Making The Case For: Pat Devlin
Quarterbacks: They're important. This is the second in a short series in which we will try to decipher which quarterback will give the team the best chance to win.
Ladies and Gentlemen, Allow Us to Introduce: Pat Devlin
Eligibility Remaining: Three years. No redshirt available.
Metrics: 6'4", 222 lbs, 4.7-4.8 40-yard dash.
"Services Say...": Devlin was the #4 QB in the nation according to Scout, good for a four-star rating. Rivals named him the #5 QB, and also a four-star. His numerous high school accolades include being the Pennsylvania AAAA player of the year, Gatorade Pennsylvania POY, first-team all-state, and attending both the Big 33 game and Elite 11 quarterback camp. Besides that, didn't accomplish much prior to enrolling at Penn State.

Ability To Run: It's a lazy mistake made by a number of otherwise good football writers, but Devlin and Daryll Clark are practically equals in the forty-yard dash. Despite his obvious status as The White Quarterback, Devlin is deceptively nimble. He may not be as productive as Daryll Clark as a runner from a YPC standpoint, but Devlin isn't even remotely reminiscent of Drew Bledsoe back there.
Ability to Pass: At the highest level of Pennsylvania high school football, Devlin threw for 3,300 yards and 35 touchdowns his senior year, and holds the career high school record for passing yards -- 8,162. But on the college level? Nobody can tell. He's thrown one pass in a live college game, an incompletion against Florida International. However, Devlin showed amazing touch and vision during the Blue/White game, especially on two particular throws. First, a beautifully placed ball to tight end Andrew Szczerba down the left seam between the linebackers and safeties -- a throw Anthony Morelli couldn't dream of making. Second, on a fly pattern to James McDonald which Penn State fans would still be buzzing about if McDonald had simply caught the ball. The football arrived just over McDonald's shoulder, eight yards deep in the end zone, and inexplicably clanked to the ground.
Intangibles: Jeff McLane, Philly Inquirer. Take it away.
"With Pat, it's all about the immeasurables," said Mike Matta, Devlin's high school coach. "And when he gets in the huddle and commands, you can't measure that. He becomes a different kid. It's not that he motivates by yelling, he motivates by setting an example."
The figure of college quarterback as big man on campus is not one that befits Devlin. Despite his 6-foot-4, 222-pound frame, Devlin says he goes largely unnoticed around State College, as "just the skinny, white dude flying under the radar."
"I just go to class," he added, not mentioning his 3.74 grade point average. "I come to practice, work out, go to my bedroom, do my homework and then go to bed."
What does that mean? Ehh, who knows. High school intangibles aren't college intangibles. Practice intangibles aren't "4th quarter against Ohio State" intangibles. We don't know much about Clark or Devlin until we see it on the field. During a real game.
In Conclusion: The reality is that while Devlin and Clark are sloppily labeled as the throwing and running quarterbacks, respectively, they're more similar than people think. The question, then, comes down to, "What does this offense need most to succeed?" We already know the Penn State offensive line is going to create problems for defensive coordinators, who quickly tire of their defensive fronts giving up 6+ yards per carry. When the defense brings that extra defender toward the line of scrimmage, which quarterback do you want behind center in order to exploit the thinned-out secondary? Who do you trust more to make the big play through the air? No offense to fans of Daryll Clark, but if I have to pick one guy, give me the quarterback who ran a pass-happy spread offense in high school and doesn't need to be coached up quite as much -- Pat Devlin.
0 recs |
38 comments
Comments
so did he help or hurt
his “white qb” image by taking Mills’ old number?
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on
Aug 12, 2008 8:44 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think maybe Dynamo, but Buzzsaw was last year's champion. I can't decide
Then don’t decide, hard decisions call for hard solutions and here are 2 hard asses ready to step in and take charge.
by PSU Nick on
Aug 12, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll be back
Only in a re-run.
by Run Up The Score on
Aug 12, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank you
You guys just prove that we need a two qb system. Now that said, it would be of no use if you ran Clark all the time and Devlin passed all the time. Run the plays according the situation and not by the qb. Both will be fine, and the subtle difference will be to our advantage. Sending in a different qb causes the whole defense to readjust. If it is a quick offense (should I dare to say a no huddle offense {my dream}) this would give us an advantage plus having two experienced qb in case of injuries.
by aluf on
Aug 12, 2008 9:57 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
unfortunately
It also makes the whole offense readjust too.
by queler on
Aug 12, 2008 10:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Urban Meyer on ESPN.......
can’t wait to spell Tim Tebow with Cam Newton and/or John Brantley the way he spelled Chris Leak with Tebow. This isn’t 1968 anymore guys. I think this whole notion that a 2 QB system is a trainwreck waiting to happen is based more in how somebody feels about it than in reality. JMHO.
Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.
by ech2os on
Aug 12, 2008 10:18 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Two things you rarely see in the nfl, but that can work in college:
two qb system and the option.
by spakajewia on
Aug 12, 2008 10:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your right, this could work
Clark is the better runner, he starts, plays so long as the running game is working.
Once the other team adjusts, brings guys into the box, bring in Devlin who is a better passer, but who is a good enough runner that you can’t sleep on it.
The pieces are there, you could make this work in a video game to be sure. Wait, isn’t that how they cam up with this in the first place?
We’ll see.
For the Glory; National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994,
by jesse. on
Aug 12, 2008 11:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Leaning Toward Devlin...
I want to see us have the same QB under center for 3 straight years. The more I read about D. Clark, the more I like him…but I don’t see the same potential in him that I see with Devlin. The guy flat out knows how to the throw the football. Imagine a guy at QB for 3 years that has the tools that Devlin has…by the time he is a senior, it will be amazing.
by Rocky Mountain Nittany Lion on
Aug 12, 2008 10:23 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This is a good point
It’s not just about 2008, it’s about 2009 as well. If Clark wins the job this year, I doubt they are going to compete for the job again next year.
by speedomike on
Aug 12, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Damn it.
I actually meant to make the “three years” point, and just forgot it.
Clark’s coming back for 2009, so the question is potentially “two for Clark or three for Devlin”. But I have a feeling that it’ll work itself out.
by Run Up The Score on
Aug 12, 2008 11:41 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
RUTS nailed it....
Right here….
We already know the Penn State offensive line is going to create problems for defensive coordinators, who quickly tire of their defensive fronts giving up 6+ yards per carry. When the defense brings that extra defender toward the line of scrimmage, which quarterback do you want behind center in order to exploit the thinned-out secondary?
FWIW, I’m pretty sure Clark ran a spread in high school as well. But, I agree with RUTS in that the running game should be strong and defenses will have to defend against it. I think either QB could do just fine at handing the ball off to Royster, Green, Carter, DWill, etc. But, who can be the guy that can make that 3rd and 7 pass to keep a drive moving? Devlin seems like that guy, but, just like people think Devlin can’t run, Clark can throw too. I think we’ve got a good problem on our hands.
by speedomike on
Aug 12, 2008 10:26 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Angry
I think I am still miffed that we didn’t see Devlin or Clark more last year. That still boggles my mind that Morrelli could perform poorly on a consistent basis and yet we barely saw another option. There was no downside to doing it…the Devlin/Clark would have received real game experience, etc.
by Rocky Mountain Nittany Lion on
Aug 12, 2008 10:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
JoePa
JoePa has recently said that we didn’t see more of Clark because he was worried about Morelli’s confidence
by mgr135 on
Aug 12, 2008 10:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The more I hear that quote from Joepa....
the more it seems like he is saying it to get some positive JayPA news out there. i.e., My kid isn’t the dungbeetle you guys think he is.
www.pinkertonpark.com
by rahpsu92 on
Aug 12, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
my vote
is for Devlin
"Boy that student section now is up and really making a gigantic amount of noise. You see the sea of white, the white out. Well they are 2 minutes and 28 seconds away from the whiteout of the Buckeyes here tonight." - Ron Franklin
by rmcmillen50 on
Aug 12, 2008 10:51 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I'm that guy.
I don’t have a vote. I’m not going to pick sides b/c I haven’t seen enough of either of them to make a decision. Just play the guy who gives PSU the best chance to win (* cough * unlike last year * cough *)...there, easy enough.
by Screen Name 20 on
Aug 12, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I am proud
...of you boyyyee!
