Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Joe Paterno Press Conference Notes

Here are some news and notes from Joe Paterno's weekly press conference leading up to the game between the Penn State Nittany Lions and the Wisconsin Badgers this weekend.

  • Playing a team like Wisconsin creates different challenges than playing a team like Purdue. This is like saying tackling a wild boar is slightly more challenging than stepping on a bug.
  • Jordan Norwood should be good to go this weekend. Quarless and Shuler are questionable.
  • Joe lists himself as day-to-day. Some days he feels good and some days he doesn't. Whether he will coach from the sideline or the press box will be determined on game day. But Joe doesn't think this makes a difference to the team or the coaches.
  • Joe had thought about playing A.J. Wallace on offense as a backup to Derrick Williams before the season started. But his hamstring injury nixed that and gave Chaz Powell an opportunity to switch sides of the ball.
  • Joe is pleased with our situation in the defensive backfield. Joe says we are "fortunate" to have Wallace, Sargeant, and Davis at the corners and with the emergence of Drew Astorino we have three good guys on the inside too.
  • Joe hopes we see more Chaz Powell as the season goes on. He says Powell has struggled with confidence because they switched him to offense just before the season started.
  • There was an amusing moment where Joe was asked about coaching in the booth and he took the time to explain how a headset works as if we didn't already know.
Actually, as far as making a significant contribution to the strategy side and on the tactical side, you're better off upstairs. You can see more. You can get, as long as we have the kind of communications we have now, I can talk to everybody on the sideline with the one microphone and the one set of ear phones, and they can all talk to me.

Thanks for explaining that, Joe. This is why I love the man.

  • Joe refused to say the turf was to blame for all the running backs slipping. Then he told a story about some guy who used to coach at Penn State 450 years ago that would preach against cutting on the inside foot. It's actually good advice when you think about it.
  • Joe repeatedly said things like he's going to have to live with the pain in his leg for a few weeks. Then he said what he has "can be fixed" which leads me to believe we're talking hip replacement surgery or something like that. My guess is Joe wants to tough it out until the season is over. Say what you will about Joe Paterno, but he's a tough dude.
  • Joe mentioned that Evan Royster was good enough to play lacrosse on the Div. I level. He said he would consider letting Royster play lacrosse for Penn State if he came to him and asked.
  • Not surprisingly, Joe says his most recent injury will have no effect on his coaching future. Some poor reporter actually wasted their one question in asking this. Probably some guy that flew all the way from Wisconsin too.
  • Joe refused to compare this team to the '05 team saying this team hasn't been in as many tough spots yet. But he finished it up saying this is a good squad that he likes very much. This is a mantra he has repeated several times this year which is very unlike Joe Paterno.
  • To compensate for his absence on the practice field and the sideline on game day Joe is spending more time hanging around the locker room to build camaraderie with the team.
  • Joe has been very pleased with the performance of the defense. He pointed out that Purdue didn't commit a single penalty and only turned the ball over once. They played a sound game against us and we held them to six points.
  • When asked about Wisconsin's defensive line he said, "they'll knock your jock off." I love that line. But then he followed it up with "They're not flopping aroudn out there. They're not big strong fat guys."
  • This quote was kind of disturbing.
Q. Will this be your offensive line's toughest test (so far)?

Yeah, I think so. They're going to play eight guys in a box. They're going to stop your run. They've got good corners. That number 17 (Allen Langford) is a heck of a football player. Number 25 (Shane Carter), their safety is really a big time safety. As I said, they've got three good linebackers. So I think it will be a test for us to be able to move the ball. (ed. - emphasis added)

Sounds like Joe is already convinced we won't be able to run on this team. Could he have tipped his hand that he plans to open the playbook and throw down field in this game?

Comment 33 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't want to say it, but I can't help but think this:

“But he finished it up saying this is a good squad that he likes very much.” + his desire to leave the next Penn State coach with a good team = foreshadowing?

by GreatScawt on Oct 7, 2008 10:44 PM EDT reply actions  

joe's going nowhere

I was born when Joe was an assistant. Have had a couple dozen conversations with him ‘what a unique individual’. Although I have not talked to him yet this year; u guys that think he is gonna retire…..Ludacris. First off he doesn’t fish. Secondly, do you really think he will let Spanier get the “win”? JoePa is a competitor that hates to lose.

by Rockin on Oct 8, 2008 12:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah but

Don’t you think there is a part of him that is a bit embarassed by all the attention being placed on his health? Two years ago it was his leg. Last spring it was the flu and dehydration. This year it’s his other leg. Next year it will be something else. These are the problems 80 year old people have to deal with and they aren’t going to go away.

He’s a proud man, and you can tell it bothers him he can’t do the things he wants to do anymore. I think he loves coaching, but he hates dealing with the media aspect of it these days. So far the former has outweighed the latter, but I think the latter is catching up.

by BSD on Oct 8, 2008 7:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Please please please tell me we’re going to let ’er fly in Camp Randall!

