Playoff Possibilities Continued...
After lots of good discussion from my last post about a possible realignment and playoff system, I've come up with another one that gets 'football factory' schools a 7th home game and allows more connectivity between conferences with additional ooc games.
The downfall is an extra week of the season and the eventual champ and runner up will have to play 16 games.
First - divide the teams into 7 MAJOR (12 teams each) conferences and 4 Minor (9 teams each) conferences.
Each major conference is split into divisions and plays 5 division games, 3 opposite division games and 4 ooc games.
7 conference championships and a play in championship between the "best" non-conference championship contender and the "best" minor conference team - choose any method you like to pick the "bests" - if you can't win your own division you shouldn't get to argue.
Week after the Conf Champ games - first round of the playoffs at the top four seeds home field (seeding by some sort of super fancy committee) - losers eligible for bowl games.
Bowls proceed as normal with orange & rose as semi finals and sugar the week after as a championship game.
Here are the conference alignments
| ACC | Big 10 | Big 12 | Big East |
| Boston College | Illinois | Baylor | Cincinnati |
| Clemson | Indiana | Colorado | Connecticut |
| Duke | Iowa | Iowa State | Louisville |
| Florida State | Michigan | Kansas | Pittsburgh |
| Georgia Tech | Michigan State | Kansas State | Rutgers |
| Maryland | Minnesota | Missouri | South Florida |
| Miami-Florida | Northwestern | Nebraska | Syracuse |
| North Carolina | Ohio State | Oklahoma | West Virginia |
| North Carolina State | Penn State | Oklahoma State | Central Florida |
| Virginia | Purdue | Texas | Navy |
| Virginia Tech | Wisconsin | Texas A&M | Army |
| Wake Forest | Notre Dame | Texas Tech | Temple |
| SEC | Pac 10 | MWC |
| Alabama | Arizona | Air Force |
| Arkansas | Arizona State | Colorado State |
| Auburn | California | UNLV |
| Florida | Oregon | New Mexico |
| Georgia | Oregon State | San Diego State |
| Kentucky | Southern California | Texas Christian |
| Louisiana State | Stanford | Utah |
| Mississippi | UCLA | Wyoming |
| Mississippi State | Washington | Boise State |
| South Carolina | Washington State | Brigham Young |
| Tennessee | Fresno State | Idaho |
| Vanderbilt | Hawaii | Southern Methodist |
| WAC | Conf USA | MAC | Sunbelt |
| New Mexico State | Memphis | Akron | Troy State |
| Nevada | Western Kentucky | Ball State | Louisiana-Lafayette |
| Utah State | Southern Mississippi | Bowling Green State | Louisiana-Monroe |
| San Jose State | Marshall | Central Michigan | Florida Atlantic |
| Tulsa | East Carolina | Eastern Michigan | Florida International |
| Houston | Northern Illinois | Kent State | Arkansas State |
| Texas-El Paso | Alabama-Birmingham | Miami-Ohio | Middle Tennessee State |
| North Texas | Toledo | Ohio | Louisiana Tech |
| Rice University | SUNY-Buffalo | Western Michigan | Tulane |
Thanks for the fanpost! Please do not post any content from a premium site that requires a subscription. Also, if you just want to share a link consider using fanshots instead. Thanks.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Divisional love
I’m just not a fan of “if you can’t win your conference, you don’t deserve to be considered.” Especially when you consider this year: Oklahoma, Texas Tech, Texas are all completely worthy candidates for a conference championship (I believe that’s why they call it a ’tie’), and any of those three are a clearly better candidate than Cincinnati.
The alignments you have still are going to have the same disparity in conference strength that we have now. The PAC-10 still has only one, maybe two football factory schools, whereas the SEC has four or five.
In fact, with only one play-in spot available, that’s kindof a recipe for disaster. The best claim that a non-champion has is if there’s a circle-of-death, and in that case there are almost always two other valid teams. From one conference!
I just don’t see the advantage of a bracketed playoff system unless Division IA is cut down in size a ton. At least in three. With 40 teams you could get decent connectivity most years (with scheduling concerns) with only 8 games, and you could probably end up with 6.5-7 home games if 3 of the remaining games were preseason (only counted for tiebreakers).
I also don’t really see why you want winning a conference to play-in to the championship bracket. Who cares? If you’re forced to let in a team from, say, the Big East (Cincinnati), it just lowers the bar for everyone.
Let winning a conference just play-in to a major bowl. That should be good enough. The players would probably prefer to play a winnable game, rather than being a sacrificial lamb in a playoff.
by Bleed Blue 'n White on Dec 3, 2008 7:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I also don’t really see why you want winning a conference to play-in to the championship bracket. Who cares?
That is basically a response to the bowl purists who claim that the integrity of the regular season would be lost in a playoff scenario
by brubby on Dec 3, 2008 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
By playoff "possibilities", you mean, like as possible as world peace, right?
The playoff is the most doable part of your scenario. You’re forcing ND to join a conference? Good luck with that.
by pjk on Dec 4, 2008 9:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Forcing isn't quite the word...
if a playoff was to proceed – the powers that be would just have to give ND a choice… take the harvard/yale route and forego any playoff or get with the program.
ND stopped being special decades ago
by brubby on Dec 4, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ND stopped being special decades ago
Except for the bajillions of dollars they make because of their ridiculously huge fan base.
by Bleed Blue 'n White on Dec 4, 2008 11:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Their team is nothing special, but somehow they still get treated like they are
I dislike ND about as much as I dislike Michigan, which is alot, but…
Their AD makes decisions for the BCS along with the conference commissioners, so they are one of the “powers that be”, and have a disproportionate say in what goes on. They won’t be faced with a choice between joining a conference or not being involved.
They already have their own BCS bowl qualifying rule (top 8 finish), so if a playoff happens, they will be allowed to remian independent and get in with a certain record/ranking.
by pjk on Dec 4, 2008 11:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just because things are the way they are
doesn’t mean they must stay that way…
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT
Do the worst thing you can to nd
ignore them and they will lose their power over you…
by brubby on Dec 4, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















