Everybody Has A Price

So it's been 24 hours since the news broke that the Indiana Hoosiers will play a home game against Penn State in Fed-Ex field in Washington D.C. And the general consensus is that everyone, except for Penn State fans, is pretty ticked off about it.
Indiana fans are justifiably disgusted.
Bill Lynch is a good company man, so it will be interesting to see if or how he puts a positive spin on this. Whatever he says in public, this must be a kick in the teeth to Lynch and his staff. Again, actions speak louder than words. Glass has strongly supported Lynch publicly, but selling a game like this is not something an athletic director would do if he expects to be competing for a bowl berth in that season. This move implies that Glass expects 2010 to be yet another rebuilding year. Maybe it will be. Maybe that's a safe bet. But what if the program does make some progress, and does win 6 or 7 games this year? That means that in 2010, when trying to take advantage of a strong 2009, Lynch and his team would be trying to do so with a schedule that includes only three Big Ten home games.
Michigan Wolverine fans are outraged! OUTRAGED I SAY!
"The Big Ten should shoot this down, and do it soon. This is the I-A equivalent of forfeiting a conference game so you can get paid by Michigan. Insert some bylaw that says any attempt to move a conference home game out of state or to a point that's closer to the nominal road team than the home team must be approved by the league first, and look very sternly at the Indiana administration when you do."
I must say that if I were an Indiana Hoosier fan I would be hurt by this too. If my athletic department took one of the marquee home games on the schedule and moved it 600 miles away to the opponent's back yard, I think I'd be pretty mad. In the short term, this stinks for Hoosier fans. But let's get some things clear.
First of all, there is a perception out there that Indiana "sold a home game to Penn State". This is not a Penn State home game. Yes, it's nearby. But Indiana is getting $3 million for this game. Penn State gets the usual cut for a conference road game. It's a competitive advantage, yes, but on the financial end of things Indiana is getting the benefit and then some of a regular home game.
Oh, and as for the Big Ten stepping in and calling a stop to this? Keep dreaming.
Glass acknowledged economics played a significant factor in Indiana's interest in the proposal. When Glass approached Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany with the idea, he said Delany advised him on certain contractual elements. As part of the finalized deal, the Redskins will pay the full amount owed to Indiana prior to the game being played and the Hoosiers must sell 7,000 tickets.
Seems like Delany was in on this from the ground level. So much for the Big Ten stepping in.
And let's point out another fact in Penn State's defense here. Columbus is near Ann Arbor. Ann Arbor is near Evanston, East Lansing, and West Lafayette. West Lafayette is near Bloomington. Madison is near Champaign. My point here is that most Big Ten schools have a nice setup where it's easy for fans to travel with their team throughout the season. And schools can count on visiting fans to fill up their stadium during their down years. But Penn State, as we are constantly reminded by the Big Ten purists, is not a good geographical fit for the conference. It's over 330 miles and five-and-a-half hours by car to get from State College to the nearest Big Ten School. So we get a little excited when we get a chance to see our team on the road without having to fork over money for air fare and hotels.
Penn State travels well, and probably still would have sent 10,000 people to help fill Indiana's 50,000 seat stadium. But there would still be some empty seats. By moving the game to Washington D.C., Indiana assures a sellout. And instead of selling tickets for $25 a pop they can sell them for $50 or more, and they get the added bonus of parking fees and concession sales which will be heavily fueled by alcohol; something they could never do in Bloomington.
The other thing I keep hearing is that this gives Penn State a competitive advantage in the Big Ten title race. C'mon. Really? Does anyone think Indiana and Penn State were going to be playing for the Big Ten championship next year? Does anyone really think Penn State stands a chance of losing to Indiana even if the game is played on the moon and Joe Paterno forgets to pack the oxygen masks? Please spare me the talk about the Hoosiers only losing the last two games in Bloomington by an average of 4.5 points. The 2007 Indiana team was their first bowl eligible team in a hundred years. This is no longer Terry Hoeppner's team. And the 2004 Penn State team was one of the worst offenses in the Joe Paterno era. And we still won. In fact, Penn State has never...NEVER...lost to Indiana. So let's not pretend that this game is tipping the balance of power in the Big Ten.
The fact of the matter is this was a brilliant move by Indiana Athletic Director Fred Glass. He is tasked with the job of making sure Indiana Hoosier sports are competitive, but he also has to balance the books. He doesn't have the luxury of selling club boxes for $85,000 each. Tripling your income by moving one game you were probably going to lose anyway is a no-brainer for him. While Indiana fans local to Bloomington are justifiably upset about missing a chance to see one of the premier Big Ten programs come to town, in the long run they should applaud their athletic director for seeking out innovative ways to even the financial playing field with the conference's bigger teams.
And the other schools of the Big Ten crying foul need to pipe down. You're just jealous because Indiana didn't pick your school to play in an NFL stadium. The conference as a whole benefits from exposure to the D.C. area. Indiana will be able to provide a much larger share to the conference coffers than if the game were held in Bloomington. And as a conference there are times when we need to boost up the lower programs by encouraging them to think outside the box rather than insist they compete with the economic disadvantages they are given. I think we can all agree the Big Ten is down right now in the eyes of the national media. The less competitve programs of the conference have to be encouraged and supported in trying to make themselves better.
0 recs |
310 comments
|
Comments
Its still a slipperly slope...
Exchanging a competitive advantage for a big pile of cash sets a bad precedent. It reminds me of that old joke about negotiating a price with a woman of ill repute. The conference has already agreed to sell its integrity we are now just negotiating on price.
by VVeRPennState on Aug 27, 2009 10:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Free Markets Rule
In reality, I can’t see any situation where an athletic department can sustain a long term model of selling off their biggest home game on the schedule to the highest bidder. The alumni would never stand for it. What good is building up a competitive team if you never get to see them play good competition.
I think Glass realizes this is a card he can’t play too often.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Everyone has their price but I would have never have moved this game to DC for 3M unless I was DESPERATE! To slap your alumni in the face like that I think you need a bigger payday unless the IU is so desperate for cash. Maybe IU would want to play Pitt in the NY Bowl!
Wait a second, Pitt does not even play in their own stadium… does Pitt get 3M for each of their home games? Does this mean IU is better than Pitt?
Peter
by psuboy on Aug 27, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is no different than being a 1AA team and playing a 1A opponent
some times you just need cash. In this economy, if someone came to PSU and offered Tim Curley a chance to play a mens home basketball game at the United Center in Chicago for a $3 million dollar payday, or even if you base it on a percent, say a 50% increase in profits, I bet he would jump all over it.
Maybe Indiana gets their brains bashed in, but they take the added income to upgrade something around the program or athletic department. In the end it is an upgrade and helps the overall health of their program and thusly the Big Ten.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is a difference
First off, you can’t really compare football and basketball in this instance. The difference in the number of games as well as the profit made per game are too different. When it comes to what a DIAA team normally does and what Indiana intends to do, there are differences as well. Arguments could be made that a DIAA school receives other benefits besides cash without losing anything. When Coastal Carolina travels to Beaver Stadium they not only get the payday, but they get added exposure with the game being broadcast on television and highlights being show on ESPN. Their players who rarely get the chance to play in front of large crowds get the experience of playing in front of 100k, something they will remember for a long time. The only thing they lose is an out of conference game that could have easily been a road game somewhere else. With Indiana it is a pure cash grab. They are not gaining any extra exposure. The main stream media isn’t going to care where this game is played, its still going to get near identical coverage as a normal PSU vs IU game. And to the team it will seem like any other Big Ten road game. In addition Indiana loses a home conference game and one of their marquee games at that. I agree with MGoBlog, its much more like Delaware state forfeiting a conference game in order to play Michigan, a decision I am equally against.
by VVeRPennState on Aug 27, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do not see a difference
I said the basketball deal could be the same percentage of profit gain that they are making in comparison to the football situation. Indiana does need the cash, that is no different than any other low tier team, including 1AA teams. I wasn’t going to mention the stadium thing but since you brought up the "playing in front of 100k, as being “something they will remember for a long time”, for many of these Indiana players playing in an NFL stadium will be an experience they may remember for a long time, since 90% of their team has no shot at the NFL.
I find it very disagreeable that you and Michigan fans are saying this is like the Delaware State situation. It isn’t Indiana will be at least a 20 pt underdog no matter where they play. As for losing a “marquee game” what exactly do they lose? The local economy might take a hit, but the university will do just fine.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like that Michigan fans are pissed
Primarily because Indiana would never sell the Michigan game, hell it’s probably homecoming. It is unfair to Michigan, in my opinion it’s about damn time something in this confrence was unfair to Michigan.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Michigan can kiss my Zugg brand bacon grease
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
getting warmer
I think you’re getting close to the mark. I understand the slippery slope argument some are making, but that is something that will work itself out down the road as BSD suggests in the comments. Personally, i wouldn’t give a rats or wolverine’s ass if Indiana or Minnesota, or hell any team sold the michigan game to a pro stadium, Ford Field even.
