Apparently Lee and Bowman aren't very good players...

Neither is in the top 50... I find that difficult to believe.

over 2 years ago psume06 5 comments 0 recs |

Comments

Injuries/time missed?

Could be a factor… both have missed games this year with injury, so their numbers when compared to others could be down… Plus Bowman has some off-field history that may be hurting him as well. Still, I was surprised at some of the names that are ahead of them. I think Odrick in low 30s is a little low too. I could see him being a late 1st rounder, mid-to-high 20s.

by Domin8ing the Big Ten(11) on Oct 23, 2009 9:49 PM EDT reply actions

What would you expect?

They really haven’t had great seasons. Both have missed significant time. I would guess they will need to prove themselves in the next 5-6 games and at the work outs. Also, Bowman’s personality issues probably has some people worried. I just think it is playing time this year that has them rated low.

Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.
Vince Lombardi

by PaJoe on Oct 23, 2009 9:52 PM EDT reply actions

Um... Jermain Gresham... Sam Bradford...

Look, we all knew OU sucked balls. Like, seriously, they sucked them last year, A LOT, and they’re much better at ball-sucking this year, but if neither of them is being hampered by “injuries” (read, for JG at least: I just don’t want to play on a superbly shitty team), then Lee and Bowman shouldn’t be docked points either.

by psume06 on Oct 23, 2009 11:51 PM EDT reply actions

Yeah this debunks the injury theory

and it’s not like they didn’t both have great years before this season. It’s not a “power ranking”, it’s a draft board, so injuries shouldn’t really matter in that case.

BSD

by KevinHD on Oct 24, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions