Black Shoe Diaries: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Big Ten Preview

over on tWWL of sports they had a chat going over all the BCS conferences. Adam Rittenberg was answering the questions about the big ten. if you want to check the whole thing out here is a link http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=26580 

Here are some of the ones talking about Penn State:

 

Adam Rittenberg: By the way, Joe Paterno is over sitting at the hotel bar by himself

 

joe (chicago): whats joepa drinking?

SportsNation Adam Rittenberg: I don't want to speculate on that. It's something red. It could be a bloody mary, but I don't want to speculate.

SportsNation Adam Rittenberg: He'd never be able to have a drink alone if he were in Pennsylvania.

Fernando (Mart, TX): Love the blog. Coming out of spring, who are the major Heisman contenders from the Big 10? And is it already Tebow's to lose, before the season even starts?

SportsNation Adam Rittenberg: It is for sure Tebow's to lose. I think the Heisman has become a QBs award and the Big Ten's problem is that they haven't had a lot of good QBs lately. Darryl Clark from PSU might have a chance, but their schedule is so soft that it will be hard for him to get the recognition early enough to be a good candidate.

Scott (DC): Do you think the decisive game for the Big Ten Championship will be OSU-PSU?

SportsNation Adam Rittenberg: Definitely going in, that's the way it looks. I think things could change with the Iowa, PSU game earlier, but right now, that looks like the game of the year.

Rick (Howell, MI): How can Penn State NOT be everyone's preseason Big Ten champ pick? Isn't it yours? So they lose some receivers...they were good but not great. Daryll will get the ball to the new ones just fine...GO PENN STATE!

SportsNation Adam Rittenberg: That's very confident. I like to hear it. I think the bigger issue will be the secondary and the offensive line losing three starters. But PSU has a lot of star players and a very favorable schedule.

John, Michigan: Who are your top three favorites to win? And who is this years Dark horse?

SportsNation Adam Rittenberg: My top three are definitely OSU, PSU and Iowa. My dark horse would be Michigan State. I like the way the schedule sets up for them. Illinois is a potential dark horse, but they were so disappointing last year that it's hard to put them in that category.

Thanks for the fanpost! Please do not post any content from a premium site that requires a subscription. Also, if you just want to share a link consider using fanshots instead. Thanks.

0 recs  |  Comment 54 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Ladies and gentlemen...
Rick (Howell, MI): How can Penn State NOT be everyone’s preseason Big Ten champ pick? Isn’t it yours? So they lose some receivers…they were good but not great. Daryll will get the ball to the new ones just fine…GO PENN STATE!

…We have a new gold standard in kool-aid! I dare you to top this.

Derrick Williams was good, but he’s not as good as Brett Brackett!

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 20, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ha

I think there’s going to be a very hard-to-swallow dose of reality next season about what we are and what we aren’t. Last season’s offense may have been the most versatile and explosive we will see for a long time. You don’t just get handed 3 4th-year starters at wide-out every season. You don’t get 4 returning starters on the offensive line every season. We’re recruiting really well again, but we had more than just talent last season.

We might have to go back to being a defense first team next season, like normal.

"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.

by millzners on May 20, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I just wish the secondary was better.

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 20, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Swallow this

The Wide Receiver position itself is over-rated.

The difference between Cadogen/Ohrnberger and Pannell/Troutman is gonna be so much more important than the difference between Williams/Butler/Norwood and Moye/Powell/Zug it’s not even funny.

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 20, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

p.s.

And it won’t be known until 11/7, how important the difference between Clark 08 and Clark 09 is.

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 20, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Difference = Passing Accuracy

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 21, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

quibble, quibble

eh, which gets them down the field further and sets up for a Clarke rushing touchdown, which equals more fist pumps. Do we get Clarke Fist Pumps (CFP’s?) for accurate tosses and catches?

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 21, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

But we do get mini-CFPs and Daryll Clark smile times, which are similar to Hines Ward smile times:

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 21, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree 100%

Penn State typically has a decent offense when they are confident in their OL, with the inverse also being true. The play of the OL is the difference between an aggressive and explosive offense and 3 yards to Royster intermingled with a third down out pattern. If you go across the projected offensive line position by position, the only upgrade is a one year older Landolt. Also, establishing a receiver that is capable of stretching the field is imperative (assuming Powell). I have concerns that, although more talented with infinitely greater potential at the skill positions, this offense is eerily similar to Rashard Casey’s senior year (inexperienced OL, senior QB, below average receivers).

by cpm126 on May 21, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see it being that bad

The OL won’t regress that much, and the receivers may not be able to stretch the field like last year, but they won’t be below average.

