remember how whiney he was before the Outback Bowl - and he played pretty well in that game - so maybe it's a ritual.
Yeah, we were appalled by MRob until late in the NW game - it was really that 4th and a city block play that was the "tide turner" (for me anyway) - he just took the team on his back and said, we're gonna win - and they did. I don't see AM doing that - he doesn't (imo) have the all around strength and talent to just "win games" - hopefully the team can work together (with or without the help of the playcallers) and get similar results.
BTW - the games on the College Pick 'em are brutal this week - the "ranking" shouldn't be for how confident you are, but for how much you really want it to happen.
by PSUgirl on Sep 13, 2007 11:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Harsh
It's a critical eye that remembers his fumble against ND last year and this year, his three INT pick 6's (doesn't anybody on offense know how to tackle?), his terrible sacks.
What about his 46 yard TD to Butler to start off 2006...or his clutch play versus UTenn...or his perfect pass to DWill when UM's fat DT fell on him and rattled his brain cage...or the TD to Bell on Saturday?
Just because a kid doesn't have media savvy doesn't mean the Nittany Nation should pile up on him.
by micahandme on Sep 13, 2007 12:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it really isn't apples to apples
Anthony was the starting qb last season - "in his career" by his 5th start, MRob was a bit of a superstar. He wasn't a great passer - he was a very good rusher - he didn't always execute plays exactly the way they were written - but he brought back a team (utilizing an unbelievably young team) that had been to the lowest depths - and for that we have canonized him.
So yeah, AM has a lot to prove before he can be compared to Michael Robinson.
by PSUgirl on Sep 13, 2007 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Slight disagreement
As I've said previously, this was Morelli's FIFTEENTH start at QB. 15. The first two things you mentioned about Robinson happened when he was still a RB/WR. Even worse, Morelli's been a quarterback his entire time at PSU, which is anywhere between 2 or 3 more years than Robinson, depending on how you'd like to measure it.
Comparing the QB careers of Robinson and Morelli is completely worthless, IMO. It's not even apples and oranges.
by Run Up The Score on Sep 13, 2007 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Catch to Bell
by nittanyroar on Sep 13, 2007 12:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Two words:
Seriously, if the over/under for points on offense in your bowl game this year is 1, I'm taking the under. Beating mediocre to poor teams all year isn't proving anything.
by WakeUp on Sep 13, 2007 3:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Our very own Vinnie Intercepta-verdi?
I can understand Morelli's frustrations with the media, but as of now he's swimming in blood with journalistic sharks circling impatiently.
by Blood Meridian on Sep 13, 2007 3:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not true...
by Run Up The Score on Sep 14, 2007 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh...
by Run Up The Score on Sep 14, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And because I'm bored and it's late...
Ohio State: None.
Northwestern: None.
Minnesota: 2 (M. Hahn, T. Hunt)
Michigan: None.
Illinois: 1 (K. Darling)
Purdue: None.
Wisconsin: None.
Michigan State: 2 (A. Quarless, J. Norwood)
by Run Up The Score on Sep 14, 2007 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MRob
Robinson had more heart than Morelli, and he had the "it" that so many pro players talk about. However he wasn't a great QB. He could improvise because he was a superb athlete, and Morelli is just a straight drop back QB.
How about we start blaming Galen Hall for the TERRIBLE (I cannot emphasis that enough) playcalling so far. Morelli can throw the ball 80 yards yet we insist on running 5 screens in the first quarter of games. I think the jury is still out on Morelli because the offensive line isn't great, getting better but not great, and the playcalling is god awful. However Morelli does seem to have trouble leading receivers on slant routes. (those get called twice a game)
by CBlack79 on Sep 13, 2007 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Against UM
by stonewall435 on Sep 13, 2007 4:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Monkey on AM's Back is Gone
by whonext360 on Sep 13, 2007 4:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it's Paterno's fault.
If Paterno had kept the red-shirt on Morelli, he would have had sophmore eligibility last season. Tony had a damn good year for a sophmore. Late last season Morelli started playing more like a Junior, and by the end of this year he is going to be strong. Which is unfortunate, becasue we wasted a year of eligibility for the greater glory of Zack Mills in a 4-7 season.
by jesse. on Sep 14, 2007 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
An opposing viewpoint
You might want to check out this piece for a different viewpoint on whether or not it was a mistake to play Morelli: http://laschout.com/2007/08/16/did-psu-blow-anthony-morellis-redshirt.aspx
by Elihu on Sep 14, 2007 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AM Stats
I agree with AM. I don't care what the stats are as long as PSU has a "W" at the end of the game.
Yes, it is frustrating watching other teams run their sleak "pro-style" efficient offenses, and it would be fun if PSU could create a '94 type offense every year, but after suffering through 2000 - 2004, all I want is a "W". Actually 10-12 of them every year, and I don't care how they do it! (except that they do it legally)
by BigDer on Sep 15, 2007 9:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















