I think there can be some interesting match-ups. I’m sorry you can’t get excited about the Rose Bowl, but I’m really intrigued by those match-ups. But there are going to be other BCS games, with other potentially good match-ups. People think Florida will kill Cincy? Based on what? Florida’s outstanding offense? A defense that was exposed? These match-ups will only be as predictable as the amount you buy into ESPN’s crap.

This season, nobody is good, and you never know which team will show up. It’s like every game is Russian Roulette with EVERY TEAM.

Although I didn’t intend it when I wrote the post

I don’t want the two undefeated mid-majors in the same bowl game. Part of me wants to see TCU, Boise, and Cincy all finish the season undefeated along with the MNC. You know, just to spark some outrage and other types of fun.

Could you imagine the screaming that would happen if Texas squeaked by ’Bama in the MNC, and you have Cincy, TCU, and Boise all still undefeated after their bowls as well? It might not lead to a playoff, but damn would it be hilarious to watch the fallout.

I could not disagree more with this. People say the mid-majors haven’t proved themselves because they haven’t played anyone, well you people won’t let them prove themselves and that’s the whole point!

TCU would probably stand a fair chance against Florida, but we can’t let Orrin Hatch ruin this whole thing, now can we?

One of them will remain undefeated, and what have we learned? Nothing. We will never know whether we should actually be giving these mid-majors a chance at the MNC when they play ridiculously poor conferences and schedules. We’ll never know if they actually deserve to be sneaking into the top ten every year by gliding through said schedules.

And you know what will happen the next year? The same thing. One or more of them will go undefeated, and we’ll have no gauge as to how good or not they are because the BCS made them play each other, which could either be putting two deserving top ten teams against each other, or essentially sacrificing the Fiesta for a cripple fight.

I’ve argued before that I’m extremely skeptical of these teams based on the schedules they play and the level of competition they face each week, and unfortunately I came off as a bit of a douchebag, but even I admit that I would rather see both of them play BCS conference teams than play each other. And while no one wants to risk the Oklahoma Death Scenario from 2006, putting two mid-majors in the same bowl isn’t the answer. Well, it is the answer for the BCS, who will gain more by sacrificing one of the bowls to create better, more exciting matchups for the other BCS bowls.

plus, they played each other in a bowl game last year. I think things would be more interesting with an Iowa vs TCU, and a GT vs Boise State match up