Black Shoe Diaries: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Grading The Offense Against Michigan

All of the wrong things were happening to Penn State's offense -- botched snaps, fumbles, dropped passes, receivers coming up a foot short on third downs.  If you felt the onset of deja vu and dread, it was completely justified.  They eventually settled down, and with a little help from an amazingly stupid personal foul penalty, scored a late touchdown to make it a three-point deficit at halftime. 

Offensively, the turning point was cashing in with a touchdown after the third-quarter safety.  After Michigan shanked the free kick*, Penn State received the ball at the 50 yard line.  Four plays later, the score was 26-17 and the rout was on.

Anyway, the grades.

Star-divide

Offensive Coaching

Most of my gripes are of the player error variety.  However, something has to be done about Penn State's ghastly performance on 3rd and 1.  I mean, really.  It's one yard.  On Saturday, they went 0-for-3 on 3rd and 1.  They were just as awful against Purdue.  Fix this, please.

Also, despite Stephfon Green blazing through the Michigan secondary for PSU's final score, there's something very wrong and sloppy about Penn State's screen passes this season.  They appear very congested and dangerous, and I'm scared to death that Daryll Clark is going to bury a screen pass in a defensive lineman's stomach at a very inopportune time.

Finally, no more shotgun QB sweeps.  I think we only saw that play once on Saturday afternoon, on a 3rd and 2 early in the second quarter, and Clark made the first down by mere inches.

But whatever, this is beyond picky for a team putting up such large offensive numbers.

Final Grade: A-

 

Quarterback

Your numbers for Clark, 18-for-31, 171 yards, one touchdown, two fumbles (one lost).  Forty-six yards rushing, two touchdowns on QB sneaks.  Clark throws the "darts" well -- those 10-15 yard patterns that come out of his hand very naturally and are almost always on target.  When he makes mistakes, it tends to happen early in the game.  He's a ridiculously emotional guy, which is great if you're a linebacker or defensive end.  Quarterback?  Maybe not so much. 

The fumbles are troubling, obviously.  On the first, he had two hands on the ball and it still was knocked loose.  Nice hit, but he had two hands on the ball.  I don't know what the hell happened on the second fumble, which appeared to be a botched QB sneak on a 3rd and 1.

Good, not great.  We'll probably need "great" next week.

Final Grade: B 

 

Running Backs

What's left to be said about Evan Royster at this point?  He's still getting nearly eight yards per carry.  Stephfon Green is struggling to control his speed -- it's as if his legs are going way too fast for his brain.  Reminds me of old Road Runner cartoon, actually.  Joe Suhey did a nice job blocking on a few big plays.

Final Grade: A

 


Offensive Line

Solid effort here, as you would expect.  Michigan didn't sack Daryll Clark, and only came close on a few occasions.  There were a handful of blown assignments -- one of them resulted in Michigan LB John Thompson pulverizing poor Evan Royster -- but overall, who can complain?  No sacks, 6.1 yards per carry, minimal penalties.  Damn right it was a good day.

Final Grade: A

Wide Receivers

I'll lump the tight ends in here too.  Mickey Shuler has turned into a pretty good blocker, and had a good game despite his dropped pass.  You can tell that Jordan Norwood wanted to crawl into a hole after his consecutive bobbled passes in the first half, but he more than made up for his mistakes. 

This could've been Derrick Williams' quietest game ever (two receptions, 16 yards).  He had a chance for a relatively easy touchdown pass on a trick play, but didn't lead Deon Butler toward the sideline.  It was a sure touchdown if it was thrown correctly.  Of course, Deon Butler was the star (8 catches, 105 yards).  Along the sideline and over the middle, he was great.

Do not ever overlook the downfield blocking of this group.  They're the guys who are turning Royster's eight yard runs into 25-yard runs.

Final Grade: A-

* - Truly, there are no free kicks in space.

0 recs | Comment 42 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Short yardage

My only complaint with play calling is in the short yardage situations. If we need one yard we’ll call a play designed to get two (QB sneak). If we need two yards we’ll call a play designed to get three (also a QB sneak). Or maybe we’ll run Stephfon Green up the middle. They have to get more diverse in short yardage. I remember a game last year where they threw a flare pass to the fullback in the flat on the goal line and everyone was like “whoa where did that come from?” The dude was wide open. Mix it up a bit.

Part of me wonders if this is just Clark stepping up to the line and calling his own number. I like his confidence, but it’s not always the smartest thing if you’re doing it on every 3rd and 1 situation. It seemed to me on the fumbled snap he ran up under Shiplely and smacked him on the ass and started pushing him before Shipley snapped the ball.

by BSD on Oct 21, 2008 12:47 PM EDT   0 recs

#22

is the love child of Terrell Davis and Emmit Smith.

He just gets a ton of yards, doesn’t get hit too hard, and scores TD’s.

Also, he doesn’t look fast, but rarely get caught.

by SweepTheLeg on Oct 21, 2008 12:49 PM EDT   0 recs

WRs Blocking

Great to see that get a mention on here. I’ve noticed that since the Oregon State game, which I’ve watched repeatedly on DVR. In that game, they consistently put corners and safeties on their backs.

They haven’t been quite so dominant since then, as OSU’s safeties had a rough, rough day. But they always do a nice job blocking, not just for Royster, but a block by Butler opened up a Norwood first down, and Williams benefited from a nice WR block on one of his two catches, too.

by tuscaloosalion on Oct 21, 2008 12:55 PM EDT   0 recs

I may be crazy

But I just don’t think Green looks that good running up the gut. His numbers look good but I definitely don’t want him to get the ball on third and one unless it is a screen or pitch. Royster is so good between the tackles I don’t understand it when Green gets the call. Clark is emotional, but in a good way because it has made him a natural and vocal leader. It was cool how the team went to the student section after the win, the last person I remember doing that was Mrob after we beat MSU (at MSU- Ha Ha).

I don't know, Mello Yello is pretty awful. What's the worst that could happen?

by psu on Oct 21, 2008 1:03 PM EDT   0 recs

Green

Is not a good option in short yardage, or at least not of the up the middle variety. He seems to run right into the line instead of waiting for that hole to dive in to. He is maybe our 12th best option on 3rd and short.

by Kevin HD on Oct 21, 2008 1:15 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I'd rather have Green snapping the ball on 3rd and short

with AQ Shipley as the RB….he’s definitely get the first down.

I bleed Blue and White.

by Horse N Buggy on Oct 21, 2008 1:44 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Awesome

That would officially be the sweetest play ever. I’d love to see that call on Saturday night.

by NittanyBadger on Oct 21, 2008 7:40 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

What about

The plain old option on 3rd and short. It worked well on that TD against Wiscy. For a team with a “running QB” we sure don’t run the option very much. We did a ton with MRob in ’05.

by whiteoutonly on Oct 21, 2008 1:49 PM EDT   0 recs

Option

Yep — I’ve been thinking about that. And I’ve really been thinking that we might see some of it in Columbus on Saturday.

Even though we’re 8 weeks in, I feel like the coaches have held things back. They opened the playbook about halfway for Oregon State, then a tiny bit more for both Illinois and Wisconsin, but there’s plenty left, I think.

by tuscaloosalion on Oct 21, 2008 1:52 PM EDT   0 recs

Absolutely

I really believe JoePa and the rest of the staff learned a big lesson (from last years woes) about play calling diversity and not showing the whole playbook. There are still so many plays out of the same formation that they’ve held back, and I really think they have been saving it for this one game. We’ve yet to see a triple option out of the split back set (zone read with an option man following clark if he decides to keep it). If a noob like me can figure out these simple but highly effective plays just from looking at the formations, I have to believe the coaching staff has kept quite a few plays under wrap. They also know that OSU has not been very good at defending mobile QB’s, which is why I think they’ve been very limited in showing designed QB runs/options, so as to really surprise them on Saturday (hopefully).

Oh OhOhOh Oh Oh!

by doctadas on Oct 21, 2008 2:19 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

but if a noob like you can do it

you gotta figure the guys at OSU suspect it as well. Of course it is much harder to gameplan against the thousands of “possible” plays they “think” PSU might run, when they already have plenty to practice against from what they’ve seen in games so far.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 21, 2008 2:21 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

yes, but...

How much do you gameplan against plays you “think” the opponent might run? I mean, that’s got the potential for a huge waste of time. That’s what in-game adjustments are for.

For instance … I think Ohio State will adjust to the option … just in time for Clark to fake option right to Royster, and then pitch to Williams who’s at full speed coming left out of the slot.

