FanPost

Intraconference Variety at the Top


I was thinking about the Pac-10, and how for the past decade it's been USC and 9 teams named Fred (or so it seems).  So I decided to compare each conferences' performance in the last decade (2000-2009 regular seasons) by the number of different teams that made it to a BCS bowl game, and by the number of different teams that won a BCS game.  Here goes:

Big Ten: Made it: Purdue, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio State, Iowa, Penn State (6/11).  Won: Ohio State, Iowa, Penn State (3/11)

Big East (current members): Made it: Pitt, WVU, Louisville, Cinci (4/8). Won: WVU, Louisville (2/8)

ACC (current members): Made it: Miami, FSU, Maryland, Va Tech, Wake Forest, Ga Tech (6/12) Won: Miami, Va Tech (2/12)

SEC: Made it: Florida, LSU, Georgia, Auburn, Alabama (5/12), Won: Florida, LSU, Georgia, Auburn, Alabama (5/12)

Big 12: Made it: Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Kansas State, Kansas, Nebraska (6/12) Won: Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas (3/12)

Pac-10: Made it: Oregon State, Washington, Oregon, Washington State, USC (5/10) Won: Oregon State, Washington, Oregon, USC (4/10)

Conclusions:

  • When it comes to getting the greatest percentage of different schools into a BCS game over the past decade, nobody tops the Big Ten at 54.5%, and every other league except the SEC (41.7%) was at 50%.  Everyone loves to talk about how top-to-bottom competitive the SEC is, but by this metric, it ranks as the single most top-heavy league.  By contrast, the Big Ten ranks as the most competitive, amplified by the fact that each team that made it to a BCS game made it to at least two, with the exception of Purdue.
  • The Pac-10 and SEC win BCS games like it's their job. 41.7% of SEC teams and 40% of Pac-10 teams won a BCS game in the aughts.  The closest league to them was the Big Ten, where 27.3% of its teams won a BCS game in the same decade.  Granted, the last time a team not called USC won a BCS game was Oregon in the 2002 (2001 regular season) Fiesta Bowl. Regardless, those 2 leagues have clearly had the widest variety of excellent (as measured by BCS game winning) teams in the aughts.
  • The Big East compares well to the other leagues, even after the ACC allegedly raided its best teams. 50% of its current membership has been to a BCS game in the past decade, which is worse only than the Big Ten, and 25% of its current membership has won at least one BCS game, which is only worse than the SEC, Pac-10, and Big Ten, and much better than the league that supposedly took all of its best teams, the ACC (16.7%).
  • The top of the ACC stinks and lacks variety.  It was better than only one league (the SEC) at producing a variety of BCS paricipants, and dead, distant last at producing a variety of BCS winners.
  • Congratulations to the Big 12 on being average at both producing a variety of BCS participants and BCS winners.  You are the Big East.  Don't you forget it.  Now fork over Texas.
  • Michigan didn't win a BCS game this decade?  And Louisville, Kansas, WVU, and Oregon State did? Find somebody who would've predicted that before the 2000 regular season.

You created a Fanpost! Any content from a premium site that requires a subscription will be deleted once we catch wind of it. If you simply want to share a link, quote, or video, please consider using Fanshots instead. Thanks.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Black Shoe Diaries

You must be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Black Shoe Diaries. You should read them.

Join Black Shoe Diaries

You must be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Black Shoe Diaries. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker