Indiana Hoosiers By The Numbers

 

Penn State

Value (Nat'l Rank)

Value (Nat'l Rank)

Indiana Hoosiers

Advantage

Rushing Offense (ypg) 145.9 (71) 183.3 (92) Rushing Defense (ypg) Push
Passing Offense (ypg) 213.8 (66) 228.3 (81) Passing Defense (ypg) Push
Pass Efficiency 122.4 (85) 154.8 (114) Pass Efficiency Defense Psulogo_medium
Total Offense (ypg) 359.7 (74) 411.6 (89) Total Defense (ypg) Push
Scoring Offense (ppg) 23.2 (89) 33.6 (100) Scoring Defense (ppg) Push
Rushing Defense (ypg) 172.2 (83) 104.1 (108) Rushing Offense (ypg) Psulogo_medium
Passing Defense (ypg) 184.5 (19) 287.4 (16) Passing Offense (ypg) Push
Pass Efficiency Defense 133.0 (81) 129.4 (62) Pass Efficiency Push
Total Defense (ypg) 356.7 (52) 391.5 (53) Total Offense (ypg) Push
Scoring Defense (ppg) 21.9 (38) 26.8 (62) Scoring Offense (ppg) Push
Net Punting Yds 39.3 (11) 8.7 (49) Punt Return Yds Psulogo_medium
Punt Return Yds 7.4 (67) 33.8 (98) Net Punting Yds Psulogo_medium
Kickoff Return Yds 23.6 (26) 25.1 (106) Kickoff Return Defense Psulogo_mediumPsulogo_mediumPsulogo_medium
Kickoff Return Defense 19.7 (18) 23.3 (37) Kickoff Return Yds Push
Turnover Margin -0.30 (76) -0.50 (91) Turnover Margin Push
Penalty Yds/Game 27.1 (1) 44.6 (T-27) Penalty Yds/Game Psulogo_medium
Sacks 1.40 (T-98) 0.90 (T-12) Sacks Allowed Indiana_hoosiers_logo_mediumIndiana_hoosiers_logo_mediumIndiana_hoosiers_logo_medium
Sacks Allowed 0.90 (T-12) 1.40 (T-98) Sacks Psulogo_mediumPsulogo_mediumPsulogo_medium
Redzone Offense (%) 0.77 (T-92) 0.92 (T-113) Redzone Defense (%) Push
Redzone Defense (%) 0.92 (T-113) 0.85 (T-41) Redzone Offense (%) Indiana_hoosiers_logo_mediumIndiana_hoosiers_logo_medium
Redzone TD % 0.51 0.63 Redzone TD % Defense Push
Redzone TD % Defense 0.69 0.54 Redzone TD % Push
3rd Down Conv. % 40.7 (55) 43.9 (97) 3rd Down Defense % Psulogo_medium
3rd Down Defense % 31.2 (8) 45.5 (28) 3rd Down Conv. % Push
1st Downs Per Game 18.9 (T-73) 19.1 (53) 1st Downs Allowed PG Push
1st Downs Allowed PG 17.8 (31) 21.6 (35) 1st Downs Per Game Push

 

Legend

Difference <25 in National Rank = Push

Difference >25 in National Rank =   Psulogo_medium

Difference >50 in National Rank =   Psulogo_mediumPsulogo_medium

Difference >75 in National Rank =   Psulogo_mediumPsulogo_mediumPsulogo_medium

Difference >100 in National Rank = Psulogo_mediumPsulogo_mediumPsulogo_mediumPsulogo_medium

Note: The Redzone TD% and Redzone TD% Defense are calculated by me and not ranked by the NCAA. Determining who has the advantage in these categories is strictly my arbitrary judgement.

More analysis after the jump.    

There's not a lot of color on that chart which would lead us to believe these teams are pretty evenly matched. But here again we have to look at the story behind the numbers. Indiana has played four absolutely horrible teams out of conference that have a combined record of 7-33. Arkansas State is the best of them with a 4-6 record, and the Hoosiers beat them by two points.

In Big Ten play, the Hoosiers are sporting the big goose egg with an 0-6 record. In fairness, they could easily be 3-3 right now as their losses to Michigan, Northwestern, and Iowa were very close. However, their losses to Illinois, Ohio State, and Wisconsin were not.

If you look at the numbers above for Penn State's offense against Indiana's defense, most of those numbers are very close to tipping into the PSU column. So I think it's safe to say Penn State should have a slight advantage here. Especially after playing the Buckeyes last week. Indiana defenders should look like they are running in slow motion to our offensive line and Matt McGloin.

Teams that have success against Penn State on offense do so by running the ball. Indiana is not going to be able to do this. Not only do they not have the players to run on Penn State, they only attempt to run the ball 41% of the time by nature. Look for Penn State to play a lot of nickel defense as Indiana likes to spread you out and they won't do a lot of running. Damarlo Belcher, Tandon Doss, and Terrance Turner are three wideouts that can burn you, and Ben Chappell is a very capable quarterback with a 19/8 TD to INT ratio and 2700 yards passing on the year.

Penn State should have an advantage on special teams this week as Anthony Fera has been doing very well with his punts and Indiana has not. The Hoosiers are also not great at covering kickoffs. Kick returns is an area where Penn State has struggled in recent weeks, so it will be interesting to see if they can get that going again here.

Though the chart looks pretty even, Penn State should have the talent advantage to go with the home field advantage of playing in Maryland. This should be a game Penn State wins.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Black Shoe Diaries

You must be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Black Shoe Diaries. You should read them.

Join Black Shoe Diaries

You must be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Black Shoe Diaries. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker