Rest Assured, Stephen A. Smith Shares In Your Outrage
The ESPN segment on the Penn State football program (video here) essentially can be boiled down to the following arguments:
1. Penn State's football program is filled with criminals.
2. Joe Paterno doesn't seem to care all that much about it.
3. Penn State coaches are intentionally recruiting players with questionable behavioral issues in response to the losing seasons of 2000, 2001, 2003, and 2004.
The first argument is compelling, though slightly overstated.
At this point, the statistics are hardly worth arguing over, nor is the process of haggling about the number of charges filed, charges dropped, plea bargains, and so on. Yes, most of the convictions concern drinking and fighting. However, despite the fact that the vast majority of serious charges were either dropped, dismissed, or plead down to misdemeanors, there remains a rather obvious discipline problem within the football program. Anyone who states otherwise cannot be taken seriously.
This brings us to Joe Paterno. He was defiantly defensive in the clips ESPN broadcast. It's partially understandable. Regardless of your opinion on Paterno's present and future roles at Penn State, you can't entirely blame him for not being particularly receptive to ESPN's work.
With that in mind, let's hand it over to David Jones, who wrote an excellent column in Sunday morning's Patriot-News:
What "OTL" gets right is Paterno's nouveau permissiveness. Recalcitrant outliers were thrown out of school in the old days. Now, the coach makes excuses, makes war with Judicial Affairs, and makes up absurd "suspensions" between February and August -- instead of making examples of his scofflaws.
Tough to argue with, even if details concerning the apartment and HUB fights remain somewhat sketchy as to who exactly did what. With each additional arrest or citation, fans on message boards and blogs consistently asked when enough would be enough, essentially calling for someone to be made an example for the good of the program. It hasn't happened, not unless a Ginsu knife and 70 witnesses are involved.
Paterno didn't do himself or his program any favors by being alternatively dismissive and confrontational with the interviewer. He's a trained lawyer* and has 50+ years of experience dealing with the media. If he truly believed the facts were on his side, he should have argued them more effectively. Nobody knows what was edited out of Paterno's interview -- they probably used three minutes of tape from a 45-minute interview session. Still, if ESPN set out to portray him as someone who either doesn't know or doesn't care that there is a discipline problem within his program, they succeeded.
On the other hand, Graham Spanier's appearances in the ESPN piece showed him to be tactful and shrewd. He recognized that while many charges have been thrown out, the number of player encounters with the police are far too great. He closed with, "The bad publicity is frustrating, it's not how we want Penn State to be portrayed in the news." A shot across the bow, perhaps, but not unwarranted.
With respect to Penn State and Joe Paterno intentionally recruiting questionable players, ESPN sought out former Penn State All-American defensive end, Michael Haynes, Scout.com analyst Bob Lichtenfels, and the recently retired sports editor at the Centre Daily Times, Ron Bracken. This accusation was supposed to be the dagger -- proof that Joe Paterno had abandoned the Grand Experiment and gone to the dark side.
A funny thing happened on the way to the sports Emmy. Haynes didn't say anything to directly implicate Penn State. He did say that there was a lot of pressure to go out and get high-end players. This is true. He also said that sometimes, players get out of line, party too much, and generally find ways to get in trouble. This is also true. But while Haynes and Lichtenfels spoke generally of the recruiting difficulties that all programs face, neither explicitly said, "Penn State is intentionally recruiting evil players" or anything remotely approaching that. If they had, you better believe ESPN would've rolled the tape.
Bracken's appearance was forgettable.
Toward the end of segment, Bob Ley interviewed Philadelphia sports radio personality Mike Missanelli (who better to ask about questionable aggressive physical behavior, right?). He made a valid, if rather obvious, observation about Spanier handling the interview better than Paterno, then muttered some weird crap about the need for early signings and called Paterno "an elderly coach who may not be fit to be head coach anymore."
Missanelli's fumbling was funny enough, but the comedic highlight of Sunday morning came afterward on Sportscenter, where an apparently clueless Bob Ley interviewed a sedated (no, wait, that was just his Serious Face and Voice) Stephen A. Smith, of whom Ley said, "from his years in Philadelphia, he's got a perspective on Penn State." Well, yes, a perspective. That's like saying I have a perspective on Easy Bake Ovens -- I know they exist, but not much else. Smith called Paterno "disgraceful, and the University of Penn State needs to get rid of him expeditiously, as quickly as possible." Then the man from Philadelphia who has a perspective on Penn State called it "The University of Penn State" again as his remarks concluded. The Worldwide Leader In Sports, indeed.
Long-term effects? Don't expect any if the team stays out of trouble. That's the danger with the "Outside The Lines" piece. It will only leave a lasting mark on the program if the players continue to put themselves in a position to be arrested. The ESPN report would have been much more damaging at almost any other point on the calendar. It won't affect recruiting -- if anything, it would cause some parents whose kids are considering Penn State to look into the situation a bit further, which in this case is a good thing. The good news is that ESPN came looking for a huge story, and didn't find all that much. Also, it's hard not to wonder how the football program will react to ABC and ESPN this season, in terms of access and hospitality.
Okay. Can we talk about football now?
* - No, wait, that's stupid and not true. He never made it to law school, as 90% of you probably know. Thanks to our friend PSUGirl for the catch.
0 recs |
108 comments
Comments
Ron Bracken himself
is forgettable. So no surprise there.
Pete the Streak
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Jul 28, 2008 9:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He's lost control, but nobody knows if he's lost control.
His appearance was so weird, claiming that Paterno had lost control of the program…but because access is so limited, nobody knows what goes on within the program. So, uh…yeah.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 28, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My favorite part...
...was when they were detailing the confrontation on the street which was the impetus for the beatdown.
They’re attempting to give a play by play of what happened, while a copy of the police report is floating around in the background. I can clearly read (after the punchy-kicky) ”...Scirrotto took out his cell phone and [the guy] slapped it out of his hand, onto the ground.” I would have liked to read some more of that.
But I guess ESPN ignored that part, because it doesn’t mesh with their version of events.
Lastly, the dig on Scirrotto being named captain is what annoyed me the most. The guy made a mistake, was punished by the law, and is trying to own up to it. JoePa sees this, and attempts to use Anthony as an example to inspire the team, highlighting the fact that he is attempting to rectify a past mistake (we’ve all made them). Somehow that gets twisted into “Come to PSU and commit some felonies…you’ll be named captain!!” Ludicrous.
"We heard all that talk all week about the SEC and their speed, but we knew personally that they weren't nearly as tough as us."
-Tony Hunt
by Cpiritual27 on Jul 28, 2008 9:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
something that comes to mind re: jones' story
is what players were kicked out of school in the past for things that are being done by current players? That’s an honest question.
Also, I suspect he means the team, as (1) Paterno has nothing to do with who is allowed to actually stay enrolled in the school, and (2) I know of situations where students did things an awful lot worse than anything the football team has done and been allowed to remain at penn state.
By the way, I don’t think there is anything wrong with that. Said non-football players owned up to their mistakes and were able to get their lives back together.
Also, SAS’s segment could not have been any more typical SAS. I’m not even mad.
Come on August 30th…..
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 28, 2008 9:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
exactly
Kevin,
This is exactly what I thought when I read the article. Paterno has always preferrred to handle things within the team. This is where Jones dropped the ball. He established that there has always been fights and former players said those things have been going on forever. But Jones concluded that Paterno had changed and provided no proof. Where was one guy who got in fights and was kicked off the team? I know Millen got in fights in practice all the time, sometimes just so he could get kicked out of practice.
by markyramone on Jul 28, 2008 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
(may want to repost)
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steven A. Smith
Grade A braying jackass. Believes shouting and getting loud is all it takes to win an argument, who needs the facts?
Go back to your full time job of portraying NBA criminals/players/millionaires as downtrodden victims of society, you’re sorely needed over there .
Maybe if JoePa had been just caught with weed in his Lamborgini, Steven A would approve of him.
by CDRS on Jul 28, 2008 10:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
SAS on football...
This is the man that thought if you chose to kick a FG on 3rd down and miss, you can re-kick on 4th down (in re: Chargers game).
If he doesn’t know anything about pro football, what makes tWWL think he’s gonna care/know anything about PSU football? Is it because he used to be a reporter within 200 miles of the university???
by Screen Name 20 on Jul 28, 2008 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That, and...
He’s already on their payroll and available for everything.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 28, 2008 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also by "reporter"
you mean “used to send his stories into the newspaper from California on his blackberry”.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 28, 2008 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yes, of course...
and by “stories” we mean “garbage”.
by Screen Name 20 on Jul 28, 2008 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
HOWEVA
STEPHEN A SMITH TAKES EXCEPTION TO YOUR CHARACTERIZATION OF HIS STORIED STORY-WRITING ABILITY. STEPHEN A SMITH DOES MORE ON HIS BLACKBERRY BY SIX A.M. THAN YOU DO ON YOUR LAPTOP ALL DAY. SLA-VA MED-VE-DEN-KO KNOWS MORE ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY OF PENN STATE THAN YOU, KEVIN HD.
______
Sent from a Blackberry wireless device
"Bob Zook has to be the laziest man alive"
by Hawkeye State on Jul 28, 2008 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well played hs.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 28, 2008 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
idea
has anyone thought of doing a paterno/SAS “conversation” over at BHGP? rife with potential…..
JD
by psudrozz on Jul 28, 2008 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TOO MUCH CAPS LOCK
"Bob Zook has to be the laziest man alive"
by Hawkeye State on Jul 29, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
is he THE CLOSEST/knowledgable reporter they have? !
Or they needed some “edge” to offset the means of Bob Ley and the “witch-hut” so they could “pull the story together” so they ENDED the whole story with him…WWL’s “big-bang” ending…not impressed.
However, I do hope MANY learned a big less here: lets keep our noses clean, you are football players @ PSU; you’ll be in the spot light and are treated differently for the “good” and the “bad”...lets keep with the GOOD. “We Are…”
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on Jul 28, 2008 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The premises of the story:
1] Penn State was loosing, so we started recruiting thugs, rather than the choir boys that used to play for us. Obviously the criminal charges provide a ton of smoke for this point, and certainly there is a little fire. But three things to consider;
1) Certain guys, who committed serious crimes, were kicked off the team;
2) Guys who got caught doing petty misdemeanor things were punished. I don’t care how temporary an expulsion is, I certainly wouldn’t want to explain it to my parents; and
3) the graduation rate is still high, and for African Americans, it is unprecedentedly high. We may be recruiting players differently than we were before, but we are still graduating them.
2] Penn State has changed it’s method of discipline. This is not true. I’ve followed this program for more than 20 years, and the myth that 15 years ago these guys would have gotten kicked off the team no questions asked is just that, a myth. Kicking a guy off the football team and giving away his scholarship for an underage drinking arrest is draconian and cruel. Joe Paterno didn’t do that thirty years ago and he doesn’t do it now. For lots of these kids football is there only chance to go to college, if you take football out of the equation they are lost, to set some sort of blanket zero tolerance policy is foolish.
What I didn’t like about the story is that OTL went in with their minds made up. They made a case against Penn State, rather than reporting a story about Penn State. I liked that PSU made Paterno, Spanier and (especially) Scirotto available. It did not appear that PSU was in massive cover-up mode, rather, they wanted to make as many facts available to the reporters as possible.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 28, 2008 10:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
tWWL vs. PSU
Of course, it all makes sense…they’re still pissed about Fowler getting doused by a brew.
by Screen Name 20 on Jul 28, 2008 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was not good!
I, like you most likely, watched that live and I was embarrassed for the University.
That is exactly the way for the general public to quickly and easily think poorly of PSU…
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on Jul 28, 2008 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Embarrassing...
The Fowler incident and the whole “frat beer throwing incident” that made its rounds on youtube…those two incidents, the latter moreso, fueled a general perception that PSU fans are barbarians.
by Screen Name 20 on Jul 28, 2008 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto - Not funny & not good!
Stupid move by one (student?) reflects on the whole university. The guy that did it should have been turned in by the crowd. It certainly didn’t increase our chances of being picked for future “Game Day Live” events….which are truly good opportunities to showcase the university, impress recruits, etc.
by PSURob on Jul 28, 2008 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jones' article
He cited Gelzheiser as being thrown out of school for something which was arguably less drastic than the apartment thuggery. Did you even read his article?
