Grading the Offense - Oregon State
In the wake of the 66 point barrage against Coastal Carolina there was talk about this team being the best offensive Penn State team since 1994. More talk on that later. Let's review their performance against Oregon State.
Quarterbacks
Daryll Clark has drawn a lot of comparisons to Michael Robinson ever since he rushed for 60 yards against Texas A&M in the Alamo Bowl. I must admit, if he had been wearing a #12 jersey on Saturday you could have convinced me the earth had passed through a rift in the space-time continuum and taken us back to 2005. Of course, if that had happened would we be aware we had gone back in time? Or we just think it was 2005? How sure are we this is 2008? Maybe it's 2010 and Pat Devlin is the starting quarterback and we don't know it.
But I'm pretty sure that was Daryll Clark out there on Saturday, and I'm pretty sure he pretty much kicked ass. He looked poised and confident sitting in the pocket. But he looked equally poised in the few times he had to escape pressure. Some times he rolled to the outside and passed downfield. Some times he tucked it under and ran. He certainly didn't look like a guy in his second career start. His stat line was very Michael Robinsonesque.
But here are the most important stats to me: The offense, when led by Clark, converted eight of their nine third down attempts and scored touchdowns on five of the first six drives in the game. If I have one knock on Clark it was that some of his passes were a bit high and floated a bit too much for my liking. He'll have to get that in line before the conference slate begins.
With Clark playing so well it was hard to justify pulling him out in favor of Pat Devlin, but Pat did manage to get into the game late in the third quarter with the rest of the second team offense. By then the game was well in hand and Joe wasn't going to let him open up the offense too much. Two of his three passes came on 3rd and long when the defense was pretty much expecting it.
Final Grade: A-
Running Backs
It's time to start talking about Evan Royster in the upper echelon of Big Ten running backs. He reminds me a lot of Terrell Davis back when he rushed for 2000 yards for the Denver Broncos. He's tough between the tackles and can lower his shoulder for an extra yard. He's got the speed to break to the sideline and turn the corner around a defender. And when he gets in the open he almost shifts into an overdrive gear where his running style looks completely relaxed but he's still running away from the defense. He is a total package running back unlike any we've seen since Larry Johnson. It's just too bad we have so many weapons on offense he'll never see 25-30 carries a game.
Stephfon Green got in for 11 carries, most of them in garbage time, but he just couldn't seem to get anything going. As I watched the coaches keep bashing this small speed back up the middle I kept wondering if they were trying not to run up the score or if they were trying to send the kid a message on what he needs to work on to humble him a bit.
But any time your lead back averages 8 yards per carry and scores three touchdowns you're going to grade out well. But only the fumble at the one yard line keeps him from getting a perfect score.
Final Grade: A-
Receivers
We've seen this so many times over the past three years with the trio of Butler, Williams, and Norwood. One guy catches everything in sight and the other two leave you wondering if they even played as you're walking out of the stadium. This week it was Norwood's turn to carry the load in catching eight passes for a career high 116 yards and a touchdown.
Williams did catch a pretty pass for 20 yards that would have been an easy touchdown had he not lost his balance tip-toeing down the sideline. And Butler had a nice 24 yard catch to put Penn State in nice scoring position at the eight yard line. Too bad Royster fumbled the ball away on the next play.
If there was a second star in the receiving corp it has to be tight end Mickey Shuler who took full advantage of the added reps with Quarless once again firmly entrenched in Joe's doghouse. One of his three catches went for a touchdown, and the other two earned first downs.
Final Grade: B
Offensive Line
Totally utterly dominating. I can't think of any other way to describe this offensive line. 239 yards rushing and for the second week in a row there were no sacks allowed. Clark only had a minimal amount of pressure to deal with all day long. And I can't think of any boneheaded penalties yet in the first two games.
Final Grade: A
Offensive Coaching
The preparation was spectacular. The execution was nearly perfect. The playcalling was excellent. I wish they had worked Devlin in there somewhere in the first half while the game was still in question, but with Clark playing so well it's hard to bench him so I'm willing to look the other way on this one. The people who were still saying Pat Devlin should be the starter after the Coastal Carolina game should have nothing to complain about this week.
Final Grade: A
Final Thoughts
So is this offense better than 1994? I'm not ready to make that leap just yet. The 1994 offense is arguably the greatest offense ever in the history of college football. That team scored at will. Every play was a potential touchdown and it didn't matter where they snapped the ball on the field. Typical drives would cover 80 yards in four plays just elapsing two mintues off the clock. Not only did they rarely face a 3rd and long situation, they rarely faced third downs. That was a big play offense, and they did it against USC, Michigan, Ohio State, Illinois (when they were actually good) and Wisconsin. It didn't matter who the opponent was.
This offense, while good, is different. This is a methodical offense that can cover ground in ten and fifteen yard chunks, but thus far it's not a big play offense. And to this point through two opponents the level of the competition is still questionable. When we roll up 63 points on Ohio State I'll be convinced they're better than the 1994 squad. But we're still very good and I think we're in for a heckuva season.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Comparison to the 1994 team
I was a junior in 1994 and it was an exhilarating time to be in Beaver Stadium! I was saying all day Saturday (to anyone that would listen) that this is our best offense since 1994. I know that Michael Robinson was incredible and that 2005 was a great year, but we had some nail biting games and didn’t really come into our own until Northwestern (in my opinion and memory – feel free to argue). I agree that this team may not be as good as the 1994 team, but I think that it’s more dynamic with Clark’s ability to run. Given the problems that Ohio State had on Saturday against Ohio (although I didn’t see the game, just the scoring updates), I am very optimistic about our chances to rule the Big Ten!! Hopefully we’ll see another 63-14 win against Ohio State, but not if we keep losing defensive players to injury and stupidity.
I don’t think that Pat Devlin really got a chance to show his skills. Once he got in the game, it was the conservative run, run, try to pass, punt situation that spelled our death against Michigan last year. The game was well in hand, why not let him play to his potential? I think he showed in the Coastal Carolina game that he can throw the ball. I have no disagreement with Clark at quarterback, he’s great, but I think that Devlin needs more experience and to be given a freer rein when we’re that far ahead. He needs to be prepared if something happens to Clark (God forbid).
Sorry if my post was too long. I think this is the first time I have logged on and seen “0 comments,” although there are probably several by now.
For the glory
by Paige2PSU on Sep 7, 2008 10:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rolls
I’ll simmer on the terrell davis comparison some more, but I’m home now and watching him on tivo, and I keep thinking of his lacrosse background. He just looks elegant as he runs, looking every bit the rolls royce. The vision is noticeable. You can picture him with a stick in his hand trying to find the hole to shoot it in for a goal. Instead, he’s carrying a football and still there’s no wasted motion. And, as we’ve noted all through the preseason, this o-line makes both him and clark look more smoothe.
Convivite Nudem!
by jtothep on Sep 7, 2008 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The one thing I love most about Royster
is he is a straight line runner. Once he gets the ball, he goes upfield, no dancing; once he breaks through the line, that’s when he makes his cuts. The other thing is, yesterday was the first time I remember him losing yards on a carry. When it happened I had to double take to make sure that was actually Royster.
by WPIALkid22 on Sep 7, 2008 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stacey Dales
does look good, even on grainy tivo. I like the wet look.
Convivite Nudem!
by jtothep on Sep 7, 2008 10:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Stacey
I went a little harder on the tailgate yesterday, so we had crappy seats, but I definately spotted her and thought it was Andrews. Then I realized she would probably be at the Florida game, so I was wondering who that was. Definately got to thank whoever hires these chicks on ESPN, they deserve a raise
by WPIALkid22 on Sep 7, 2008 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The '94 offense
would have scored 60+ points yesterday against this weak of a defense. The blitzkreig would’ve had them up 42-0 at halftime. Remember that the ‘94 offense was one for the ages, we’ll be lucky to see something like that again. But the ‘08 offense will be great to watch, they’ll move the ball and score points with a powerful running game and Clark is more than good enough to keep defenses honest by both passing and running.
by Joe 96alum on Sep 7, 2008 10:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Agree...
I think that this offense is the best since 1994, but not sure that it’s as good. It’s certainly not the big playmaker team that the ‘94 team was, but I’m still excited, nonetheless.
For the glory
by Paige2PSU on Sep 7, 2008 10:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Pulling of the Offensive Line! Yes!
I was giddy when I saw the PSU OL on running plays yesterday, they were so good that I could hardly believe it.
They were absolutely dominant when they had Royster running to the weak side. There was absolutely no pressure on him from the defensive front 7. I know Oregon State’s lines are pretty bad, but I’ve seen many PSU offensive squads in the past completely unable to take advantage of other teams weaknesses. This was the most exciting development of the day.
by Cairo on Sep 7, 2008 11:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Offensive Line was PULLING!?
Must have been during a timeout whilest looking Stacey Dale’s way:)
T J Walker
by teejaywalker on Sep 8, 2008 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a little upset that Devlin didn't get more meaningful snaps
Clark, while good, was all over the place on his throws and the receivers deserve most of the credit for the receptions, Shuler (or Shular if you are to believe the video board, WTF can’t they spell the names of the Penn State players correctly? and Murry State? We’re a freaking university, someone needs to check these things.) had one especially outstanding save a Clark pass.
by PSU Nick on Sep 7, 2008 11:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on Devlin's snaps
and Clark had some throws that were waaaaaaaaaaay overthrown. It’s not as if he had much pressure on most of those throws either.
Still, he was so poised in the pocket that I’d take an overthrown ball every so often over our happy feet qb of last year.
by Cairo on Sep 8, 2008 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is what we’re going to get with Clark; Athleticism, run/pass option, ability to move the chains on third down if the pocket breaks down.
What you’re not going to get is Peyton Manning-esque throws. Some of the balls he threw on Saturday just weren’t pretty. Others, like the 20-yd pass to Williams, were saved by the WR.
But, I don’t think this offense needs him to be like Peyton Manning. So long as he doesn’t force too many throws into coverage, I think we’ll be ok.
by Tailgate Shogun on Sep 8, 2008 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All of that is true
Along with the obvious point that any potential QB controversy at Penn State dissolved in the first half on Saturday. Clark will have to massively suck to get pulled at this point.
by Run Up The Score on Sep 8, 2008 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it might have just been me
I haven’t gotten a chance to look at the dvr, but I remember a lot of Clark’s errors, a long pass to his left, and a swing pass to his right, were the result of him and the receiver not being on the same page, not necessarily poor aim. Maybe it’s his fault, but I’m a lot more comfortable with those types of errors in the second game of the season than truly errant passes.
Don’t get me wrong, he missed some throws, but the TD in the back of the end zone and finding a wide open Williams was encouraging.
Kevin @ Black Shoe Diaries
by Kevin HD on Sep 8, 2008 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And that throw to Shuler was amazing.
Honestly, for all the squirrely looking passes he threw, he also threw some absolute beauties.
by Run Up The Score on Sep 8, 2008 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The TD to Shuler was good
because the ball was put where only Shuler could catch it, that was very well done.
by Joe 96alum on Sep 8, 2008 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't get it
Was I the only one who thought that TD throw to Shuler was lucky? Had the defender bothered to turn around I thought he could have easily broke it up or even picked it off. Maybe it was me.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Sep 8, 2008 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will admit...
DC is a monster out there and deserves all the snaps right now. I have been a big Devlin fan, but you cannot argue the results with Clark at the helm.
I would have liked to see Devlin get a series in the first half to play while the game was still somewhat close.
Overall, most impressive game since Wiscy last year. Great to see the team respond with this game.
This team has great on the field leadership with Shipley, D-Will, Gaines, etc.
Pat Devlin in '08, er, '09
by Nick7 on Sep 8, 2008 7:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I love DC...
…but I think we all have to temper our enthusiasm a little bit because Oregon St. just simply isn’t very good. Also, we have yet to go on the road to show off a lesson in conservative 101. I think Clark can take us all the way, but I feel like a lot of these ‘94 comparisons are coming after playing two weak teams. I’m just trying to be cautiously optimistic I guess because I believe in Clark so much, and I don’t want to be let down.
Oh OhOhOh Oh Oh!
by doctadas on Sep 8, 2008 8:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Last year to this year...
On our second drive, on the designed run by Clark, when he got into traffic in the secondary, he tucked the ball in both hands to be sure not to fumble it at the end of a good run. Last year, …. well, I don’t think I need to say the rest.
by Elihu on Sep 8, 2008 9:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is such a relief to watch Clark command the offense.
My question is now that things are going well do we credit Jay? I was happy to bash him the last 2 years so I will give him the credit for getting Clark so ready to play. He is more poised than his game experience would warrant so someone did something right.
I don't know, Mello Yello is pretty awful. What's the worst that could happen?
by psu on Sep 8, 2008 9:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Opti-Pessimistic
if he had been wearing a #12 jersey on Saturday you could have convinced me the earth had passed through a rift in the space-time continuum and taken us back to 2005.
Only if you are comparing it to 2005 at the end of the season. The 05 offense at this point in the season was turning the ball over all over the place. I think we led 1-A in turnovers through the first 3 games, and those were some real cupcake teams that year. However, put Mike Robinson in this team with seniors everywhere and no one would doubt that we were going to win the Big 10.
The only problem is that the defense gets more suspect every week. They started out pretty well this week but then got really tired at the end. A better team would have decimated them. I still can’t believe that OS’s score came on a running play!!!
The offense is definitely the best since 94, but then again, only 03 and 05 are really worthy of consideration in that stretch, and 03 was a one-trick pony. It’s not good enough to score more points against Ohio State than we are going to give up, though.
by JeremyInDC on Sep 8, 2008 10:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1994...
This offense is not better than 1994, although that is not necessarily a bad thing. In 94 the teams biggest weakness was that the defense was on the field too much. A huge key to this season is going to be controlling the ball to keep the defense fresh in the fourth quarter.
I am already really worried about Wisconsin and Michigan State beating on our defense later in the game.
"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008
by jesse. on Sep 8, 2008 10:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The team leaders need to speak up now..
and point out to the fighters and tokers in the room that this team needs every player if they are going to do what is within their grasp.
If the players are bored because there just isn’t enough going on in UP or SC to keep them out of trouble, then the captains should go as far as scheduling bingo night or something to keep this crew reigned in.
check out pinkertonpark.com you owe yerself a laugh.
by rahpsu92 on Sep 8, 2008 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In a positive light
It’s refreshing to see an incident at an apartment and NOT see Anthony Scirrotto’s name anywhere.
by Cairo on Sep 8, 2008 12:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pre-Season
The first four games this year are nothing more then pre-season games and we should not start making comparisons to previous great teams just yet. With that said, it is very encouraging to see how well the team is executing. So far I think Clark is a better passer then Robinson was. I would give Robinson the edge in running ability.
by ageing lion on Sep 8, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















