JOE PA vs. bowden analysis
by georgialion on Mar 10, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
3 comments
Here we have collegefootballnews.com, and pete fiutak giving his analysis of joe v. bobby 60;s-08. And the verdict is JOE PA!
Impressive body of work. cfn.scout.com gives the wins by year on the main page. Long live the King. joe v. bobby
and how bout that basketball team, are they in the tournament or not? will they win any games? who cares?? overanalysis, you bet, find out sunday.
We are Penn State
Thanks for the fanpost! Please do not post any content from a premium site that requires a subscription. Also, if you just want to share a link consider using fanshots instead. Thanks.
0 recs |
3 comments
Email
Print
Comments
Bowden
That Tulane forefit is the worst kind of garbage I’ve ever seen. Total crap. Especially since nither Penn State nor the NCAA count Oklahoma’s Sugar Bowl forefit because Joe Paterno was man enough to refuse it.
That’s pretty much all you need right there.
"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008
by jesse. on Mar 11, 2009 9:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What are the details behind the
Tulane forfeit, i.e. Why did Tulane forfeit the win?
pinkertonpark.com
by rahpsu92 on Mar 11, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically
I believe it was academically ineligible players.
"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008
by jesse. on Mar 11, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
