Grading the Penn State Defense Against the Iowa Hawkeyes
It's hard to evaluate the defense when your offense goes out and lays a turd on national television. When your offense keeps putting you on the field with your back against the wall you can only hold out so long.
Defensive Line
The unit wasn't it's dominating self, but then the level of competition was about 1000 times better than the first three games. Jared Odrick and Ollie Ogbu went pretty much unnoticed, but they did a good job in occupying blockers so that Josh Hull and Navorro Bowman could combine for 26 tackles and 5 TFL.
The defensive ends didn't impress me much. I noticed that Jerome Hayes got the start, and Iowa went to work attacking him right away. He was lined up on the side with Bani Gbadyu when Brandon Wegher ripped off his 32 yard run on Iowa's second drive. On the next drive he was replaced with Eric who I thought did a much better job in run defense. Jack Crawford didn't make a big impression on me. He's still a year away from being a monster.
But overall I felt like the line held their own against the powerful Iowa offensive line. The Iowa running game averaged 4.4 yards per carry and gave up two sacks.
Final Grade: B
Linebackers
Navorro Bowman returned, but Penn State is still waiting to see their two All-Big Ten linebackers on the field at the same time as Sean Lee sat out with a sprained knee. So his spot was filled by Bani Gbadyu and Nate Stupar. Stupar came into the game nursing a sprained ankle, and I noticed Gbadyu got a little dinged up himself in the game. It sure would have been nice to have Mike Mauti out there. It seems like the deeper Penn State is at any particular position, the more injuries they tend to get. See defensive tackles.
Bowman and Hull looked fantastic. Both of them had 13 tackles in the game. Bowman tackled three ball carriers behind the line while Hull had two TFL and a sack. After that blocked punt you could tell by the body language on the team that they had given up, but Hull and Bowman kept playing hard to the end.
Personally, I think the bashing Josh Hull sees is no longer justified. He's a tremendous player and a tenacious linebacker that goes hard every play. He's not the best in pass coverage, but then neither was Paul Posluszny.
Final Grade: A
Secondary
I thought the secondary played an excellent game. Ricky Stanzi was held to just 135 yards and completed less than 50% of his passes while throwing two picks. But it should be pointed out that Stanzi wasn't helped by his own guys dropping several passes.
Two guys that really impressed me were Nick Sukay and Stephon Morris. Sukay had nine tackles, broke up four passes, and caught an interception. Unfortunately, it was his missed block that led to the punt block, but that shouldn't completely negate a solid game. Morris has basically solidified himself on the first team nickel package; a truly amazing achievement for a true freshman in only his fourth game. And remember that Morris did not enroll in the spring and just joined the team in July. He's going to be a special player.
I was disappointed in Drew Astorino. Normally he's a pretty sure tackler, but he overran some plays and looked silly in whiffing on some arm tackles. I chalk that up to a wet field where he wasn't able to plant his feet and set himself.
Final Grade: B
Special Teams
I was worried going into this game that special teams were going to liability, and they were. Colin Wagner is not getting it done as the place kicker. His kickoffs aren't going past the five yard line, and I don't think he's made a field goal over 40 yards yet. I'm officially on the Give-Anthony-Fera-A-Chance bandwagon.
Once again Jeremy Boone was the lone star averaging 53 yards on his two punts. But other than that everything was atrocious. Iowa averaged 24 yards per kick return, and they returned a blocked punt for 53 yards. Penn State averaged 17.2 yards on five kick returns, but that was with one good return for 36 yards by Chaz Powell. The Nittany Lions only averaged only 12.5 yards on their other four returns.
Remember everything I said about Nick Sukay's play on defense? Yeah, well, none of that applies to special teams last night. He blew the blocking assignment and also drew the questionable roughing the kicker call on the Iowa punt. But he's still a good player who will get better.
Final Grade: F
Defensive Coaching
I happened to be sitting next to a few Iowa fans in the stands during the game. They were nice guys and very friendly complimenting us profusely on how awesome our stadium was. Anyway, right after Clark hit Powell for the 79 yard touchdown the place was rocking and they were obviously standing there with that "Oh Crap" look on their face. I leaned over to the guy and said, "This probably works to your advantage. With a seven point lead Joe is going to go conservative and let you get back in it." Today it kind of frightens me how accurate that was.
I paid particular attention to the secondary since it's hard to tell what they're doing while watching a game on television (I'll save my rant on television coverage as it relates to football strategy for another day.) They pretty much played Cover-3 the entire first half, and just like the fourth quarter last year in Iowa City, Stanzi picked them apart for eight or nine yards on every second down to set up a short yardage situation for third down. In my opinion, this is inexcusable.
Back in 2004 Joe Paterno came to the realization that if he wanted to be competitive he had to change his offense so it wasn't so predictable. Out of this was born the Spread HD with multiple formations, plays, and personnel to keep the opposing defense guessing. The new offense has been a tremendous success (last night notwithstanding), but yet Penn State hasn't changed a thing on defense. I know the defense still manages to do quite well, but why put them at the disadvantage of being so predictable? Why let Iowa march down the field and hope you can tighten up inside the 30 yard line? Would it kill us to play man-to-man once in a while? Or even a Cover-2 where the corners are in man and the safeties are covering deep zones?
I was pleased to see more blitzes in the second half and I thought it worked well to keep Stanzi off balance. I thought that was a nice adjustment. I also liked pulling Hayes in favor of Latimore.
Final Grade: B
88 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i hate hang-over mondays
defense played well. offense laid an egg. makes me mad that i dvr’d it, because i’ll only ever watch the first quarter. i don’t remember having this sinking feeling after the loss last year. might be that i was more preoccupied or something, but this one stings. it reminds me more of 2005 post-michigan monday. but, hey—that turned out just fine. i’m just glad i’m a giants fan, and not a steelers fan. else i’d be looking for some advil.
"They stalk their prey to within two or three great leaps and then launch a lightning-fast charge, striking their prey. Victims are most often killed by suffocation with a prolonged bite..."--Hinterland Who's Who
This loss was easier to see coming, IMO.
We knew the line was bad and if Iowa got pressure on Clark, it would get hairy. Last year, it was like everything conspired to rise up and get us. Weather, luck, referees, etc. This loss was much more cold and clinical, and it was apparent by halftime (even with the lead) that Iowa would end up winning.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions
It's funny you mentioned that...
After drinking several Dogfish Head 90s, dropping about 50 f-bombs, threatening to drive to S.C. to tackle Stanzi myself, and finally driving my wife upstairs, I pushed my DVD recorder eject button and bent the disc in half.
by LowcountryLion on Sep 28, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
MMmmmmm, Dogfish head 90-minute IPA
Probably the only satisfying part of your Saturday evening.
I bleed Blue and White.
by Horse N Buggy on Sep 28, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I was at rehobeth this summer for 10 days
I tried one of everything they had on tap over that time, my favorite was the chicory stout, the best stout I ever had.
"How many things do you do where you are involved with 110,000 other people on the same page? Unless you're in an English class cheating with 30 other guys."
Did you see DE Adrian Clayborns post game quote about DT Karl Klug?

Don’t look him in the eyes or he might break his chains!
by HawkeyeRecon on Sep 28, 2009 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions
You forgot the most important thing
I think the bashing Josh Hull sees is no longer justified. He’s a tremendous player and a tenacious linebacker that goes hard every play. He’s not the best in pass coverage, but then neither was Paul Posluszny.
I agree 100%, but the biggest improvement is the sweet stache.
"How many things do you do where you are involved with 110,000 other people on the same page? Unless you're in an English class cheating with 30 other guys."
Hull
I won’t bash him, but I’m not going to praise him either. Okay, I lied, his stache is awesome.
by Screen Name 20 on Sep 28, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions
NO
that stache is gross from a girl’s point of view. Otherwise, he is totally hot
Lucky gun, fake fifth, 8XY bitch
Daryll Clark, The Penn State Football Story Is...
Why anti stache? He isn't afraid to get a little hair on his face, though women liked that thing?
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, GUIDO
by SweepTheLeg on Sep 28, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Some women maybe, but not me
an apparently not letsgopsu
Just ask Mike, he grew a goatee a couple times. Looked ok but he didn’t get kissed much.