PUH LEEZE!

by deihlba on Oct 8, 2008 7:30 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree

If we win a close low-scoring 17-13 game the voters will look at it and say “nice win”. But if we go in there and make a statement like winning by three touchdowns the voters will go “wow”. I want that wow factor.

by BSD on Oct 8, 2008 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

What you want and what Joe wants

are different. All of us PSU fans want to see us finally open up the playbook on the road, however, Joe just wants to play to win a hardfought game and minimze mistakes. I hope I’m proven wrong, but I’ve been fooled before.

by Screen Name 20 on Oct 8, 2008 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll take any win. . .

On the road, at night, in an incredibly tough place to play. Why does Penn State need a “wow” factor for voters? Didn’t we already discuss two weeks ago that as long as Penn State takes care of busines week in and week out, the chips will fall into place (see the Red River shootout this weekend)?

by The IC Lion on Oct 8, 2008 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

look at

’94, we never ran up the score, and it ended up costing us a #1 ranking. voters get hard-ons for touchdowns. never mind you handled the game and won, you gotta blow your opponent out of the water and make them cry all the way home

For the glory

by lionalum05 on Oct 8, 2008 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are we sure the score would matter anyway?

The voters would say “Well, Wisconsin is obviously inferior” and go back to their wet dreaming about the SEC.

by ReadingRambler on Oct 8, 2008 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm with IC

No way Paterno is left out if they go undefeated, it would probably take a one loss jumping him and I don’t see that happening.

Also, after the OSU game, I’m not convinced Wiscy is that tough of a place to play…or at least not a “crazy” I’ve we’ve been lead to believe. During the PSU-Illinois game the announcers were saying things like “it’s deafening down there”. There was a point during the OSU-WIscy game where the guys in the booth actually made a comment about how quiet it was while the Buckeyes had the ball…….and don’t even think about giving me the band excuse.

by KevinHD on Oct 8, 2008 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Awwwlll, cmon!

I totally wanted to give the Band excuse. Dangit!

pax et amor

by jtothep on Oct 8, 2008 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

They will say that no matter how we beat them

If Wisconsin loses to us, it will be their third loss in a row, and even if those losses came to the #1, #2, and #3 teams in the nation, the media will just say “ooh, 3 losses in a row, they are terribad”, especially since they are in the Big 10.

by The JuggerNitt on Oct 8, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agree with ya RR

I am so damn sick of the SEC an all that hype I can’t stand it. I give credit where credit is due but when they lose in conference it’s because they are all so awesome and deep but when we do it’s because we suck. tOSU’s crapping of any bed not in conference over the last three years will haunt us until we redeem the conference this year when we kick the shit out of Vandy in the NC game!!!!

OK… I may have gotten a bit out of control there….

If you can smile when things go wrong, you have someone in mind to blame.

by TheMightyErik on Oct 8, 2008 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm hoping for Georgia in the NC game

So Mike can get creative with the pregame pic.

by ReadingRambler on Oct 8, 2008 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now that is some funny shit.

There is nowhere near enough Civil War humor on this website.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on Oct 9, 2008 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wasn't he from Ohio though?

And Georege Meade is not nearly as funny.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on Oct 9, 2008 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Joepa

The way he motivates his team from week to week is amazing. I think his quote this week is saying to the line, “ok, you think you’re good, well I think Wisconsin’s D is good. Go out and run the ball on them and then we’ll talk.” PSU is going to pound the ball and then play action deep. Wisconsin can’t defend the Playaction.

by psu1313 on Oct 8, 2008 8:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Running the ball

I agree completely. Joe has been at this for a while, so I wouldn’t put any stock into him having “tipped his hand” with opening things up. If anything he just wants to give that appearance before he predictably gives Wisconsin a heavy dose of between-the-tackles stuff. I for one really like to be able to run the ball down the opposition’s throat. It’s about who is tougher, who can knock who on their ass, who can impose their will on the other. I think we can do that to Wisconsin and if we get any kind of early lead, I like us to try to break their will by long, clock-eating drives on the ground.

by jimbo2psu on Oct 8, 2008 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I think Joe meant that Wisconsin will try to stop our running game rather than that he thinks they will stop it. I don’t know if we’ll try to do this or suceed if we try, but if we do establish that we can run early, the game is over.

by Elihu on Oct 8, 2008 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Open Playbook

or closed playbook. I don’t care. I just want to see a W.

PSU Softball

by QBsneak12 on Oct 8, 2008 9:08 AM EDT reply actions  

They could win it either way

But I’d much prefer they let loose, especially with Norwood back in the picture, and dare Wisconsin to score 24 points.

by Run Up The Score on Oct 8, 2008 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

That would be awesome

We’d have to make bets on how many INTs Evridge throws.

by ReadingRambler on Oct 8, 2008 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

You have to play to the weaknesses of your opponent. Wisconsin’s strength is in stopping the run. So it makes no sense to try to beat them at their game and jam it up the middle on first and second down. I want to see them play action pass on first down to get those linebackers guessing. Force Wisconsin to open up their playbook and good things will happen for us.

by BSD on Oct 8, 2008 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

See tOSU from 2005

I still have the PSFBS on my TiVo…

Herr Junker points out that our first TD drive is entirely on the ground against the Ohio State defense that, at least up until that game, was the Big Ten’s best against the rush. I’m not saying that we’re going to see the same thing here necessarily, but you have to think that the constant, nagging possiblity of our WRs breaking loose will force Wisconsin’s D back off the ball.

