Nitt Picks Has Your Alarm Clock Right Here, Buddy
Wake Up, It's Football!
Penn State Blue Band wakes up tailgater | Penn State vs. Temple (via gotoaroundtheleague)
This Scholarship Offer Was Totally Not Stapled To Your Birth Certificate. As noted in the Fanposts, there's a weird rip in the time-space recruiting continuum with respect to Levi Norwood. We were all led to believe that Levi wowed the coaching staff at the recent senior-only camp, leading to the formal scholarship offer. As it turns out, well, not so much:
On Friday and Saturday, he worked out at Penn State's senior camp, meeting current Lion recruits P.J. Jones and Adrian Coxson and catching up with former teammate Alex Kenney. However, he had actually been in town for the entire week, helping Little Lion boys basketball coach Drew Frank with a camp at the high school.
Most had felt Norwood had gotten his Penn State scholarship offer based on his performance at Penn State's camp. Norwood, however, said that was inaccurate.
"I had the offer a week before I came back,'' Norwood said.
Not that it's any sort of groundbreaking revelation, unless Norwood was misquoted or misspoke. As long as Norwood wasn't visibly limping or drooling on the football, he was going to get a scholarship offer. His dad coached here for a number of years, his older brother went from walk-on highly scrutinized greyshirt to the school's #3 all-time receiver, Penn State preaches loyalty and family, etc. But there was a little spinning going on last week, it seems.
Creampuffery. So, have you heard anything about Penn State's non-conference schedule lately? The York Daily Record's Frank Bodani (one of the best on the PSU beat, incidentally), does a little reverse engineering of his own:
Part of it is an aberration, a rare chance to pocket another $4 million from an eighth home game. Remember that the Nittany Lions travel to Alabama next year and get the Crimson Tide at home in 2011. Part of this also is a change in the college football landscape. The recent 12-game schedule makes it easy for everyone to grab a guaranteed non-con victory at home.
But the most important thing? Like it or not, this schedule will do more to help Penn State make a national title run than hurt it. Look at it this way: With the Nittany Lions breaking in multiple new receivers, offensive linemen and defensive backs, it will take a while to find their stride, to play up to their talent level. Go back to 2005 to see how this works.
Sadly, this one reads like a press release from the ever-breathless GoPSUSports.com. Yes, the joke of a schedule makes it more likely to go 12-0 or 11-1. Obviously. We're all happy to not be playing at Florida in Week One. That doesn't make it a good schedule. It's about the $4 million, and playing Alabama in 2010-11 doesn't make up for Eastern Illinois and Akron in 2009. Fine, it's about money. We know it, Penn State knows it, let's move on. Just don't come back in November whining about ZOMG ESPN HATES ON PENN STATE MARK MAY IS A JERK if they're absolutely skewering 11-0 Penn State* for their garbage non-con.
Like The "World's Strongest Man", But Without All Those Scandinavians. Penn State's annual Lift For Life fundraiser will be held Friday from 2-7 p.m. at Holuba Hall. Suggested donation is $5 for kids and students and $10 for adults, proceeds to benefit the Kidney Cancer Association:
Last year, more than 90 Nittany Lion football student-athletes tested their strength and endurance in the 11-exercise competition (featuring bench press, leg press, tire flip, iron cross and others), which raised more than $70,000 for the Kidney Cancer Association.
...
If you do make the trek to Happy Valley, you'll have a chance to meet and get autographs from current and former Penn State players. New this year is a "Fun Zone" with kids games, a silent auction and onsite credit card processing.
Uplifting Athletes events are organized by current football student-athletes. The Penn State Football chapter of Uplifting Athletes is run by members of the Nittany Lion football team, including officers Brett Brackett, Jesse Alfreno, Patrick Mauti and Ryan Gmerek, as well as Brennan Coakley, Mike Farrell, Ty Howle, Stephen Joseph, Shelton McCullough and Matt Stankiewitch.
In Scores Of OthCOME TO PENN STATE. CDT has a glowing review of Penn State's early recruiting efforts. Michigan DE C.J. Olaniyan is narrowing his choices. Shockingly, early playing time is a point of emphasis.
* - Yes, that involves at least four legitimate leaps of faith.
0 recs |
48 comments
|
Comments
"or drooling on the football"

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 9:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is that QB14?
And regardless, why is there an air pump right next to him?
by dawsonPSU10 on Jul 6, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, that is QB14
I do not know why there is an air pump next to him.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the air pump is for...you know...to fill his head back up with air...
PSU Softball
by QBsneak12 on Jul 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+0.21
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, when’d you get replaced with a Russian judge?
