Black Shoe Diaries: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Breaking Up Is Hard To Do For The Blue-White Roundtable

This is going to be the last Blue-White Roundtable you're going to see for a while. It'll be back for next season and we reserve the right to break it out on special occasions during the off season like letter of intent day and the Blue-White game. But it's just too hard to organize to keep going through the off season. So let's not make this harder than it is. It's not you, it's us. We can still be friends and stuff. Maybe we'll call you sometime.

Run Up The Score
There Is No Name On My Jersey
The Nittany Line
The Nittany Notebook
William F. Yurasko

Let's start off with a positive note. When you look back on the 2007 season five or ten years from now, what will be your fondest memory? It doesn't necessarily have to be Penn State related.

Even though the team was disappointing I still had a great time. Without a doubt my fondest memory will be making the last minute road trip out to Ann Arbor. It was my first away game ever so it will always be memorable for that reason. PSUncle and I had a great time even though the team lost. Now I can cross "Seeing a game at the Big House" off my list of things to do before I die.

What should the Big Ten conference consider as its highest priority this off season?

They need to tighten up the officiating. Some Michigan or Ohio State flamer will come in here calling me a Penn State whiner, but I saw plenty of Buckeyes and Boilermakers complaining about the officiating this season so it's not just us anymore. The Stephen Pamon gambling scandal has the potential to call the ethics of the officials into question if it goes deeper.

Priority number 1.a. would be resolving the differences between the Big Ten Network and Comcast. I've personally made the switch to another carrier that provides the network and I can tell you I love it. Getting the channel into every home in America would elevate our conference to a whole new level.

Clark or Devlin? Whose camp are you in and why?

I'm going to cop out and say right now I don't have a pony in this race. At one time I thought Devlin was our best chance for success. Everyone says he has the physical tools to be a big time passing quarterback. But from what I've heard and what I've seen of Daryll Clark he may have that "it" factor. He certainly looked like it in the Alamo Bowl. So now I'm anxious to see what he can do too. It's going to be a topic of a lot of heated debate over the coming months, but I think Penn State will be ok with either one of these guys. I'm glad we have both of them.

Which position not including quarterback is your biggest concern looking ahead to 2008?

Right now I would say free safety. The results of the Tony Davis experiment are inconclusive since he was injured for much of the year and didn't play. Due to Spencer Ridenhour's transfer we were forced to play Mark Rubin a lot. He did ok, but he's not a very instinctive player. Can anyone remember him breaking up a pass? I can't. But I can remember him making a lot of tackles. I just don't think he gives the type of impact player we need at safety. If these guys get injured or can't get the job done we may have to look at using a couple of redshirt freshmen in Nick Sukay or Chaz Powell.

If Justin King goes pro I change my answer to cornerback.

Lightning Round

Who is the early favorite to win the Big Ten in 2008?

I guess you have to figure everyone will say Ohio State is the favorite. Illinois and Penn State are going to make a run though.

How many Fulmer Cup points for Penn State this summer?

I think it will be much lower. Paterno is going to weed out some bad apples and we'll be hearing about some players being released from their scholarships before April rolls around. I think Lee, Shipley, Williams, Butler, Clark, and Evans will provide a lot more leadership than Morelli, Connor, and Golden ever did. I'll put the over/under at 10. We'll have one fight and one or two underage drinking charges.

Now that the offseason has begun, what will you keep your mind occupied with until fall practice?

Well, we have three more weeks of the NFL playoffs. I just have to survive a few weeks after the Super Bowl until February 17 when Nascar kicks off in Daytona. Then my Sundays will be tied up until September. Of course the men's basketball team is looking like they may make that time between football and racing easier to handle.

0 recs | Comment 18 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Leadership
I agree that we will have better leadership, and this will translate into a better team and better play.  Last year was an anomaly with AM and Connor not being the best natural leaders.  Do we really think that between the 2 QB's the best player will be picked or will it just have to be Clark with the seniority (see austin scott).

by PSU86 on Jan 10, 2008 9:07 AM EST   0 recs

Honestly
I believe that Joe will go with the guy he feels gives them a better chance to win. He has played plenty of sophomores in the past. Poz, Connor, Lee, Hunt, Mills, Evans...you could list hundreds of sophomores who have started under Joe. I just think sometimes he puts too much emphasis on experience. I don't think it's just a matter of being loyal to the seniors. He feels more comfortable with guys that know the system. I can't ever recall him saying he was starting player A over player B because player A has paid their dues.

But like I said, I like both Clark and Devlin so I'm ok with either guy for now. At least until I see them play some meaningful snaps. The Blue-White game is going to be very interesting this year.

Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Jan 10, 2008 9:16 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

you're right
He has even played freshman as we know, Only 3 months till the blue white game WOOT.  I think competition is a good thing, We should get the best player for the job.  It is always easy to second guess coaching decisions and as they say the most popular player on the team is the second string QB.

by PSU86 on Jan 10, 2008 10:13 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Clark
Are the fans putting Clark in a no win situation? If he gets the starting QB job will everyone think it is because of experience instead of talent? That's what I read into the statement:

"Do we really think that between the 2 QB's the best player will be picked or will it just have to be Clark with the seniority".

I've seen the same type of statement in many places. The hidden message is Devlan IS better and I hope the coaches see that and plays him. I  think the IT factor overrides talent as evident by Morelli. Clark my have IT. I hope Devlan can show he has IT. I know both are talented.

As long as whomever plays wins, then I don't care who is quarterbacks.

by ageing lion on Jan 10, 2008 1:35 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

QB
Morelli had all of the tools to be a great passer, too.  But Mike has made the point before - he did not have what it took to overcome the coaching (or lack thereof).  

With this offense, I'd rather see a guy that can use his legs to extend the play a little bit, or, is a threat to run.  It's just one more wrinkle that the defense will have to think about.  Teams won't be able to play that two deep man under anymore.  

I have never seen Devlin play so I can't say what kind of runner he is, but seeing the way that Clark ran in the Alamo Bowl just brought back 2005 flashbacks.  
 

by Spats on Jan 10, 2008 2:10 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Morelli
Then I guess I'm disagreeing with Mike if he thinks Morelli's problems were all coaching related.
Morelli can't adapt to the situation that unfolds before him on the football field no matter how much coaching he gets. You must have an innate football sense of what's happening around you that he doesn't possess. It can't be taught. It's the "IT" factor Mike refers to when talking about Clark. Morelli memorized the plays but couldn't adapt when they didn't develop as they did in practice. During the games he threw the ball to the receiver he threw to in practice no matter how well they were covered. He didn't have the IT factor and the coaches/Paterno  didn't recognize it or refused to acknowledge it and try someone else.

by ageing lion on Jan 10, 2008 3:07 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

For the record
I think Morelli's problems were more than coaching. I think he was insecure and not very confident for one thing. This made him a poor leader people couldn't look up to. Beyond that he just wasn't a very smart player. Coaching may have something to do with it, but some players have the instinct to know what's going on around them almost without actually seeing it. Some players don't. He didn't.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Jan 10, 2008 3:47 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

AMEN
Pat Devlin in '08

by Nick7 on Jan 11, 2008 7:58 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Better quarterback for right time
Remember 1998-99 season when Tennessee won the national title? That team was led by Tee Martin, who was a senior and had spent most of time on the sidelines while Peyton Manning broke all records. After he left, that team was full of experienced starters and all they needed was a quarterback who did not make a mistake or turn over the ball. Martin was that man.

If we think Clark can manage the game, not making mistakes, and do smart things, then he should be the quarterback. Devlin might be talented but I'll rather have someone behind the center who can manage games. Clark seems to be one who have more experience and probably knows better to not make mistakes like Morelli has done. Penn State returns most of starters and can be geared for a title run and I don't want to see that team being quarterbacked by an inexperienced player who may make mistakes that Penn State cannot afford.

With this kind of roster, there should be no excuse to have another 8-4 mediocre season.

by DeafPSUFan on Jan 10, 2008 2:17 PM EST   0 recs

SI
Stewart Mandel has Wisconsin WISCONSIN at number 10 on his 2008 rankings.  Are you friggen kidding me?  They lost their bowl game, and got crushed by us and had the exact same record, and you think they're better than us?  Puhlease!

I'm not sayin we deserve to be #10 either, but wisc.?  Give me a friggen break big guy.

God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by fugimaster24 on Jan 10, 2008 3:15 PM EST   0 recs

Is this the first time...
...you've read anything by Stewart Mandel?  He's an idiot.  I wouldn't put much stock into anything he says.

by Cpiritual27 on Jan 10, 2008 4:01 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

next year rankings
who gives a rats ass about next years rankings, we have to win games.  If we win we will go up, once the season begins we will know who is good and who isn't.  Not a rip on you, just on preseason rankings.

by PSU86 on Jan 10, 2008 4:41 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

agreed
The preseason ranking thing is getting a little crazy. It used to just come out the week before the season. Now they start doing them right after the bowl games. Pretty soon they will start ranking teams four years down the road.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Jan 10, 2008 5:15 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I'll refer...
...you to my rant a few posts down regarding preseason rankings.  Nothing was more sickening to me this bowl season than virtually every announcer talking about how teams were "playing for next year's preseason ranking."  Ok, sure...there were probably things that were more annoying, but you get the gist...

Basically, preseason rankings are bogus.  They insert bias into the season before we even know how well the teams can play or how they'll fare against a team like...say...Appalachian State.  There shouldn't be rankings until AT LEAST week 6 or 7.  Just my opinion...

by Cpiritual27 on Jan 10, 2008 8:48 PM EST   0 recs

announcers
The only thing worse than "playing for next year's preseason ranking" that the announcers kept saying is when any schmo touched the ball or made a tackle they would be all like "Oh he'll be playing on sundays".  The 3rd string defensive end from tuscon state makes a tackle in the who gives a crap bowl and "that's the sort of play that will get you to the next level". Lol.

by PSU86 on Jan 10, 2008 9:07 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

In Their Defense..........
I think they are trying to give the Bowls more importance by connecting them with Pre-season rankings.  And I think they should.  If I have to listen to another Georgia fan complain for another year about how they got screwed out of this bowl or that bowl and imply that IF the Dawgs lost it will be because they had nothing to play for, I'll puke.  Hyping up pre-season rankings during the bowl season sends the message to the teams that they better show up at their bowl games.
Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

by ech2os on Jan 11, 2008 10:30 AM EST   0 recs

Georgia
Comments like that are making you guys a regular feature over on DawgSports.com. LOL
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Jan 11, 2008 10:36 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Dawgsports
I went over there and did a little Penn State defending the other day, think I did a pretty good job if I do say so myself.
Angelo

by nittanyroar on Jan 11, 2008 11:10 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Penn St. Nittany Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Excitement!
Img_0163_small
Rumor: Vanderlinden
Pennsttemple_small
NCAA 2009
Fieldofdreams1_small
We Are...White Out [Marshall]
Small
OT: ProjectFranchise.org, Help Run A Pro Sports Team
Small
"107,000 Screaming JoePa's"
Small
Rivals.com's PA Top 40
Small
Significance on 2008
Small
Favre-Paterno
Schools_pennstate6vn_small
Penn state could reach 800 wins

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Lioneye_edited_small BSD

Editors

Fieldofdreams1_small Kevin HD

ad

Site Meter