I am not anit-stache, it just depends on the style
I wonder if he is trying to make some statement with that pornstache, or maybe he lost a bet. But I don’t like it.
Lucky gun, fake fifth, 8XY bitch
Daryll Clark, The Penn State Football Story Is...
'Stache is cool, but does the...
wind resistance make him a step slow?
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
WOW
I agree that Hull is much improved and a lot of the crap he takes is unjustified but let’s not start comparing him to Poz just yet. He’s good, but not on-a-level-with-one-of-PSU’s-all-time-best-linebackers good.
by PSUMark2008 on Sep 28, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
He’s more comparable to Gino Capone.
by Screen Name 20 on Sep 28, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Recruiting Rankings / Stars
I think it’s funny we all say that the star ratings are meaningless.
However, if Josh Hull had been hyped a 4-star recruit instead of a walk-on … I think we would have a completely different opinion of him.
"I want to eat some dessert." - Brandon Ware
by The Man with One Black Shoe on Sep 28, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Never said he wasn't
just saying that he’s more comparable to Capone than to Poz.
by Screen Name 20 on Sep 29, 2009 7:59 AM EDT up reply actions
no, i know....
…I was saying Capone was so “good” because he was Italian….NOT!!
Joe Pa loves his meatballs after all
need that sarcasm font to type with
Hull has gotten better but
Though his tackling has vastly improved from last season, if you rewatch the game tape he was out of position a great deal in his zone drops.
I thought only safeties played 15 yards off the ball?
Defense was fine, with one complaint
They couldn’t get the ball back at the end of the game, not that it likely would’ve mattered all that much. Nobody will remember the performance of the defense on that night.
Defensive line more or less held their own. Bless his heart, but Jerome Hayes simply doesn’t have the burst to compete at the Big Ten level because of those knee injuries.
Stanzi actually had a horrible game. His receivers dropped a few early, but he was badly off-target for most of the night.
Astorino wasn’t at his best, that’s true. Missed tackles, dropped INT’s. Hull was pretty good. Great having Bowman back.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 8:55 AM EDT reply actions
I wish they would have sold out more on the run.
It was pretty clear they weren’t going to throw with the weather and Stanzi’s play up to that point. But I echo your “oh well,” we weren’t doing anything with the ball.
I don’t really have a problem with the play calling. It was conservative as hell but definitively good enough for the win. You only give up 12 points, and all but three were drives that stared in PSU territory.
And that roughing the kicker call was absolute insanity. Not only was he thrown towards the kicker, which negates this whole conversation in the first place, but he didn’t actually touch the guy until he flat out dove on top of him. Utter bulls#&t.
BSD
Did you see the way the blocker threw up his arms after he threw Sukay?
I’ve never seen an acting job as organized as that.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions
The whole thing was torture for me.
Easily the most frustrated I had been up to that point, even with an EPIC FAIL offense.
BSD
I agree it was a terrible call.
That being said everybody else is backing off setting up a return while he tries to be a hero. I just dont think he should have been in a position to allow that to happen.
"Wherever you go, Penn State will go with you. You are now a part of her. Her image will be cast in your image. Your reputation will become her reputation."
by noodlebucket on Sep 28, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Ogbu
saw a lot of the bench. Still was in there a ton. When Ogbu was in there, I thought he was consistently in the backfield disrupting plays. Not sure what the reasoning was, but I felt that Still was low impact. Odrick I thought was doubled every play and neutralized. When that happens Crawford needs to get to the QB.
Hull...
While I don’t want to bash him because he did make some good plays, I also seem to remember noticing a few times when he was just totally out of position and got burned. Since I am trying to block the majority of the game (except our first play on offense) out of my memory, I don’t have any specifics to mention.
I may have just been looking for someone to blame since I was so aggravated watching and blaming Iowa just didn’t seem right at the time.
Yeah, he was fine.
He was burned by one of Iowa’s RB in open space, but I expect that. He also missed a tackle on Iowa’s last TD (and so did Astorino).
