Ohio State post game altercation

I know what you’re talking about and I don’t have a problem with that. It’s normal.

What’s not normal is to boo every play, and I mean every last one that doesn’t go Penn State’s way loudly and bitterly. There was an angry edge to the crowd last night that I frankly don’t understand. Yeah, it was Ohio State, but c’mon. I’ve been to the last three OSU home football games (two of which we lost), all of which were infinitely bigger than last night’s game, and I’ve never felt this kind of fury and rage just boiling over.

I honestly wondered if I was watching the same game as everyone else

Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Apart from hating Curley, I’m pretty sure fugi loves PSU as much as anyone here.

My view was just fine.

And I REALLY don’t think we’re in a position to complain about and-1s, because we got plenty last night.

What happened last night wasn’t necesarily “rowdy” or “unclassy”, it was just off the tracks ignorance to the game of basketball.

Just sit down and shut up…..

but if he was going to do anything…pointing at the scoreboard was the right thing to do. Rather than Ron Artest everyone in the crowd.

most students don’t know the name though, but as long as they come we’re happy.

Post it.

the jersey countdown can’t start until 99

We weren’t a spectacularly easy group of fans, yes. But frankly, I don’t know what he expected, what with him being a Buckeye and this being Happy Valley. Not to justify our actions or anything, but it is what it is. And he is the one in the spotlight. So in the end, maybe it would have been smarter to let bygones be bygones. Last thing someone in the spotlight needs is video evidence that could be so easily taken out of context.

My favorite part, personally, was when TV Announcer Man went into a little speil about how Turner and Battle were oh-so-cool, yo. It was almost sweet, until Turner went for the crotch.

Did you hear the student section say?

I believe—and stop me if I’ve jacked this up in any way; although I routinely excel at the oft-underrated skills of Reading and Thinking, I remain capable of the occasional mental fumble— that you are endeavoring to define a moral distinction somewhere down through the middle of the Behavior of Crowds. And after so doing, you further attempt to assign levels of propriety to each side of that new definition. Do I have this right?

More importantly, do you think your current arsenal is actually capable of this ambitious aspiration? You’re familiar with the notion of choosing one’s battles, right? Have you been thoughtful about this one? I mean, there’s no crime if you haven’t (Mike didn’t get to 3million visits without a fair subsection of doofusery squeezing through the cracks); it just seems to this reader that your Posts & Stories have improved so much in critical areas of wisdom, judgment and organization and your comments in this thread seem to falling short of that bar.

Now don’t get me wrong, this obviously isn’t the first time this mission has been undertaken. As Penn State fans, we routinely self-examine our personal and crowd behaviors—our moral righteousness being such a thick part of our fanatic fabric. It’s just that, reading through this thread, it appears you’re getting your ass kicked.