There is a tractor in the parking lot, West Virginia license EIEIO. Your lights are on.

by leeharvey418 on Oct 8, 2008 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Running the Ball

Running the ball is, of course, a huge part of Penn State’s offense. However, the Passing game has been just as effective (49% of PSU’s yds from scrimmage). With this Penn State offense it seem that defenses have to pick their poison.

Put 8 in the box and you will have to play man-to-man against Williams, Butler and Norwood. drop 7 and Royster will make you pay.

If all Wisconsin has is: “we’ll put bring up a safety…” than PSU will crush Wisconsin through the air.

by GLORYOFOLDSTATE on Oct 8, 2008 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Makes Sense. . .

As long as Penn State has good pass protection. Is that a concern in this game?

by The IC Lion on Oct 8, 2008 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Protection

You always want to try to ensure that your QB has enough time to throw the ball. Wisconsin does have a good defensive line, however, this seems to have translated into a stout run defense as opposed to putting a lot of pressure on the QB. Wisconsin has only 9 sacks so far this year (1.8 sacks per game) as opposed to Penn State’s 17 sacks this year. Wisconsin’s pass defense also ranks 40th in the nation in passing defense.

Basically, I don’t think there is any reason to think that Wisconsin will get a lot of pressure on Clark without bringing the house on every play.

by GLORYOFOLDSTATE on Oct 8, 2008 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Run or Throw

isn’t this what the spread is all about? Hopefully Clark has the permission of the coaching staff to audible at the line depending on what he sees from the defense. We should be able to confuse the crap out of their D.

by Rockin on Oct 8, 2008 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't buy it...

We didn’t throw downfield much at all last weekend. A part of me still thinks we will be somewhat conservative… not that I have a problem with it if it works. I would LOVE to see Royster get 20 carries (does anyone notice that this guy is averaging 7.8 yds/carry?). If that does become the case, we will easily come out of Camp Randall with a win. Could you imagine beating Wisconsin at home, at their own game (power running football)?

by Bstoner52 on Oct 8, 2008 11:22 AM EDT reply actions  

I am not so sure about that.

I think Penn State’s running game is keyed to Daryll Clark being efficent in the passing game. I can think of three 3rd and 1 situations we could not convert running the ball against Illinois and Purdue, as well to subsequent fourth downs that were not converted either. We stalled in the red zone against Purdue a couple of times as well. Those are things that both really concern me when I wonder about how successful we can be running the ball when we need/want to.

Royster is killing people in space to be certain, but based on the last two games, I’m not sure we will be able to run the ball down anybodies throat without a strong passing game.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on Oct 8, 2008 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Penn State Nittany Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Niceshoes_small
I know I said I only wanted to say this once...
Crystal_ball_small
Untarnished
Small
Ignorance Still Reigns...And I'm Not Letting It Pass
Joe_small
Sanctimonious Hypocrites Can't Diminish the Warmth for Joe Paterno
Psukoolaid_small
BSD Donations to THON in Joe’s Memory.

Recent FanPosts

Calvin-n-hobbes-733953_small
A cross-generational double-blind retrospective study...
Penn_state_logo_small
Dessert for V-Day - Raspberry Almond Cookies
333548_10150603261640663_143212655662_11113964_892862173_o_small
Junior DAY
Small
Moving On – This will be just the third Offensive System I’ve Seen at Penn State
Tipoffbasketball_t_small
2013 SF Brandon Austin commits to Penn State
Jessedotsmom_small
Food for Thursday: The Valentine's Day Edition.
Lion2_small
Penn State – the 2nd private school in the B1G?
Hugh_griffith_small
My Theory on Space, Time, Imaginary Numbers and Super Bowl Rings.
Kool-aid-man__small
Where's the love for Sukay?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE BLACK SHOE DIARIES STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Managers

Blog_gang_sign_small Chris Grovich

Powers1_small Kevin Powers

Editors

Zn_avatar_small Mike Pettigano

Img110_small Jeff Junstrom

Authors

Iron_armor_small Galen

New4_good_small Nick Blonde

Turd_ferguson_psu_small Tim Aydin

6a00d8341c630a53ef0105369fb7ee970b-800wi_small whiteout1

On_the_way_to_grad_small Kyle_Martin

N53100510_31463067_5584_small Adam Collyer

Aquateen_vol1_mastershake_1__small Ben Jones

Penn_state_mascot_small Peter Gray

Baller_small Eric Gibson

Small kmplatt