But yeah, whatever. Hull was #40 on the list of reasons why we lost that game.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions
- - Josh Hull
- - Tim Curley
- through #2 – Iowa
- - Offensive line
Correct?
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Format fail
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
He had some good (the sack) and some bad (missed tackle on the TD run) but he wasn’t one of the reasons we lost.
by Screen Name 20 on Sep 28, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Crawford
He has really had a lot of hype coming into the season but I just dont see it. He has unable to get at the QB really at all this year which is something our defense needs.
"Wherever you go, Penn State will go with you. You are now a part of her. Her image will be cast in your image. Your reputation will become her reputation."
He doesn't have the burst yet
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
His name was never called on the TV broadcast.
Ever. DE’s facing backup left tackles should be able to penetrate from time to time.
I do disagree with you on one thing Mike...
The Defense did show a rare instance of man coverage. Someone, I forget who, went up against Lynn (#8) and Lynn covered his man very well, even though the pass wasn’t really on target. I don’t remember seeing a safety in the zone, although it was on TV.
Anybody think that the secondary has more talent than the last few years? I think so. I also think there will be some growing pains for this group, but they’re off to a nice start.
I like the future at corner.
Morris and Lynn should make that a strength for us in the future.
"Wherever you go, Penn State will go with you. You are now a part of her. Her image will be cast in your image. Your reputation will become her reputation."
by noodlebucket on Sep 28, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it was a hybrid
something like a cover 12 or 13, putting one corner alone on a man and zone the other side of the field. Or I could be completely wrong. But overall yeah, there’s definitely some potential cookin’ in the secondary.
Defense
I think the defense kept us in the game. Going into the 4th, it was still 10-5. If you would have told me the defense only gave up 12 points (i’m not counting the safety or the blocked punt) I would have said we had a good chance.
It was nice to see that Morris will be a player down the road. I think their O-line did a nice job against our front 4.
Bowman was everywhere…good to see.
On a side note. We got our tickets through the Varsity S Club. When we got to our seats, it was right next to the Iowa fans. There were no problems with any of the fans during the games. I had to listen to them do a first down chant and spell out IOWA. however, as the clock was ticking down, about 50 of them went to the first row and tried to rush the field….i don’t think they made it over the railing.
"I'm not affraid to compete"
~Robert Bolden
Wow
I guess the Iowa fans didn’t realize that they were in one of the few stadiums in the country that will mace their own students just for looking at the field… And then try to arrest them by facebook-stalking them later (at least until someone in the University PD realizes that joining a facebook group called “I rushed the field” isn’t strong enough evidence to convict someone in court)
by PSUMark2008 on Sep 28, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Dont question
Madera or you will end up indicted
"Wherever you go, Penn State will go with you. You are now a part of her. Her image will be cast in your image. Your reputation will become her reputation."
by noodlebucket on Sep 28, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't understand....
how each year the defense can be championship or near championship calibar, but the offense can only peak every 3-4 years. It seems the offense gets to a certain point (usually senior laden) then falls off and has to climb the mountain again.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 10:35 AM EDT reply actions
+1
I think a big part is our inability to reload on O line and inconsistency of QB recruiting. We’ve never been known for our QBs and hopefully with Clark and now Newsome, Jones and Bolden this is changing, but it’s kind of hard to have a consistently good offense when half the time you’re rebuilding your O line.
Also, why is it that once our QBs start playing they always seem to regress (or at best, stay the same) rather than improve? I don’t wanna rag on JayPa ‘cause that was so 2007 and I really do think he’s redeemed himself, but still…
by PSUMark2008 on Sep 28, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
I can't think of a year....
since they join the B10 that I thought, the Defense is going to hold this team back. Every year seems to depend on how well the offense does. I guess in 94 the offense carried the defense a little bit that year. Are there other years like that?
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Um, yeah
Last year.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Defense was fine last year.
The got torched against USC, but were good otherwise.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Disagree, I thought the D...
played well the whole year. Bowl games are entities unto themselves.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I think '04s defense was amazing.
They were just coupled with an atrocious offense. They continually did what they were asked, but they can only do so much when your offense is getting one touchdown every other game.
Look at how the offensive coaching is structured vs. defense.