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
I never claimed to, is there an article I should have read. And by Glezheiser, do you mean the Glezheiser that was “kicked out of school” in 1991 and graduated in 1995 after playing for three years?
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 28, 2008 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, Jones' freaking article
which was referred to in the body of this post that you, uh, commented on.
What “OTL” gets wrong is the naive assumption that the old days were pristine. Former linebacker Brian Gelzheiser (‘94) said ESPN’s Delsohn interviewed him.“I asked him, ‘Why are you chastising these kids?’ He said, ‘Well, you guys didn’t get in trouble.’ I said, ‘Bull … we didn’t get in trouble! I got kicked out of school!’” Gelzheiser said. He was expelled because he was accused of attempting to use another student’s lost credit card in 1991. Gelzheiser still maintains he was essentially innocent, but Paterno would not allow him to fight charges.
“This guy [Delsohn] really annoyed me,” Gelzheiser said. “I mean, I got in trouble. But I was OK then?”
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
The formatting messed up the part of my post that said several players were expelled for the summer session. So my point, which is still pretty clear from my post, is that Joe Paterno has never made a habit of summarily kicking people off the team.
In your effort to be a smart ass you essentially proved my point. Glezheiser was no more expelled in 1991 than Anthony Scirotto was last summer. Both had to earn their way back on the team, and both did. Brian seems to have done pretty well for himself; Bobby Engram has done okay too. Perhaps Anthony Sciorotto will also benefit from a second chance and a little leniency?
It’s easy to be a hard ass and stand on your principals when your opinion has absolutely no bearing on what actually happens. When some kids’ future is on the line, the issues get a little more complex.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 28, 2008 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Expelled for the summer session is a joke. Do you have any real information that all Gelzheiser got was that joke of a slap on the wrist? Because Jones sure makes it sound otherwise.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea
http://blogs.mcall.com/nittany_lines/2005/11/linebacker_u_in.html
If you scroll down, you’ll see that Brian was a four year letterman. He graduated, according Jones’ article in 1994. How long could have possibly been kicked out of school for? A semester sounds about right.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 28, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That part withdrawn
You still have the embarassment of Scirotto et al being allowed to practice while “expelled”.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you watch the report?
Paterno said to the father of the kid, tell me who threw the bottle and they’re gone.
by PSU Nick on Jul 28, 2008 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is, of course, a load of crap.
As the father said, how the hell am I supposed to bring you the guy who threw the bottle?
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well one would guess that they would have some way
of identifying their attacker. How the hell is Joe supposed to recognize him?
by PSU Nick on Jul 28, 2008 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a serious question
Would someone of an age to remember, please enlighten me to the turbulent year of 1979 in Penn State football history? I’ve heard of some of the goings on from the offseason and spilling into the season, but I did not exist yet. Seems that situation was so much worse than what we’re currently dealing with.
by PSU Nick on Jul 28, 2008 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Outside the bubble
Most irresponsible story
ESPN’s Outside the Lines does such outstanding work that it’s all the more noticeable when one of its stories fails to meet the high standards it sets. And when a story fails to meet most journalistic standards, it’s disturbing.
Such was the case with Steve Delsohn’s sloppy, irresponsible story on Penn State football. The piece tossed out a bunch of numbers to make it appear as if Joe Paterno’s program is out of control because of off-the-field incidents. The emphasis was on charges and arrests as opposed to convictions. though all numbers were revealed. Worse, the numbers were given no context as to how Penn State compares with other Division I programs, or even the regular student body. That’s Journalism 101.
Only a couple of incidents were mentioned in detail, giving the viewer no clue as to how serious all of the incidents have been. (The highlighted incident appeared to be little more than a late-night party fight.) And the most powerful interviews came from students whose credibility could not be verified.
Paterno, on air, said the piece was a “witch hunt,’’ and he’s right. It’s as if a bunch of producers sat in a room, decided they were going to go after Paterno and his program, and then geared the story, statistics and interviews to fit their agenda. This story fails to pass journalism muster, and it’s quite shocking that a quality show such as OTL would air a piece with so many holes in it.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 28, 2008 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I remember an old Paterno quote
It went something like this, every year some hot shot reporter comes here to write the expose on Penn State football, to expose us as frauds, and make us look bad. Every year they go home and write a puff piece, because we’re not frauds, what you see is what you get.
OTL wasn’t going home with a puff piece. But they didn’t go home with the expose they wanted either. They presented no new facts, and interviews with a couple of kids and their father that certainly had an agenda. Then they wrapped it all up in a presentation that deliberately made an effort to obscure the fact that report uncovered no new information, that Penn State was very cooperative in the preparation of their story, and that their report glossed over other facts that didn’t support their hypothesis.
ESPN won’t be winning any Emmys for this story.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 28, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That quote was provided by none other than...
Everyone’s favorite Penn State writer, David Jones.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 28, 2008 11:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jones
Gets a bad rap…I think he is much better reporter than most…he is fair in most cases…being fair can sometimes open you up for attack by PSU kool aid drinkers.
Its tough to be honest in PA when talking about PSU/Paterno…you will get blasted. Do I think he is going for a reaction sometime…yes but it doesn’t mean he is making stuff up.
by SweepTheLeg on Jul 28, 2008 11:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
SAS
I wonder if ESPN really thought that by adding some bs commentary from Stephen A. Smith it somehow further legitimizes this story? When is the last time we heard this guy talk about college football? Now, all of a sudden he’s an expert on the goings on at Penn State? Because he wrote for a Philly paper? What a joke.
I agree that there are obvious discipline problems with the program but this story was LAZY all the way around. And to bring in SAS to provide some BS commentary proves this point.
by 4thand15 on Jul 28, 2008 11:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
For one quick, sweet moment
I thought that SAS was on the Paterno payroll, because there’s one sure way to turn public opinion in your favor—be on the opposite side of the argument from Screamin A. Smith.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 28, 2008 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
that SAS is a curious choice for an editorial response on a story already lacking credibility.
the questions they ask were sometimes fair, but the allegations from “some people who are saying” is only made more laughable by bringing Mr. Quite Frankly
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 28, 2008 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya know
I almost thought they were going to bring up the Tony Johnson DUI…I mean if you really wanted to discredit the university why not talk about the coaches son who got a dui on park road…or what about the paterno road rage incident…seriously why didn’t they just say that maurice clarrett was now enrolling at PSU or that JoePa required that every player be issued a glock upon enrolling in the school
SAS is a joke and his opinion has no merrit what so ever…he tries to act like he is calm and dignified but two seconds into his arguements he starts talking louder and talking street…I have never liked him and I never will, if I even see he is coming on sports center or any other show on ESPN then turn the channel immediately…I would like to see what the boys at PTI have to say about this b/c you know they would have a way better story and would have better opionions about the subject…atleast they would give the facts and if not Tony would say it at the end of the show any way
we need it to be August 30th sooner than later…I’m surprised they didn’t put anything in the story about us playing CC as the home opener…if you want to talk about our football team beating up on some hapless victims you should start there
(nothing against CC I’m sure you are a fine school with great athletes but lets face facts you are getting paid to come up here and take a butt wooping admit it)
by Lion Alum on Jul 28, 2008 12:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Austin Scott
I love how they just brushed over the Austin Scott rape charges. “Charges were later dropped”. Leaving out the fact the the “victim” has done this before and Austin was not guilty of anything other then taking the wrong girl home.
As for those two students who seemed to be enjoying themselves reliving the fight…if 7 football players went into that tiny apartment how could anyone see anything? If it was a crowded party and they show up there would be no way you could see across the room.
PSU Softball
by QBsneak12 on Jul 28, 2008 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Question............
If you take Fulmer Cup points over the last 2 or 3 years as any indication of a programs off the field issues, we are right in the hunt for the title. However, so are UT, Alabama, UGA, and Florida. To me, this begs the question….......why Penn State ? Is it because the expectations the WWL has of the other schools is so low or is it because the combination of Penn State Fans and the media in general have held Penn State up as the model program for so long ? Or a little of both. The answer to this question is most likely either a compliment to Penn State in that more has been expected relative to programs like UT, UGA, UF, and Alabama or a get off your high horse PSU fan “what do you think of this piece” by the WWL.
Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.
by ech2os on Jul 28, 2008 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points...
I hate to generalize w/o hard “cited” facts, but you’re might be on the money on the “high horse” rational…
I don’t know or remember EXACTLY, but it usually seems to me that those schools you had noted are more like the “favorite sons” of the WWL (and others). Any chance to minimize a BIG10 school, PSU particularlly, to knock on them (lets not give them any more “oppurtunities” guys) is a ‘gimme!
Not to mention, I think some of those writters have an “bad inkeling” that PSU is set for a comming-out-party this season. They might just be taking this oppurtunity (some players are handing them) to tarnish the “good” PSU name…while they can. Let’s NOT give in. Leave it on the field!
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on Jul 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would say that PSU has such a long
history of good citizenship that when the ship starts to turn it becomes a noteworthy story.
The other Fulmer Cup schools mentioned above don’t taut “The Grand Experiment:” and “Students first, athletes second” so there is no newsworthiness around them.
For the most part I didn’t have a problem with the OTL story. If there hadn’t been a run of bad behavior the last few years there wouldn’t be a story. Several people noted how bad Paterno came away – I didn’t think he did anything different than he ever has.
In the end, Hopefully this is a kick in the pants for the team to band together and prove the WWL worng.
"60% of the time, it works every time"
by rahpsu92 on Jul 29, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This all makes me very happy that
I don’t get ESPN and I have never read anything written by Steven A. Smith.
University of Penn State?? I guess we’re UPS! Maybe we need brown unis.
by NJ lion on Jul 28, 2008 1:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's another response that was posted about the OTL report
by mike missanelli (sp?)
http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/video/videopage?videoId=3506616&categoryId=2378529&n8pe6c=2
ohio sucks=/
by mikeissurreal on Jul 28, 2008 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Graduation Rate
and since when is being 12th in the graduation rate a bad thing? Assume that Stanford, Northwestern, Notre Dame and a bunch of smaller schools are ahead of PSU. Where is USC? Florida? Oklahoma? 12th in D1 is a great stat that shouldn’t be overlooked.
PSU Softball
by QBsneak12 on Jul 28, 2008 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Like Duke, UVA and Wake Forest?
I completely agree. I think between the two of us…..we have probably named six of the 11 that are ahead of PSU in graduation rate (BC may be a 7th). And those are some pretty fine institutions of higher learning. I mean seriously….................HOW MANY OTHER D1A SCHOOLS CAN SAY THAT THEIR LIBRARY IS NAMED AFTER THEIR HEAD FOOTBALL COACH! Don’t remember that on OTL either but maybe someone can let me know if I missed it!?
I thought only safeties played 15 yards off the ball?
by pic15 on Jul 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you misread
The implication was “they’re still good at the academics part, just not the off-field behavior part”. IE, they were saying that 12th was very good.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on people......
If your really think fighting didn’t take place in the 60’s 70’s, 80’s and 90’s you are sorely mistaken AND YOU CAN NOT BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. It is just prosecuted today (by an overzealous DA looking to make a name for himself) when then it was just kids being kids. As for people who claim Paterno didn’t used to give second chances…..anybody care to remember why Bobby Engram missed a year of football??? Have PSU football players put themselves in positions they don’t need to be in…..yes. Is it a sign there is a problem with the program…..NO! EVERYDAY STUDENTS were the instigators in the Scirotto incident…...remember the police report states Scirotto was punched and his girlfriend WAS PUSHED TO THE GROUND. I don’t know about the rest of you on here but if somebody pushed my fiance to the ground you had better believe that I would be looking to beat some ass! As for his buddies going with him…....that is football mentality and it is something that is instilled by the coaches. YOU ARE ALWAYS SUPPOSED TO HAVE YOUR TEAMATES BACK! What went on inside and who started throwing blows…..no one can say for sure. What is for sure is that MULTIPLE witnesses say that Justin King was attempting to act as a peacemaker (ahh didn’t hear that in the OTL piece).
Same thing with the HUB incident…..by most accounts started by the non-athletes. Should the boys have known by this point to walk away …...sure. But at 20 years old and getting punked by some frat boys a desire to respond (THOUG WRONG) should be understood by all of us old foggies!
As for Paterno fighting with JA. I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT IT! From the information I heard…....he was not significantly involved in the Chris Baker hearing. Witness testimony is what saved Baker with JA…...not Paterno.
The fact that Austin Scott and Scott Paxson were not issued public apologies by the University, by the Daily Collegian and by the Centre County DA is disgusting. AND THE FACT THAT IS WAS GLOSSED OVER BY OTL tells me that we can not take them seriously as reporters. To be a good reporter…...you are supposed to cover all sides of a story. Too frequently today news stations think it is their civic responsibility (ah-hem CNN) to put a political slant on its reporting…......all that does is question credibility. Since OTL didn’t present all parts of the story….... the piece they did is a piece of crap and deserves to be taped over. Maybe if they would have portrayed to good our student athletes do, including both D-Will and Scirotto the piece would have been slightly better.
I look forward to our guys doing it the right way…..the PSU way…...THE PATERNO WAY in 2008! WE ARE!
I thought only safeties played 15 yards off the ball?
by pic15 on Jul 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You're really out of touch
Engram was punished far more harshly for a far less serious offense than were Scirotto’s gang of thugs.
And, no, getting a gang together to bust into a party is NOT what used to happen at Penn State – it’s what used to happen at Miami.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who is out of touch
Is that what happened? They are all of a sudden thugs for helping out a team mate and friend? I hope you hold everyone else who doesn’t play football to that standard.
I think a lot of fans are out of touch and have selective memory if they thought the only thing the football time ever did in the past was just drink. I’m not condoning their actions, but who are you to label anyone a “thug” for one mistake? Punishment has been dealt out to pretty much everyone involved I believe. Not to mention anything the coaches chose to do themselves or their treatment by the other players who essentially share your “thug” branding just because they play on the same team as them.
This issue as a whole seems to be brought up over and over again. I’ve been done with it for so long, hopefully everyone can move on and in the next few months the focus of the football team will be their on field performance.
I was out in the trenches, which enables me to paint such a powerful picture, like Apocalypse Now.-Cormega
by OMEGAMAN on Jul 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're out of touch
Getting together a posse to bust into a party and start whaling on people is not “helping out a team mate and friend”.
It’s really sad that this is what the Grand Experiment has come to – delusional denial at its worst.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to say.....
From the details that I’ve seen and heard surrounding the Scirotto case. I think we’re lucky he didn’t kill that man, because there is no way in HELL, I’m gonna stand by and let somebody do the things that were done to him and the woman he loves, just because I’m on the Football team.
In life we are all faced with challenges and choices that effect our lives everyday, but in the heat of the moment when your manhood and you’re ability to provide and protect those that you love is challenged, it is instinctual to react a certain way. And call me crazy, but I have no problem with the Football team coming to his aide, because I’m sure after they were presented with the facts, they had the same instinctual reaction that Anthony had. They knew they were on the side of ‘Right’. If they didn’t think that, they wouldn’t have been there. That’s the kind of football team I want to be on. There was more at stake than a Football scholarship.
Penn State doesn’t have any Thugs on the team, we have young men, like every other football team. It’s just that in the past College football players only had to battle their opponents, and their professors. Nowadays, they also have to battle a sensationalist media corps, and a student body that is growing increasingly jealous of the attention and success that their classmates are getting.
Let’s leave them the hell alone, and let them play FOOTBALL!
What’s the countdown at? I’m ready to suit up myself I’m so fired up.
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Jul 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good lord
They busted into a party and started beating people up – many of whom had nothing at all to do with the street altercation and had no idea what was going on…
and you think they were heroes?
You’re a really bad person. Seek help.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's right M1EK....
Continue judging people. It seems to be what you do best.
I stand by what I said.
You seem to be taking the incident at face value, and not taking into account what instigated it.
Put yourself in Anthony’s shoes for a minute, or any MAN’s shoes (IMO), and don’t be so quick to judge people.
If you think that 6 football players went to that apartment, that quickly, ready to risk their Football scholarships if they didn’t think they were there for a damn good reason your delusional. Of course there were people who weren’t involved in the street altercation that got hurt, it was a PARTY. They didn’t show up to beat up INNOCENT people, just like we don’t aim to kill innocent people when we drop bombs on foreign countries. It happens. They wanted whoever did this to Anthony to know that he had some SERIOUS backup. They even talked about how Justin King tried to be a peace maker. I’m sure these idiots who assaulted Anthony and his fiancee weren’t trying to step outside, when they saw who was at the door, if you know what I’m saying.
Again, I’m not ADVOCATING this kind of action, I’m just saying in the heat of the moment, I UNDERSTAND the action and the quick response from people who are like family to him. If someone threatens my family, or people who are like family to me, you better believe I’m going to be by their side when they call. PERIOD. I’m sorry you don’t feel the same way. God bless your family, M1EK.
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Jul 28, 2008 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
kajpsu, you’re a thug if you’d respond this way – you’re damn straight I’d defend my family on the street, but I wouldn’t gather together a posse to break down the door of the dude’s apartment and start attacking random people.
You’re a really bad person. God wouldn’t bless somebody who would seek vengeance in such a careless fashion.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that what happened?
No one is saying they are heroes, but from that high horse of yours their depiction as thugs is also inaccurate. Like I said, it was young men my own age who made a bad decision. It happens. Funny that they are the villains when this never happens if not for a few drunken, non-football team students who decided to flex their beer muscles.
I was out in the trenches, which enables me to paint such a powerful picture, like Apocalypse Now.-Cormega
by OMEGAMAN on Jul 28, 2008 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody's defending the idiots on the street
The fight on the street was “just a fight”. Had Scirotto fought back harder then, it still would have been “just a fight”. Gathering together a bunch of teammates to bust into an apartment party and then beat down on random people is NOT just a fight; and it IS exactly the kind of thuggery we used to make fun of Miami for tolerating.
by M1EK on Jul 28, 2008 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Had Scirotto....
taken out all three men by himself and saved his girlfriend from attack at the same time, he would promptly have left the Penn State Football team and taken on his new job as the next OO7.
But that’s alright. I’m sure your girlfriend would have stayed with you long after you scraped her up off the ground and took the high road and headed home as you watched the attackers head on into their party.
Just giving you some perspective. Since you seem to have NONE.
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Jul 29, 2008 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s YOU that’s throwing around the challenges-to-masculinity here; so why isn’t Scirotto under attack for not throwing down on the street?
A clue: breaking into somebody’s home to settle the score is what thugs do. The fact that you don’t see this is pretty scary. And the fact that so many people here are ignoring the innocent people who were attacked (who weren’t involved in the street altercation at all) makes me sick.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with M1EK. This is the stuff of which gang wars are made.
Football players are bound to be challenged on the street or in bars by dimwits with something to prove and won’t always have the self-control to turn the other cheek. Thus, fights emanating out of such confrontations are inevitable. If Scirrotto had merely defended his trash talking girlfriend on the street and left it at that, we wouldn’t still be talking about it.
But no, Scirrotto escalated the forgettable street incident. He couldn’t handle two guys on the street, so he gathered an army to invade an apartment with the intent of trashing the apartment and its occupants, including people who whose only involvement was being in the wrong place at the wrong time. THAT is what turned a minor “boys will be boys” incident into gang warfare and it should be recognized as such.
To minimize this type of gang behavior is to condone it, and that attitude will promote more of the same (viz. party walkin’ and frontin’), particularly if players know they’ll survive the investigation with a slap on the wrist and might even be elected captain.
--TNT
by The Nittany Turkey on Jul 29, 2008 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks TNT
Another angle to the “WE MUST DEFEND OUR BRETHREN” ridiculousness is this: What about the guy(s) in the apartment who got hurt who didn’t actually have anything to do with the initial confrontation? Sure, there’s only one or two of them compared to 15 football players, so by the “logic” of the comments here, they should go out and gather a posse of a couple hundred of their buddies and go to football practice and start attacking the entire team, right?
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really.....
Engram (and Rick Sayles who was ultimately dismissed from the University) was charged with theft…...a crime I and most deem far more serious than a fight…...which is all the Scirotto incident was and ultimately all that stuck as far as charges! Get your facts right with Scirotto too. You don’t even mention in your weak retort that he and his girlfriend were assaulted by several individuals who were non ballplayers. Guess its alright that took place, huh Chump? If you think ballplayers have not ALWAYS had each others back at PSU and EVERY OTHER SCHOOL ACROSS THE NATION YOU ARE SORELY MISTANKEN AND NEED TO WAKE UP!
You wanna talk Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida or FSU …..bring it and bring some facts! I live in the heart of the SEC my friend…...SO I KNOW WHAT HAPPENS HERE! Don’t even try to compare what happened at PSU to the thuggery that took place at Miami during the 90s.
What the Scirotto and Hub incident break down to are two fights that made national news because of an overzealous DA! FACT!
I thought only safeties played 15 yards off the ball?
by pic15 on Jul 29, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good lord, you're sad
Again, if it’s such a good thing to “have each other’s back”, then it would have been even cooler for the people in the apartment who got hit (who weren’t involved in the street altercation) to get together a couple hundred of THEIR buddies and go break down the doors of the football players’ apartments for a beat down, right?
Hooray!
The Scirotto incident was NOT “just a fight”. The incident on the street WAS. The rest of it was thuggery – of the sort better associated with our friends to the south.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And you are out of touch with reality
As other bloggers have noted …...if half that stuff the kids on the OTL special talked about really happened:
1) it would have been in the police report….it wasn’t.
2) Actual players would have been identified ( there are so many multimedia options especially concerning the football team)
3) Felong charges would have stuck…..they didn’t
You must have had a sad existance at PSU…..i feel sorry for your that you are so jaded!
I thought only safeties played 15 yards off the ball?
by pic15 on Jul 30, 2008 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
doesn’t it really seem that way…
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on Jul 30, 2008 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then why did Scirotto have to plea-bargain?
The legal system disagrees with you. Plea-bargains aren’t agreed to by plaintiff’s attorneys if they think they have a really good case that the original charges were overblown.
by M1EK on Jul 30, 2008 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't hire M1EK to be your lawyer
Scirotto faced 7 charges
1 felony count of burglary (entering a premises with intent to commit a felony in side);
1 felony count of trespassing (the underlying felony that is the basis for the burglary charge);
2 misdemeanor counts of criminal solicitation (convincing other people to commit a crime)
1 misdemeanor count of simple assault (any unwanted touching of another person)
All of these charges were all dropped at the preliminary hearing, where the evidentiary standard is merely probable cause that a crime was committed. For reference, the phone call that was widely regarded as exonerating Austin Scott (although I don’t think it did) was sufficient evidence to bind the charges over for trial against him.
The remaining charges were
Harassment, a summary charge; and
misdemeanor defiant trespass.
The latter charge is what he plead guilty to.
A person is guilty of defiant trespass if they refuse to leave private property when they are asked too. There does not seem to be any doubt that Anthony Scirotto did that, hence the guilty plea.
So the right or wrong, the criminal justice system agrees with me. But like you said, the facts are only important to idiot homers like me. Scirotto is guilty on all charges in the illustrious courtroom of M1EK.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 30, 2008 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Yea or Nea..."
...all in favor…( a hush falls over the “BSD blog room for a moment, with only the sound of crickets for one second…” )...
“Quickly and in unison…”
“YEA”
...aaaaaand CUT…that’s a wrap!
“Peace-out” and “Word to ya motha…”
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on Jul 30, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One last thing
Had there been any evidence at all that somebody got hit in the head with a bottle, the charge would have been aggravated assault, or possibly even attempted murder.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 30, 2008 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's IF
you can get people to testify against the football team. The follow-up story from ESPN addresses a lot of this stuff – and it doesn’t sound even as good as the original video.
by M1EK on Jul 30, 2008 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
That might account for the simple assault charges being dropped, but not for the more serious charge never having been filed.
Also, I have to think that two kids who went on national television to tell their story would have testified.
With that in mind it bears notice that the same DA attempted to take the very shaky testimony of a victim to a trial in the Austin Scott case. He only dropped charges after an evidentiary ruling ensured that the accusers testimony would be crushed on cross examination.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 30, 2008 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well put Jesse....
Also don’t forget the evidence he was prosecuting Scott Paxson with. In that instance the alleged victim indicated she invited Paxson to her room, had sex with Paxson and NEVER told him that she did not want to have sex. She changed her mind later and low and behold Rape charges appeared from the Centre County DA. When the DA finally realized the case was a dud, Paxson pled to a misdemeanor…...which was the smart thing to do (regardless of innocence) in light of the felony charges that were pending.
I thought only safeties played 15 yards off the ball?
by pic15 on Jul 31, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
M1EK...
Nice to see you are making it interesting here also…good to see you bud!
by SweepTheLeg on Jul 28, 2008 8:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Real nice...
giving this idiot encouragement. Of course, you’re the only two guys throwing around the term “kool aid drinkers” with regularity. It makes me sick. If you hate Penn State so much, try cheering for another team. And don’t tell me you say the things you do because you’re the only REAL Penn State fan who posts here. That doesn’t add up. We’re Penn State fans mostly because we love and defend our alma mater through good times and bad. We NEVER purposely drag her name through the mud like you do, M1EK, day in and day out. The Penn State football team IS the players who comprise it. I’m not suggesting you or anyone else place them on a pedestal and allow them to do anything they want, but in times like these when the media is doing everything they can to make these guys look like common criminals and to encourage the rest of the nation to adopt this view, IT IS YOUR DUTY AS A PENN STATE FAN to step up and say, “Listen… what you’re saying is wrong and this is why!”
You REALLY need to think about what it means to truly love your alma mater, M1EK. Right now, you just don’t get it.
by BSM PSU 93 on Jul 29, 2008 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your duty as a fan
is to stand up and say “what these players did was wrong, and this is why”.
What YOU’RE doing is what Nebraska fans tried to do with Lawrence Phillips; and what Miami fans did in the 1980s.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw this M1EK Blogwar
coming a mile away when RUTS moved here. Is it wrong to be excited for the fireworks?
by psuphiman80 on Jul 29, 2008 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I disagree w/ most of what M1EK writes…but he does make it interesting.
He is that guy who will disagree to disagree and get people all fired up.
M1EK…making friends one blog at a time…
by SweepTheLeg on Jul 29, 2008 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smuggery
Smuggery is better than thuggery, but not much. So please shove it where the sun don’t shine.
I’m very proud of the reputation Penn State earned for having good academics and relatively good off-field behavior. I take this very seriously – and really am pissed at the antics the last few years, but I’m even MORE pissed at the fact that our superhomer fans see nothing wrong with attacking Miami, Nebraska, etc. for thuggery, but turn into the three monkeys when it’s time to step up, and be men, and admit that Our Team Done Wrong.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smuggery?
Me smug???
Next you will acuse me of being sarcastic and a superhomer?
Come on M1EK…you are better than that.
by SweepTheLeg on Jul 29, 2008 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fireworks...
It kinda makes me feel like I’m reading Audibles, what with all the intra-PSU bickering (no offense to those involved, as it is quite entertaining).
by Screen Name 20 on Jul 30, 2008 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A few thoughts
I call total bullshit on the breaking the beer bottle over the guy’s head. Impossible. Try it with a coconut sometime. A bottle will smash a skull before it’ll break over one. That kid has watched too many movies.
I would have liked to have OTL ask the two apartment dwellers whether they knew the 3 guys the players were looking for, and whether THEY were invited guests of the party. Were they friends of theirs? Are they still? Was anyone crowing about how they just showed a badass football player who was boss?
I agree that this was a hit piece planned in advance. I also hate all the ammo the players have given them to make it happen. What struck me, though, was when the numbers of players, charges and convictions were shown on screen. Lots of players, even more charges, but just a fraction thereof of convictions or guilty pleas. Why is that?
Yes, the players need some leaders on the team to step up and take charge, and get this shit stopped.
It’s also quite obvious that over recent years, the Centre County DA has been charging a lot of people (at least football players, anyway) with crimes that he then can’t support. I’m too lazy to look back and do the math, but of the litany of charges that were listed in this piece, what was the actual conviction / guilty plea rate? 20%? 15%? What was the percentage of felony count convictions or guilty pleas?
Who was it that said he didn’t care what people wrote about him as long as they spelled his name right? Poor old SAS failed miserably. But loudly, at least. University of Penn State? Sheesh.
Pete the Streak
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Jul 29, 2008 7:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
further...
i worked a lot of club/bar jobs in the 90’s-ive seen people break bottles over others’ heads. there is a profuse amount of blood and flesh shredding involved. it’s nothing like what the movies show.
didn’t the victim just get treated for bumps and bruises?
JD
by psudrozz on Jul 29, 2008 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
the injuries do not match the story.
by psuphiman80 on Jul 29, 2008 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dang
What’s with the highlighted section in my post above?
The second sentence should read “I also hate all the ammo the players have given them to make it happen’.
Double dang.
Pete the Streak
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Jul 29, 2008 7:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My final word
At this point, we’ve beaten this thing pretty much to death. The OTL story was news, old news, but news I suppose. I thought the reporting was a little suspect but that’s not my decision to make.
The Meridian incident was preposterously poor judgment on the part of the players. Of course, we shouldn’t condone activity like that, or even go out of our way to explain it. On the other hand, since nobody knows what happened in the apartment, and the only information we have are wild accusations and unverified speculation, I think it’s awfully presumptions of anybody to make blanket character judgments against these kids, all of whom had different degrees of involvement in the incident. None of the accusations made by the students interviewed by OTL passed even the most lenient standards of judicial muster, and that says something to me.
FWIW, I think our role as Penn State fans is to act like educated, reasonable human beings, not zealots. It’s good to have people who will call bullshit on the football team and even Paterno from time to time. But when it rises to the level of an agenda that finds fault in everything, and ignores contrary evidence, I think that is bullshit too.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 29, 2008 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
We didn't just beat it pretty much to death....
We called up a bunch of our boys, then busted into it’s apartment, fists flying, bottles swinging, and THEN beat it pretty much to death. Sorry, just had to do it.
I bleed Blue and White.
by Horse N Buggy on Jul 29, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since I know you're talking about me
Your post is bullshit. I’ve not found fault in everything – just in a case where if it were any other school, we’d be pointing and laughing at the idiot homers circling the wagons defending the indefensible. And you don’t NEED to know the facts of what went on IN the apartment – the simple fact that a posse went there and forced their way in is already enough to classify it as, as TNT put it, “gang tactics”.
I’ve been on mgoblog defending our academics against theirs on several occasions in the last year, BTW.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude - take a chill pill
It’s a blog….you know, the spot on the interwebs where people can come and express their own opinions. No need to get so worked up.
I’m just afraid you might call a bunch of your boys and start breaking into apartments and beating down anyone who doesn’t agree with your opinion, you e-thug, you.
I bleed Blue and White.
by Horse N Buggy on Jul 29, 2008 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If what I said applies to you, maybe I was talking about you.
you don’t NEED to know the facts of what went on IN the apartment
Passing judgment without facts is the privilege of those of us who have to take no responsibility a decision or its consequences.
It’s also why coaches hate blogs.
But by all means rave on.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 29, 2008 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dear idiot
You don’t need to know what went on in the apartment to know that breaking into it was a crime in and of itself. This is inherently obvious to anybody who’s not a blithering superhomer.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well said jesse
"Boy that student section now is up and really making a gigantic amount of noise. You see the sea of white, the white out. Well they are 2 minutes and 28 seconds away from the whiteout of the Buckeyes here tonight." - Ron Franklin
by rmcmillen50 on Jul 29, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you jesse...
Summed up this shit show perfectly.
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Jul 30, 2008 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yay
We dropped to 7th in the Fulmer Cup.
http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2008/07/29/fulmer-cupdate-sprinting-to-the-end/
by psuphiman80 on Jul 29, 2008 6:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Down to seventh indeed. Better yet, we’re only 3 points from dropping off the board entirely
(Must…..hang…...on…...)
Umm…...is it OK to post a comment containing optimistic sarcasm, M1EK? ‘Sarcamistic’, if you will. I truly don’t want you to consider me (from this thread alone) ‘really out of touch’, a ‘thug’, a ‘really bad person’ (twice), ‘sad’, an ‘idiot’, accuse me of ‘smuggery’, or being a….shudder…......superhomer.
Dude – I thought you libs were all tolerant and stuff. Is that just bullshit, or are you simply the outlier?
Pete the Streak
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Jul 29, 2008 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Miss State
is the only one around us who has a problem pending in the Processing Station, and there isn’t much time left. A whole bunch of teams are gonna have to score big if we’re gonna fall of the big board and I don’t see it happening with just a month left. We’ll see how it plays out.
http://www.sportsargumentwiki.com/index.php?title=Fulmer_Cup
by psuphiman80 on Jul 29, 2008 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pot. Kettle. Black.
“He is that guy who will disagree to disagree and get people all fired up.
M1EK…making friends one blog at a time…”
F. U. Now.
by M1EK on Jul 29, 2008 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
M1EK
Is no different that every other delusional anti-homer who thinks they know better than the folks in Lasch. He doesn’t need facts, and he’s never wrong, he ignores the good things and only talks about the bad things…end o’ story. For those of you who read FOS, he’s basically Lion King 25.
Here’s what I didn’t like about OTL:
1) The anti-JoePa agenda. Spanier, Bracken, Lichtenfels (Pitt fan), SAS…the list goes on. One fuckin’ guy (AS) to give an opposing point of view, but we’ll give the amateur wrestler 30 seconds to show us elbow drops and stool bashings.
2) The math of the injuries. By my count, there was a guy being beaten to a bloody pulp on the futon (WOOOOOO!!!), a guy taking a stool to the head, and a guy bouncing up and down while unconscious on the countertop. Yet only two guys had injuries that were deemed hospital-worthy. Uh huh.
3) The little point that they didn’t prove their premise. Show me what these guys did in high school that we should’ve backed off. Show me some Noel Devine/Willie Wilson behavior. Not a SINGLE fact to prove that the “Dark Years” caused us to recruit the scum of the earth.
4) JoePa’s interview: I’m sorry, but I don’t believe for a second that that’s all he said. But hey, why not just show the things that make it look like this type of behavior doesn’t bother him?
5) The overall bias: I thought a program like OTL was supposed to show all angles. Unfortunately, 90% of the show was used as a hit piece on PSU players/coaches. Ignore Special Olympics, ignore Lift for Life, provide about 3 seconds to detail academics, mock AS as a captain, etc. Ludicrous.
That’s my take. Oh, and if we’d all just ignore M1EK, this thread would be much better off and much more productive.
"We heard all that talk all week about the SEC and their speed, but we knew personally that they weren't nearly as tough as us."
-Tony Hunt
by Cpiritual27 on Jul 30, 2008 10:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You're a complete idiot
and you’re devaluing the Penn State brand. Please stop talking immediately.
by M1EK on Jul 30, 2008 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who died
and left you king. You might get a little more respect if your posts weren’t laden with insults. You are insufferable.
by psuphiman80 on Jul 30, 2008 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree
"Boy that student section now is up and really making a gigantic amount of noise. You see the sea of white, the white out. Well they are 2 minutes and 28 seconds away from the whiteout of the Buckeyes here tonight." - Ron Franklin
by rmcmillen50 on Jul 30, 2008 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Insults beget insults
I didn’t start it; but I’ll fire back.
by M1EK on Jul 30, 2008 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So I guess PSU...
...must be a school full of idiots, since apparently you’re the only intelligent one who has ever graduated from there, correct?
"We heard all that talk all week about the SEC and their speed, but we knew personally that they weren't nearly as tough as us."
-Tony Hunt
by Cpiritual27 on Jul 30, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure...
...a lot of elementary school kids would say the same thing when they’re wrong too.
Keep ignoring the facts buddy, and keep assuming everyone is wrong but you. Your problem, not mine.
Oh, and you’re a Pitt fan!!
"We heard all that talk all week about the SEC and their speed, but we knew personally that they weren't nearly as tough as us."
-Tony Hunt
by Cpiritual27 on Jul 30, 2008 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















