Wrap-Up: Maybe We Can Dismiss This As Parity

Iowa 30, Michigan 28
A first drive Stanziball, good for six Michigan points, set the tone early in this one, but Iowa made up for it by harassing Tate and ended his Disneyland start to the season.
Forcier finished 8/19 for just 94 yards, zero TDs and one pick. Denard Robinson entered in relief and led Michigan on a late scoring drive. The eventual pick by the more mobile of the two freshman quarterbacks sent the Mgofans into civil war over RichRod's decision.
But, like, look at Forcier's numbers? They're frickin' awful, and although Robinson is more of a runner and perhaps not fit for a hurried drive, he was averaging a half yard more per rush than Tate was putting up per pass.
And the turnovers: Michigan had five of them, but as BHGP points out:
Team A: 367 yards, 2/3 RZ opportunities for 10 points, 6 points scored off 5 TOs
Team B: 319 yards, 3/3 RZ opportunities for 21 points, 7 points scored off 1 TOs
Ohio State 31, Wisconsin 13
Ohio State is getting a lot of credit for beating Wisconsin so badly without actually have to do much, but I'm surprised there isn't more of a "dodge a bullet" reaction to this one.
Wisconsin dominated the game statistically, summarized nicely by DocSat:
I think if you'd told the Badgers coming in that they would run twice as many plays as Ohio State; gain twice as many yards; force almost as many three-and-outs (six) as they allowed first downs (eight); and hold Terrelle Pryor below 150 yards total offense and pick him off once while limiting the Buckeyes to one offensive touchdown, I think the Badgers would have taken that game.
The short and sweet of it was this: two pick-sixes and a kickoff return were enough to cancel out any advantage Wisconsin might of had in actual offense.
And what is giving me shivers is the realization that this years OSU-PSU game could quite possibly eclipse last year's version in defensive dominance and offensive conservatism.
Ohio State's defense is clearly elite, but there's nothing to suggest that Penn State (when healthy) can't play in stride. That means the game will likely hinge on offensive miscues exploited by the defense. So the bet becomes: who would you take to make the first major mistake, Pryor on the road or Clark at home? If Paterno has more faith in Pryor having success, he needs to takes chances to win. If Paterno backs his senior quarterback, we're talking 1920s football at its finest.
Michigan State 24, Illinois 14
The wheels have come off, the roof is on fire and the floorboard is wearing thin on the proverbial FAILmobile that is 2009 Illinois Football. This was supposed to be the year things came together -- strong recruiting, an all-star QB and the return of one of the league's best receivers -- only to have the offense lack momentum in every way.
Zook's decision to pull Juice lasted for about a half when he realized that change is not always good. McGee was 2/11 with a 2.8 ypa average. Williams came in and upgraded that average in garbage time: 7/17, 109 yards and a touchdown.
The score was 27-zip with a little over 3 minutes to play. Michigan State wins big but at a cost: starting RB Glenn Winston is out the rest of the season with a knee injury.
Minnesota 35, Purdue 20

Virginia 47, Indiana 7
WTF, Indiana? Virginia came into Bloomington with three losses to non-BCS teams, one of which wasn't even a D1-A squad, and all they did against the Hoosiers was gain 536 yards, pick up 29 first downs, and get running back Mikell Simpson four touchdowns, which is more than he scored all of last season.
Indiana QB Ben Chappell is insisting "that wasn’t our football team," which is probably what I would say too.
Northwestern 16, Miami (OH) 6
You can't ever beat a MAC school by 10 and be happy, but LTP is already deviling into the archives:
The 1983 White Sox called. They want their slogan back. Northwestern's 16-6 win over Miami (OH) today was a thing of ugly.
[...]
Yes, it was Miami (OH), but it appears our D is getting the locomotive moving in the right direction. We hit hard. We made plays. We should have had a shutout. But man, was that offensive exhibition God awful. LTP will go in to full breakdown tomorrow, but you don't need to be a rocket scientist to know the offensive playcalling, and thus Mick McCall, gets an "F" grade today.
Even with an OOC schedule that would make Tim Curley blush, they sit at 58th in total offense and 49th in total defense.
0 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
If that wasn't IU's football team, then whose football team was it?
John L. Smith’s?
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 13, 2009 10:05 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Nah
John L. would have had us up 21-0 and give up four 4th-quarter TDs to lose.
by SpartanDan on Oct 13, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
No I can totally believe that Indiana was there
It’s UVa that I think was up to the shenanigans.
Where’s the Beer and the Bar-b-Que?
by jesse. on Oct 13, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good. Don't we play them in a few years?
Get that team up and running so they’re decent for us. Please not another Syracuse.
by PSUJunny05 on Oct 13, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This comment is also true for Indiana.
by Cairo on Oct 13, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Indiana isn't an OOC game.
We can’t control who our Big Ten opponents are, for the most part. So we have to hope our OOC opponents are good enough that Mark May doesn’t have a wet duke when talking about us.
by PSUJunny05 on Oct 13, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say we convince UVA to play their home game in D.C.
Just to piss off the Holier Than Thou Michigan fans.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 13, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of which
Why don’t we try this for basketball. Offer to give up one of our home games to play Nova in Philly or Maryland in DC?
How could Nixon know so little about Watergate and so much about football ?
by psupride on Oct 13, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lose-lose for those teams
Until we prove we are good, that game can be seen as a RPI killer, and if we beat them then it is a bad home loss. They can use that game for a better Big 6 team.
by STU Boy on Oct 13, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a Nova alum, I would like to see that matchup...
but I don’t know what Nova gets out of it? A win against MSU or another top tier Big Ten team looks sexier and a loss to MSU won’t d*mn you when it comes to getting in the tourney. Beat PSU and its so what, you are supposed to, lose and it could become a “bad loss” come tourney selection time. With that being said, PSU’s basketball program has made great strides and last year’s teams would have been an interesting matchup.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Oct 14, 2009 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is my issue
With the Rutgers and UVA home and homes. They are going to be the “marquee” matchup.
by speedomike on Oct 13, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minnesota-Purdue
Apparently left RUTS speechless.
by speedomike on Oct 13, 2009 11:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha you can't tell the difference between Kevin and RUTS hahaaha
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 13, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tressel vs. Paterno
Over/under on the number of completed forward passes by both offenses combined: 15.
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Oct 13, 2009 11:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the best things to come out of Illinois this year
Was this great line from Joe at Hail to the Orange:
The weakness was masked due to Tressel’s on going war against modern football
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Oct 13, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I found that comment funny
but at the same time, Tressel plays the cards he is dealt. Plus, it is hard to ever tell what the play design for Ohio State was, since Pryor “playgrounds (yes that was a verb)” out 90% of the passing plays.
It really does not apply as much to college football, but Jaworski once said of Michael Vick, “you do not win championships playing recess football”. Ohio State’s passing game often appears to be “recess football”.
by cpm126 on Oct 13, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Tressel plays the cards he is dealt"
considering OSU is supposedly able to get most any recruit they want, and he’s in charge of the team and effectively deals himselves whatever hand he wants, that isn’t really the best analogy to make.
by The JuggerNitt on Oct 13, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they had a decent pure passer on the roster
he would be seeing at least a few plays a game.
by cpm126 on Oct 13, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assume for a second they wanted to bench Pryor?
Who is their backup?
Where’s the Beer and the Bar-b-Que?
by jesse. on Oct 13, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Joe Germaine?
Craig Krenzel? Wait, wait, don’t tell me.
Art Schlichter.
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Oct 13, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Joe Bausserman
I heard he was pretty good. How good, I have no idea.

I’m from Virginia.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 13, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hi, I'm a 24 year old redshirt sophomore!
by dawsonPSU10 on Oct 13, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Had some time in
the minors. He never got to the show, so he always carried his own bags. But yeah, minor league baseball is why is such an old-timer.
by Onestatewest on Oct 14, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know, I'm just poking a little fun
by dawsonPSU10 on Oct 14, 2009 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
whoa... is that the guy from 'Coach'?
I thought he was doing the Patrick Starfish thing but I must have been mistaken
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member
by TheMightyErik on Oct 14, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Clark won't have time to throw and Pryor just sucks?
by Run Up The Score on Oct 13, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm saying it right now:
Clark will complete 14, Pryor will complete 9.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 13, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
But if will either of them throw for a 150 yards? It doesn’t matter, no turnovers, no special teams screw ups, we win. Otherwise, think Iowa.
Where’s the Beer and the Bar-b-Que?
by jesse. on Oct 13, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ut-oh
no special teams screw ups
I don’t feel good about that
"I'm driven by greatness" - Derrick Williams
by HookMania on Oct 13, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah... I think even
that directional Illinois squad came after Boone and actually got closer than je should have
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member
by TheMightyErik on Oct 14, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















