Black Shoe Diaries: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

Daryll Clark Is Aware Of Reality

Daryll Clark is mad as hell, and he's not going to take this anymore.


Screen-capture-2_medium

 

Hey, that's the deal.  In 2009, there's 12-for-32 against Iowa and 12-for-28 against Ohio State.  In 2008, there's 9-for-23 in Iowa City and 12-for-20 in an incomplete performance at the Horseshoe.  And in between, a lot of gaudy numbers against some awful defenses.  The Capital One Bowl won't make or break Daryll Clark's career, and Clark can't do it by himself.  However, even he couldn't deny that a win against a top-15 team* would do wonders for how he's remembered in Happy Valley.

 

* - Other than that ridiculously fraudulent 15th ranked Michigan State team that was pasted in Beaver Stadium last year.  They were awful.

0 recs  |  Comment 193 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Black Shoe Diaries

Closing The Book On 2009

Jan 2010 by BSD - 84 comments

LSU Preview By The Numbers

Dec 2009 by BSD - 44 comments

Comments

Display:

Thanks, RUTS

Me and you see this the same way, and there will be people here saying stuff like “What, Wisconsin and MSU and Illinois and Michigan weren’t good games?”

And the answer will be no, those teams all sucked. When it came down to it, Clark never beat a real upper-echelon team, and one meaningless game won’t do shit for his legacy. Sorry, Daryll, you were a great guy, but damn, man, Iowa twice and OSU you couldn’t have possibly played worse. That’s your legacy in my mind, bro.

NittanyWhiteOut.com. Arguably the second best Penn State blog I know of.

by PSUdevon on Dec 20, 2009 11:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

2008 Michigan State

Defensive rankings entering the Penn State game last year

Passing Yards: 39th
Opposing QB Rating: 12th
Scoring Defense: 25th

Seems to me MSU last year was a pretty decent team, or at least the numbers say that.

by catesinator on Dec 22, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If "not sucking against bad teams"

is the criteria for being a good Penn State QB, then we really must suck as a program.

NittanyWhiteOut.com. Arguably the second best Penn State blog I know of.

by PSUdevon on Dec 21, 2009 12:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How about spoiled brat?

Clearly nothing but the second coming of Todd Blackledge, MRob or Kerry Collins is going to please Devon. Yeah Clark sucks ass, I can’t even believe we kept letting him play over the past two years. Oh, we didn’t beat Iowa two years in a row? Thanks Captain Obvious. I mean for christ’s sake the guy loses four games in his PSU career and suddenly his legacy is as shitty as QB14’s was (and if you even dare to counter me with “QB14 beat Iowa” I will internet kill you).

And let’s all keep pretending that it’s entirely Clark’s fault that we lost those four games, just so we can continue to shit on him. Yeah, he made mistakes, even Tebow H. Christ makes mistakes (GASP!), yet we don’t see his legacy tarnished any. Let’s see:

Iowa 2008: Clark is recovering from a freaking concussion, the coaches let him play anyway, the offense sputters. But let’s completely ignore the fact that we couldn’t do jack shit on defense in that game to stop Iowa.

USC Rose Bowl: Yep, clearly Clark’s fault we got torched by Sanchez and dug ourselves into that hole we couldn’t get ourselves out of. And for the record, we were playing against the best defense in the country, and still managed to score more second half points than USC let up all year. Yeah Clark threw an INT on the last play for us, our receiver fell, leaving only the defender to grab the ball. FYI, we still would have been down 7 points even if we had scored with a minute left in the 4th quarter leaving us to attempt an onsides kick to try and give ourselves a shot at the tie.

Iowa and tOSU 2009: Wow, I totally agree Clark’s stats were horrible. Clearly he should have been benched in favor of Newsome, because these two were entirely his fault. Let’s ignore the O-line who had struggled against the cupcakes in the first four games in establishing the run game. Clearly Kerry Collins, Blackledge, and MRob would have kicked Iowa and tOSU’s asses even if the O-line was giving them three seconds before they let Clark’s pocket collapse. Yep, Clark is totally to blame.

I mean, honestly, if you’re going to hold every PSU QB to the gold standards established by KColl, Blackledge, and MRob (who by the way, I don’t know if you remember, struggled as a starting QB at first, despite getting us wins), then why even bother following PSU football anymore. You’re going to just end up disappointed every year.

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 2:23 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Unlike you,

mediocricy just won’t cut it for me. What has Clark done other than benefit from a HORRIBLE schedule? Oh wait let me guess, he beat Michigan in Ann Arbor!!! wow one of teh worst not just Michigan teams of all time but one of the worst big ten teams.

and I don’t know if you remember this, but MROB only started one year. When you start two years like Clark, you can’t have “growing pains” mid way through your second year.

And who the hell are you to ask someone “why even bother following PSU football anymore”? It seems to me that if you are willing to strive for good as opposed to great you are the one who lost the greatness that is PSU football.

But have no fear, Temple is playing well and could use some fans without high expectations.

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 7:02 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Mediocracy

Is not the right word for Clark. He is good, not great. He needs others around him to excel in order to play well. As of now, I’ll remember him for the spark in the Alamo Bowl, the beat down he put on Oregon state, and the fist pump. Totally fine with me.

by jigalion on Dec 21, 2009 8:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wow one of teh worst not just Michigan teams of all time but one of the worst big ten teams.

A game probably close to 50% of us thought we would lose. But hey, it’s in the books, so CLARK SUCKS.

When you start two years like Clark, you can’t have "growing pains" mid way through your second year.

Tell that to Wiz or Troutmann or receivers who can’t get off press coverage, not Clark. Clark has had one bad game this year that actually cost the team: Iowa. Ohio State was all on the line and receivers.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oregon State

was a game that at least 50% of us thought we would win. So is his and the team’s performance any less great just b/c a group of people thought they would win the game?

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and at that Iowa game

Clark wasn’t on the punt protection unit, nor did he fumble the ball at Iowa’s 30 while driving late in the game.

by PSU Mudder on Dec 21, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mediocricy just won’t cut it for you

Or what? What are you going to do? Complain.

Give me a break.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 10:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not going to complain

But I’m also not going to go through life and only talk about puppies and ice cream. The fact of the matter is Clark is a good QB and a greta success story off the field. But nothing to tell your grandkids about.

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 11:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

10-2 is a good time for puppies and Ice Cream

Especially after it comes after 11-1. Mediocre is somewhat less than that. I for one try to enjoy winning, otherwise, all I do is bitch about losing, which isn’t fun for me, or anybody else for that fact.

I always get a kick out of it, when a “realist” bashes a “kool-aide drinker” for not having high enough standards for the program. When, of course, our standards are objectively meaningless, insofar we have no ability to enforce them.

We’ve had two very good seasons the last two years, and to rail on Clark is just wildly silly. The general consensus is that is a pretty good college football player, which he is.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the fact that he is a pretty good college football player

but I have a problem with him even caring about his so called “legacy” I wonder what JoePa would have to say about one of his players pissed off about his “legacy”

I for one try to enjoy winning, otherwise, all I do is bitch about losing, which isn’t fun for me, or anybody else for that fact.

I guess since I’m from Philly bitching about losing is fun for me – but in all seriousness, I’m not “bitching about losing” All I’m saying is that he should care about working his ass off to leave college on a high note. Not what someone he will most likely ever meets thinks about him.

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How do you "Internet Kill" someone?

Do lightning bolts come out from the screen and fry your head? I think that happened in the “Hello Mary Lou” movie. It was cool.

"Wow. You know you have problems when even the cheerleaders know you suck." ~ Pain in the Sash

by Leftcoast Hawk on Dec 22, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That movie rules

"I'm colonel cool! And I'm the captain on this rocket to the stars!"

by psuphiman80 on Dec 24, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

kinda like "playing not to lose"?

but that’s what we’re good at! Which makes us good!

by Mr. Rosewater on Dec 21, 2009 12:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously man, just stop

You act like we just crank out Heisman winning/NFL caliber QBs here. I would certainly agree DC isn’t the best QB PSU has ever seen. I would also like to know how many Paterno has had that are definitively “better” than him, as in won more and was a better quality passer. Who? I’ll give you Collins, Blackledge, and Robinson. Who else? Maybe Fusina? Richardson? Shaffer was a winner but he also couldn’t throw worth a damn.

He’s at least a top 4-8 range QB all time here, nothing to sneeze at.

This stuff makes me sick man. You don’t have to be all fanboy over everyone, but people should show a little more respect for chrissakes.

I mean, he had problems in “big games”, but he also had a good game against USC, beat UM twice, was a 2 time 1st team all Big Tenner, won the Silver Football, won a big ten title, has set many PSU passing records, and has a chance to win a new years day game against an SEC team and has a very good chance at being our first 3000 yard passer, behind one of the worst O-lines we have had around here. He also had to absolutely work his ass off to get his spot. And don’t feed me bull about padding stats against cupcakes. We have been praying on Temple and Syracuse for ages.

Also, what qualifies as a big game? Before we played them in 08, Wisconsin was a huge game, and Iowa was a mere formality. Illinois was ranked last year, MSU clinched the title last year. He was hurt against tOSU and was still reeling at Iowa in 08. This year he had a terrible oline against the 2 best defensive fronts we faced and got crushed.

As has been said a trillion times, QBs get far too much credit and far too much blame.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 1:13 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Oh, FYI

I certainly do fault him to a degree in our losses this year and last year, but the point is that he didn’t single handedly lose us any games a la Anthony Morelli SMASH. In all reality, he is a lot better than his critics say and not as good as his fanboys might think. And there is nothing wrong with that. He is just pretty good, not a world beater.

If he guides us to a W against LSU, adding a big bowl win against an SEC team, I think he cements himself firmly as one of our best ever. If we lose, and he plays really poorly, then I think he will always carry that monkey on his back. I’m done rambling now, I am tired and the mighty ducks just ended, so I am going to bed.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 1:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark has benefitted from a number of things.

But mostly, hard work and good timing. Expectations were lowered after the QB14 years and the Big Ten has been rather awful over the past two years, but he’s put in a lot of hours and been a fine ambassador for Penn State. He’s been an above average quarterback, but not as great as some of the pom-pom wavers here would have you believe. If the standard is “better than Morelli”, great, Daryll Clark is Joe Montana. And yes, next year we’ll be crying into our beers and wishing we had him back. If Clark needs to be pissed off in order to motivate himself, great. Whatever works.

Fair or not, quarterbacks are remembered for their performances in the most important games. This is how the world works. Dropping four passing TD’s on a historically bad Michigan team is nice, but not important in any sense. I like Daryll Clark a lot, and so do about 95% of Penn State fans. But to refer to him as one of Penn State’s all-time greats while glossing over the fact that he has some giant holes in his resume is myopic, if not downright ignorant.

Twitter: @scrappled

"When it’s third-and-10, you can take the milk drinkers and I’ll take the whiskey drinkers every time" - Max McGee

by Run Up The Score on Dec 21, 2009 9:31 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The fact still remains...

All of this “couldn’t do it in big games” crap is ex post facto reasoning.

Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio State were all big games in 2008. It was only after the season was over that the “meaning” of those games came to be.

It’s the fact that Iowa could stop Clark/PSU TWICE that show’s they are good. So a very talented defense beat a very talented offense/QB… are you guys saying that isn’t possible?

by stonewall435 on Dec 21, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There's truth to that.

Illinois and Wisconsin were big games at the time they were played, even though both teams ended up with sub-.500 conference records. Clark was very good in both games, but players’ legacies (stupid as the term/concept may be) are shaped by how they played against the other teams who finished at the top of the standings. Maybe that’s not fair but that’s how it is, and whining about it on Twitter isn’t how I’d like my QB to handle it if I’m a coach or teammate.

Twitter: @scrappled

"When it’s third-and-10, you can take the milk drinkers and I’ll take the whiskey drinkers every time" - Max McGee

by Run Up The Score on Dec 21, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like Clark but when things go wrong he mentally checks out.

He doesn’t seem to handle adversity well, he can manage a game but won’t win the game in a tight spot.

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I demand evidence of this

Otherwise, I will consider it yet more ridiculousness considering the horrible performance of his offensive line and receivers.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ban the RR?

Can we place a limit on comments per account on a thread

No offense Rambler but every other post on here is you trying to dominate the conversation.

I welcome all comments but you are killing this site IMO.

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously?

Dominate the conversation? First of all, bullshit. Secondly, bullshit. Thirdly, if I was dominating the conversation then several people here wouldn’t be posting.

Fourthly, do you have an actual argument or are you going to ask the mods for help?

