Penn State Beats Michigan
| Michigan | 61 |
| Penn State | 69 |
When Geary Claxton went down with the ACL tear against Wisconsin, everyone said the torch was passed and this was now Jamelle Cornley's team. Maybe it was for a while. But not anymore. This team is Talor Battle's team now.
Every team has a few good players. Some have more than others. But for every 100 good players there is one special player, and not many teams have those. Special players can take over a game. They will the ball into the basket when a big score is needed. They seem oblivious to pain and injuries. They come up with a big rebound or an important steal when the game is on the line. And they make their teammates better. Last night I became convinced that Talor Battle is one of those players. The sensational freshman took over the game scoring 28 points on 10-of-13 shooting (7-of-9 from the arc) with 13 rebounds and 6 assists, all career highs. It was his first career double-double.
You don't need to know anything more about his importance to this team than what happened in the second half. At the 12:50 mark he drove the lane and got nailed by a Michigan big man. He landed awkwardly on his tailbone and laid on the court for a minute as the entire Jordan Center held their breath. When he limped off to the training room it looked like our season was over for the second time this year. Penn State went from holding a slim five point lead to the short end of a 49-47 score. But then in the third minute Battle rose again emerging from the locker room telling Ed he was good to go.
On Michigan's first possession he grabbed a defensive rebound and made a three pointer on our end. Two possessions later he sank another three. Then he pulled down another rebound and assisted Mike Walker on his three. He repeated it two possessions later. Rebound, pass to Walker, three. Then he sank another three of his own. After he returned with 8:30 to go Penn State went on a 15-0 run to put the game out of reach. And the angels sang Halleluiah.
As I said, Mike Walker was an integral part of that 15-0 run and the win in general. It seemed only right on senior day that he would get the start have a great game scoring 15 points. Senior Brandon Hassell also got the start. He only scored two points in 24 minutes, but it was a huge two points. Michigan was trying to make a late comeback pulling within seven points with 1:30 to go. Hassell reached in on Manny Harris on a pick and roll and poked the ball loose at the top of the key. He streaked out to midcourt and took the ball in uncontested for a dunk.
The entire team seemed to have a renewed effort in rebounding last night. I've been pretty frustrated in that regard lately. Not that they're not rebounding well. Just that there hasn't been any effort in times. There have been too many possessions where Cornley throws up a 15 foot jumper and the rest of the team cuts back on defense not even trying to rebound. But last night the guards were in there mixing it up with the big guys and getting results. Battle's 13 rebounds led the team effort in pulling down 37 rebounds to Michigan's 31. Cornley added 10 rebounds of his own despite missing the last 14 minutes in the first half. Say what you want about Ed's coaching ability, but the man is a class act. He sat his star player for three quarters of the first half after Cornley received a technical foul for arguing an offensive charge.
The boxscore didn't show it, but I thought DJ Jackson looked more aggressive last night. In fact the whole team looked more aggressive. Pringle was focused on driving the lane and dishing the ball. Jeff Brooks pulled in 5 rebounds. Great effort.
This was a good win on a few levels. It snapped an 11 game losing streak to the Wolverines for one thing. It also marked our sixth conference win and our fourth in a row at home, both highs in the Ed DeChellis era. It sure looked like we were left for dead when Geary Claxton went down against Wisconsin. I honestly didn't think we would win another game this year, but they proved me wrong winning four games since then. And with four freshmen seeing serious minutes and everyone but Claxton, Hassell, and Walker coming back next year the future is looking bright for the Nittany Lions.
0 recs |
12
comments
Comments
For Ed's sake
by psuphiman80 on Mar 2, 2008 10:19 PM EST 0 recs
agreed
by blt on
Mar 2, 2008 11:19 PM EST
up
0 recs
on the off chance
by psuphiman80 on
Mar 2, 2008 11:38 PM EST
up
0 recs
Hold The Phone
I'm not expecting a tournament berth yet.
by fugimaster24 on Mar 3, 2008 3:20 PM EST 0 recs
Agreed
by Mike on
Mar 3, 2008 3:24 PM EST
up
0 recs
NIT/NCAA
by psuphiman80 on
Mar 3, 2008 4:08 PM EST
up
0 recs
This happens every year (I told you so)
This came up after Claxton got hurt. The question was, does this buy Ed DeChellis another season. This is a direct quote from my post more than two months ago;
The answer is unfortunately, yes. This is just the excuse Ed needs to get another season. The team will get younger guys on the Court, pick up a win later in the season, and we'll be building for next season.
Ed will be back, and the team will suck again.
by jesse. on Mar 3, 2008 4:56 PM EST 0 recs
So you don't think the team would be comfortably
by PSU Nick on
Mar 3, 2008 6:15 PM EST
up
0 recs
Short answer
by jesse. on
Mar 4, 2008 3:57 PM EST
up
0 recs
I agree
by PSU86 on
Mar 3, 2008 10:23 PM EST
up
0 recs
Well look at it this way
Second, based on how bad Penn State got beat, you would have to assume that even with Claxton, Penn State would have lost at Indiana, Purdue and Michigan State and probably at home against Purdue as well. Further, even with Claxton wins at home against Indiana or at Wisconsin in the last two games would be pretty big upsets
So, by my methodology there are only four games that the loss of Claxton really could have had any effect; at Iowa and versus Ohio State, both games where we got killed, and the two road games against Michigan and Minnesota (who beat us at home with Claxton).
So the best realistic scenario is that Penn State, with Geary Claxton, finishes 18-12 (10-8) (4-0 in the Claxton swing games) and theoretically on the bubble, but with very little chance of getting in. More likely is 16-14 (8-10) or 15-15 (7-11) (2-2 & 1-3 respectively in the Claxton swing games) which is certainly NIT land (of course 15-15 would require a B10 Tourney win to get into the NIT), but not too much better than the 14-16 (6-12) we'll likely finish.
I have no problem playing the "what-if game" in an effort to Give Ed DeChellis the benefit of the doubt, but let's play it honestly and make a fair decision as to whether you think that Ed's got this program heading in the right direction. I give Ed and the kids credit for keeping the season respectable; but don't think this team contends in the Big Ten or for an NCAA bid if Claxton hadn't gotten hurt. Since the pattern with this team is that we are always hopeful that the young guys will come around, but they never seem to, perhaps its time to look in a different direction.
by jesse. on
Mar 4, 2008 9:20 AM EST
up
0 recs
Tourny Talk
Likewise, unless Ed lands a major recruit or two that can make an immediate impact next year I don't see this team improving to the point we go to the tournament next year. I think a realistic goal would be to try to shoot for 9 or 10 conference wins and make the NIT.
by Mike on Mar 4, 2008 9:44 AM EST 0 recs