On defense, who’s accountable? Bradley, after a loss where the defense gets torched. The haters are never bashing Vandy, LJ, Buggs, etc….the blame goes straight to Bradley.
But with an offensive disaster…who do the haters blame…Joe, Jay, Galen, Anderson/Kenney?
I know its a weird way of looking at it, but Bradley shoulders the load for his unit and gets the job done. He’s accountable and lives up to his mistakes. When the offense is a mess, it usually seems like a variety of things are to blame. I think one guy, yes one guy needs to be offensive coordinator and take care of business. I think that would make a lot of difference.
by Artiefufkin10 on Sep 28, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Good point(s)
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
On that note
Who gets all the credit when the offense is good?
Quite a system they have there.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Although it's not like Jay doesn't get dumped on.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Twitter-loving freak
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it is assumed that he is the main "voice" of the offense.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Jay gets plenty dumped on...
and maybe sometimes it was justified and sometimes it wasn’t.
Do you remember ‘06, I used to read FOS back then (don’t any more because its totally immature) but everyone wanted to fire Kenney/Anderson after the Illinois game, where Joe said the team was L-O-U-S-Y.
Same thing with Joe. People get after him for keeping it conservative all the time and bottling up the offense after a lead.
Point is, having one guy just take the heat on the offense would probably be better. Nobody would really have to lose their current job, but this weird chain of play calling Galen→Jay→Red→Joe→QB is just weird.
by Artiefufkin10 on Sep 28, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Galen gets it for the RBs, JayPa for the QBs.
Is there a more innocuous OC than Galen Hall in BCS football? His name never comes up in any discussions of PSU football. It’s as though he’s a figurehead. Couple this with the growing perception of JoePa as a figurehead and you get concerned that JayPa and Bradley are managing this team.
Agreed, Galen is a huge mystery.
I’ve heard that Galen calls the running plays and Jay calls the pass plays. Whatever I guess…but who decides when to run or pass it?
I won’t doubt these coaches abilities because they’ve put good product on the field. Galen has developed some nice backs here and Jay did well with Clark because I can remember how awful his throwing was in ’06.
I question their ability to coalesce and identify the weak points and how to overcome that. For example, the weakness in the line.
by Artiefufkin10 on Sep 28, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
You say this
and all I can think of is that this has the makings for a bad comedy series. Galen and Jay – Penn State’s “The Odd Couple”. Sounds like we have another hit TV show for RamblerTV!
"In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
No
Galen’s too boring for TV. And Jay’s already busy with “Paterno and Son”.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't understand what the core competency of the PSU offense *is*.
I’m not being a wise guy. I think you spread yourself too thin. Oh, sorry. You try to do too many things.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Thats the thing.
If you have the talent to do a bunch of different things, you can be quite the force. See PSU offense circa 2008. If you have a ton of weapons, spread it around to those weapons, it is much harder to key on any one guy or play set.
If you are lacking the talent(even if it is really only at one position) like we are on our Oline right now, it makes you look really incapable, especially against a very good defense. See PSU offense circa 2009.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth."
Bradley
I pretty much think he has free reign of the D. I think Joe might go over some high level stuff with him, but that is about it.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 11:09 AM EDT reply actions
I don't want to make this into a who should succeed Joe thing but....
for the people who doubt Bradley’s ability to do get it done…I seriously wonder why? He’s accountable and I always feel that he does the best with what he has.
I can’t see him not putting the right people in charge of the offense and defense to get things done.
That’s all.
by Artiefufkin10 on Sep 28, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Would he...
be “allowed” to pick his own people? Which is a discussion for another day.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
it is...
but I think most of the staff would probably stay in tact on the defensive side of the ball. LJ to defensive coordinator is probably a gimme.
Galen would be gone as would Anderson probably because I think Joe is twisting their arms to stay on.
by Artiefufkin10 on Sep 28, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Random Thoughts
Mike is grading our D-line on a curve because of the powerful Iowa O-line. However, this was a powerful O-line that was missing their star starting LT.
