Nitt Picks Is Standing Up Anyway
Down In Front. The Kansas City Chiefs, in a move that can only be described at anti-American, have released a "Fan Code of Conduct" that prohibited the following:
• Standing and/or obstructing the view of other fans
They've actually had this policy at Michigan for years, all in an effort (successful, I might add) to keep the largest second largest stadium in the nation off of anyone's "toughest places to play" list (double zing!).
(Note: It looks like the Chiefs have altered the Code, the word "Continual" has been added to the above ridiculous rule.)
Stabilitness Is Next To Godliness. The Columbus Dispatch has tried to solve the mystery of why Ohio State continues to flat out own in the Big Ten recruiting race:
"You want to figure out if (a coach) is going to be there for the long run or if he's going to be there just to make the next move up," Coleman said. "And definitely coming here, you know coach (Jim) Tressel and the gang is going to be here for the long run."
Indeed, since Coleman committed, not only has Tressel signed an extension through the 2012 season but there has been just one departure from his nine-man staff of assistants -- cornerbacks coach Tim Beckman left in February 2007 to become defensive coordinator at Oklahoma State (Taver Johnson replaced him).
Stability is nice, of course, but could it maybe have something to do with the three BCS Championship games they've played in since 2002? Or the three consecutive years they have either won or tied for the conference crown? Or their perpetual top ten ranking in the polls? Stability is great, but it takes more than a contract extension to all the sudden land every recruit you go after.
Speaking Of Stability. In another one of those charts that screams "look how old Paterno is!", the Dispatch also ran the following, average tenure of each schools coaching staff:
| NO | SCHOOL | AVG TENURE | CHANGES |
| 1. | Penn State | 16.0 years | 1 |
| 2. | Iowa | 6.6 years | 1 |
| 3. | Ohio State | 5.5 years | 1 |
| 4. | Purdue | 4.4 years | 6 |
| 5. | Northwestern | 3.7 years | 6 |
| 6. | Indiana | 2.4 years | 4 |
| 7. | Illinois | 2.2 years | 5 |
| 8. | Wisconsin | 1.8 years | 8 |
| 9. | Michigan | 1.6 years | 9 |
| 10. | Michigan State | 1.1 years | 10 |
| 11. | Minnesota | 0.8 years | 10 |
This is similar to something I wrote at TBE a while back. The Big Ten has gone through a rather quiet yet significant changing of the guard. Only four guys were here before the 2005 season, and that number will drop to three after this season (when Tiller exits stage left). The Big Ten does appear to have lost some meat in the middle, the 5-9 teams aren't as solid as they have been historically, but you have to consider that it's going to take most of these new coaches several years until they can run in stride.
47? The Sporting News is doing one of those eternal team by team rankings, and Penn State's Pac-10 opponent Oregon State came it at 47. They appear to be going through a bit of a rebuilding year:
The Beavers do return four starters on the offensive line, plus receiver Darrell Catchings. And gifted flanker Sammie Stroughter received a medical hardship from the NCAA, allowing him to play this year. He could be worth an extra victory by himself.
But Oregon State also must find a replacement for departed tailback Yvenson Bernard.
And how good can Oregon State be having lost its entire front seven on defense, including a top-notch linebacking unit? The Beavers always have good defensive backs, and this season will be no exception with corners Keenan Lewis and Brandon Hughes. And sure to be missed -- greatly missed -- is kicker Alexis Serna, a four-year starter who developed into one of the best in the conference.
According to ESPN, they are only bringing back ten starters: seven on offense and three on defense. This is probably good news for our out-of-the-plastic HD offense and will give
0 recs |
27 comments
Comments
FIRST
/not on deadspin
//where is everybody?
by gbd106 on Jul 8, 2008 3:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
tree in the woods and all that
i’ve written worse stuff, so i don’t really have an answer for you.
thanks for breaking the ice though, its been a long day.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 8, 2008 3:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just hoping...
that is the definitive word on Oregon State…I haven’t gotten a straight up answer as to how good they will be.
And since we talk about recruiting so much, lets hope a winning season for us opens up some new avenues and the new coach(whoever he is and whenever he arrives) will be able to take advantage of them.
I was out in the trenches, which enables me to paint such a powerful picture, like Apocalypse Now.-Cormega
by OMEGAMAN on Jul 8, 2008 4:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i second that
they finished strong last year and were in at least one 2008 Spring Top-25 on ESPN…but based on what I’ve read lately that might have been misinformed (imagine that!).
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 8, 2008 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hoping...
that Oregon State is going through a rebuilding year and is a fringe top 50 team??? As much as I would like to get our HD offense some time to work out the kinks, that’s not a good thing for our foremost OOC game. I’m hoping they’re a great team…we shouldn’t hope for teams to be mediocre or rebuilding, we should hope to play and expect to beat the best.
by Screen Name 20 on Jul 9, 2008 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The preseason mags...
collectively list them as rebuilding, many starters lost to graduation.
We pumps my ‘nads is that the other day I saw them listed @ #25…and we weren’t ranked in that poll…which I believe was SI’s…
I prefer to hold my cards close, and really don’t prefer to be in the Top 10 in preseason…BUT DO want to be ranked…deservidly so…in a season full of “good feelings” and returning starters/talent. I never want to see us fall in the polls…”just climb baby! ! !”
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on Jul 9, 2008 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've seen that poll
i thought it was espn, but now that you mention it maybe it was si. who cares though.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 9, 2008 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
quick question
I’ve been with BSD for about a year and a half now, but i’ve never figured out…... where does the term “Nitt Picks” come from?
by rmcmillen50 on Jul 8, 2008 6:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thats a question for mike
i just work here.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 8, 2008 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nitt Picks
I used to call them “Quick Hits”. It was basically just a bunch of links to different articles that showed up that day. It was meant as a way to convey a massive amount of information on current events that can’t be tied into one cohesive post. But I hated the name “Quick Hits” so I asked for suggestions from the group and someone (I’m sorry I can’t remember who it was) suggested Nitt Picks. I thought it sounded perfect so I’ve used it ever since. Over time the list of quick links evolved into fewer links with more commentary added to them. If you read MGoBlog it’s very similar to Brian’s Unverified Voracity posts.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Jul 9, 2008 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's like "Squib Kicks" but suckier.
ba-dum-psh.
-- Run Up The Score http://runupthescore.wordpress.com
by Run Up The Score on Jul 9, 2008 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
when is the last time Penn State attempted an onside kick?
and what’s the Bielema Kickoff called? I don’t want to call it the Bilema Kickoff.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 9, 2008 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's called Bullshit.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 9, 2008 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s what i figured…
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Jul 9, 2008 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bush League
would also be appropriate.
the idiot formerly known as "joepadon"
by nittanyroar on Jul 9, 2008 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
or is is Busch?
the idiot formerly known as "joepadon"
by nittanyroar on Jul 9, 2008 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's called
, in pre-game, ‘let’s embarrass the rules-making committee by showing how effing silly this rule is, and in the meantime see if we can give JoePa a coronary.’ And, in post-game, ‘holy shite, one worked and the second nearly did!’
Convivite Nudem!
by jtothep on Jul 9, 2008 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
two things
1) I know there is a rule that allows you to call a penalty for something that should be a penalty but isn’t. It’s seldom (if ever) used but it exists for that exact reason.
2) I’ve heard that Penn State’s coaches asked about the offsides on the kickoff thing during pre-season rules meetings and were informed that if anyone did it, it would likely draw an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty, pursuant to the above rule.
Which explains why the coaches were so pissed, ie they thought a penalty should have been called. In fact one could have been called. I’ll venture a guess that if Wisconsin had pulled that shit in Ann Arbor instead of in Madison, a penalty would have been called. It’s no coincidence that nobody did it again after that.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 9, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It most likely
would have been called had they tried to do it anywhere other than Madison, not just Ann Arbor.
the idiot formerly known as "joepadon"
by nittanyroar on Jul 9, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoa
I’ve never heard of #1. I’m not calling bullshit, but rather calling for more info. I browsed through this: http://www.ncaapublications.com/Uploads/PDF/Football_Rulesadc982b5-03fb-4e27-828c-c2d26b95e6c1.pdf but didn’t quite know where to start to look for a rule that allows for a penalty to be called a penalty for something that should be a penalty, but isn’t. I can see why a Rules Committee might deem such a rule necessary, but can also see why it is seldom if ever used.
In any case, it’s beautiful coaching by Bielema, including choosing the location and timing of using it.
Convivite Nudem!
by jtothep on Jul 10, 2008 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's Rule 9-2 Article 3 [c]
In the rules that you linked to.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 10, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think more properly
in response to #1, the rules say the officials have the authority to create new rules on the fly when they feel a team is abusing them. In the instance of the offsides kickoffs, the officials had the authority to recognize what Wisconsin was doing and award Penn State the ball with a five yard penalty added on to the end of the run rather than let Wisconsin kick it over and over again to run out the clock.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Jul 10, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clarification
I can’t site the rule. I’m only going by what the announcers were saying at the time, which admittedly might be wrong.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Jul 10, 2008 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can
Rule 9 Section 9 Article 1
A player or non-player or peron not subject to the rules shall not hinder play by an unfair act which has no specific rules coverage
Rule 9 Section 9 Article 4
Neiter team shall commit any act, which in the opinion of the referee, tends to make a travesty of the game
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 10, 2008 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those might not seem to fit the bill exactly, but
Article three of the same rule specifically prohibits repeatedly committing fouls which half the distance to the goal line.
For the exact same reason, if the ball is inside the one you can repeatedly try to jump the snap count to get a stop, essentially without penalty. The rules actually allow the officials to award a score in that situation.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 10, 2008 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The penalty is "Unfair Act", not unsportsman like conduct though.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994
by jesse. on Jul 10, 2008 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















