Penn State Basketball Preview - Part II
Earlier this week we talked about what Penn State has to replace this year. We'll get into the new faces Ed DeChellis will ask to fill those minutes. But first, let's talk about what Penn State has coming back this year.
22 - Andrew Jones III (6-10, 245)
The evolution of Andrew Jones was a fun thing to watch last year. He started out with a rather insignificant stat line for a starter only managing five or six points and three or four rebounds per game. But by the time the NIT came around he was a dominating force on the hardwood. During the tournament he averaged 10 points and 8.2 rebounds per game. Here is what I had to say after the Indiana game.
Andrew Jones has become a really solid player. He had a couple of boneheaded turnovers, but for the most part when he gets the ball in the low post good things happen. He finished the night 4-for-4 from the field, and get this: over his last eight games Jones has shot 21-of-27 (77%) from the field. He has shown a nice mid-range jumper to go along with the baby hook he's developing. And when an outside shooter pops open he's good at getting them the ball. I'm starting to think he may turn into a significant scoring threat next season when he gets some of Cornley's touches.
Penn State will look to Jones and his 6'10" 245 lb frame to provide a big presence in the paint this year.
15 - David "D.J." Jackson (6-7, 210)
He was expected to be a major contributor last season, but David Jackson suffered through one of the most horrendous sophomore slumps this blogger has ever seen. Here is just one example of a review of one of his performances.
I hate to keep harping on the kid, but David Jackson is a complete liability. He only saw six minutes of play last night to close out the first half. He was completely ineffective against covering his man through the screen and Michigan State went on a 15-2 run during that stretch to close out the half. He had one scoring chance where he was standing all alone under the basket, and he traveled. Like I said, I really hate to talk down on college kids, but he shouldn't see the floor until garbage time for the rest of the season. And he better hit the gym and training table hard this summer. He looks scrawny against his competition and needs to put on 25 or 30 pounds.
That was after the Michigan game. I'm usually not one to rag on kids like that, but there was no other way to describe Jackson's performance. Every time he got the ball it ended in disaster. Passes were going right through his hands. He would get the ball all alone under the basket and travel. He looked completely lost on defense. He was nothing short of a liability to the team, and Ed eventually had no choice but to remove him from the starting lineup.
But, this story has a happy ending. Something clicked and Jackson managed to score in double figures in four of his last seven games of the season. I'm hoping he put on a few pounds in the weight room this summer and he can ride that momentum from the end of the season into this fall.
25 - Jeff Brooks (6-8, 200)
Jeff Brooks has been an enigma his first two years at Penn State. He came from Kentucky full of athleticism and promise, but he has yet to live up to the hype. As a freshman he looked completely lost on the floor. As a sophomore, he didn't look lost, but he didn't play with confidence or control. He would often pull down an impressive rebound on the defensive end only to dribble down the court and bounce it off his foot out of bounds. If he can put it all together and average seven or eight points and six or seven rebounds it will be a tremendous improvement.
10 - Chris Babb (6-5, 215)
Babb was one of two true freshmen to see the court in 2008-2009. He's a tenacious defender with a pretty jump shot. Ed played him sparingly in the early part of the season and it was readily apparent he was only a freshman. His minutes diminished significantly during the thick of the Big Ten season, but toward the end an ankle injury to Stanley Pringle and the fatigue of the Big Ten season wearing on Talor Battle forced Ed to put him on the court. By the end of the year he was providing solid minutes and scored double digits against George Mason and Rhode Island in the NIT. This year Babb will most likely be starting in the backcourt along with Talor Battle.
24 - Cammeron Woodyard (6-5, 210)
One thing Cammeron Woodyard did not lack when he stepped foot on the floor as a true freshman was confidence. He proved early on he was not timid about putting up a shot from anywhere on the court. Unfortunately, this can often come across as being a player who "doesn't play in the system". As the season wore on, Woodyard's minutes dwindled and dwindled to the point he didn't even see the court during the NIT.
This year I think Ed will experiment with Woodyard by plugging his big body in the two, three, and maybe even the four position. The hope will be to create a mismatch somewhere with his size against smaller guards and swingmen. The hope will be for him to be a solid player off the bench averaging maybe eight minutes, four points, and two or three rebounds per game.
54 - Andrew Ott (6-10, 240)
When Ott joined the floor after sitting out the first month of the season due to transfer rules, the hope was that he could just provide five or ten solid minutes per night to give Andrew Jones a break in the middle. I don't think Ed really expected him to do a lot of scoring. If he could just play good defense and pull down some rebounds everyone would have been thrilled with that.
But Ott was somewhat of a disappointment. As expected, he wasn't really a scoring threat. But his defense wasn't much to speak of either. He was a big man who didn't pull down rebounds, and wasn't blocking many shots. And so his minutes dwindled as the season progressed.
This year Penn State will hope he has improved over the summer. Ott will be counted on to provide a solid five or ten minutes per game to give Andrew Jones and occasional rest.
#12 - Talor Battle (6-0, 170)
You may remember Talor Battle from such movies as...
Talor Battle Scores the Game Winning Basket PSU Bests Illinois (via pickletoon)
I don't have to tell you how good Talor Battle is. You already know that. And you probably already know that he is the unquestioned leader of this team. He will be asked to mentor the younger players while running the offense to get the ball in the hands of guys that can score.
The question for Talor Battle will be how well he can hold up. Last year he started off on a tear and he peaked during the amazing upset of Michigan State in East Lansing when he scored 29 points. After that it was obvious the wear and tear of playing 40 minutes per game through the tough Big Ten schedule was starting to get to him. He lost some of his zip. The jump shots stopped falling, and he struggled to score. This year, Penn State will need some of the new faces to reduce his minutes. If Ed doesn't feel comfortable in any of his freshman guards by the time conference play starts, it's going to be a long season for Talor Battle.
0 recs |
27 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
i remember at MSU
he was just nailing EVERYTHING, from what seemed like almost half court. and exactly like you said, he just never really looked the same after that game.
We are gonna shock them with 5,000 mega watts of raw ROO POWER.
by psuwxman on Oct 28, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He never looked the same BEFORE that either.
He was just bonkers that night.
"Every player we have, someone-maybe a parent, a grandparent, someone-poured their soul into that young man. They are handing that young man off to us. They are giving us their treasure, and it's our job to make sure we give them back that young man intact and ready to face the world."
-J.V.Pa.
by psume06 on Oct 29, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SWOTTED!
Deus nobiscum, quis contra?
by chocochuck02 on Oct 28, 2009 11:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope
to get to a game this winter, I haven’t been to one since college.
by Joe 96alum on Oct 28, 2009 11:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm assuming Battle is still going to wear #12
unless him and Jones are forming some super player we have not reviewed yet….either way it would be awesome
"I'm not affraid to compete"
~Robert Bolden
by QBsneak12 on Oct 29, 2009 8:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There's historical precedence
of big men in this program making huge strides between their sophomore and junior seasons. The two most prominent examples are Jarrett Stephens and Gyasi Cline-Heard. If you go back and look at their stats in their first two years, they’re eerily similar to those of Andrew Jones and, to a slightly lesser extent, Jeff Brooks. In their third years, both Stephens and GCH morphed into all-conference performers who could take over games. I expect to see a similar evolution in AJ’s game this year and hopefully marked improvement from Jeff as well.
by jtw126 on Oct 29, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Potentially very good news
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?columnist=oneil_dana&id=4601355
I bash ESPN a lot, but Dana O’neil is a great college basketball writer, in my opinion. This is great news for the good, “clean” coaches like Big Ed, Greenberg, and some others.
If you think recruiting in football is dirty, then college basketball recruiting is like ’69 Woodstock. I really, really hope this passes, as it would benefit everyone, especially the kids who are mostly being used by their AAU coaches even though they think they are getting something out of that. Suck on this Calipari.
by STU Boy on Oct 29, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Big Ten getting respect
In the preseason Top 25, with Five of the top 18 teams.
Michigan State #2
Purdue #7
Michigan #15
Ohio State #17
Minnesota #18
Illinois receiving votes.
Gonna be a tough conference schedule, let’s hope the improved non-con slate gets us prepared…
by jtw126 on Oct 29, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I see Michigan isn’t overrated in football only…
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 29, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're good
I would not be suprised if they finished 2nd in the Big 10.
by STU Boy on Oct 29, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
I think they’re still too young at spots.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 29, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They have the college formula
Great coach + 2 NBA ready players + solid transfers + decent incoming freshman class = Potential very good team.
by STU Boy on Oct 29, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harris+Sims=awesome
Best two-some in the B10 and that includes Lucas and Morgan, Hummel and Johnson.
NittanyWhiteOut.com. Arguably the second best Penn State blog I know of.
by PSUdevon on Oct 29, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
I feel like we’re being set up here. I bet some writers are already drafting their “Look how far the mighty Big Ten has fallen” articles and holding them until January.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Oct 29, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strongly disagree
I would get ready for lots of stories about the Big 10 and ACC fighting it out for the #2 spot between the Big East, especially if Indiana shows a little bit of pulse.
by STU Boy on Oct 29, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
I think MSU is a top notch team. Purdue is slightly less than top notch, but still a cut better than the rest of the conference. But teams 3-8 in the conference look pretty interchangeable to me. I think they are good teams, but I don’t see any of them getting past the second round of the NCAA. We’re not on the same level with the Big East or the ACC IMO.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Oct 29, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big East, no way
But ACC and Big 10 will be close this year, and I think this is the year we finally win the ACC-Big 10 Challenge.
We have 2 potential FF teams, at least 3-4 more potential Sweet 16 teams on top of that. That’s very good depth. Personally, I think you’re seeling Purdue a little short. Don’t forget, they made the Sweet 16 last year with their best player playing an entire season with a hariline fracture in his back.
by STU Boy on Oct 29, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Purdue
Like I said, I think they are a Sweet 16 type team. But they’re not a Final Four team. They’re just slightly below top notch.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Oct 29, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Painter has been bringing great classes, they were Sweet 16 last year, Hummel, Johnson (who could end up as one of the best big men in the country), Moore, et al are now experienced. Hell, I’d take them over MSU in the conference if it weren’t for The All-Powerful Izzo.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Oct 29, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kinda short-sighted
to make NCAA predictions before you even see the teams in their uniforms, no?
by jtw126 on Oct 29, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Battle
I love the fact that he has the mentality of being willing to take the big shot, I just hope that he can improve his consistency throughout an entire 40 minute game, and from game-to-game.
In other words, if he is going to average 20 points a game, I hope it is not because he scores 40 one game, and then zero the next…but that he can bring the same level of play each and every night. I think the confidence and experience of playing this summer will help him. He’s gonna need it…as they are a lot of points and minutes to replace from last season.
by mundyscorner99 on Oct 29, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