Of course, there’s a dandy chance Tressel’s been holding some things back, too…

by tuscaloosalion on Oct 21, 2008 2:25 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

right

plus you figure they’ve already practiced against the option for a bunch of their other games

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 21, 2008 2:36 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I doubt tOSU has held back

They played USC and went down to the wire with Wiscy. You’d suspect that they used their best plays in those games to try to stay competitive.

by DCPSU on Oct 21, 2008 3:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Big difference between those teams and the team they have now

Beanie Wells is healthy, and they have a completely different style QB (who is still learning the system). I’d imagine they’re still keeping it simple for Pryor, but I’d also imagine that they give him something new to work with every week.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 21, 2008 4:48 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm not impressed by his passing

Though he looked a little better then those punts Threet was throwing up.

by queler on Oct 21, 2008 5:50 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Neither am I...

He has a very slow, pronounced release. And, once he starts moving his feet, it seems like he’s a lot more inclined to run, unlike Clark, who does a pretty good job keeping his eyes downfield.

by Spats on Oct 22, 2008 7:51 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

True

He’s been floating his passes up in the air. I’ve been saying for a while that I’m surprised he hasn’t be intercepted a lot more. He also has a tendency to make stupid pass decisions (such as throwing across his body). I’ve definitely been unimpressed with his skill as a QB so far. That doesn’t mean, however, that he hasn’t been improving every game, learning more about being a QB and also learning more plays, which was the point I was trying to make. Also the different style of QB basically means their plays from the first few games are meaningless to watch.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 22, 2008 11:17 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Split back set

I’d love to see Royster and Green back there together.
Fake to Royster up the middle, pitch to Green to get him space around the end.

by confirmy on Oct 21, 2008 4:23 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

that's the feeling

I’ve been getting as well.

I just hope it isn’t something that will implode on them for lack of game experience.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 21, 2008 2:20 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I've never understood

why we never see us running a bootleg. As often as the “typical-PSU-run-it-up-the-gut” gets called, why don’t we ever use that as decoy for a fake to the rb with a qb keeper going around the end?

I also wouldn’t be surprised to see us use the shuffle pass in those short yardage plays. We showed it at Purdue, haven’t run it since. I have been thinking that it maybe has been a “keep it in the hip pocket” play. I also wonder if we aren’t going to see a fake punt or a fake field goal attempt sometime when we need to extend a drive in a hard-fought game.

"the secret to loving your job is having a hobby that you really despise"

by nitwit86 on Oct 21, 2008 3:43 PM EDT   0 recs

Against the Illini

Last TD drive against Illinois, we had a third and short, and did exactly that — fake left, and Clark took off right for the first down and much more. He even had the corner sucked in on the fake.

by tuscaloosalion on Oct 21, 2008 4:31 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah i see

where i was corrected about “never see us running a bootleg” down below as well. So instead I’ll just wonder aloud “I’ve never understood why you never see us running a bootleg more often” in short yard situations.

"the secret to loving your job is having a hobby that you really despise"

by nitwit86 on Oct 21, 2008 4:35 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

GREEN SCREEN

Good lord I hope they call a few against OSU on a blitzing down, nothing will take the fire out of that defense like a 3rd and 10 screen that goes for 20 yards. Green, I think, is a slightly better option for that play.

by millzners on Oct 21, 2008 3:53 PM EDT   0 recs

I'd disagree with that for one big reason

Royster reads his blockers about 10,000x better than Green. Dude doesn’t waste a single step. Green just RUNS.

by Run Up The Score on Oct 21, 2008 3:55 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

This is so true

Soo efficient. Unbelievable vision. Agreed: not a single step wasted.

pax et amor

by jtothep on Oct 22, 2008 12:25 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Bootleg

They used the bootleg twice vs. Illinois, with Clark passing out of the designed roll out.

by boston_zenos on Oct 21, 2008 4:25 PM EDT   0 recs

Holy hell!

I completely forgot about those plays and I was at that game. I must not be in very good tailgate shape anymore or something. Must be my training regimen.

"the secret to loving your job is having a hobby that you really despise"

by nitwit86 on Oct 21, 2008 4:31 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I've noticed

that I tend to forget the specifics about a lot of the plays when I actually attend the game. Maybe it is because the view isn’t as good as it is on TV, or maybe it is because (except for a few plays) you don’t see a bunch of replays of it.