I think Sukay’s 9 tackles are just a product of missed tackles or assignments up front. While it is a sign of solid tackling, I don’t think # of tackles should be the judge of his game. If he had only made 3 tackles because of better play up front, does that mean he played worse?
When we see Sack and TFL totals, does a sack count in both categories? Or are TFL only non-sacks?
Bowman & Hull both had 13 tackles, but I know that includes shared tackles. I wonder how many individual plays they actually made the stop on (i.e. would be 26 minus any tackles they both shared).
"I want to eat some dessert." - Brandon Ware
by The Man with One Black Shoe on Sep 28, 2009 11:48 AM EDT reply actions
fairly certain
sacks count as TFL’s also
by PSUisMyHeart on Sep 28, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Correct
"...Drink'n Blue Kool - Aid; One Sip @ a Time..."
by BlueWhiteLife on Sep 28, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
LBs
Bowman was a one man wrecking crew, and Hull played great against the run, put our zone pass coverage is terrible. We gave up a lot of intermediate passes that shouldn’t have been that easy and keep in mind we were playing Stanzi. I’ll give them a B-
Iowa receivers dropped
a lot of underneath passes as well. There was a lot of room for them to run out there.
by Screen Name 20 on Sep 28, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
DLine
really was outplayed by Iowa’s offensive line (not a total demerit because Iowa has a good line). JO didn’t get his normal QB rushes, and aside from Lattimore knocking down that pass I can’t remember anything that stood out. My question is why didn’t we throw in more blitzes? When we started blitzing Bowman at the end was when we actually got TFL.
Stephan Morris’ play is really encouraging. I like his attitude and he got good discipline and fundamentals for a true freshman playing a tough position
They started blitzing more in the second half.
Hull had a sack and the LB’s also got to Stanzi on the failed two-pointer. And we even threw a corner blitz (!) at them.
--
"Not everybody is the perfect person in the world. Everyone does - kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me." -- Terrelle Pryor
by Run Up The Score on Sep 28, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah as I just posted a second ago, that CB blitz was really really effective. It’s one of those things I hope we work on more b/c with Lynn and Timmons/Wallace we actually have guys with good size to be successful.
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
Cover blitze
that’s right, I saw that and was surprised as to how well that worked. From what I remember it flushed the play inside and Ogbu got the TFL?
Odrick's lack of production surprised me
Iowa’s interior has really improved from the first game.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Sep 28, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Anyone see
The CB Blitz? I was so excited about that. I think Lynn blitzed in there, but it was an all out blitz and we got to Stanzi for a sack. Makes you wonder why we didn’t do more of it (all out blitzing that is). I think the thing we missed the most was pressure on the QB — all night it just seemed like we couldn’t get to Stanzi like I thought we should.
"We hugged as grown men do. It was a great moment. Then, it was business as usual." -- LJ Sr.
thats because we rely on the front 4..
to get good/decent pressure and it really wasn’t happening.
by Artiefufkin10 on Sep 28, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
What was frustrating was...
I had no sense that Iowa could move the ball more than 45-50 yards for a score. The way Stanzi and the WR’s were playining there was little chance that they could sustain a long drive. Of course they still found a way to win.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions
Iowa only had one 3 and out...
and that eventually played huge dividends for Iowa. Of course that factored heavily in Iowa’s game calls. Sure, Iowa was not scoring points but we were winning the field position batle rather handily. PSU got inside the Iowa 30 yard line on only one drive (I don’t count the bomb to start the game), that long drive in the first quarter. After that it was Iowa pushing hard on the Penn State side of the field, essentially the rest of the game,. Ferentz realized around mid-2nd quarter that his defense had stabilized and that in order to win he needed to grind down Penn State and hopefully grind out scores. Why hand back to Penn State field position advantage by taking un-needed risk? Of course, your defense was stout and thus it was a matter of who blinked first.
Karl Klug is an animal. Next game we’re going to bring him in a cage. -- Adrian Clayborn
I think that was my point.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
by Esteban d' Amur on Sep 28, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Sukay
Can someone explain why our 208 lb. safety was assigned to block a 282 lb. Clayborn on that punt?

by 






