The fact of the matter is that they are seeing themselves displaced in the overall league hierarchy, on the field and in off the field in matters of money/prestige.
by larchlion on Aug 27, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's exactly the opposite of that
There is no way in hell Minnesota would give up a home game against Michigan. I think that if the money was right, they would look the other way at it if it was Penn State.
Penn State is getting a competitive advantage that could theoretically affect Michigan. I mean, upsets do happen, especially in road confrence games. We know what it’s like to have everbody gunning for you, and to skate on a road game, even one that on it’s face looks like an easy win, is a break. And it’s a break that will never be afforded to Michigan.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So everytime someone schedules Penn State at night instead of 12:00 we are giving Michigan an unfair break?
Come on, as was stated by Mike above, they are underdogs no matter where they play this game. The only thing that changes is the fan base. Penn State still has to break routine, and play on the road, they still have to adjust to the different environment. The only difference is that now Indiana has to do the same.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And
as Bill Lynch said, this is their bowl game. Making Indiana go on the road to play in front of 90,000 I think adds to the hype for them.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Ted Dibiase pic
Where’s Virgil?
What is the outside-the-Big-Ten media saying about this? Does this help/hurt the B10’s rep?
by PSUJunny05 on Aug 27, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't imagine anybody outside the Big Ten gives a crap.
Frankly, I’m stunned anybody gives a crap.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
What you said
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said....
Sums up my thoughts exactly.
The thing I don’t understand is what the Redskins or any Pro team gain from giving $3 million to a College team to hold their game in the stadium.
Someone help me out please.
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Aug 27, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
65K college kids/alumni buying alcohol? I’d be willing to bet an NFL stadium, at least Washington’s, makes more money on alcohol from a college crowd than an NFL crowd. I could be way off base, though.
by PSUJunny05 on Aug 27, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That game will be a sell out,
throw in parking, alcohol, and concessions and they will easily recoup their money and then some.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So basically...
the Redskins will keep all revenue from parking, alcohol, and concessions and turn a profit on top of the $3 mill they spent?
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Aug 27, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think about it this way
The stadium seats 70k? Say tickets are $35 a piece, you sell out and make 2.45 million. Then you throw in concessions, say every person spends on average $10 a piece (when your selling beer, that number will most likely be MUCH higher) that makes you an additional $700,000. Putting your total on concessions and gate at over 3 million. Anything else you do, in Parking, concessions, and merchandise is profit. You may spend another million on employees but you will do just fine economically.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The stadium seats ~92000
and they’ll probably net more than $35 a seat, even after paying for the stadium crew.
I may loathe Dan Shyster, but the man does know a good deal when he sees one.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He may be after Tim Curley's title

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I LOATHE this man
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah...
Curley’s got nothing on Snyder when it comes to flagrant greed in the face of reasonable logic.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought his problem was stupidity
Not necessaily greed, at least as it relates toward spending money on the Redskins. I mean, he spends a fair amount of money getting players.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He wants it now (a SB ring)

"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Eight Arms to Hold You
Nice WW reference! +1
by nylyst on Aug 28, 2009 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ummm
I’m ignernt. Either of yas care to enlighten this guy on the nuances of your little tangent here?
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 28, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Willy Wonka
Veruca Salt? I want it NOW Daddy
replace Golden Goose with Super Bowl Championship
I was scared of her when I was small, she would have beat me up in grade school
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 28, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually it sits 90k so that number now comes to 3.15 million on $35 tickets.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But does IU or PSU get any part of the Tix sales?
"A setback is just a set up for a comeback." -Drew Brees
by kajpsu on Aug 27, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PSU get’s whatever PSU would normally get for an away game. Indiana gets their $3 mil and that is it.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So we get our regular cut, plus our revenue-sharing cut
Plus, the game is closer… and in prime recruiting territory.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I get to go.
So yeah, win win win.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They probably can't have any in-game contact with recruits
But 50,000 (possibly 85,000) people cheering for Penn State probably make Indiana look bad, but let’s be realistic, the two programs are not recruiting from the same talent pool for the most part.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No in-game contact
But what are the rules governing our players getting their full allotment of tickets and handing them out to their former teammates?
Just sayin’
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rumors in the DC area recently
have said that Snyder’s trying to move the Skins back into DC proper by retro-fitting RFK. (This would be awesome by the way; FedEx Field, as everyone will found out in 16 months, pretty much sucks. I’m no skins fan, but I’d go to the games if they were in RFK.)
Anyway, Snyder needs to pay off the stadium if he hopes to ever move the team, so maybe that’s why. From his perspective, why not offer this? That stadium gets used for 10 days a year (8 home regular season skins games, two preseason games) and that’s it. Might as well try to make some scratch.
I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.
by spakajewia on Aug 27, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
RFK would be knocked down
He’d make deal to lease the land and then build the new stadium, probably with 100,000 seats and a roof, himself. More or less. Given that his investment in Six Flags has been a disaster and the fact he has something like 17 years left on his deal with Maryland, I don’t see this happening soon.
It would be cool though.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
didn’t Jack Kent Cook pay for FedEx himself? If I recall, it was orginally named after him. Too lazy too look it up.
Anyhow, I loved RFK, it rocked and the way the roof was shaped made the noise just reverbarate through the place
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
RFK is really a great stadium
and I wish the Nats still played there. I lived about a mile away on the hill when the Nats came to DC and went to like 20 games the first season. $5 tickets, $5 beers, those were the days.
They played a bowl game in RFK last year, I forget what it was called, but Navy won, I think. The DC MLS team still uses RFK. As cool as I think it would be to bring the skins back into the district, it would suck if that meant tearing down RFK.
I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.
by spakajewia on Aug 27, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eaglebank Bowl, I think
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
FedExField was originally called Jack Kent Cooke Stadium.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was a mean old man, but was sure willing to spend $$ on his team yet not interfere with the operations
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Fedex Field Sucks

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bitch set me up!
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of my favorite lines
Right up there with Ice-Cube’s: ‘better take yo ass to the sto wit dat, bitch.’
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember the Skins beat Denver in the Superbowl, they were interviewing MB on one of the local DC channels. He was wearing a cowboy hat and shearling coat, and apprered drunk off his a$$. Someone was trying to pull him off and but would not stop. It was hysterical and also sad.
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he was drunk
I recall hearsay that he was rushed to a San Diego hospital due to OD’ing.
Barry wasn’t Mayor when JKC cut off dealing with D.C. though.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love the pic....
I wonder if Indiana approached the Colts about a something like this and the Colts declined.
by Esteban d' Amur on Aug 27, 2009 11:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't work as well
The advantage here is that D.C. is in PSU’s back yard. Penn State has a huge following in MD, VA, and DE. If they held the game in Indy they would never fill up the stadium.
Now if it were Ohio State or Michigan we were talking about, it would make perfect sense for Indiana to book the game in Indy. And I bet they’ll look to do that going forward.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I was implying...
I bet those schools will be looking to that too. I’m surprised Michigan has put “pressure” on Northwestern to play a game or two at Solider Field.
by Esteban d' Amur on Aug 27, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically though
Minnesota has been playing in an NFL stadium for years, and they couldn’t wait to get out.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michigan and Northwestern
Why should they put pressure on Northwestern? The cats never sell out, so pretty much any Michigan fan that wants to go to the game can walk up to the ticket window and probably buy a ticket for $20. Put it in an NFL stadium and you’ll pay that just for parking. Suddenly an afternoon trip that would have cost $100 to cover your ticket, beer, gas, and parking now runs you $200.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but...
With the amount of Michigan alums living in Chicago and public transportation, I think Solider Field would sell out. You may even get more Northwestern alumni to come to the game. For the really sucessful Michigan alums, the difference between $100 and $200 is nothing.
by Esteban d' Amur on Aug 27, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For the really successful Michigan alums
the difference between Evanston and the Loop is nothing. It really is that close.
Now if we were talking about Illinois moving a game to Solidier Field, that would be different.
by PSU Mudder on Aug 27, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But that's why they (UM & OSU) are pissed
Indiana would never give the home game with those two, because they would sell out their stadiums. Plus their fans would basicly burn the town down. Penn State offers the best of both worlds, it’s a sellable game, that while the home town folks might be pissed, they aren’t going to riot in the street.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
...and it's a game that PSU fans are less likely to travel for in Bloomington.
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Aug 27, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The nice thing
Is that this seems to be a trend. Giants Stadium is trying to lure some big time college football. Yankee Stadium is hosting Notre Dame, so maybe they’ll make a play for Penn State too. With nearby stadiums in Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and Baltimore I’m hoping this becomes a trend where NFL stadiums try to bring together big time programs or worthless conference games for cash grabs.
It’s kind of like the preseason bowl system I’ve been mentioning here and there. Get a third party to host these things and let the schools split the cash. Instead of insisting on four crappy home games every other year to offset playing one good opponent on the road, play a neutral site game every year with a big name opponent.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure it's worth it for PSU
I mean Indy is trading zero attendance for a sell out of one of (the?) biggest NFL stadiums in the country…that’s something that’s getting lost here…this thing holds like 90K. PSU would be trading 110K for 60-80K, which is a downgrade, and one the alcohol sales might not be able to overcome.
There is something to the idea, I think, but I’m not sure the alcohol sales would be enough to overcome the lost number of tickets and pissing off loyal alums, who are likely to get even more gouged for parking and the like.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
PSU will never, never farm out a future home game to an NFL stadium. Not with how much the local economy depends on football games.
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Aug 27, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But would they take off one of the big "home and home" games to play in a bowl style game?
And still have 7 or 8 home games?
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well...
Indiana is making three times their typical home-game income off this venture. When somebody offers PSU $18M to play somewhere besides Beaver Stadium, I wouldn’t fault Curley for jumping on it.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nobody would
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
So why is everybody jumping on Glass for doing basically the same thing?
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What if it was the Alabama game
and they moved it to the Georgia Dome? Trust me, you’d all be pissed.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point was also that it was kind of apples-and-oranges
Nobody is going to offer Penn State or any other established major college program a bigger payout than they would see from a BCS game… but they can offer a small program a proportionally similar payday.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
But the point holds. If somebody offered us 18 million dollars to move the Alabama game, there would be a strong argument to be made to swallow our pride and move the game.
The fact that it’s cheaper to move Indiana is actually more insideous, because it effects the intergrity of league play.
It’s similar to prostitution, just because somebody will pay you a lot of money to do something doesn’t mean you should.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the prostitution analogy
At the end of the day, though, Indiana and the rest of the conference have basically added the payday that they would get by adding another bowl on the level of the Outback or Alamo Bowl without lifting a finger.
Unsavory or not, it’s the ADs’ responsibility to make money, and that’s what Glass did here.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure
Unsavory or not, it’s the ADs’ responsibility to make money, and that’s what Glass did here.
I don’t disagree, but that doesn’t make it competitively fair to the rest of the league. The rest of the leaque simply decided to disregard an admittedly minor, breach of integrity in the confrence scheduling to make more money.
Keep in mind though, Indiana is pocketing the the Three Million, or at least a large chunk of it.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yet, no one objected
The ADs at least.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct
I presume they weighed the benefit of extra money versus the cost of basicly allowing Penn State to skate on an away game, and decided the benefit outweighed the cost.
In this finite instance I don’t even have a problem with it. But we’re supposed to be a league of equals. Buying off Indiana, or any team in the league, sets a bad precedent/
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buying off Indiana
Indiana started this. I refuse to feel bad for them if they accepted this from the Redskins folk and brought it to the big ten.
Why should it bother me, if IU’s Head Coach, IU’s AD, all big ten AD’s, and Delany aren’t bothered by it.
Don’t tell me they were pressured, if Indiana’s office didnt want this to happen, they just had to say no. They didn’t.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Aug 27, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
But they all but admitted that they only did it because they need the money.
Back to the prostitution analogy. The hooker needs the money, that’s why she sells herself. But you are not helping her by paying her for sex, no matter how cool with it she seems.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So we're all agreed that Jim Delaney is a pimp?
Good. Break out the bourbon!
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
So.
It isn’t my fault that they need the money. I would hate to sound callous, but it is the truth. It isn’t like they are a starving child and I have a ingrained sense of responsibility to help a human. They are an athletic department. Pure priveledge, not a neccessity. Football is not something god given or needed for survival like food and shelter.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Aug 27, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as the AD's accepting it
If a member school came before the other schools, showed them their balance sheet with a $5 million shortfall, and then showed them an opportunity to make up $3 million of that in one game, I would hope the other member schools would support them even if it meant creating an uneven playing field.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
At the end of the day it’s a football game in Maryland, not sex with a sweaty toothless “gentleman” in the back seat of a Chevy Nova.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zug you, man
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So we can't sell our selves as Prostitutes for more money
But it is ethical to do that same thing in reverse to 1AA teams? Last time I checked the police logs they arrested johns too.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference being
that I don’t care about the integrity of the league schedule of whatever league Delaware State is in. Should they forfeit a game for money? Of course not, but it can’t possibly effect the outcome of the Big Ten confrence.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So PSU playing on the road in Maryland is jeopardizing the integrity of league play?
As I have stated before, it is still a road game, we still wear white, we still call the toss, we still have to sleep in a hotel, we still have to break routine. It is still a road game. Do you think Paterno, or ANY coach would change his preparations because of it being in Maryland instead of Indiana? I will answer that for you, NO.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet
we won’t spend too much time preparing for noise caused by Indiana’s student section.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And they would prepare for that any other time they played?
Or would the away game at Alabama earlier in the year kind of work all those kinks out? Noise is something you address once as a coach, once your players play in it, there isn’t much of a concern.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually....
….Indiana’s student section is right on top of the visiting sideline. one of the more colorful places to play in the big ten
by hbeach08 on Aug 27, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You keep pointing to the degree of unfair.
My point is that it’s unfair. Yours seems to be that it’s not that unfair.
Which is fine, and I concede it.
But it’s the fact that Indiana has conceded every competitive advantage of a home game that’s problem.
Situations arise where an upset changes who wins the league. If MSU beat us last year, then OSU would have won the confrence. If you need Indiana to beat PSU to win the league, or go to Orlando instead of El Paso, you want, and in fact you have every right to expect, that Indiana is going to go out there do everything they can to win the game.
By selling the game to DC, Indiana isn’t doing their job. That’s unfair to the rest of the league.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pyrrhic defeat?
If Indiana reduces their chances of winning one game, but does it for the sake of increasing their chances of winning future games, then can you really say that they haven’t done their job? It’s a unique situation, and anybody who says that Indiana had a substantial chance of winning even if the game had been played in Bloomington is either A) borderline delusional or B) wallowing in sour grapes.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1994
Miami plays Nebraska in the Orange Bowl. Miami wins, Penn State wins the National Title. I expected Miami to try and win. That’s like the whole tennant of football right? Miami lays down and dies in the second half. Nebraska wins, Penn State is screwed.
Now, it’s 2010, pretend you are whatever team that rotates off our schedule. You have the exact same record as Penn State. But you know, if you finish with the same record as Penn State, the bowl game at issue is taking PSU instead of you for economic reasons.
You need Indiana to win. It’s a long shot, to be sure. But then you realize that for 3Mil Indiana sold their home feild advantage, and now the game will be played in front of a decidely partisan Penn State crowd.
Your pissed right? It’s unfair right?
At at the end of the day does it matter? Who knows? But this is the problem with the game being moved.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I just wanted to set
the record for narrowest post ever until someone replies to me.
by cpm126 on Aug 27, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How's This?
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Aug 27, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or this?
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dis?!
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Aug 27, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
O Diz?
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WE STILL HAVE A LONG WAY TO GOOOOOoo!
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Aug 27, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Must keep trying...
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 28, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Echoing JuggerNitt's point from below-
Let’s give all the naysayers the benefit of the doubt and say that this is the competitive equivalent of making it a PSU home game- That would be a 6-point spread swing versus holding the game at Bloomington. If the final outcome of the game is within six points, then all the people from tOSU or whatever school who thinks they got jobbed out of a conference title can cry all they want about how Indiana handed PSU the conference championship. Until that happens, just sit back and watch the game.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, I thought OSU DID win the conference last year
didn’t you hear? 4 straight Big 10 Championships.
In reality (for last year), the only thing that would have changed is that it would have likely been PSU in a different BCS bowl and OSU vs USC in the Rose Bowl.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
um...is anyone offering to pay me?
just asking…
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they increased the payday for PSU no I don't think anyone would.
I attended last years Alabama-Clemson game there, it was a blast they did a great job of promoting, and running the event, it really was a “bowl game” atmosphere. Besides I have been to Bryant-Denny it is not special.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm talking about selling the game at Beaver Stadium
People would be pissed. Super pissed.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am sure they would but that is not a similar analogy.
What if Penn State sold the Ohio State game to Pittsburgh? That would be a better analogy.
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
The best analogy would be selling the Michigan game to FOrd Field. And people would be pissed. I know I would.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Jesse.
I respect you, even though I do not always agree with your opinions. So I will let it be, you are pissed, and I am not. We are…
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Penn State
and I’m not pissed. I think it’s great for Penn State. But I can see why other teams would think it’s unfair. Because I think it is to an extent.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But we’re PSU and we sell 108,000+ seats for games. So it’s a silly analogy. If we sold 40,000 seats for home games, the question might make sense. But people would be pissed because, well, we sell out for every football game and get massive coverage for big games — so selling one to a neutral site would be “wrong” for completely different reasons for why it’s “wrong” for Indiana to do so.
A better question is “what if PSU sold their home basketball game against Michigan St to the the Palace at Auburn Hill?” And I would say, if the money was right and the exposure was right, I’d support it.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 27, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you.
That’s my point.
If Penn State sold the home basketball game everybody would roll their eyes, and say oh well, they were going to lose anyway. But we’ve beated Michigan State at home, and it has had an effect on the Big Ten title.
By moving the game, and forfeiting home court advantage you’ve dramtically decreased the chance of an upset. It allows a richer program to further reduce the chance of a season killing upset.