Old School... MEETS New School!
by BlueWhiteLife on
Aug 12, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A 2 quarterback system...
scares me. The QB position is fragile. Its not like a RB where you can put in different style runners to suit the situation. The QB needs to be the leader of the offense and set the tone. Exchanging QBs in mid-drive can disrupt that flow. Theres a lot of chemistry in an offense that you can’t measure by stats and exchanging different QB styles during a game also means exchanging different leadership styles. This can have an undesired effect. Some teams might be able to handle this, but i’m not sure penn state (who’s offense can be spotty at times) can handle it. I think we need to go with one QB (Clarke being the most likely candidate in my opinion) and if he self destructs mid-season than luckily we have another thats more than qualified.
by MeetMeAtTheCorner on
Aug 12, 2008 11:30 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Disrupt the flow any worse than say
being really successful calling runs and tearing off chunks of yardage only to inexplicably throw 3 straight incomplete passes and give a game away late in the fourth?
by PSU Nick on
Aug 12, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Merit
I’m worried less about leadership than the fact that the two quarterbacks only appear to have cosmetic differences. I don’t see much validity to a two quarterback system if we take out our 6’2” 230lb 4.7 QB who is a good passer and can also run and replace him with a 6’4” 225 lb. 4.7 QB who is a good passer and can also run. There’s no change of pace there besides that of fresh legs. Since passing ability is difficult to coach up (at least at our school), I’d rather see who can make in-game decisions better during the non-conference schedule and name him the full-time starter for Big Ten season.
by gumbercules on
Aug 12, 2008 12:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A 2 QB system might work better if Devlin was the starter
Despite the liklihood that Devlin is mobile in the pocket, it’s almost certain he’s not the running threat Clark is. Similarly, Clark may be a fine passer; we know he’s a bruising runner. I see the advantage of putting in Clark to spell Devlin, you’ve added a running threat the defense has to account for. But what advantage does Devlin bring as the second QB? Is he that much better of a passer? If so, he should be the starter.
That being said, I suspect Clark will start and “surprise” people with his passing ability.
by pjk on
Aug 12, 2008 1:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Speculation
it’s almost certain he’s not the running threat Clark is
It’s almost certain that with a minimal level of access, we have no idea how practice is shaping up or who is excellent at what. This will be a much more interesting conversation after the Oregon State game. I suggest one of the bloggers (if they have time) revisit these “Making the Case For” posts when we have some more game data to work with—possibly in the form of a two game UFR? I think I’ve seen RUTS post them before.
by gumbercules on
Aug 12, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not sure i follow...
Are you saying that you don’t think Clarke has the ability to throw the ball? (if so you’re opeing a whole new can of worms. See http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/509904.html?nav=5017 )
by MeetMeAtTheCorner on
Aug 12, 2008 12:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
DARYLL CLARK HAS NO ARMS!
No, just saying that I don’t think he throws as well as Devlin, and that the best passer will help this team more.
by Run Up The Score on
Aug 12, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Who is the Closer?
I think either guy can lead the team in the first 3 quarters but which one will emerge as the closer. The guy the team will rally around to preserve a victory or to come from behind late in the 4th quarter. There’s been a lot of articles written about each s leadership abilities but neither one has had an opportunity to show it with the game on the line. Joe should choose the starter based on which one the team responds to best both on and off the field.
by ageing lion on
Aug 12, 2008 12:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
as i read this thread
all i can think about is how big a shame it really is that they were both given zero playing time last year.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on
Aug 12, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Morelli was excellent
at not getting injured
by PSU Nick on
Aug 12, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let them
both play and see what happens on the field in real games. Personally I prefer Devlin for the added passing ability and extra year of playing time.
by SweepTheLeg on
Aug 12, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that's what will happen
I think they’ll both play a significant amount of time in the first 4 games, then we’ll see one guy get the bulk of the snaps come conference play. That’s just speculation though.
by speedomike on
Aug 12, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree...
and i hope this is exactly what happens… the first four games are (arguably) favorable match ups for Penn State… both QB’s should be able to come through with wins in these game. Use them as a try out, basically for the next 2 to 3 years. Watching QB’s play against our own players in limited contact scrimmages is one thing, watching and evaluating them while playing against actual opponents who are trying to remove their head from their body is another, and should give us a better picture of who our future qb needs to be.
by erieisforlovers on
Aug 12, 2008 10:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Speculation's all we have right now
and it’s gonna have to keep this blog-ship afloat for 18 more days until the games begin.
by NJ lion on
Aug 12, 2008 2:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Sheeeeeewt
We made it this far through the offseason. 18 days is nothin’
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on
Aug 12, 2008 3:02 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which guy gives us the most chance
to overcome Jay’s horrible play calling?
I poopoo the 2QB system, because our dual coordinators have no clue what to do with them. The running guy ALWAYS runs. Last year the few snaps that Clark and Devlin were given how many passing attempts did they have? They should both be great at taking a knee.
www.pinkertonpark.com
by rahpsu92 on
Aug 12, 2008 3:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs