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

18,000 post jagoff...that is how many you have

No, I don’t need help from the mods.

I just think you are an internet tough guy who is really a pussy in real life.

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you serious man?

Come on. There is no place for this here.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 1:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I am serious....he likes to attack anyone who disagrees

I don’t take it personal but the fact he has over 18,000 post on here in less than 2 years is insane.

Every post from ANYONE is followed up w/ 3 by RR.

I guess I am just sick of reading his crap all the time

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wow, someone really woke up on the wrong side of the bed today

I mean granted, RR does post a ridiculous amount, but I’ve never seen him act like an internet tough guy.

Methinks if someone wasn’t the brother of one of the mods, they’d be banned for these comments.

If anything he is a “one upper” and/or just has to have the last word on something, but I don’t recall him berating or degrading people with opposite viewpoints as himself.

And in the specific post that seemed to set you off, all he asked was for some evidence to your claim " I like Clark, but when things go wrong he mentally checks out. He doesn’t seem to handle adversity well, he can manage a game but won’t win the game in a tight spot."

If anything I would say it has been a bit of the opposite, where when things go wrong he tries to do too much/forces certain situations, and the opposing teams with good defenses (Iowa & tOSU) have taken advantage of that. He certainly didn’t mentally check out of the USC game. My only recollections of him acting like you suggest were after his pick against Wisky, and after his concussion against tOSU last year. Maybe there were more, but this would be the place where you offer the “evidence” instead of turning to personal attacks.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

BSD is not about attacking each other

One of the best things about BSD is that we are civil with each other, I think this thread has spun too far away from civility. I would recommend no more responses to this whole mess.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I think this whole discussion is fascinating

I selfishly wanted to see it keep going for a while.

It’s not just that one of the mods’ brothers (which I’m assuming is true — can’t attest to this) launched a personal attack on another person – it’s the fact that people believe that this is what happened at all. It seems like some people really believe they are extending their real-world identity into the virtual, and then unconsciously apply their emotions because they want to genuinely interact with these other “people” and build a social reputation, despite the fact that you’re using some random handle that you may think prevents you from being legally bound to what you say, in most instances. Yet even a cursory look at computer science shows us there can be no guarantee that that’s even a human being on the other side of the wire you’re arguing with — the fact that Rambler didn’t get into it with STL suggests either he was busy or he doesn’t buy into virtual-persona-as-real-persona (i’m betting the latter based on the comment count).

I mean, how does SweepTheLeg know ReadingRambler isn’t a four-guy apartment sharing a single account, because they can leverage each other’s social rep gains that way? It would take some coordination but might pay dividends when they post on here looking for lower-level Ohio State tickets at face value. Even the handles themselves are kind of entertaining too – most people probably chose them when you were oblivious to this whole virtual personality thing, which eerily parallels your parents giving you a name when they didn’t really have a great handle on this whole parenting thing or have any idea how you’d turn out, and now you might dislike it or think it doesn’t describe you accurately but you’re pretty much stuck because it’s on all of your licenses and papers and test scores.

A weak analogy would be BSD as an enormous, organized town hall meeting about Penn State football where everybody is wearing masks, except Eric Watters didn’t try very hard on his and has essentially given up on the whole charade but still brought his opinions, which makes him about the most honest person here, but some other people are genuinely concerned about staying anonymous because they’re voicing contentious opinions, or harbor a deep fear of their masked opinion becoming actual, or they’re actually skipping out on work to be here. The idea of one person at this meeting launching a personal assault on another is sort of silly – you’re assuming you even know who you’re talking to, and that the other person isn’t acting, and that they’re a single human being capable of interpreting the point you’d like to make. In real life these are obvious assumptions. On the Internet they are regularly broken.

As a side note, what I’m really, really waiting for, is a paid employee of an athletic department somewhere to get busted on one of these blogs by outing themselves and then having a comment trail hundreds deep going back several years pushing certain opinions or views of the team.

Now, back to work.

by gumbercules on Dec 21, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

+1

for the very last paragraph

it’s gonna happen

by hbeach08 on Dec 21, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe you are right JuggerNitt

It just drives me nuts that every 3rd/4th post on here is RR trying to “1 up” or trying to get “last word” as you put it.

I responded in such term…I guess the xmas spirt skipped me today.

RR – I am sorry…beer on me during the BW game

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes...last word

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

HAHAHA

Wow, now we’re going to go with the equivalent of old school playground insults insulting posters arguing against people trashing our well above average QB? That’s mature. Did he kill your dog or something?

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I love Clark, and I think he's a very good college QB.

But he has mentally checked out when he makes mistakes. There were many times last year that AQ had to get in his face because he was stomping around. Wisconsin comes to mind, he threw an interception and was Baron Von Poutypants. Now, he DID bounce back after he was straightened out, and I give him credit for growing and learning from that.

But the bottom line is when the pressure is turned up in the pocket he doesn’t make great reads. That doesn’t make him a bad player. I think where we are losing each other is how we talk about him. Great college QBs make plays even when they have less time and small windows. The problem is they are few and far between. Clark is very good, and I love him for the many wins. But because of our school’s history sometimes we have a tendancy to treat him like an all time CFB qb. He’s not that, but it won’t stop me from remembering him fondly.

by PSUinBOSSton on Dec 21, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would take Hunt

as our RB every year if we could.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And for the most part

I’d take Clark as our quarterback. He might not be Kerry Collins, but Tony Hunt wasn’t Ki-Jana Carter.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The voice of reason

"God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy"

by NJ lion on Dec 21, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+2

Excellent post by jesse.

Tony Hunt is a great comparison.

by Laaaaazzz on Dec 21, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I agree with most of this.

I think the difference is we have a crowded top tier of running backs to look to at PSU. So yeah, everyone likes Hunt for what he was because it is clear that he’s not a top 3 back in our program. Clark does not have that benefit, and in trying to figure out where he belongs, maybe some people have taken his status as a Penn Stater and tried to extrapolate that to CFB as a whole.

But I think we are sort of saying the same thing, and if everyone looked at Clark the way you do, we wouldn’t be having this discussion whatsoever.

by PSUinBOSSton on Dec 21, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What I don't get... is this

Why were you guys throwing on that down that led to the INT that turned into the winning FG? You had the game in the bag, all you had to do was grind out the clock. Stanziball wasn’t fully evolved at that point. I mean, that was a really bad throw deep in your own territory.

But I shouldn’t talk, we have a QB that thinks his throws will magically drop into the right WRs hands ala Farve.

"Wow. You know you have problems when even the cheerleaders know you suck." ~ Pain in the Sash

by Leftcoast Hawk on Dec 22, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And yes I have a DVD of that game

And chortle with great mirth every time I watch that play.

I’m sure you guys are going to stick a fist up our butt someday and wiggle us around in a game of Football Popsicle.

"Wow. You know you have problems when even the cheerleaders know you suck." ~ Pain in the Sash

by Leftcoast Hawk on Dec 22, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't it like third and twelve?

And Williams was open, Clark just overthrew the ball.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 23, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

don't forget that Iowa was NOT a big game at the time

except for the fact that it would be a road win, etc. If anything it was a trap game, and we got trapped.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh Please

Every game is a trap game. Fact is, whoever plays all 60 minutes like they might be the losing side in an Aztec basketball game usually wins football games.

That said, Clark doesn’t throw that INT, PSU likely wins that game.

"Wow. You know you have problems when even the cheerleaders know you suck." ~ Pain in the Sash

by Leftcoast Hawk on Dec 22, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For real?

I am not judging him in the frame of all of CFB, only at PSU. Show me all of these fucking awesome QB’s we’ve had that are sooooooooooo much better than DC.

He wasn’t perfect. Never said he was. I acknowledged that he has had struggles.

The fact is we have had a ton of anywhere from bad to mediocre quarterbacks. Especially recently. We have had about 3 quarterbacks that most people would agree are in another league than Clark (Blackledge, Collins, Robinson). And a few others that are about the same. So, how is being anywhere from a top 4 to top 10 QB here anything but really good, possibly great? I don’t get it. I didn’t say he was one of the best all time in CFB, just here at PSU where hey, we typically aren’t great at QB.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 12:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Records

Don’t know all of them, but if I recall he now holds several at PSU.

by smashtheguitar on Dec 21, 2009 1:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He has to have poise when it's happening

I mean, you just can’t be afraid of 300 lb linemen when they’re about to crush you. You have to have poise. And presence. Don’t forget about presence! You need both before sustaining a concussion.

Unfortunately, DC scrambled for his life. Like a mortal! PPFffffttt…

by Mr. Rosewater on Dec 21, 2009 12:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Better playcalling might help.

If your O-line can’t handle the pressure, find a way to take them out of the game, as it were.

by smashtheguitar on Dec 21, 2009 1:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm game

I mean, clearly even the best PSU quarterbacks of all time would be able to make brilliant throws when their O-line gives them 3 seconds of protection, so obviously Clark is the weakest link on the team. We should just bench him.

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 2:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, we blame both of them for not doing their jobs

HAHS circa 93' "Football is 1/2 Offense, 1/2 Defense, and 1/2 Special teams".

by SweepTheLeg on Dec 21, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, you do because fans always blame the quarterback

What do you want? Guts? Heart? Poise? None of that matters when you sidestep Cam Heyward only to find that – SHOCK – the receivers aren’t open again.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 12:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

just to clear things up

And since I can’t respond to everyones comments:
I don’t think clark has been a bad quarterback, not at all. If you wanted me to pick between clark and devlin, I’m still taking daryll. He’s been a solid qb, just not the juggernaut people seem to think he is. At most schools, he would be considered an above average qb, and if we went right from mrob to clark he would be too. 14 was so bad that clark seems great in comparison. He never won a close game in his career, and never won a statement game. I don’t blame him for his losses, but I certainly don’t give him all the credit for the wins. If he beats iowa once or osu cleanly in 08, I think I would have a different perspective. He’s not mrob, he’s not blackledge, he’s not even schaffer, so let’s stop pretending he is.

NittanyWhiteOut.com. Arguably the second best Penn State blog I know of.

by PSUdevon on Dec 21, 2009 7:17 AM EST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

"at most schools he would be considered an above average QB"

“most” indicates greater than 50%. So that would be 61 teams in division 1-A. You are going to tell me that Clark wouldn’t be the “best ever” QB for some of those schools? People have a serious perspective issue.

As for “MRob was a better QB than Clark”. How so? MRob had a few TERRIBLE years at QB (granted he didn’t practice the position full time), then in his first year as the undisputed starter, they had the same regular season record, and MRob benefited from a MUCH WORSE bowl opponent, and still took 3 OT to win it.

I love MRob as much as the next guy, but for anyone to say he was obviously better than Clark is delusional. MRob had “heart”, if you will, but he was nowhere near as good a QB as Clark has been, he just benefits from having an amazing season immediately after the Dark Years. And I know PSU lost a few games under Clark, and he definitely didn’t play his best against OSU and Iowa, but those teams have 2 of the top 10 scoring defenses in the country, and our O-line did NOTHING to help Clark out there. Can anyone honestly say that MRob would have done better, given the circumstances of pretty much immediate, constant pressure in those games? Do people recall Northwestern in 2005? MRob single handedly tried to lose that game for us. It took a 4th and 15 catch by Smolko, and then an amazing pass/catch to D-Will, with an amazing run afterwards to win that game. Maybe his “heart” wins Iowa/OSU for us, I don’t know.

I see all this “Clark isn’t one of our top QBs ever” argument, and see it exactly the same as when people say teams are ranked too highly in the polls, but then can’t really name anyone that should be moved ahead of them. PSU has never been known as a producer of good (let alone great) QBs. We had Collins who was great. We had Blackledge who was really good. Then who? Seriously, who? MRob? Fusina? Richardson? Sacca? Hufnagel? Lucas? Morelli? Shaffer? Shorty Miller?

Those are pretty much the only QBs that I can think of who were even potentially considered good/great (I probably am missing someone, and I added Morelli in for some comic relief, and Shorty Miller because he was part of the game that caused OSU to forfeit because we were too rough).

Sure a case can be made for pretty much any of those to be ahead of Clark, but a case can also be made for Clark to be ahead of most any of them.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 12:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chuck Burkhart

Went 22-0 in 68-69. If you’re making a list of guys that just didn’t lose, despite brutal numbers (see also: Schaffer, John) he’d have to be on it.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

as I said, I knew I'd forget someone

and I actually don’t think Shaffer (who yes, I did include on the list) as a good/great QB, but when you don’t lose you do have to be in the discussion.

Of course this only goes to help the case for Clark, as a few of these guys really weren’t very good, yet they’re still in the running for top 10 QBs at PSU.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Its the luxury of a school that

for years, the QB just had to manage the game/not make bad plays/don’t put the stellar defenses in bad spots. Clark never had one of those teams.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Anybody

And I mean anybody, who looks at you and tells that at no point in 1986 they did not scream (by scream, I mean profanity laced tirade) “put in Matt Kizner” is a liar.

Anybody.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I did not scream this

but I was only 6, and grew up in a Rutgers/Seton Hall family, so yeah…

But not lying, either ;-)

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Obviously you had to watch the games

But if you had, age is no excuse. Seriously, John Shaffer (whom I love for different reasons) was not a pleasant experience. It was kind of like a root canal, even though they usually end well, you want to kill yourself they’re hapening.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Schaffer completed 56% of his passes for a whopping 126 ypg in 1986. Love him too, but for different reasons.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It took heart....

to spend an extra year in prep school working your ass off to qualify academically. To come in to a big time program underrated and unrecruited, and work your ass off some more to be the best that you can in the classroom and on the field.

This is what the grand experiment is all about, no? The winning is fun, but I had more fun seeing DC win than I would ever have watching an entitled douchea win (insert overhyped “It” boys here)

But what do I know, I’m just a girl.

Lucky gun, fake fifth, 8XY bitch
Daryll Clark, The Penn State Football Story Is...

by letsgopsu on Dec 21, 2009 6:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You mean like Mr. J. Claussen?

And the best part is: he didn’t even win. Stupid domer.

Just a girl? Self-deprecating lass, you. Girls win NC’s. Three straight, as a matter of fact.

Girls rock.

'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'

by Pete the Streak on Dec 21, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he's a good example

but Morelli was the first thought that game to my mind (though admittedly he didn’t really lose much either, just lost more than Clark and MRob with very similar teams)

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 22, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark...

is one of the best QB’s at a school that doesn’t really have a tradition of great QB’s. For years, the QB was just supposed to not get in the way. Clark is the best QB since Collins and talents like Collins are rare. With the change in offensive scheme, I think QB play will pick up and we will look back and see MRob and Clark as the beginning of a pretty good QB run at PSU – QB’s that are mobile and can throw down the field.

Never mistake effort for achievement.

by Esteban d' Amur on Dec 21, 2009 7:44 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

DING DING DING DING DING

I have been trying to say this and I think failing miserably.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think...

both sides of this “argument” are saying the same thing.

Never mistake effort for achievement.

by Esteban d' Amur on Dec 21, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

They are just going about it at wildy different angles.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This.

The kid has always been classy, he’s won a bunch of games. What more can you ask from a PSU qb?

"Every player we have, someone-maybe a parent, a grandparent, someone-poured their soul into that young man. They are handing that young man off to us. They are giving us their treasure, and it's our job to make sure we give them back that young man intact and ready to face the world."

-J.V.Pa.

by psume06 on Dec 21, 2009 8:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This +2

Clark has been great for us with a 84% winning percentage in a tough BCS conference and he’s held himself with class and poise. I am not saying he’s looked the best in tough games but neither did the rest of his teammates at times either. DC may not be the best PSU QB of all-time but he’s up there. Hopefully he’ll save his best for last against LSU and lead us to victory over a very, very tough opponent.

Go get ’em Daryll!!

by LionsandBear on Dec 21, 2009 9:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let's not forget

This is a guy who had to take that extra year to get his grades in order to get into PSU. He not only gets in but becomes the starting QB of a team that has already won more than 20 games, and he has two Penn State degrees to go with it.

by ChrisHarrell's_stache05 on Dec 21, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My Take

I don’t think it’s fair to say his legacy is “on the line”. He’ll always be remembered as a quarterback that beat Michigan twice, only lost three regular season games in two years, brought home a Big Ten title, and beat a few school passing records. He’s a good quarterback, and a win or loss over LSU won’t change that.

Part of his problem is he has never had to step on the field down by four points with two minutes to go in the game and asked to deliver. When he wins he wins big, and when he loses he loses big. He really doesn’t have a signature win where he led the team to a victory in the clutch. Until you have that, nobody calls you a “clutch player”. And if you are not a “clutch player”, you’re just another good quarterback.

by BSD on Dec 21, 2009 8:59 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

As Russ Rose would say, it's a matter of defining your metrics

Kevin Thompson’s pass to Chafie Fields to beat Miami in 1999 was clutch; on the other hand, November 1999.

Outside of some John Sacca-shaped outliers, I propose Penn State QBs are one of the following:
 mediocre QBs who can technically throw the ball better than I can,
 good QBs who you trust to manage the offense and score some points, &
 great QBs who dominate the games.

History tends to look fondly on good QBs who finish strong; a “clutch” win over LSU will make Clark look better, whether that is fair or not.

by Aaron PSU on Dec 21, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"On the other hand, November 1999"

Thompson was the perfect mediocre PSU QB. But it’s not Thompson’s fault that the defense choked against Minnesota and Michigan and got ground into dirt by TJ Duckett.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark has been a great quarterback for PSU

He is a great leader and has good skills, he has won games for us that a lesser QB might have lost (see prior 2 seasons). Football is a team sport and this year the O line let the team down in big games more than he did. No reasonable fan could say he has had a poor career at Penn State.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 9:15 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What game did he win for us that lesser QBs would have lost?

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually didn't have any specifics

My gestalt is that because of his leadership and some of the great passes we did win some close games that we might have lost. Also some of the games in which we dominated and didn’t even let the other team get started were because of his arm.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Michigan 2008

You know, when we were still losing at halftime.

by stonewall435 on Dec 21, 2009 11:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

interesting

D. Clark 18/31 171 yards 1 TD 0 interceptions

E. Royster 18 carries 174 yards 1 TD

I don’t know about you but I would think that that win was largly due to Royster’s running and even a “lesser QB” would have won that game

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You left out part of the story

D. Clark 9 carries 45 yards 2 TD

I only hope Royster cares enough about his legacy when he leaves/graduates.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops

Selective statistics strikes again!

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Selective statistics

the two TD runs were 1 yard QB sneaks and at least one of them was set up by a long Royster run….but I guess your selective statistics strikes again

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gee your right

What was I thinking – start up the Heisman train……

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 22, 2009 8:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who said I was pulling for the Heisman because he ran for 40 yards?

Just saying you’re selecting your stats to boost your own point without looking at the whole picture. Sure, 18/31 (only 58%), 219 total yards, and 3 TDs (2 1yd rushes, and 1 thrown), and 0 INT isn’t a career day for him, or any QB, but it’s pretty far from a bad day, IMO.

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 22, 2009 6:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Read the comments that I have been replying to

I asked to name a game that Clark won that a lesser QB would have lost which PSU said. stonewall435 stated the Michigan game since we were losing at half. That’s why I did not factor in his rushing yards. Especially since we were running the ball well that day.

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 22, 2009 6:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that is some selective use of stats

And blows any illusion of objectivity out of the water.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

which part?

the one that omits the full stats of Clark, or the one that adds in the rushing part to round out the discussion?

People always forget to add in rushing stats in the QB discussion, but to intentionally (which I don’t think was the case, I think psupride just didn’t think of including the rushing stats) not include the full contribution of their effort (and 2 TDs is a pretty good contribution) would definitely discredit the objectivity.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am trying to support Clark

So I was referring to the omission of his running stats, psupride may have easily overlooked these on accident and I agree that his passing stats were pedestrian for the day.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I intentioanlly left those stats out

The stats were to illustrate to stonewall 435 that his claim that a lesser QB would have lost that game for us. I don’t think his 2 1 yard runs were the difference. No way were they stopping anyone we handed the ball to

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 21, 2009 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

I’d take 219 total yards and 3 touchdowns vs no picks from any PSU quarterback especially if its against a team other “maybe we can be awesome” QB’s lost to 9 straight times.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

F... it, I'm going deep.

A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby

by psu on Dec 21, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta unleash the dragon

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

WE ARE...

MAYBE WE CAN BE AWESOME!!!

Hmm, doesn’t have the same ring to it.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, and how many recent..

…lesser QBs would have kept the INT mark at 0. It’s hard for Royster to run the ball when he’s not on the field.

by stonewall435 on Dec 21, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What is a close game?

Penn State was in a ton of close games this year. At halftime at least. Are there are no points to be had from using pretty ruthless efficiency to turn close games (about six or seven this season alone) into routs?

Maybe we’d remember Clark more fondly if sucked on ice for three quarters, then came up with two good plays at the end of the game to pull it out (ie Robinson vs. Northwestern) rather than him just lighting up the same kind of team for the entire second half.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Northwestern 2005

I think the point about the NW 2005 game and MRob is important. IMHO, if Clark is in that game, we don’t look like crap in the first half and probably end up winning by 2-3 TDs easy. And Clark fails to get any credit because it’s not a “close game”.

by Laaaaazzz on Dec 21, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That is likely true.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

To a certain extent that happened this year vs NW

Regardless of Kafka going out, the NW defense was holding us very well in the first half. But the second half (more specifically the 4th quarter) the offense unleashed it’s fury and it ended up looking like a blowout. Obviously with Kafka they would have most likely scored more points, but it was the same defense in the second half, and we stepped it up, and put the points on the board we knew we could get.

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Regardless of Kafka going out, the NW defense was holding us very well in the first half. But the second half (more specifically the 4th quarter) the offense unleashed it’s fury and it ended up looking like a blowout.

So I guess you are ignoring the fact that Kafka was their leading rusher and was keeping the drives going. I guess the fact that Penn State was now able to force the Wildcats into 3 and outs and not let the NW defense catch their breath had NOTHING to due with the fact that the lions (and speciifcally Clark whom I bleieve you are arguing about) unleashed their fury since it was the same defense in the second half.

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face

by psupride on Dec 22, 2009 8:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What about the several other games this year that all followed the same script?

Michigan State didn’t lose their quarterback, neither did Indiana, or Illinois.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 22, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Injuries happen big deal

Who knows what would have happened. What would have happened if PSU had Sean Lee in 08 or Mauti this year.

"I'm colonel cool! And I'm the captain on this rocket to the stars!"

by psuphiman80 on Dec 22, 2009 12:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

or even lee and bowman all of THIS year

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!

by thedrizzle on Dec 22, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Force them into 3 and outs?

They did the same thing to us for pretty much the whole game until the 4th quarter, I didn’t see our defense wear down.

I know from your previous comments you like to select statistics to boost your own point, but now I see you like to pick and chose words out of context to further your point as well. Don’t know if you read the entire comment or just the part you wanted to read, but here since you obviously missed the part where I said Kafka would have had a greater impact on the game had he not gotten hurt:

Obviously with Kafka they would have most likely scored more points, but it was the same defense in the second half, and we stepped it up, and put the points on the board we knew we could get.

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 22, 2009 10:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You're also ignoring that it was a 46-17 blowout

I’d hope that means Royster gets many more carries, and Clark many less pass attempts than when it was 10-0.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps Illinois 2008 (though that was D-Wills game)

perhaps OSU 2008, where he didn’t “win” the game for us (neither did Devlin, so don’t even start that, but even then, I don’t think Devlin was a “lesser QB”), but kept us in it. A lesser QB may have crumbled.

Maybe Illinois this year (was a much closer game than final score indicates. PSU didn’t really start to dominate until Clark’s 50ish yard run).

Who knows, it is all speculation. Maybe a “lesser” QB comes in and throws 3 pick-6s to Temple or Akron or whoever. Maybe a “lesser” QB comes in and throws 6 TDs against Iowa and OSU.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 21, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

50 yards rushing vs. Tennessee

Again, all speculation, but if you’re playing this game, he did some excellent running in the clutch in a New Years Day bowl against the OMGSEC.

by BooyahPSU on Dec 21, 2009 3:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My bad, the aggies...

Still had to bail out Morelli either way

by BooyahPSU on Dec 21, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I've said it before

but despite the emergence of Clark in the Alamo bowl, and the come from behind win, my favorite part of that game was Morelli lining up at WR when Clark ran the wildcat. Still puts a smile on my face to this day.

I can’t remember, did they even bother to cover him?

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 11:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"lesser QB"

Ok, let’s go with Clark’s immediate predecessor. That’s right.

With that lesser QB, we would have lost to Iowa by 20, lost to Ohio State by 30, and we would have lost to Michigan and some other team in a frustrating “upset” (probably Northwestern). We also would have been close with MSU.

But this is all speculative BS anyway.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 22, 2009 9:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But this is all speculative BS anyway.

isn’t that what’s great about fan-dom?