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet. -jesse. @ BSD
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Jul 6, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
In Soviet Black Shoe Diaries, umm, I can’t figure out a joke.
Graham Zug praises YOU!!!
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
man, I wish I was in Soviet Black Shoe Diaries
I could use some Zug praise
by The JuggerNitt on Jul 6, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How in the world did you find a picture of QB14 holding a monsterous catfish?
Or at least which hilarious search term yielded this?
by dawsonPSU10 on Jul 6, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“Interspecies Doublemint Twins”
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet. -jesse. @ BSD
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Jul 6, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did a search for "Anthony Morelli"
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 7, 2009 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
…who?
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet. -jesse. @ BSD
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Jul 7, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, I was so focused...
on the nasty looking catfish(?) that I didn’t even notice who was holding it.
A lot of marinas have air pumps – if you drive out on the sand to fish you need to deflate your tires to maintain traction. Or maybe a buddy of his pumps gas in Oakland.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Jul 6, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's put this issue to rest once and for all.
With respect to the schedule, our non-con schedule is made up of three cream puffs, plus one BCS school (Syracuse). That’s no different that what the Fuckeyes do in Columbus, or any of the other major powers. The two game set with Syracuse was inked when the Orangemen were coming off a 10 win season, so it was not our intent to schedule a fourth suck-ass game. I have no doubt that if Curley’s crystal ball would have been working then and he could have seen how far Syracuse would fall, we would have looked elsewhere for a respectable opponent. This is the way things work in college. With graduation cycles, coaching changes, you never know 3 or 4 years in advance what kind of team you’re going to actually play against (rebuilding, senior-heavy with tons of experience, etc). I believe the intent was there to schedule one of our old eastern foes that looked to provide some decent competition. Did any of us think Syracuse would fall that far? So, how’s about a pact that from this point forward, we let the outsiders take the potshots at our schedule, and we just take care of business?
61 DAYS 46 MINUTES 29 SECONDS UNTIL KICKOFF!!
WE ARE!!! PENN STATE!!!
by Ab4PSU on Jul 6, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it doesn't matter
if it is PSU’s fault or not that syracuse is less than steller now. the fact remains that PSU has an absolutely horrible OOC schedule. those who contribute to the rankings, outside media, etc. will not be paying close attention to how our talent really stacks up, because how can one really evaluate how good a program is when they beat up on a bunch of chumps (no offense to future chumps being scheduled)? by actually watching every down and using intelligent analysis? on every rankable team? nobody has that amount of time.
unfortunately, the “who have they played” metric will always be used as the standard until ’bama rotates on the schedule next year.
Equating our matchup against syracuse and OSU vs. USC is a bit of a stretch.
hypothetically, if the USC program was reduced to cinders by the NCAA a few years back, would we be saying the same thing about OSU scheduling USC?
I looked at Ohrnberger in the fourth quarter and he looked back at me. And we said, 'We're not losing this game"
by psudrozz on Jul 6, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scandinavians?
Must I remind you that Zug Magnussan would make them all appear to be the spawn of Twiggy and Pee-Wee Herman?
Wow. That’s a more disturbing mental visual that I initially thought.
'People are about as happy as they decide they want to be'
by Pete the Streak on Jul 6, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Of course I am fine with schedule ripping, whatever
But, what gets me is that people act like we have always and always will have this bad of a schedule. You never hear anyone say “well, this is kind of an abberation, I mean the schedule is never THIS bad.” People act like PSU has never ever or ever will play a good noncon. This year is gonna be rough, but we gotta bite the bullet and wait for better OOC days.
I dunno, watching CFL and reading ESPN makes me wonder if I imagined playing Nebraska, Miami, ND, OrSt, BC and scheduling Bama, Rutgers, Virginia, Nebraska.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Jul 6, 2009 12:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree. Even in years when our OOC schedule isn’t this bad, we still have a reputation, fair or not, for playing a weak schedule. This certainly goes back to the days of being an independent (which everyone was bitter about ) and I don’t really think there is much we will be able to do about it. The only solution that will really end this type of talk is walking through our schedule, hearing every talking head and half-wit local sports reporter for the Podunk Times Gazette explain in thier recycled columns and sound bites how we don’t stack up against anyone and have no right to be in (insert bowl game here), and go out and roll a Florida/USC/(insert Big 12 flavor of the month). Frankly, until we do that I might stop whining about it. That USC game certainly knocked me down a peg or two. But I appear to be in the minority.