This is also one of the reasons why I’m hoping that someone on here can put together all the games onto a tape or DVD or torrent or SOMETHING.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 21, 2008 4:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

3rd and short

A great play for us to run would be this one: Line up in the I formation, fake handoff to the fullback on the right side, then pitch to Royster/Green running outside on the left. It would work because we’ve done a FB dive at least 4 times this year and I think Lawlor scored twice on it

by WPIALkid22 on Oct 21, 2008 5:14 PM EDT   0 recs

on the other hand

if we have a play that results in a TD 50% of the time we run it, I think I’d keep running that play ;-)

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 21, 2008 5:25 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed

Run that once, then when they’re expecting it again, we’ll flip it to Royster

by WPIALkid22 on Oct 21, 2008 5:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

If you think about it we have only really been close in the ILL game

I am sure they holding some stuff back. We have not been close in any other games even vs Wisc you can’t really call that a close game. I think we might see some more trick plays but maybe not. I guess the theory is if you can run 10 plays and can run them great why change up your playbook.

I think our best bet is to jump on OSU fast get a 14 – 0 lead or something will cause them to make Pryor pass and take beanie out of the game. He scares me for the game. They both can run I am just afraid about our linebackers.

by jetskijoe on Oct 21, 2008 5:46 PM EDT   0 recs

I want to see

Devlin & Clark both in the backfield at the same time

by Rockin on Oct 21, 2008 10:41 PM EDT   0 recs

2nded

"For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled"- Hunter S. Thompson

by phishead_psu on Oct 22, 2008 3:31 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Why?

Just wondering why you’d want to mess with this offense by going back to the weird 2 QB formations.

by Run Up The Score on Oct 22, 2008 9:08 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed

It was a cute gimmick, but if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Also, it hardly worked when we tried it last (though that may have to do with the highly predictable plays being called for that set, along with essentially taking another specialized player out of the game and replacing him with someone who for the most part didn’t do anything so as to avoid getting hurt)

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 22, 2008 11:19 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Right

I think the difference here is that instead of putting Morelli at wideout (and I still can’t believe I saw that in an actual football game), we would have an athlete like Clark in the backfield along with Devlin.

I still don’t like the idea, it screams of desperation to me.

by jimbo2psu on Oct 23, 2008 9:06 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Absolutely NOT!!!

The only time we ever did that two QBs in at once shit was because we had no quality receivers or running backs. That was designed simply to get MRob on the field in any way possible to utilize all his talents. Do you really want to see Clark or Devlin running down field in open space and get drilled? We don’t need those kinds of gimmick plays (now those are gimmick plays, not your QB lining up in the shotgun). We have all the weapons we need to win Saturday. All we need is for the coaches to not be afraid to pull the trigger.

by Ab4PSU on Oct 22, 2008 10:11 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

and I hope it is set on automatic fire

RATATATATATATATATATATAT and PSU is up 35-0 to start the first half.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 22, 2008 11:20 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

How about this

for 3rd and 1: I-formation, turn around and hand the ball off to Royster and let him find the freaking one yard. He might even break away for a TD once he gets through the line like Wisconsin last year.

by Joe 96alum on Oct 22, 2008 1:00 PM EDT   0 recs

Bingo

I’m an old-school kinda guy. I love when a team just lines up and tries to run you over on 3rd and 1. There’s nothing more demoralizing for a defense than lining up on 3rd and 1, knowing exactly what’s coming, and not being able to stop it. I think our line is good enough to get 1 yard on anybody, despite our recent trouble on 3rd and 1 this season. Smack em in the mouth.

by jimbo2psu on Oct 23, 2008 9:09 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Penn St. Nittany Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sutherland_small
I Love These Guys
Avatar2_small
Rose Bowl Tailgating

Recent FanPosts

Psu_small
Mr. and Mrs. McCoy
Ftuetruy_444_small
Rockin's Rose Bowl Trip
Image_small
Resharpening The Knives
Small
USC success without honor
Lioneye_edited_small
Reason #562 Why Bleacher Report Sucks
Ron_small
WR's 09?
Gijoeae16_small
09 Secondary
Small
'09 schedule change?
Small
Army All-American Game
Small
BLOGWAR!

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Lioneye_edited_small BSD

Editors

Image_small Run Up The Score

Reporter_small Kevin HD

ad

Site Meter