2009 in a Nutshell
If you can get pressure on the quarterback with four guys, you win. If not, you lose. And probably by a lot.
That's the entire season, and it's not even sufficient for a fanpost. In order to get there I'll make an observation. The pessimistc side of us all would say this team had a habit of starting slowly. But if you look back every team we beat had some manner of gameplan to get pressure on Clark which worked to some degree in the first half. But almost without exception, the team played a great second half and won handily.
You might make a case that a coaching staff that catches a lot of grief in losses for failing to make adjustments actually makes adjustments quite well. It's just that there is no solution to not being able to block the other teams front four. Just a thought.
I say let's hit the Orange Bowl, because nobody will remember in five years anyway,
Thanks for the fanpost! Please do not post any content from a premium site that requires a subscription. Also, if you just want to share a link consider using fanshots instead. Thanks.
4 recs |
14 comments
Comments
Sometimes I love football for how brutally simple it can be
"I don't know. I don't know. [waves hand dismissively] First, you'd have to tell me what a 'BCS' is. I don't know."
by ReadingRambler on Nov 22, 2009 1:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I've often thought the same thing.
Everybody tries to think in terms of complex strategies, but when it comes down to it it’s really about an individual completing one specific task at a time.
May no act of ours bring shame.
by mushdamma on Nov 22, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Some guy on BHGP had it right (while talking about uniforms):
Uniforms changes don’t matter when it comes down to smashing the other guy in the face for 3 hours.
"I don't know. I don't know. [waves hand dismissively] First, you'd have to tell me what a 'BCS' is. I don't know."
by ReadingRambler on Nov 22, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Similar to
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face
How could Nixon know so little about Watergate and so much about football ?
by psupride on Nov 22, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would add a competent punting (and punt return) unit.
Only because, if we had one, we could be 12-0.
by PSUinBOSSton on Nov 22, 2009 1:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The spread hd, spread, and all other strategies
Sometimes it comes down to experience and knocking the guy who lines up in front of you. All in all not a bad regular season for loosing the meat and potatoes of you’re line, receivers and secondary
"No, Donny, these men are nihilists. There's nothing to be afraid of"
by psu in the w-b on Nov 22, 2009 1:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Is this a prognostication for 2010?
Or a look back at 2009? Or both?
The headline date and the post analysis didn’t jibe for me.
Umm…IS it just me?
Anyway – all true.
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Nov 22, 2009 1:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oops
Land Grant or bust! Worst 10-2 team ever? Beat Michigan State.
by jesse. on Nov 22, 2009 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 for the 'Oops'.
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Nov 22, 2009 7:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
weird season....
we lose two big games at home (you probably have to go back to ‘04 for that) and go undefeated on the road…(’94 for that one?)
I think the lack of a stout offensive line really made the difference between 10-2 and 11-1 or better, but establishing consistently high finishes in the conference is always a good thing.
by Artiefufkin10 on Nov 22, 2009 2:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Frank Broyles, circa 1978
When commenting on PSU’s 1978 team:
“The Lord Smiles On A Coach With Two Defensive Ends!”
Pretty much, thats all it takes!
Elizabeth, the only person on earth working at the same job longer than JoePa.
by joefromboalsburg on Nov 22, 2009 4:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Question
Are you describing 2009 in a nutshell or football in general? Because what you’re saying is one in the same.
by catesinator on Nov 24, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