We are not normal. We are legends.
by NittanyAlum02 on Jul 6, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know a lot of this is homerism
but I really don’t feel bad about the loss to USC. It was a lot closer of a game than the final score indicated (even without the “oh, USC wasn’t playing in the 2nd half” argument, which I think is BS anyway cuz they seemed to be playing pretty hard to me), but even in the first half, the difference was essentially 2 long plays with broken coverage by our secondary, and a fumble by Green. Yes, I know that’s part of the game, and yes we blew it, looked crappy, and lost, but at no point did I really feel like USC dominated us. I mean heck, pretend Green didn’t fumble the ball, and we wound up getting at least a FG, and then let’s pretend that Clark’s last throw was a TD in the endzone instead of an INT in the endzone. That’s just 2 turnover plays that had they gone the other way would have made it a 4 point game (or even a tied game if we got a TD instead of a FG). TWO PLAYS!
by The JuggerNitt on Jul 6, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh, and the main point I was actually trying to make
Is I still think the top 4 teams in the country last year were Florida, USC, Texas, and PSU, and that on any given day one of those teams would beat another one of those teams. Sure, maybe we’d only win 30-40% of the games against those teams, but I don’t think wed generally get blown out by them either.
by The JuggerNitt on Jul 6, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we could've beaten TX
If tOSU came that close to beating them, I think we would have won. That could’ve been our MNC right there had both of us gone undefeated….SIGH…oh hindsight, how you hurt me so.
by dawsonPSU10 on Jul 6, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We would have scored 50 on Texas’s defense.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's true, but the worst part is
They would’ve been number 1, McCoy would’ve won the Heisman, and the scenario would have been set up for every MNC we’ve ever won: we’re #2, playing against a Heisman winner.
And we probably would’ve brought back some semblance of respect to the Big Ten for taking down an undefeated Texas, putting a few Band-aids on the cracked dam that tOSU created. Actually, who am I kidding, then the MSM would’ve actually finally covered how big of a joke Big12 defenses are, and considered our win a fluke.
by dawsonPSU10 on Jul 6, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but would we have cared what the media said?
I would have opened my 1982 National Champions Coke bottle and chugged it. That’s all that matters.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m afraid that it would have been a shoot-out. Our secondary was more suspect that we were willing to admit. I think that is probably the only position that tOSU really had us outclassed. I can’t think of another: linebacker (no); d line (not a chance); o-line (nope); wide recievers (ha – no); running backs (a wash with a healthy Beanie Wells); qb (edge to PSU b/c Clark doesn’t throw punts). I think it would have been a much better game, but we still would have heard how all worldly Texas offense was when they hung 40 on us even if we hung 52 on them.
We are not normal. We are legends.
by NittanyAlum02 on Jul 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BUT
The Texas O-line would be facing a D-line and LB corps like they’ve never faced before, so would they even have a chance to burn our secondary? Remember this is when we still had Project Mayhem and Evans. I’m not so sure it would’ve been a shoot-out, even with an exposed secondary.
by dawsonPSU10 on Jul 6, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is a very good point. Our d-line was pretty silly!
We are not normal. We are legends.
by NittanyAlum02 on Jul 6, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m sorry but it is homerism (lets also pretend that we didn’t make Mark Sanchez a #1 NFL draft pick – or that I just married Giselle Bundchen. Its fun, but its still just pretend). Frankly, you can shine that turd up any way you want (I’ve heard all of the excuses), but “we played a competitive second half” just doesn’t sit well enough for me. The resounding message from that game is that we got blown out in the Rose Bowl and did not have the athletes to compete. Was USC the best team in the nation? I would say probably yes. But if we are going to make the argument that we were one of the best, that performance, whether due to turnovers or not, does not support it. I wish I had your blue tinted shades to look through, but not even the absurd amount of shots that i did during the second half at Carpool can wash away the misery of the build-up and then let down of that game.
As an aside, I also realize that I shouldn’t let a PSU football game ruin my week/month/off-season. But it does and will likely continue to for the remainder of my life. Just how I was raised I guess.
We are not normal. We are legends.
by NittanyAlum02 on Jul 6, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I already said it was homerism, so you don't have to apologize
and I’m not saying that we should have won the game, or even that we are better than USC was. What I am saying is that the final score wasn’t really a “blowout” score, and the entire game wasn’t a blowout. People keep saying the game was a blowout, and I just don’t see it. If just 2 of about 4 or 5 different plays broke a slightly different way, then the game would have been a tie. Those plays happened, yes, so we didn’t “earn” it, but it wasn’t like they could do as they pleased against us outside of a few long balls in the second quarter that exposed our undermatched secondary. But they weren’t giving up those plays all game long, either.
