Extra linky to same spot (CFN). These are all pretty good and pretty fair. I like that they didn't skimp on references to his arrogance.

Some of my favorites:
Fiutak:
"He was what the program needed as far as an Xs and Os coach, but he lacked the personality, the people skills, and the recruiting ability to make Notre Dame a superpower again. He failed to let others into his program to provide insight and to try to help, and because of the BCS runs in his first two seasons, it was impossible to convince him, or anyone, that the whole thing needed to be torn down and rebuilt to get to the level that Notre Dame wanted to be at."

Cirminiello:
"With no head coaching experience or experience at this level, he wound up being out of his league, yet the arrogance, not to be confused with confidence, always found its way to the surface with Weis."

Bradley (who inexplicably finished with 'he's rich, but he's unemployed'; umm, who cares, dude? Why are people employed in the first place? Cuz they're not rich)
"Weis’ "schematic advantage" never materialized, and he only won big with Ty Willingham’s players. He paid scant attention to the defensive side of the ball, while trying to load up the offense with playmakers who could make him look more smart. But his biggest sin was in having never led a program at any level. That made him susceptible on the recruiting trail and during the operation of a game."