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!

by thedrizzle on Dec 22, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Err

That he IS going to try and do everything himself…

by cjapsu on Dec 21, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

that IS when he gets himself into trouble, getting all geared up/Tebowed up like before OSU last yr and OSU and IA this year.

by JoePaMustStay on Dec 21, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's what I don't get...

Before the season, we were all talking about how one of our biggest question marks on offense was the group of WR’s. Everyone said that a lot of the reason Clark was good last year was because the triplets made things easy for him.

So when people say “he only put up big stats against bad teams,” I see “he molded a green WR corps into something good enough to potentially see 3,000 passing.” It’s almost like everyone seemed to have forgotten the degree of difficulty involved in turning over a group that included THREE OF THE BEST PSU WR’S OF ALL TIME!!. It legitimately got to the point where no one really worried about the WR’s anymore. Raise your hand if you saw that coming, preseason? But that has nothing to do with Clark, right?

Lastly, yeah, some of those games against “crappy teams” last year may have lost their luster as the season wore on. But don’t give me some line about them not being worth a damn. You all remember how virtually every game last year was our “first real test/first OOC test/first away game test/first UM test/the OSU game.” Go ahead an make them look worse in hindsight, but they sure were meaningful at the time. Pardon the cliche, but without a playoff, every game matters. I’m glad that we have had a QB who has won a lot more of them than he lost…

"We heard all that talk all week about the SEC and their speed, but we knew personally that they weren't nearly as tough as us."

-Tony Hunt

by Cpiritual27 on Dec 21, 2009 12:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Long story short

His legacy is already established in my mind, win or lose against LSU. Maybe that makes me a kool-ade drinker, or someone who’s content with “mediocracy,” and that’s fine. But give me the kind of mediocre talent which can win 10+ games every year, and I’ll “settle” for it.

"We heard all that talk all week about the SEC and their speed, but we knew personally that they weren't nearly as tough as us."

-Tony Hunt

by Cpiritual27 on Dec 21, 2009 12:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

People continually forget

that Clark is the reason so many of these games are blowouts. And to poo-poo the ‘08 Michigan State game is ridiculous. That was a great performance by the team and it was led by Clark. The Spartans came here with a real chance to grab a share of the Big 10 title. It’s hindsight at its worst.

by Joe 96alum on Dec 21, 2009 12:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Right

I suppose it’s possible that in two years every team we beat sucked. And every team we lost to was good. But that would be kind of a coincidence, no?

There are a fair number of teams going to bowl games this year that got absolutly schooled by Daryll Clark and Penn State.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I like your ability to phrase words.

+1

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

^this...

PSU is on a pretty good run of not losing to teams “below”. They may lose to the “better” teams, but they don’t lose to 1-5 Purdue and they win games on the road now. Every road game doesn’t make me roll up in the fetal position.

Never mistake effort for achievement.

by Esteban d' Amur on Dec 21, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And for the people who want to use hindsight to say that Illinois or Wisconsin ended up sucking and they don’t count, turnabout is fair play — and Oregon State ended up ranked with a good record in 2008 and we absolutely killed them. And Clark was a big part of that.

by Laaaaazzz on Dec 21, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Illinois/Wisconsin

It seems so cliche, but one play really can change a game. Those were not great teams in either case, but they weren’t Coastal Carolina either.

To put it another way, I’ve seen what most would consider “better” Penn State teams, carry far, far, worse teams. The fact that we got in a position to put daggers in Big Ten teams, and for two conscutive seasons did it, speaks volumes to the team in general, and Clark specifically.

Iowa stanziballed themselves out of a perfect season because they couldn’t put anybody away. If our offensive line could block, that would not have been our problem this year.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's something I always ask myself.

Do I value big wins, or lack of bad losses more? What makes a better (or even great) team? Beating top teams when you play them? Or is it never getting upset?

by PSUinBOSSton on Dec 21, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How you value it

is obviously a personal choice. But not forgetting those 10 fourth quarters when there was nothing to stress about because we were up by three scores should be an important part of the DC legacy debate.

I mean, I was playing the Blue Band CD and laughing, literally laughing, at Michigan for a full quarter of game time this season. My guess is that’s what I’m going to remember most about Clark. That or the two Michigan State games that I thought we’re going to be losses or at least close wins, where we simply dominated.

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I mean, I was playing the Blue Band CD and laughing, literally laughing, at Michigan for a full quarter of game time this season.

Right there with you.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and as close as the Michigan 2008 game was at halftime

it was pretty much a blowout the entire 4th quarter.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 22, 2009 12:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ask 2007 Michigan

Beating #10 Penn State and #9 Florida, or losing to Appalachian State? What will people remember?

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

If we had lost to Temple, would beating Iowa have made up for it? Not likely (B10 title ramifications aside).

Beat LSU

by jesse. on Dec 21, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Despite how good App State actually was

Losing to Temple > Losing to Appalachian State.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder, though

since Temple would have been an early season loss, where we would have wound up in the final rankings, comparatively.

by The JuggerNitt on Dec 22, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think comparing 2005 and 2008 PSU is more accurate.

Lose to 7-5 Michigan but beat Fiesta Bowl Champ aOSU? Or not have any of those losses and none of those wins?

Personally, they don’t feel much different to me. And if Clark only had 1 year it would be easier to compare him to MRob for that reason. If MRob came back and lost to another underdog Michigan team, we wouldn’t remember him the same way we do.

by PSUinBOSSton on Dec 21, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't trying to weigh specific games or teams

But, in general, beat the bad teams and lose to the good teams is better than beat the good teams and lose to the bad teams.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And likewise I wasn't trying to push one option or the other.

Like I said, I don’t feel the answer is as clear cut as you. And I think when it comes to looking back, most people feel the opposite of you. I think it’s that most people can look at a team that beat top teams, and explain away a bad loss as a lack of focus.

Also, above it should say and 2009 PSU, since 2005 and 2008 were more similar than anything else.

by PSUinBOSSton on Dec 21, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Anyways.

Why can’t we all just get along? People are going to believe what they want to believe one way or another.

Let’s calm down, get ourselves collected and get ready to kick some LSU ass. Arguing about our quarterback only shows weakness.

For the Glory

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 12:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'm putting him second to Kerry Collins

MRob gets a lot of credit because he willed us from Zombie Nation. Plus, he was one tough SOB. But overall, I’d say DC is better than MRob.

Blackledge had the National Championship, which is huge of course. Don’t know about his numbers. Before my time. Those three: DC, MRob, TBlack, are a toss up. And seriously, I can’t think of another PSU QB that would come close to them. We’re Linebacker U, not QB U.

by Mr. Rosewater on Dec 21, 2009 1:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Blackledge was better.

He had a lot of these records that DC is taking. He helmed a pretty high flying offense by our standards at that time. He also won the davey o’brien if Im not mistaken and was a top 10 draft pick.

Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.

"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."

by Roland86 on Dec 21, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

according to wikipedia

TD-INT 29-38

Is that right? 38 interceptions?

by Mr. Rosewater on Dec 21, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thats weird

I found 41/41

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nevermind

that includes the NFL

by Mr. Rosewater on Dec 21, 2009 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that has to be it

There were some QBs in ‘82, so they wouldn’t give it to someone with stats like those.

by ReadingRambler on Dec 21, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Some QB's?

You mean John Elway, Jim Kelly, Tony Eason, Ken O’Brien, Dan Marino, Jeff Christensen, Reggie Collier, Babe Laufenberg, Gary Kubiak, Tom Ramsey, Bruce Mathison, Jim Bob Taylor, Clete Casper, David Mangrum, and Scott Lindquist?

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Kind of wonky

1st in TD’s (tied with Mills and Sacca); 1st in INT’s; 6th in yardage; won Davy O’Brien in ’82; 29-4 as a starter.. Played with Curt Warner, Kenny Jackson, and Sean Farrell.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh wait.. Thats pre-DC17.

Clark is 1st in career TD’s, 1st in single season TD’s, and 1st in single season yardage. 21-4 as a starter.. Played with Royster, Moye, and uhh… other people.

Deus nobiscum, quis contra?

by chocochuck02 on Dec 21, 2009 1:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

DC took an extra year to get his grades up, and when he got here he still was just a two or three star recruit (depending on recruiting service). He beat out a four-star recruit (Devlin) and played so well that Devlin only saw very limited playing time before taking his ball and going to Delaware.

DC graduates with a 21-4 record as a starter, and a Big Ten Championship. If we didn’t have to rebuild our OL and WR corps in 09, the record might be 23-2 and two Big Ten Championships.

We were extremely close to having one, if not two, undefeated seasons. If he doesn’t throw a late INT vs Iowa last year, we would have played for the MNC.

DC won’t be one of the best PSU QBs to play at PSU. I’d say he belongs in the Top 10 QBs to play here. And that’s a pretty nice legacy, with or without a loss to LSU.

"Is that right?" Joe answered. "That’s not a problem. But you’ve got a problem. You don’t relate to me. And that’s a big problem."

by dmoney350z on Dec 21, 2009 4:00 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Let's close this thread

So I can have the last word.

Just nod ‘yes’.

’Preciate it.

'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'

by Pete the Streak on Dec 21, 2009 6:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

So far, so good........

'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'

by Pete the Streak on Dec 21, 2009 7:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So

What did I miss? A bunch of Debbie Downers vs. Kool-Aid chuggers?

Luring recruits with my new "Posting HD" scheme since '08.

by 06Lion on Dec 21, 2009 7:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

"Happy Jacks" vs. "Sad Jacks"

Typical PennLive post:

“Hi guys, I’m new to the board and I HAVE to ask what Happy Jack and Sad Jack means? – For the Glory, WE ARE!”

    Response: “Go f* yourself”

by Mr. Rosewater on Dec 21, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark was good for Penn State

There is not much more to be said but maybe a different perspective, He is just a kid. A student athlete trying to balance academics and athletics. Yes. He did make mistakes but most of us did in college. His just get to be seen on national television. Overall, he set records, won a Big Ten championship and helped solidify PSU’s return to continued sucess.

"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week. "
George S Patton

by psu in the w-b on Dec 21, 2009 8:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

should we be happy or annoyed

that he is the QB that brought us to think that a 10-2 record is mediocre

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!

by thedrizzle on Dec 21, 2009 9:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i guess i shouldn't have used an all-inclusive "us"

should have said “many people” or something…

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!

by thedrizzle on Dec 21, 2009 9:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Annoyed

but not at Clark, at the people who think 10-2 is mediocre (yes, I realize we lost to the two best teams on our schedule at home, I was there).

by dawsonPSU10 on Dec 21, 2009 11:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And we bitch about Stanziballs

Hmmm. I don’t think ANYONE is ever happy with their QB even if the dude is on the positive side as a starter over their career.

Nice thread.

"Wow. You know you have problems when even the cheerleaders know you suck." ~ Pain in the Sash

by Leftcoast Hawk on Dec 22, 2009 2:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Penn State Nittany Lions.
Start posting about the Nittany Lions »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar2_small
TOTS!
Shooter_small
Why you can't spell Nittany without NIT

Recent FanPosts

Small
THE FIELD OF 96
1018081638_small
We Need One
Dollar_small
Selection anger
Licking_lips_small
BSD Tournament Challenge
Small
2010 Roster up on gopsusports.com
Arts_fest_2009_023_small
Vote for Cappelletti in the B10's Icon poll, earn 10K for Alumni Association
Img110_small
SPRING BREAK!
Iowa_girls_06_small
The return of the AFL (and a Penn State legend)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Notre Dame's Tim Abromaitis, right, and Ben Hansbrough smile after they defeated Pittsburgh in an NCAA college basketball game in the quarterfinals of the Big East tournament, Thursday, March 11, 2010, in New York. Notre Dame won 50-45. (AP Photo/Henny Ray Abrams)

2010 NCAA Tournament: Thursday Schedule, Previews And Predictions

South Florida guard Dominique Jones reacts after an NCAA basketball game with Georgetown in Washington Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2010. South Florida defeated No. 7 Georgetown 72-64. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

South Florida's Dominique Jones Likely To Declare For NBA Draft

Oregon's LeKendric Longmire, left and California's Omondi Amoke go after a rebound during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game at the Pac-10 Conference tournament, Thursday, March 11, 2010, in Los Angeles. California won 90-74. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill) link

What Does Omondi Amoke's Suspension Mean For Cal?

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Lioneye_edited_small BSD

Editors

Image_small Run Up The Score

Reporter_small Kevin HD

Official Partner of CBS Sports