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 21, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

Every team with a decent offensive line is decent offensively. I think this team lives and dies with Clark this year.

Keep in mind in Casey’s senior year he spent the whole offseason dealing with off field issues relative to that fight in New Jersey. That was also the begining of the dark era, you’re looking at a less talented team that still thought they were awesome.

No proven wide recievers is an issue, those dark era teams had zero talent at wide out. It’s not a coincidence that that the 2002 team actually had a decent wide out, Bryant Johnson, although I’ll grant that this is not the only reason they were good. If you have to respect the pass, than you can’t stack against the run.

If we can’t make people cover our wideouts, then the “Spread HD” isn’t going to spread anybody out and will not be very diverse. It will be the “Stack 1D”, and that offense sucks.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 21, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we can’t make people cover our wideouts, then the "Spread HD" isn’t going to spread anybody out and will not be very diverse.

And I’m convinced we can make people cover them. Zug, Moye, Brackett, and Powell might not be awesome, but I’m convinced that no defense will be able to just blitz every play without paying the consequences.

There will be a drop off, but it won’t be like going back to the dark era receiving corps (or lack thereof).

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 21, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I agree...

Who among them is going to keep them honest. Williams, by reputation alone, kept the other team honest. Remember that stupid swing pass they always throw but never works? With Williams on the field you have to cover that, so even when it doesn’t work, it distracts the opposing secondary. Who is that guy this year? I don’t know that he’s there.

Keep in mind that Clark, for all his strengths, is not a very accurate passer. Spred people out, create holes in the defense, and we’re successful. Bunch everybody togehter and force him to make difficult throws, to inexperieced wide outs, ehh, we could be in for some trouble.

One of those kids needs to be awesome, or were in trouble.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 21, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who among them is going to keep them honest. Williams, by reputation alone, kept the other team honest. Remember that stupid swing pass they always throw but never works? With Williams on the field you have to cover that, so even when it doesn’t work, it distracts the opposing secondary. Who is that guy this year? I don’t know that he’s there.

Keep in mind that Clark, for all his strengths, is not a very accurate passer. Spred people out, create holes in the defense, and we’re successful. Bunch everybody togehter and force him to make difficult throws, to inexperieced wide outs, ehh, we could be in for some trouble.

You’re right. Allow me to change my opinion to simply “There will be a drop off, perhaps a major one that forces us to rely on the defense, but there’s no way it can possibly be as bad as 2004.”

When Mark Rubin was the best receiver. Shudder.

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 21, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My major concern

is a lack of a deep threat and that’s where I drew the dark years comparison. Yes, Brackett, Zug, and Moye are more talented than aforementioned dark year receivers. However, if I am a d-coordinator, I’m not sure I even think twice about putting my safeties four yards from the line of scrimmage. Last year, Williams and Butler were significant deep threats, meaning you have to cover over the top on both sides of the field.

by cpm126 on May 21, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big Difference........

Williams – 5’11
Deon Butler – 5’10"
Jordan Norwood – 5’11"

Brett Brackett – 6’6"
Derek Moye – 6’5"
Graham Zug – 6’2"
Mickey Schuler – 6’4"
Andrew Quarless – 6’5"

You can tactically defend speed. I’m not sure you can tactically defend height as easily.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 21, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The cumulative.........

effect of their presence isn’t as great next to the guys that are shorter.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 21, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would almost say they'd make a bigger impact with the smurfs

since they gave Clark the usually reliable (though this is Quarless we’re talking about) jump ball to throw when the shorties were covered, while they don’t give much advantage being with a bunch of other guys that can play for the jump ball.

by The JuggerNitt on May 21, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I saw.......

the smurfs wide open on any consistent level, I might agree with you. But in my opinion, the taller you are the more room you give your QB to throw. Shielding the defender from coming over top of you is big.

Time will tell. I thought when Moye and Brackett and Zug caught the ball last year they looked very comfortable doing so.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 21, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant the TE's gave a bigger advantage when paired with the smurfs

since the TE’s allowed for the “tall” receiver, while with this year’s group of WRs the TE’s aren’t going to look like the easy “tall” target anymore, and will just be slower (though stronger)

by The JuggerNitt on May 21, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right.

