Erin Andrews Column in the Washington Post
Inspired this week by Horse N Buggy to heed the Call to Service, I bring you some personalized jtot coverage of a nice Sally Jenkins column on the challenges of Erin Andrews doing her job and managing her beauty. The pretense of Jenkins posting the column today is that, starting tonight, Erin must 'reassert that she's a professional in control of her own image, while acknowledging that she was victimized by voyeurism' when she returns to the sideline in tonight's USC vs. NC State game (I know you see what I did there)(btw, does this information change your plans for that invigorating Indiana game on the B10 network?). Now, beyond this questionable (to me) assertion, Jenkins goes on to pontificate and predicate and predict more than a few sillinesses, but in general puts forth a reasonable read on the complex subject of sexism in the workplace*
* Erin Andrews in her workplace:
More gripping jp commentary after the jump.
Now, although EA turned her down for an interview request, Jenkins remains a fan:
She built her on-air personality with a solid understanding that while beauty matters, because it leads to interest, it can also lead to damning criticism and easy disparagement, so her real career drivers better be smarts and preparation.
And provides more than a few provocative little nuggets:
When Playboy named Andrews the Sexiest Sportscaster two years in a row, she laughed and enjoyed the compliment without prudishness, while making it clear it would be "a cold day in hell," as her father put it, before she would actually appear in that magazine.
And:
It would be a genuine shame if voyeurism caused Andrews to like her job any less. And it would be an equal shame if it caused her to disassemble who she is, de-emphasize her natural attractiveness, or sleepwalk through interviews with less rapport, for fear it might be misinterpreted or invite creeps.
Other goodies include comparisons to Tony Siragusa and Keyshawn Johnson. In the end, it's clear that Jenkins has nothing but admiration for EA and her original assertion that EA must somehow reassert herself after this summer's invasiveness just gently fades away. And no good fanpost on the coverage of Miss Andrews would be complete without a few more offerings from the rest of blogistan:
At work:
At play:
In nomini Zugtris et Zugii et Zugitus sancti
Thanks for the fanpost! Please do not post any content from a premium site that requires a subscription. Also, if you just want to share a link consider using fanshots instead. Thanks.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
I'm not sure I'm following you
are you saying EA is, or is not, a “professional in control of her own image”?
by Joe 96alum on Sep 3, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wait...
there were words up there too?
We are not normal. We are legends.
by NittanyAlum02 on Sep 4, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Erin Andrews is simply not that hot.
There. I feel better.
"far less knowledgeable than the average poster here"
by jesse. on Sep 4, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sally jenkins....
is awful.. I would suggest never reading anything she writes
by RudyWasOffsides on Sep 4, 2009 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
EA not that hot?
Wow I want to see the chicks you hang out with . . .
by Joe 96alum on Sep 4, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with jesse
I’ve never seen what the big deal is with her. I’m not saying she’s ugly but she’s no beauty either. Her face is average and her body is a little weak. She’s got no junk in the trunk and her legs are scrawny.
by RNF18 on Sep 5, 2009 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

