Indiana doesn’t care about football so they generally shrug their shoulders and say oh well the money is right, but it can have an effect on the outcome of the Big Ten title race. Not saying it will, but it could.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 28, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, last year we beat MSU at the Breslin Center
and heck, as far as upsets go, both UofM and OSU have been upset at home (so has PSU). This doesn’t completely rule out the chances, and it does decrease the chance, but we’re talking something like going from a 15% chance to a 10% chance.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 28, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're assuming IU has a "home field advantage"
I would argue they don’t. If they’re going to win, I doubt their "home crowd’ is going to be much of a difference.
by Tailgate Shogun on Aug 30, 2009 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is the second biggest behind the new Texas Stadium which holds 100k
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except it doesn't have
8 billion inch HD screen blocking punts for the home team.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know someone who took a tour of the new Cowgirls stadium last week. He said that while he was there they were raising the screen so it won’t get hit.
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to tWWL
that was a $2 million job. I guess Jerry Jones shook the sofa cusions.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to Peter King
The NFL is going to pay to have it fixed, because the scoreboard complies with the existing rules and the league signed off on the stadiums design.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they're preparing
for when Pryor becomes a starting QB in the NFL…
"In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
by IcersGuy on Aug 27, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
A rebirth of the Kick Off Classic?
Success without honor is like an unseasoned dish, it will fill you up but it won't taste good. - Joe V. Paterno
by carolinaeasy on Aug 27, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PSU & Indiana
played at the Hoosier Dome, in 2000 I believe.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2000 or 2001 we played Indiana in Indy
When Casey was our QB, PSU played a televised night game against Indiana in the RCA dome (now replaced by the new Colts stadium). I was there and it wasn’t a sell out.
I don’t think the Indiana alumni have a beef. If they supported their team by attending games and filling the stadium then it wouldn’t be moved.
According to the article, Indiana would look to move one of their cream puff games to a home game giving the fans a better chance of seeing a win.
by ageing lion on Aug 27, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When was the last time Ohio State or Michigan lost to IU?
Frankly, after the opening kickoff of the opening game, PSU, O$U, and UM start the season with one win when IU is on the schedule. Like you said, it doesn’t matter where it occurs.
Northwestern was supposed to be the same way, but they got all stupid and started doing things like “recruiting” and “playing to win” and stuff. That wasn’t what we signed up for when PSU joined the Big Ten!
by Cairo on Aug 27, 2009 11:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yet, unfortunately...
the rest if the country still thinks NW is the Duke of the Big Ten (ironically maybe Duke will become the NW of the ACC).
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But first-
Duke need to find their Pat Fitzgerald.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could David Cutcliffe
= Pat Fitzgerald. He has a decent resume and Duke actually won FOUR games last year.
Of course with his history of Heart issues, Cutliffe could also be Duke’s Randy Walker.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking of a player who could play in the NFL and then come back to coach
…but the inspirational story of a team playing for the memory of their recently-departed former head coach could work too.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody wins...
Penn State fans get to see their team play in FedEx field.
Indiana triples their gate revenue. Indiana fans can travel to see their team play in FedEx Field if they’d like. They don’t come close to filling up their own stadium in Bloomington, so I’m not sure why they deserve any protection against the moving of a home game.
The Redskins fill a stadium that otherwise doesn’t see more than a dozen games a year.
There’s more revenue spread around, football fans get what they are thirsting for (more football). Its all good.
If this does set a precedent, why is it a bad one? Indiana has a horrible football program. Playing another game in Bloomington isn’t going to do anything to make the program better. Selling home games and tripling revenue gives them a chance to improve the program. What do you think current and future players would rather? A 6th game in a 3/4 empty stadium in Bloomington, or the chance to play at the largest stadium in the NFL?
Stop hating haters.
by NittanyBadger on Aug 27, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I only wish it was in 2013 or 2014.
I know you can’t have recruits go to road games, but imagine what LJ could do in Larryland with the players that would be juniors or seniors in those years?
by Cairo on Aug 27, 2009 11:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It'll still help recruiting
There will be so much blue and white in town that weekend, plus writeups in all the papers and on local news. It’s a big win, even if none of the recruits can get on the field.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The whole thing is kind of icky.
Regardless of Indiana’s likelihood of winning, Brian has a good point when he says that Penn State is basically getting five home conference games and three away conference games. So from that perspective, I think he has a point.
Indiana needs the money right now, given their stadium construction. And Glass has made it clear that they can’t wait for the football program to improve in order to generate income from Memorial Stadium. So from his perspective, this is a sound move. And from the Big Ten’s perspective, it’s also a good move to have Indiana’s athletic program in a better financial position. And of course, it’s good for Penn State to have a game in the D.C. area.
I think the competitive balance gripes are legitimate and not borne of jealousy, but they don’t outweigh the positives.
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Aug 27, 2009 11:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
competitive balance gripes
using http://www.sbrforum.com/Betting+Tools/Spread+ML+Converter.aspx
Let’s say PSU would be favored by 14 in Indiana, but then Indiana loses the home field advantage and it is “Neutral Site” so the spread would be 17 in FedEx
The competitive advantage would go from Penn State being 85% favored to win to 91% favored to win. 6% isn’t something to just sneeze at, but when it all comes down to it, isn’t really shifting the competitive balance in the league over the long run anyway.
All anyone cares about is the B10 championship anyway, so assuming PSU is good enough to win that, then the spread would probably be even higher, giving less of a % change.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And from the Big Ten’s perspective, it’s also a good move to have Indiana’s athletic program in a better financial position. And of course, it’s good for Penn State to have a game in the D.C. area.
From the Big Ten’s prospective, it’s huge to have a conference game in DC bringing the Big Ten to the Mid-Atlantic. I don’t think you can overlook that (and note that all the Big Ten schools voted to approve this contest being played at FedEx). This gives the conference exposure a market they don’t normally have a strong local presence in; a 90,000 attendance Big Ten game in DC will speak volumes if there is any arguments in the future regarding level of carriage of the BTN in DC/Baltimore for example.
Being in a different market makes this a far different situation from moving a game to Cleveland or Detroit (or even Pittsburgh).
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 27, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Penn State in Philly/Pittsburgh
Indiana selling a home game to DC brings up another point of discussion.
Speaking as someone who grew up in State College, I would not be upset in the least bit if Penn State shipped out to Philadelphia or Pittsburgh to play a home game. Ohio State plays a game in Cleveland (I believe against Toledo); Tennesee has played games in Nashville. It would seem natural to me that we would want to expand our outreach in Pennsylvania by playing one of our out-of-conference games in one of the two cities.
by happyvalleytom on Aug 27, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just an FYI on the Cleveland game
that was actually a Bowling Green home game, they moved it to house the thousands of OSU fans that wouldn’t fit at their tiny stadium. So OSU didn’t lose a home game there.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't there a Big Ten MAC
side deal that requires every B10 team to give a MAC school a home game, and in return B10 teams get first crack at MAC schools for preseason games? It’s part of the deal that got Temple the home game with Penn State as well as the Ohio State game in Cleveland [is it BGSU or Toledo?].
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's Toledo
September 19th
"I'm driven by greatness" - Derrick Williams
by HookMania on Aug 27, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Back in the old days
Penn State played a lot of “home games” in Williamsport and Harrisburg. Before the highway system it was a royal pain to get to State College. The nearest train station was in Bellefonte, and it took a few hours by horse and buggy to get to State College from there. Doesn’t sound bad, but when you have to transport an entire football team it’s a logistics nightmare. So a lot of teams told Penn State they would only go as far as Williamsport to play. They couldn’t even get Bucknell to make the trip to Happy Valley.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude....
….that’s old school
and I love it
by hbeach08 on Aug 27, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not as old school
as the guy on Waggle Room who compared Tiger’s putting troubles at the 2009 PGA with Old Tom Morris’ putting troubles at the 1860 British Open. THAT’s as old school as one can get.
by Cairo on Aug 27, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OSU in Cleveland
is Toledo’s home game. I’ll mail you a dollar if Tennessee gave up a home game to play in Nashville in the last 20 years.
I don’t think Pitt would look too kindly on Penn State playing anybody but Pitt at Heinz Field.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Pitt would look too kindly on Penn State playing anybody but Pitt at Heinz Field.
…and that’s exactly why we should schedule a game there every year.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
+1
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
By not look to kindly
I meant refuse to allow.
One difference between FedEx and Heinz is that FedEx only has one tenant, the Redskins. Heinz has two, there is a game there almost every weekend in the fall, there are two way more often than there are none.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Saturday's are free right?
I mean, I know there’s a game on Sunday for the Steelers. And we all know Pitt plays their games on Thursday and Friday nights.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Touche
Although I think all their games are on Saturday this year.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't think so
I’m pretty sure I read they play two Friday night games.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Home Friday night games?
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno.
Frankly, I don’t care enough about Pitt to look it up either.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did.
All of the home games are Saturday this year. At Rutgers and Louisville are Friday night games.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always knew you were a closeted Pitt fan.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My official status is sympathizer
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
GROSS
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitt has actually steadfastly refused to play home games on Friday nights — they don’t want to conflict with local high school football. Two years ago, ESPN wanted them to play Navy on a Friday, but Pitt refused, so the game got moved to Wed instead.
I’ve always thought the Pitt bashing is stupid (I don’t really get it, since Pitt is pretty much not worth caring about) but on this point Pitt has always been good. They’ve played occasional Thur nights (specifically WVU), but pretty much always played home games on Saturdays. The rest of the Big East are much more deserving of making fun of for playing on weekdays than Pitt.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 27, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bravo, Sir!
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
imagine this
Pitt plays at noon at Heinz Field. Penn State plays a night game there the same Saturday. The stadium is filled starting at noon for the PSU game, so we get a fun night game in Pittsburgh and whoever is playing Pitt gets a “home” crowd.
Never happen, but it makes me smile.
by PSUmob on Aug 27, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah, it was Toledo.
I’m not surprised at all that I mixed those two up.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you would be unhappy
if you’re a PSU season ticket holder and Penn State moved a home game to DC and charged you an additional $100 for tickets to that new “home” game. I don’t think Penn State will move home conference games, same as I don’t think OSU, MI or Iowa (that’s my team so I included them) would. What this utlimately will do is exacerbate tiers in conference – can’t take IU football seriously if they don’t take it seriously either.
by txhawkeye on Aug 27, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except this isn’t the same thing. This would be like Penn State giving up its home game with Illinois last season to play at Soldier Field in Chicago.
by catesinator on Aug 28, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
except the whole "both schools are ranked" thing
and “both schools have a legitimate shot at winning” thing
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 28, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I especially like MGoBlog's comment-
Requoted from the original post:
“The Big Ten should shoot this down, and do it soon. This is the I-A equivalent of forfeiting a conference game so you can get paid by Michigan. Insert some bylaw that says any attempt to move a conference home game out of state or to a point that’s closer to the nominal road team than the home team must be approved by the league first, and look very sternly at the Indiana administration when you do.”
Perhaps they didn’t read Rittenberg’s blog post from yesterday, in which the idea that this wasn’t approved according to conference rules is thoroughly debunked:
After Glass discussed the game with Lynch, Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany and Penn State AD Tim Curley, the league’s athletic directors voted on the game during a conference call last week. It was approved by a unanimous vote of 9-0 (Penn State and Indiana abstained). Big Ten associate commissioner for television of administration Mark Rudner told me the location was approved “with the conditions that the game is treated as a home game in every respect, an Indiana home game.”
Hey MGoBlog- you got a problem with the whole deal? Talk to your own AD… don’t cry to us.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 11:29 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Bingo
While I agree with people (like fans of other Big Ten teams) being upset about it, the reality is that their schools were enables — not unwilling bystanders. Every other school in the Big Ten felt this was a good idea and agreed with it, so clearly the (understandable) concerns about competitive balance among the fans is not shared by the people in power at the schools.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 27, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This post is worthless without video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cDWPvhiPWg
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Aug 27, 2009 11:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that hurt to watch
Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good.
by psu on Aug 27, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meatchicken Suites
For $55,000 to $85,000 per season and at least a three-year commitment, well-heeled fans will have 16 comfortable seats in a 15-foot wide by 28-foot deep box that comes with two TVs, granite countertops and sapele wood cabinets.
So I’m not a homeowner yet and had to look up ‘sapele’:
sa⋅pe⋅le /səˈpili/ –noun
1. Also called aboudikro. the mahoganylike wood of any of several African trees of the genus Entandrophragma, used for making furniture.
2. a tree, esp. Entandrophragma cylindricum, of the mahogany family, yielding this wood.
African cabinets in luxury boxes?
So um, I guess that is my contribution to the thread—and I’m a DC resident. I better drop the mic now….
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sapele
does not sound like a sustainable, green product like bamboo
Boo again to scUM
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sapele can be sustainable
They use it as an alternative because mahogany mainly comes from Africa and Honduras and it’s getting increasingly hard to procure. Used mostly for making guitars, it is pretty expensive. However, there is a better, more sustainble supply than there is for mahogany.
by PaOhWi on Aug 28, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please tell me you were a Forestry major @ PSU
Pleeease. We don’t have one of those on BSD yet I don’t think.
by dawsonPSU10 on Aug 29, 2009 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Granite...
when we did a house reno 3 years ago we had granite countertops put in.
The guy we met at the granite yard shared a bunch of good stories about other customers – The best was about some women who had more money than brains. She asked the guy if he had any antique granite. He said well most of this stuff is well over a million years old, does that count as antique?
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If a lady legitimately asked me that I'd still be laughing to this day
I may have lost her business, but it would’ve been totally not worth it to hold in the laughter.
by dawsonPSU10 on Aug 27, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You had one thing wrong
Joe Paterno forgets to pack the oxygen masks?
Joe wouldn’t forget the masks, he would just say if he doesn’t need one then neither does the team.
Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good.
by psu on Aug 27, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oxygen is for pansies.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
Just like space heaters in Iowa.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
meanwhile Joe’s up in a comfy well-heated press-box munching on a hotdog and hot cocoa. I am still so friggin angry about that.
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Aug 27, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
this whole thing has me feeling uneasy. agreeing to this is like implicitly agreeing with jim delaney’s views on football vs. profit (profit wins every time).
look, i understand that indiana is a struggling program, and could really use this. i also understand this helps recruiting down here, even though LJ Sr. owns the area. still, it just sums up to an extra home game for psu.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
by psudrozz on Aug 27, 2009 11:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
almost like
when the new york giants were the “away” team when they played at the meadowlands vs. the saints.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
by psudrozz on Aug 27, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it really the same? Didn’t they do that because of Katrina?
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i wasn't referring to the
periferal circumstqances leading to, just the outcome: the “away” team in reality having an extra home game.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
by psudrozz on Aug 27, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Be Honest
Did you kife the Million Dollar Man refrence from the Onion?
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell no
I was a big WWF fan as a kid.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I about peed my pants
the day I saw King Kong Bundy in the Philly airport.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have this image in my head of a 30 year old Mike jumping up and down like a little kid
seeing a WWF guy in the airport, while he frantically looks for a pen an paper and runs over to bug the guy for an autograph. Meanwhile PSUWifey hides her face in embarrassment and quickly shuffles the kids to the flight gate.
by dawsonPSU10 on Aug 27, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kind of
More like a 25 yr old Mike. And PSUWifey wasn’t there.
I’m just glad he wasn’t on my flight sitting next to me. Can you imagine that? I bet that pilot was trying to figure out why the left wing kept wanting to dip the entire flight.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
speaking of legendary stories of the WWF...
anyone ever hear how Andre the Giant always had to rent two hotel rooms when he traveled and what he ‘used’ the bathtub in the ‘spare’ room for? yikes…
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member
by TheMightyErik on Aug 27, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, we haven't?
Why don’t you tell us?
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 28, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please, please don't
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 28, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, letsgopsu... Jtot beat ya to it
we’re talking about 4 star hotels in NY and such when WWF was peaking. So imagine this monster checking into the Ritz Carlton or something and needing adjoining rooms. Well, no way in hell a dude that size can saddle up and spawn toilet fish on a normal human sized commode… so he goes in the ‘spare’ bathtub and sits on the edge of that and…. well… you know what happened next. Hotels just had to deal with it and really lay the ass kissing on thick to the housekeeping staff for whoever drew that room
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member
by TheMightyErik on Aug 29, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy Crap
Literally.
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 31, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had an airport meeting with
Randy “Macho Man” Savage in the greater Pittsburgh Airport. Shook his hand…but…the best thing was that “Miss Elizabeth” was with him. She was “hot”.
by PaJoe on Aug 28, 2009 7:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's just that two
independent Million Dollar Man refrences in one week is wild.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
I don’t even read the Onion.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mike, this is a “brilliant” move only if you accept the premise that Indiana will never beat Penn State. It’s fine for Penn State fans to believe that, but can’t you see why it’s a problem, and not just for our pride, if the athletic director believes that? $3 million is a lot of money, but it’s not lottery money. It’s far less than 10 percent of IU’s annual athletic budget. It’s far less than IU would make by fielding a competitive football team. I realize that IU is never going to be a perennial power, but if freaking Northwestern can become consistently decent, then so can IU.
You can say what you want about 2004 and 2007, but on each occasion, IU had the ball in the final minute with a chance to take the lead. In the 2000 game in Indianapolis, against a horrid Cam Cameron-led team that finished 3-8, Penn State kicked the winning field goal with 18 seconds remaining. That means that in three of Penn State’s last four trips to play IU, the outcome was in doubt in the final minute. I don’t mean to claim those as moral victories or to suggest that you should be impressed by that. Penn State won them all. And certainly, I think Penn State would be considerably more likely than not to win the 2010 game if it were played in Bloomington. But this move turns a likelihood into a near certainty. More importantly, it shows an inclination on the part of the AD to treat the football program as an ATM when his main concern should be growing the program by putting the team in the best position to win games.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Aug 27, 2009 11:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder why this becomes such a negative for IU when in fact part of growing any athletic program is to expand it’s revenue stream to increase it’s desireability to new recruits and coaches. It seems that the sour grapes here is the implication that the site of this game affects the outcome, and an advantage to IU was willingingly traded for a paycheck. But what can that paycheck do for your program?
What happens when this money is put into new facilities for the team that in turn impresses new recruits which in turn begins to lift the program out of the gutter? I believe the budget of any football program in the country is a leading factor for success, with some understandable diminishing returns. That’s just my understanding at least.
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Aug 27, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think what your missing
is that to a certain extent this is how programs are built. It’s more money, more exposure, a chance to sell yourself in a different way. Once upon a time, Penn State did similar things. It was a long time ago, but that’s part of it.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean like the 2- or 3-for-1 series we played against Pitt back when they mattered?
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or the 0-2
we gave Tennessee in the early 70’s
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or the 0-3 that Rip Engle played against Woody Hayes in '56, '63, and '64
All played at Ohio State, and we won all three.
by dawsonPSU10 on Aug 27, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
was that a reply to me? b/c it seems like we’re agreeing here… which would be rare.
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Aug 27, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was a reply to the IU guy
It seems that we agree.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
then let us celebrate this momentous occasion with the following graphic imagery:

"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
by millzners on Aug 27, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There was a time that I
thought millzers and jesse. were one and the same. Coming from the Pennlive board, I held that assumption even after the two of you sparred several times.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
at first glance it would be nearly impossible to know who wrote what post if their names weren’t attached to it (except that millzners is a bit more optimistic, while jesse is more pessimistic, though really devil’s advocate)
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Formidable opponent?

"In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
by IcersGuy on Aug 27, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indiana's greatest hope...
should be that the Penn State players take it as a foregone conclusion that IU is laying down as a doormat for this game.
No it’s not lottery money, but it is the equivalent of two extra home games… three if you actually do replace PSU with another home game.
You might not like it, but all eleven Big Ten ADs and Jim Delaney do, and at the end of the day their opinion on the matter is more important than yours or mine.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"all eleven Big Ten AD's [like it]"
the vote was only 9-0, with PSU and Indiana abstaining. What makes you assume that they’re in favor?
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um,
Because Glass was the one asking for it, and Curley had already agreed to it?
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand an Indiana fans complaints
for having a home game moved 600 miles (which I believe Indiana AD Fred Glass comically referred to as an “afternoon drive”).
Put aside the lengthy travel to the game. You are getting $3 million for one game. According to the Herald Times, Indiana makes less than one million for a home game.
Its also, as much as youd hate to admit, a game that you would probably not win in Bloomington anyway. Sure there have been some close games, but a win is a win. By moving the game to DC, you are taking a 28-23 PSU win and making it a 45-6 PSU win. Its not a different outcome, just a different way to get there.
You lose nothing, you gain over $2 million dollars.
by swiggy04 on Aug 27, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so what you're saying is that
in 2000 a crappy (though typical) Indiana team couldn’t beat one of the worst teams in modern (post WWII) Penn State football, and in 2004 a crappy (though typical) Indiana team couldn’t bet the worst team in modern Penn State football, and then in 2007 the best Indiana team since Penn State’s first year in the conference (Indiana went 8-4 in 1993) couldn’t beat a decent, but underachieving Penn State team. Yep, that about convinces me that this move to FedEx field is really gonna influence things…
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well if that's your philosophy
Why bother playing the game anywhere?
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
$$?
but seriously, I’m not saying Indiana can’t ever beat PSU, but PSU could probably have played every game so far in Bloomington and still have won them all, and that a move to a “neutral” site (though definitely PSU favored) isn’t going to have this dramatic affect on the outcome. Going down from 14% likely to win a game to 9% likely isn’t much (though I don’t actually know what the spread for this game will be, since it is more than a year away, I’m just going with the assumption that PSU will probably be favored by 2 TDs, and the fact that a 3 point change in “spread”, going from home to neutral, is typically worth ~7% points, and actually gets smaller as the spread gets larger). Of course if you want to say that it is essentially going to be a home game for Penn State, then it is a 6 point swing in the spread, which is more like a 14% chance in odds.
If we want to say the spread would be -14 @ Indiana, but -20 in FedEx, then the odds go from 15% down to practically 0%, which is somewhat significant of a change, but we’re still talking about going from one longshot to a less likely longshot.
If you want to say that it would be 10 in indiana and 16 at FedEx, then that’s a drop from 23% to 12%.
I know these aren’t true predictors, but the trends are there, and it is the best data I have available. I don’t think anyone is arguing that this won’t make it any easier for Indiana to win, but we may as well argue the merits of always playing Temple and Akron, etc at home, when we know that even playing Temple at the Linc we’re still pretty much guaranteed to win.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is Michigan complaining?
Arent they forcing Delaware State to forfeit a conference game so they can play them?
by swiggy04 on Aug 27, 2009 11:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hi there, Kettle!
My goodness you sure do look black today!
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is it remotely possible that
Delware State giving up a home game affects Penn State? What if Iowa had sold their home game against Penn State last year?
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure if you missed the intent of my post...
All I wanted to do was point out the hypocrisy of the average Meatchicken fan.
All the same, I’ll address that: Realistically, how does IU’s move to make more money really affect Michigan? Upsets happen, and they can happen in what amounts to a road game for both teams at least as easily as they can when one team is at home. You don’t think some teams put too much faith in home field advantage? Look at Meatchicken themselves over the last few years.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No I get your point.
I just don’t see it as hypocritical in my mind. If Indiana had sold their game against Michigan to Ford Field, I’d be pissed. I don’t think it’s fair, and it sets a bad precedent.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michigan this year or Michigan when they're good?
…because in 9 out of 10 years, I wouldn’t particularly care if they moved the game to Ann Arbor but still called it an Indiana home game.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a racial segregation level of injustice
More like bartender’s paying more attention to cute girls than they do to me level of injustice.
But it’s still unfair.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
obviously I ment it's not a racial segregation
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More like just a fact of life...
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just dont think
Michigan fan should be pointing out the flaws and injustices of other team’s schedules when they have plenty in their own schedule of their own doing.
It would be like Terrelle Pryor writing an article about how many flaws there are in Daryll Clark’s mechanics.
by swiggy04 on Aug 27, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michigan doesn't want Delaware State
They don’t want their season opening loss to end up affecting them in the Big Ten standings.
by Cairo on Aug 27, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Ten ADs don't mind
They voted 9-0 (with PSU and IU abstaining) in favor of the deal.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 12:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So in other words it was 11-0.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 27, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
Some of the revenue is shared, so they are all aboard with a chance for more. I think it was in Rittenburg’s follow up post.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My beef.
Why does it seem like peopl are at least indirectly, or directly, painting PSU as a bad guy here. Unless I see proof that Curley started this(he didn’t) why are we in any way to blame? And are you telling me any other school would NOT accept this if it was presented to THEM? Come on. Blame your AD. They were unanimous in favor of it so suck it UM fans that want to whine about it. Or at least fault Indiana.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Aug 27, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also, guess what
Life ain’t fair. I have learned this my whole life. It wasn’t fair we weren’t given a NC shot in 94 or 73 or 69 or 68. It wasn’t fair to us for UM to get 2 more seconds in 05. Its not fair that Indiana has to move a big game to make money. Its not fair I have to work 40 hours a week while taking 20 credits. Its not fair that football players get academic breaks. Its not fair that the AL has a DH and the NL doesn’t. Its not fair that ND gets 9 wins and gets a BCS bid.
Life is not fair and college football is even less fair than life. I fail to see why this is such a big deal. Guess what? If you team is not a power, things like this happen. I agree that this is VERY unfortunate for Indiana to have to do, but thems the breaks.
Dear Indiana fans, if you do not want your team to do this, then get all your fellow students and alumni to fill your stadium so recruits can see how much you care and want to go to school there. Then win a few games. Don’t be mad at PSU for accepting this offer from Indiana. If PSU wanted to move a “home” game to Indianapolis, you would take it.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Aug 27, 2009 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Key point...
Indiana doesn’t fill their middle size stadium. Fill it and maybe your AD wouldn’t have to be creative to make the budget.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better yet
Concentrate on filling up stadium before spending so much money to build a new stadium that you have to give up a game in the new stadium to keep playing BCS football.
Seriously, how twisted is the financial situation for Indiana football? This is a mid-major play.
by Aaron PSU on Aug 27, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They desperately need to
fix their Basketball flat tire.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not Indiana that has right to be pissed
It’s anybody who might potentially benefit from Indiana upsetting Penn State.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then they should be pissed at their ADs for not voting to block.
Not indiana. and DEFINITELY not PSU.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
by Roland86 on Aug 27, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who is mad at Penn State?
The anger seems to have been directed at the Big Ten Confrence, which is allowing this. That’s the proper party to be mad at.
And it’s the fans that are upset, not the athletic directors.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Based on what was
mentioned elsewhere in this thread – if the fans are angry they should direct a good bit of that anger at the 9 AD’s that unanimously voted this through.