True story.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 21, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Casey and Clark were senior QB's

…but had virtually nothing else in common. Clark’s decision making skills, ball-handling skills and leadership is markedly better than Caseys. I would also say his mobility in the pocket is better since Casey had a tendency to swing out of the box and either tuck and run or fire a pass off his back foot.

I think a big wildcard is the play of the upperclass TE’s. They could add a lot to the offense this year. Still, that’s asking a lot. Shuler’s more of a blocker and I’m not holding my breath that Andrew Quarless will put it all together this year.

by Cairo on May 21, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes, but

has Clark run 80+ yards to score a 20 yard TD?

by The JuggerNitt on May 21, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think..........

with Clark having another year in the system, we might get more production out of the passing game than we did last year.

Count me among the minority that thought Derrick, Deon, and Jordan underperformed a little bit last year relative to the hype.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 20, 2009 9:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

concurrence

from the jtothep cornerence

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 20, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I too concur

The Wideout Trio (possible jazz band?) were very important to the program as a whole. They were very good, solid receivers. But I think their most important contributions (maybe with the exception of DWill’s returns) were in the locker room and on the sidelines. There are a number of good receptions I can remember (tiptoeing the sidelines, etc), but the number of just incredible receptions made by the three are few. Its those kind of receptions I think that would make a irreplaceable receiving corps. As far as making some solid catches I think there’s a chance Zug, Moye, Powell can fill in adequately (see Overlord Zug’s TD reception against Sparty as an example of a good solid reception).

I think JtotheP is right here.

"Even though it was bouncing, I knew it was so soft that it was just going to stay in," Battle said. "Then I ran around like a lunatic."

by bconway6 on May 21, 2009 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget

we also have Justin Brown coming in (assuming we don’t redshirt him), plus Christian Kuntz (how could he not be good?)

by dawsonPSU10 on May 21, 2009 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Incidentally........

they also went back and forth on ESPN College Football Live tonight about the Big 10 and how bad its been for the last 5 years. Decent exchange between Herbie, Palmer and some other guy that I can’t remember.

Basically……….Big 10 is 6-16 in bowls over the last 3 years. 2-7 in BCS games with losses on average of 15 points per game. etc etc.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 20, 2009 9:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Was it this guy?

or this guy:

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 20, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw that too

Couple notes:
- they discussed, ad nauseum, the perception of Big Ten vis a vis the rest of the country without, of course—being the wwl, ever acknowledging their own freakin role in said perception.
- does no one, either inside Palmer’s posse, or elsewhere on the wwl set, offer dude suggestions on the fit of his suit? He looks preposterous.

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 20, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol.........

It was Ivan Drago. Classic.

You have to give Palmer credit for standing up for the Big 10s speed.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 20, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, they did a good job, all three of em

on the subject of omg big ten slowness. I think Herbie nailed it when he emphasized these things:
- the speed they’re talking about is NOT at the skill positions, but on the interior—o and d lines
- big ten has a top-to-bottom issue: the speed they’re talking about doesn’t really apply to OSU, PSU, UM, who are recruiting at a top level, but more about the Wisconsins, Purdues, Iowas
- the big ten has the obvious issue: they’re top teams have been losing to other leagues’ top teams

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 20, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or maybe even this guy...

One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's

by rahpsu92 on May 21, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My early 2009 gut

1. Clark is going to be awesome. He reminds me a bit of Roethlisberger, he’s big and strong, will be able to keep a play going and take advantage when it breaks down. This should help the recievers.

2. The thing about losing three starters on the offensive line is that you return two as well, plus Schuler at Tight End. Wisnewski is going to the league too, so it’s not like we return crap. The guys were bringing up have been in the program for a while too. I think we’ll be okay, Clark should be able to cover some of their mistakes.

3. Royster is already good, if doesn’t get any better at all we’re still cool at tailback.

4. I don’t know about the reciever position being overrated. I think losing Williams’ ability to spread the field is going to hurt more than the loss of his statistical production. I don’t see anybody that we have right now that is going to keep anybody honest.

5. Defense…What’s Penn State’s defensive philosopy? Deep Defensive line rotation, great linebackers, corners that can run and safeties that can hit. Anybody see any reason why we won’t do that this year besides different names? Me either. Defense will be fine.

At the end of the day we have to worry about Ohio State and stupid let down loss (see Iowa), I’m looking directly at Illinois, Michigan State and yes, Michigan.

We should be good, we could be great.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 21, 2009 9:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe we can be awesome?

"I'm driven by greatness" - Derrick Williams

by HookMania on May 21, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

so help me...

if Benn goes wild again I’ll go crazy.

You can’t forget about Northwestern in the let down loss category either. Looking at the schedule, I’d say Michigan or NU are prime candidates for the let down.

"I'm driven by greatness" - Derrick Williams

by HookMania on May 21, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I got news for you...

You’re going crazy. That Benn kid is the real deal.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 21, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will be shocked if he doesn’t torch our secondary and our kick and punt coverage teams. Shocked.

DO YOU HAVE ANY PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on May 21, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was suprised he didn't go pro

Disapointed too.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 21, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that he is a talented individual

But looking at his career stats – 5 receiving tds with 3 of them against PSU – why so many against PSU? Spread the TDs out across the schedule Benn!

I’ll keep my sanity if we hold him to one td and somewhere in the vincinity of 100 yds.

"I'm driven by greatness" - Derrick Williams

by HookMania on May 21, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Wide Receiver Position

Requires these skills, order of importance varies per scheme, but let’s say the Spread HD requires them in this order:
1. Get open. Also referred to as route-running or separation skills.
2. Catch passes.
3. Block.
4. Run after the catch.
5. Decoy/threaten getting open or running after the catch
What else is there? 1,2 & 3 are so fundamental that Penn State historically has put a metric assload of successful receivers on the field who had these skills in spades, but who probably lacked all the overhyped, ethereal themes of ‘blazing speed’, ‘can really stretch the field’, ‘keeps the defense honest’. When skills 1, 2 & 3 are honed, 4&5 are just overcited froth, which players who shout loudest from the position love to perpetuate. Young Zug, Moye & Powell will be just fine thank you.

Offensive guard, on the other hand….., we just never hear enough about. Even if you drop Zug’s 4.5 and Moye & Powell’s 4.4 down to Butler’s/Dwheels’ 4.3s, it don’t mean a goddamn thing if Thad Gibson or Cam Heyward is blowing right through Troutman/Pannell to hassle Clarke onto the run. Without Ohrnberger keeping Everson Griffen off Clarke’s back, PSU couldn’t even have pretended to try to come back in the Rose Bowl. Everything I’ve read the past three years says Eliades is nearly as athletic as Wiz (if not as fundamentally precise) and may even be nastier, so I picture him doing just fine filling Wiz’s spot running and pulling for wicked downfield zone blocks. And no one doubts Wiz’s ability to equal or surpass Shipley’s performance and leadership at center. And it may even be true that Pannell is actually more athletic than Cadogen, tho we’ll see about performance this year. But Orhnberger to Troutman? That’s the talent/performance gap worth focusing on.

Much more, imho, than the receiver changes.

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 21, 2009 2:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

To an extent I agree

1. I think concern on the offensive line is well founded. I think offensive line is certainly more important than wide reciever. My point is not that think it’s important, it’s that I am not terribly concerned that the o-line won’t be good. Like I said before Wiznewski is going to the NFL, and the guys were bringing back have been around. A certain amount of turnover on the offensive line is to be expected, and has never really been a problem for us. Injuries are always a concern, but all in all, I think they’ll be fine.

2. Williams was no decoy. Most of the time he was the most talented player on the field. Speed is a key component to the spread in the “Spread HD”, you can’t coach speed, and you don’t grow into it. It’s a distinct difference between replacing Williams, and replacing Shipley or Cadogen.

Notice that despite the statistcal similarites I’m not terribly concerned about replacing Butler or Norwood, two kids that I consider to be nothing more than well coached, above average, college football players. They’ll be missed, but they’ll also be replaced. I think a lot of what we lost along the offensive front falls in to this category as well.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 21, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but the most important component to Penn State football...

you, the fans.

or maybe JoePa

but they’re both definitely up there.

by The JuggerNitt on May 21, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And also with you (Zug be with you)

For my part, I’m not terribly concerned that the new receivers won’t be good (and believe the new new receivers might end up being really good). And I’ll buy lots of what you say about Dwheels, except what I think I hear you implying in the last sentence of number 2. Which brings us back to MY point, which maybe can be described like this:

My Concern about the Replacement Gap (Ohrnberger/Cadogen ≠ Troutman/Pannell) > Concern for the Replacement Gap (Williams ≠ Powell)

For even if I grant that the gap between Williams & Powell is greater (say 70pts Williams, 30pts Powell) than the gap between Oberger/Cadogen & Troutman/Pannell (say 60/40), and those are extreme for the sake of argument (I’d probably actually at this point also give Oberger/Cadogen 70 to 30 on Troutman/Pannell), my concern for the LT/LG replacements is greater b/c it’s a more important replacement task. Mostly because of the linearity of a progressive football play: receivers ain’t catching shit from a quarterback with a dlineman on his back.

“You can’t coach speed’ is just another in a long line of the receiver position’s favorite bromides, and does little to describe why replacing Dwheels is such a distinct difference from replacing Oberger/Cadogen.

Hey, this game is fun too and you can make it fun. --j. odrick
But I’m biased towards tailgating, as you may imagine. -ts
Ignore the accolades – just enjoy the games. -bb&w

by jtothep on May 21, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

does little to describe why replacing Dwheels is such a distinct difference from replacing Oberger/Cadogen.

I sincerely doubt the level of skill and talent in the offensive line replacements is anywhere close to as wide as it is between Williams and say, Chaz Powell.

"I honestly think the "Spread HD" is going to work pretty well, and we’ll be just fine this year". - 8-27-2008

by jesse. on May 22, 2009 8:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to jump in here

1. QB is the most important position on the field and we’re returning one that may be one of our best in the last 20 years. Clark will get better, and he will make other people better, particularly the receivers. He also throws particuarly well on the run, which is going to be really important b/c:

2. The o-line will piss us all off. A lot. We’re going to be screaming about it by October. It’s something that for some reason we just haven’t had the type of consistency year-to-year we see with the d-line, but maybe that’s changing. Until further notice, be very afraid, if not terrified of what happens when we face a team with a decent run-stopping front-7. When our run-game goes cold we’re dead in the water (see USC).

3. I think Stephon Green has the potential to see some time as a slot receiver. He doesn’t have the ideal height but he’s deadly in open space and he’s too dangerous to leave out of our passing game. That simple screen play we ran with him gave him some impressive receiving numbers, and there’s no reason we can’t build on that. You want a guy that scares the crap out of defensive coordinators? Stephon Green. I also don’t see why he won’t be returning punts next season.

"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.

by millzners on May 22, 2009 3:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I forget who came up with it, and I'm not going to take credit for it

But I believe it’s required now to call that Stephon Green screen pass “The Green Screen”

by dawsonPSU10 on May 22, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will be interesting......

to see if there is any creativity in “using” Devon Smith’s speed whether it be getting him the ball or being accounted for on the field.

Eric Watters Atlanta, Ga.

"If you hear Ric Flair is in town......WOOOOO........you KNOW things are takin' place".

Ric Flair

by ech2os on May 23, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully one works

And we may only get one try to use him before he’s crushed to death.

by dawsonPSU10 on May 23, 2009 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Penn State Nittany Lions.
Start posting about the Nittany Lions »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Amish2_small
Michigan State photoshop thread
Cairo_small
HATE WEEK: Michigan State!
Lenny_small
What time is it?
Lenny_small
MMM FREAKING BOP
Small
Playcalling - Beating the Dead Horse

Recent FanPosts

Psu_gr4eatestb_waa_small
RANKING THE CONFERENCES
Lenny_small
[slightly half-assed] Preview of the ACC-Big Ten Challenge - "For ****'s sake, can we just win this thing?"
1_4404_small
TV Rankings Not Easily Found.....
Camedia_pics_048_small
Wrestling Update - 'Shadow Team' Division
Joepa_rival_small
Looking Forward....Backup QB most popular guy on Campus
Sutherland2_small
2009 in a Nutshell
Small
BCS Situation for PSU
Arialndfrompsu5_small
The Bacon Explosion
Shonufffullsize_small
Tailgate/Fundraiser today!!!
Talorbattlewallpaper2_1__small
Blame it on the ball?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Lioneye_edited_small BSD

Editors

Reporter_small Kevin HD

Image_small Run Up The Score

Official Partner of CBS Sports