I suppose it really comes to what you define as a “blowout”. Is the criteria that the final score difference be 14 points or more? I don’t really feel like we “blew out” Purdue. Is it based on building a big lead during the second quarter? Because I really don’t feel like Michigan blew us out this year. If you want to say “Penn State got blown out in the second quarter”, sure I’ll agree. But the game as a whole I felt was pretty competitive, and hinged on a couple of plays,as most competitive games do, but to me a blowout pretty much means that one team did as they pleased, and the other team never stood a chance of winning it.
I also look at it this way. If you reversed the 2 teams, would people still be calling it a blowout? I doubt it. People would be saying that Penn State played a great game and beat a very good USC squad (that they would also probably say was “unmotivated to play so close to home”) on a couple of good breaks.
by The JuggerNitt on Jul 6, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perspective I suppose
I understand your argument and do not necessarily disagree with it. Unfortunately, we have not earned the free pass that USC gets from the media in the event that the situation would have been reversed. It was a blow-out because they built an insurmountable lead in the second quarter and then were able to sit on it and win the game easily (michigan was not). I do, however, slightly disagree that USC could not throw on us at will because it sure seemed that way (Sanchez completed 28 of 35 passes, setting the Rose Bowl record for completion percentage, had 413 yards and 4 touchdowns). Whether we made half time adjustments or they really just sat on the lead is almost irrelevant to anyone who isn’t a PSU fan. We had a very large hurdle to overcome in that game (for which we continuosly blame tOSU), and we failed miserably on probably the second biggest stage. Its just still a hard pill to swallow that’s all. And just to clarify, I wasn’t trying to say we just got walked over, but if we want the national media to not take shots at us, when we have these opportunities we have to take advantage of them.
We are not normal. We are legends.
by NittanyAlum02 on Jul 7, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
These are good points
Been pondering a post-post-facto revisitation of the Rose Bowl, its coverage and mostly, the importance of the loss on the Penn State coaches and program at large….
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Jul 7, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Late addition...
…via JayTweet from a few days ago, Blair Thomas is like magic.
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 6, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jordan Norwood was never a walkon
Not trying to nitt pick but he had a schollie from day 1. Deon went from walkon to schollie not Jordan.
by RNF18 on Jul 6, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
True, that.
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Jul 6, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN HATES ON PENN STATE MARK MAY IS A JERK
1) ESPN will be doing plenty of hating on Penn State…
2) especially Mark May.
These are given. I’m used to it.
by dmoney350z on Jul 6, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and Lou Holtz will spit on you if you get close enough..
PSU Softball
by QBsneak12 on Jul 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lou "the shower" Holtz
Champion of the sun, master of karate and friendship for everyone.
by psu on Jul 6, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's just me
But I feel like we’re fairly close here at Blackshoe to dictating the Terms of the College Football Conversation. How much longer til we’re quoting the likes of our BSD editors and contributors exclusively and not even mentioning the MSM?
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Jul 6, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How much longer til we’re quoting the likes of our BSD editors and contributors exclusively and not even mentioning the MSM?
About a grotto and a half, I’d say.
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet. -jesse. @ BSD
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Jul 6, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More ESPN spin....
Big10 vs. Syracuse Part 1
- Minnesota at Syracuse, Sat., Sept. 5, noon (ESPN2) – This is a good match-up between two programs scratching for respectability. They split a home-and-home series in 1995-96 in their only previous meetings.
Big10 vs. Syracuse Part 2
- Syracuse at Penn State, noon (Big Ten Network) – There is a reason why ABC/ESPN wanted no part of this game. They took it last year and PSU rolled to a 55-13 win over the sadsack Orange at the Carrier Dome. PSU leads the all-time series 41-23-5.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Jul 6, 2009 1:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In other news, The USS Maine has exploded in Havana harbor, possibly due to a Spanish mine.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Jul 6, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOOOOOOOOOO
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet. -jesse. @ BSD
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Jul 6, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lift for Life
The BSDivas (Row73Fan, psuesq and a stalker diva who will get a name as soon as she can figure out a good one) will be representing at Lift for Life this year, so stop by and give up some cash for a good cause and a great day!
Proud member of the Come Early, Be Loud, Stay Late Tailgate Crew since 1998!
by Row73Fan on Jul 6, 2009 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I dunno if I'm going to go.
Depends on how sober I am that morning (2 pm on a drinking day constitutes morning) but I may try to swing through.
"Want a donut go to dunkin donuts, want a linebacker go to Penn State."
- Cris Carter, NFL Draft, 4/25/09
by kmblue on Jul 6, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey I'm famous on a football blog youtube video
Or something. Not every day I see myself on my homepage – cool.
by PSUMBBtrumpet on Jul 6, 2009 9:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gradulations!
You should be very proud. I would be.
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Jul 7, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