One man doing the work of 100's for the good of 1000's
by rahpsu92 on Aug 27, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is anyone 100%
positive that there will be alcohol sales at this game? I’m not sure I know exactly how this rule works? Is it an NCAA rule that schools can’t sell alcohol at their respective venues or is it the schools’ discretion on what to do? I guess I’m just confused about the whole drinking thing in a professional sports venue when an NCAA event is being held. If my mind serves me correctly, the fans at the Final Four were drinking adult beverages at Ford Field. I’m assuming this is something similar to that, right?
by LIONHEAD2477 on Aug 27, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another data point
You could absolutely purchase alcohol at the Metrodome during Minnesota home games. This was a primary driving force for many of their students to attend football games at the Dome.
by PSUFlyers on Aug 27, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just no sales on campus
But any game off campus is fair game. I had a few beers when PSU played Temple at the Link in 2007.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure?
I’m pretty sure that you are not correct and that it is up to individual school’s discretion. Though I believe the Big Ten conference specifically does not allow alcohol sales at their stadiums — though, as mentioned, it probably only applies to on campus stadiums, thus not applying to Minnesota at the Metrodome or to this game at FedEx.
As an aside, did anyone go to the PSU-IU game at Indianapolis? Did they allow alcohol sales there?
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 27, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to the NCAA, it’s up to the school.
The Big Ten probably has a bylaw on it, that Minnesota was exempt from because they don’t own the Metrodome, and I bet there were some contractual issues that they couldn’t get around.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 28, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They sold beer
at the Orange Bowl (stadium, not game) in 1999
by PSU Mudder on Aug 27, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Orange Bowl is not on Miami's campus
I also think that it’s a Big Ten rule. It’s school by school and confrence by confrence everywhere else.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
silver lining alert

I found this picture of Zug in Doc Saturday’s mention of this story here
"I'm driven by greatness" - Derrick Williams
by HookMania on Aug 27, 2009 2:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have nothing substantive to add
just that I agree 100% with jesse on this.
by Nittany Lawyer on Aug 27, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I concur, except for the following:

Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good.
by psu on Aug 27, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The effect this may have on the conference race
by taking a home game between the top team and the bottom team and moving it to a neutral site away from the bottom team’s rowdy fans is really insignificant compared to the rotation of teams off of schedules each year.
Sure there is some smaller chance of an upset in this particular game. But how about the fact the NW doesn’t have to play PSU or UM this year? If you really want get hacked off and make some half-cocked case about fairness of the conference schedules, start with who’s on each teams’ schedule, not where they will play.
by PSU Mudder on Aug 27, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We don't play at Northwestern this year?
Because believe it or not, that’s kind of a relief.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My bad
they miss OSU and UM this year.
by PSU Mudder on Aug 27, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AAAUGH with the distance stuff...
Minneapolis, MN to Madison, WI: 270 miles.
Madison, WI to Champaign, IL: 250 miles.
Yes, it’s farther from Penn State to any Big 10 school, but it’s not by a lot. And the only reason that it’s that far and long is because 1) the Altoona/Johnstown area hasn’t progressed since the 1950s, and 2) Pennsylvania isn’t flat. As the crow flies it’s only 270 miles.
I’ve never bought the argument that Penn State doesn’t fit in the Big 10 geographically: State College is in the middle of PA, but it’s more associated with western PA than eastern PA, and western PA is the start of the Midwest.
by Bleed Blue 'n White on Aug 27, 2009 2:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Watch who yer callin Midwest, buddy
Starts at the Ohio Line.
by PSU Mudder on Aug 27, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Starts in Altoona/Johnstown
If you call soda “pop”, you’re in the Midwest. Sorry.
--
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State", like, now. One team, 128 pages.
by Run Up The Score on Aug 27, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Altoona was still soda
But Johnstown was “pop”
The Eastern divide goes between those two metropoli and to me that is the geographically the beginning of the midwest, if not culturally.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Midwest begins in Ohio
Pittsburgh is not Midwest, east coast or mid-atlantic. I was born and raised and still love it in the burgh (which is hot by the way—G20 here we come), and there’s no doubt that Pittsburgh is best described as the capital of Appalachia.
I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.
by spakajewia on Aug 27, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good God
G20 is going to be a disaster.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wait, the g20
is in pittsburgh? get the hell out before the circus comes to town.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
by psudrozz on Aug 27, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
And they are being super helpful by telling everybody nothing whatsoever about what the security measures are going to be. It’s in less than a month now, people are starting to stress.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 27, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Georgraphically, the Midwest is a bunch of flat cornfields
Which doesn’t start until west of Pittsburgh, just about at the Ohio Line. Pittsburgh and its environs is quite hilly, as its in the foothills of the Appalachians. Pittsburgh’s accent is also different from a midwestern accent, as Pittsburgh seems to draw more from the West Virginia accent than from the Cleveland/Chicago accent. Now, for sure Pittsburgh isn’t like the East Coast cities, and many derisively call it the capital of Appalachia (a look at the big haired hog wandering by my window supports that), but it sure isn’t Midwestern.
by PSU Mudder on Aug 28, 2009 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, Penn State defintely has to travel farther than any other Big 10 school
our closest game is still 50 miles further than any other Big 10 school’s closest game (PSU-OSU vs Minnesota-Wisky).
Our furthest game is 200 miles further than any other pair’s furthest game (PSU-Minnesota vs PSU-Iowa….oh wait, I guess that shouldn’t count, well then 210 miles further than OSU vs Minnesota)
Our average distance is more than twice that of Northwestern (who has the shortest average distance. 594 vs 277). Though we are only ~30 miles more than Minnesota’s average of 567.
The average distance (including PSU & Minnesota) is 376 mi. If you take out PSU, the average is 355. If you take out Minnesota as well it is 330.
Penn State, Minnesota, and Iowa are the only 3 teams above the average (220, 190, and 10 miles, respectively, or 2 standard deviations, 1.8 STDEV, or 0.1 STDEV, respectively).
So while we defnitely are the most extreme, Minnesota is just as far out of the “footprint” as well, and basically as “extreme” as we are. Of course, compared to some conferences like the Big East, ACC, and Pac-10 (let alone Hawaii in the WAC) that’s nothing.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so that's an extra 10 minutes
on the plane for the football team
by PSU Mudder on Aug 27, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
team yes, but when it comes to travelling I don't really consider the effects of distanced travelled on them
as an away game is an away game, pretty much no matter how far away.
What concerns me is that as a PSU fan, I have to spend twice as much money on gas, and twice as much time travelling, as pretty much any other Big 10 fan other than Minnesota, and to some extent Iowa.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's so cool
When and how did you master time traveling?
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's still 1999 in Iowa
and it’s still 1978 in some of the bars in New Castle, PA
by Cairo on Aug 28, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Midwest begins in St. Louis
Everything east of the Mississippi is East Coast, South, or Great Lakes. The Midwest begins at the Gateway Arch.
by Cairo on Aug 28, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edge of Lot 83
Is the beginning of the Midwest
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
and when it used to be around
Lot 80 somehow became a border to Siberia
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 27, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember that wind tunnel when I lived in East. It made winter suck even more than it did.
"Want a donut go to dunkin donuts, want a linebacker go to Penn State."
- Cris Carter, NFL Draft, 4/25/09
by kmblue on Aug 27, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean WAS
Lot 80 no longer exists.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wisconsin has two teams closer than Illinois
Northwestern’s only 145 miles away, Iowa 195.
by SpartanDan on Aug 28, 2009 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have opinions on both sides of this
but frankly I’m not going to bother sharing them because I’m still in the euphoric state that comes with news that your team is unexpectedly commin’ to your cit-ay!
But can we do this? Can we stop spreading around stupid stat from TCQ about the point differential in home v away games between these two teams. The fact that one of the better Indiana teams almost (but still couldn’t) beat the worst Penn State team of the Paterno Era, at home, with 1st and goal at the one, has no bearing whatsoever on the 2010 matchup. At all.
Write that it’s right or wrong or matters or won’t affect the outcome or whatever you want to do, but please don’t pretend like this move is somehow going to spot Penn State 21 extra points. No intelligent person could use that stat and really mean it.
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 3:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
werd
I guess we’ll see if the trip to Fedex from here is actually easier than the one to the Beav.
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 27, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably a wash if you have to travel more than 75 miles
Getting out of FedEx is as bad as getting out of the Beav. Of course, you can ride the Metro and walk a mile, that’s the easy way.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but oh, the humanity!
"If you let the men in you've got to let the women in. I don't want a bunch of women walking around in my locker room when guys take showers". Joe Paterno
by letsgopsu on Aug 27, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But how many cases of beer
are they going to let us take on the Metro?
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have your friends do that
They can park and take care of that — you just show up.
Blogging about D.C. Baseball since April '04. Penn State alum. Also partial to the Washington Capitals, New York Yankees and Yale football.
by WFY on Aug 27, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about if I'm travelling from Chinatown?
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 28, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No smoked ducks allowed on the Metro
Seriously- the DC Metro system is easily the easiest-to-use mass transit system in the country.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 28, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
And it even has worked for me for some other big events (Nats at RFK, Nats in SE, DC Marathon at RFK). But I haven’t ever used it in the door-to-door trek to Fedex. Have you? WFY seems to feel it works for him.
I’d like a few more case studies.
And don’t think I won’t stoop to smuggling a duck, either!
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 28, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I'd like a few more case studies"
I’ll help you with them, as long as they’re Yuengling.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 28, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Aug 28, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Metro
The stadium isn’t conveniently located right next to a Metro station, but it’s just under a mile walk from the Morgan Blvd station. It’s not the easiest walk in the world, but it’s easy enough for most people to manage. And it’s much quicker than trying to navigate the parking lots.
The DC Metro really is one of the best and busiest in this country. It’s not as comprehensive as NYC, but it’s clean and efficient and easy to navigate.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 29, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"commin’ to your cit-ay!"
not any more.
some chesney-awfulness taking its place.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
by psudrozz on Aug 27, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm gonna break something
by week two of this crap…
Order your copy of "We Are Penn State" The offseason is long. So is this magazine.
by Kevin HD on Aug 27, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
-1 for the Big and Rich reference
Ugg.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a little lost on the distance argument
Didn’t we know that we’d be far away from all the big ten schools when we signed up? No one owes us a closer road game.
I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.
by spakajewia on Aug 27, 2009 4:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By this, I don't mean to suggest that I'm against this game being played in MD
because I’m not.
I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.
by spakajewia on Aug 27, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I didn't make my point well there
I didn’t mean to say “Boo hoo poor Penn State”. What I was trying to point out (poorly) was that if it were any other Big Ten team coming to Bloomington the Hoosiers could count on a good size contingent of visiting fans to buy up a lot of tickets. Because of Penn State’s distance they probably couldn’t expect that. Even though PSU probably would have sent 10,000 fans out there, they probably still wouldn’t have sold out.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 27, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Key point
This is why it’s a PSU game being moved and not, say, Michigan (who is also playing at Indiana in 2010) — well, besides the point that it was FedEx Field that initiated the idea.
Indiana (or Northwestern, etc.) is closer to tOSU and UM and so on than PSU. Plus, those schools tend to have more alumni in the Midwest, closer to Indiana (in places like Chicago and Indianapolis and Detroit, etc.). So — and I’m just making an educated guess here — Indiana probably expects to get more visiting fans for a game versus UM or tOSU than with PSU. Plus, due to the long tradition of playing those teams in conference over decades, there is probably some more excitement among the IU fanbase for going to a UM or tOSU game. So, basically put, I’d imagine that Indiana has more downside to moving a game versus tOSU or UM than PSU. So, that’s why I don’t think you’d be as likely to see IU (or Northwestern, etc.) move games against other teams as they would against PSU. Not that it justifies anything, but as a PSU fan, I’m happy with the reality.
Furthermore, you can sensibly point out that IU moving the game to DC gives them exposure to a brand new area of the country. And it’s really only PSU among Big Ten schools that allows for big money games in novel locations (DC, but also potentially Baltimore, NYC, Philly, etc.). Whereas if you wanted to sell a game versus UM or tOSU, you’d do it to Cleveland or Cinci or Detroit or Chicago, etc. — places that the Big Ten already gets tons of exposure.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 27, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Penn State has been in the Big Ten since 1993
Almost since the league started they’ve been talking about opening up new markets. Now, 16 years later, they’ve finally done something to try. Your point about Ohio State and Michigan haveing more alumni in the midwest than us is true and well taken.
But it sure is shit ain’t Ohio State and Michigan that are going to open up NYC and DC for the Big Ten. That my friends is Penn State’s job. That’s where our alumni are. If you want to showcase B10 football in new markets, let’s do it.
The rote midwestern focus of the Big Ten is frustrating as hell. They want new markets, but they’ve had the premier eastern school in the league for almost 20 years now and what do they do to capatilize on it? Nothing, they drag our asses to Chicago and Indianpolis for every tournament, and every meeting. You’re telling me that they can’t have the basketball tournament in Philadelphia or Pittsburgh once every ten years or so? Or OMG play a neutral site football game in NYC or DC?
The execution on this Indiana thing is poor, but it’s not a terrible idea. And it’s about damn time.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Aug 28, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Recruiting for Indiana
People scoff at the idea of this DC game opening up a new recruiting area for Indiana. But it’s really not a bad idea for them. In Bloomington they have to fight tooth and nail just for the local talent. With in state schools Purdue and Notre Dame, and then bordering state schools like Michigan, Ohio State, Illinois, Northwestern, and even Louisville it’s a lot of competition. I think getting outside of that footprint to plant some seeds nationally can only help them.
If I’m Lynch I’m on the phone this week making some calls to some high school football coaches in Maryland and Virginia trying to identify some big shot juniors I can invite to the PSU game in 2010.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 28, 2009 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a wild ass thought
Do you suppose the Big 11 might have Eastern “expansion” in the back of their minds and may be targeting University of Maryland? Kind of a trial baloon in Maryland’s backyard.
I probably think the first objective was to get IU some lunch money. I’ve read some of the objections on other College boards. However, I haven’t checked Maryland’s. How are their fans taking this?
BTW, Pitt fans are up in arms about this??? They blame JoPa for setting this up. They think it’s “un-American”? They’ll never get it at Pitt! It’s OK to play games on Friday or Thursday for the $$$ but not for IU to play a “walkover” game in Maryland. In their defense, they keep Friday games out of Western PA for HS Football. They’re also paranoid that US News and World report has most Big 11 schools ranked ahead of them for academics.
by PaJoe on Aug 28, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I had that same thought yesterday
It went away in about five seconds. Maryland would bring practically nothing to the Big Ten.
Plus, we’d have to play them every year. While the (practically) guaranteed win would be nice, it would get to be about as exciting as the Indiana game after a while.
"I thought the kid we were using had the potential to be a good quarterback, and I blew that one." - Joseph V. Paterno
by leeharvey418 on Aug 28, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just was thinking....
IMO Maryland has a scholastic profile that meets the Big 11 better than say Pitt, Cuse, Rutgers or even ND. It’s a large, state university, good academics, etc. Certainly they would bring some B Ball tradition to the Big 11. They have had some “flashes” of competence in F Ball (not many however). A natural “rival” to PSU (dump the Michigan State stuff). They probably would fit in with the Indianas, Purdues, and Minnies in F-Ball. They would kill everybody in Lacrosse. However, I wouldn’t think they would give up the ACC traditional rivalries they have.
Just in case it happens 10 years down the road…remember you heard it here.
by PaJoe on Aug 28, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t mind having Maryland in the conference, but a rivalry game with them would excite me as much as our “rivalry game” with MSU excites me.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
After Notre Dame — and pie in the sky schools like Texas or Florida — Maryland would easily IMHO be the next best choice of any reasonable option for expansion. They are a large flagship state school, they are research oriented, they are a member of the AAU. There college rankings are typical and appropriate compared to Big Ten schools. Athletically, they have decent hoops and a passable football program — they are more a Purdue in football than Indiana. They have good all around athletics — while lacrosse won’t help the Big Ten, their women’s basketball, soccer and field hockey would be part of the conference. And the key thing is that they’d be bringing in two large markets in terms of DC and Baltimore and a lot of population with them; think about shifting the BTN from a sports tier to digital cable in that area — that’s a lot of additional revenue for the conference. Furthermore, a lot of Big Ten schools have significant amounts of alumni in the DC area that would benefit from having their schools’ teams visit frequently.
I don’t think this game in FedEx has anything to do with inviting Maryland… but I think they’d be a good choice if they were willing to come.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 29, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea...
would be nice to have another school on the ‘outside’ out here with us and make the rest of the comfy other schools have to do some traveling. I have always liked that the school has, from what I can remember, a clean program with good solid academics. Probably never happen but I would take them over many other schools
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member
by TheMightyErik on Aug 29, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stuff like this
makes it more and more embarrassing to be associated with the Big10. The money arguments are very rational, but it skews the competitive balance by essentially subtracting a road game for Penn State. And I continue to be extremely frustrated by Penn State playing football every damn place except for Heinz Field 20 miles from my house.
by Joe 96alum on Aug 30, 2009 2:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What do you want?
You don’t think it’d be less embarrasing to be in the Big East, do you? And this is a much better deal than having to play those losers in Oakland.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would I rather
be in the Big East? No. Although WVU would probably have won the Big 10 four years in a row with Pat White.
This game in DC is even farther away for me than State College, although I do have family and friends in the area. As it stands right now I can never see the Lions in person without at least a 3 hour drive.
by Joe 96alum on Aug 30, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although WVU would probably have won the Big 10 four years in a row with Pat White.
Kudos for the totally absurd and baseless statement. Maybe in 2007. Maybe. We would have beaten WVU in ’05 and ’08. OSU or UM would have beaten them in ’06.
P.S. your baseless statement does not negate the fact that the Big Ten doesn’t have to play on Thursday nights.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Aug 30, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saying “the Big Ten doesn’t have to play on Thursday nights” is a rejoinder for an ACC fan.
by Aaron PSU on Aug 31, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so, what you are saying is that you deserve to whine because games aren’t convenient to you. Gotcha.
There are craploads of PSU fans who are farther away — in many cases much farther away — than you from any potential PSU game. It happens. Besides having home games at Beaver Stadium, there shouldn’t be any expectation of PSU playing games in any particular location whether you think you “deserve” it or not.
by Laaaaazzz on Aug 31, 2009 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















