Lucas Oil Stadium to Host Big Ten Championship Game
The Big Ten announced today that the first Big Ten Championship game will be held at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis.
"We are excited to work with Indiana Sports Corp. and Lucas Oil Stadium to finalize an agreement to hold the inaugural Big Ten football championship game in the city of Indianapolis," Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said in a statement. "We felt at this time it was important to identify a site for the first championship game and then spend more time with other cities and venues with respect to both our basketball tournaments and the football championship games in the future."
Having been to Indianapolis a few times for conferences, I think this is a fabulous choice. The stadium is located right in downtown Indianapolis with shopping, hotels, bars, and restaurants all over the place. Much of it, like the stadium, is indoors making it convenient to experience even when the weather is not cooperating.
I also like how the Big Ten is doing a one year deal now and taking their time to explore their options and work out a long term deal somewhere else.
90 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Snooze
I guess it would be more interesting if it wasn’t in Indy, but I’d rather have seen it outdoors at Solider Field, or even Lambeau.
"I'm colonel cool! And I'm the captain on this rocket to the stars!"
You are correct sir.
The outdoor CCG may never happen, but we must continue our protests.
No matter how many teams are in it, I will continue to dislike the Big Ten.
by Illegal Formation on Aug 5, 2010 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions
All it would take to have an outdoor CCG...
is to open the roof.
"Nothing turns me on like doe estrus." - ReadingRambler
Lame.
Generic Field in Generic City in Generic State (I don’t mean to diss Indiana, but really) welcomes you to the Big Ten championship game.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
I fully expected this
I’m still holding out hope for a rotation. I want it outdoors once in awhile. Just personal preference.
Black Shoes. Basic Blues. No Name. All Game.
by Roland86 on Aug 5, 2010 9:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
snooze
Just think, after the game everyone can meet up at the Indy Applebe’s… who needs Bourbon St.
I personally would like to see the championship as a home game for the team with better record, but I know that wont happen due to it being a logistics nightmare. But honestly think how much fun it’d be to have a Big Ten Championship game at Beaver Stadium. Gives me chills thing about it.
by thecrosshairguide on Aug 5, 2010 10:00 PM EDT reply actions
would be great but...
what would you do if two teams were undefeated?
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face
Higher BCS standing gets the game
Hey- it worked so well for the Big XII.
"Nothing turns me on like doe estrus." - ReadingRambler
by leeharvey418 on Aug 6, 2010 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
white bread venue
It’s going to be Chicago for most of the time. And God help us if we have to go to Detroit!
I, too, have been to Indianapolis.
And it sucks.
But seriously, it’s not that great of a city. At all. A cleaner, slightly less crime-ridden Louisville. And that’s being generous.
One guy at BHGP (Think it was Bellanca) has been to both cities and is convinced Indy is a larger Des Moines.
For instance, Des Moines’ main selling point is also shops, hotels, and restaurants.
From there, then what? The vicinity of local racetracks and corn?
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 5, 2010 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions
what are the better options?
Chicago, and then? Detroit? Green Bay? Pitt?
Indy is a pretty good/logical first choice. I would like to see it rotate at least somewhat, though.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 5, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions
How about it goes to the team that has the best record in Big Ten play?
Wait, that’s not going to work. How about Beaver Stadium? Or Lincoln Financial?
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Chicago is fantastic town
Green Bay would be a cool venue. Indy just seems so bland.
Plus I just want the game to be outdoors.
"I'm colonel cool! And I'm the captain on this rocket to the stars!"
All of those cities except Detroit are superior because they have outdoor venues.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Chicago – It’s like Indy but bigger and with things to do. Make sure you kneel before thy god, Richard Daly.
Green Bay – Has an outdoor stadium.
Pittsburgh – Cool tours of abandoned steel mills.
All of these are more interesting than that stupid dome.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions
and I somewhat agree with that
but for the first game, with the caveat that this isn’t the permanent location, Indy is fine. If it was in Chicago the first year, then the next year some people would complain that it is in Chicago again, while others would complain that it went to Indy. Meh. I’ve been to all the places I listed (except Green Bay) and while Chicago is probably my favorite city in the country, I’m not bummed about Indy.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
This game is NOT going to be a ticket sales boon
because there are only 63,000 seats.
Maybe they can upgrade to 70,000. But that’s a big maybe. They have to make sure the game doesn’t interfere with the Colts…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 1:39 AM EDT reply actions
that's intentional
They want to drive up ticket prices, while ensuring that it will always be completely full for the panoramic and aerial shots. Larger stadia risk ACC-like empty seats; this is a smart choice for the first championship game.
There really isn’t any mega NFL stadiums in the Big Ten region. Soldier Field is actually smaller than this. IIRC, Lucas Oil is the largest non-college stadium in a Big Ten state. So, unless they wanted to go to the Meadowlands or FedEx — or play on the campus of a member school — this is the largest capacity they’ll have available.
Hey, I'm with you in the Indy support
I want the cold weather venues as well, though, but for the inaugural game, where I’m assuming there’ll be a bit more pomp and circumstance, and indoor stadium is fine.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions
It's not so bad for a weekend.
Nothing distinctive, but at least it’s walkable to bars, restaurants, and hotels. Better than sitting in a parking lot in the middle of the suburbs.
Des Moines has great steakhouses
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
went to Indy back in 1999 for the NCAA Tourney 1st/2nd rounds
Three buddies and I drove from Pittsburgh (during spring break) to Indy. It was a horrible 6 hour drive on I-70, with more 18 wheelers than cars. We stayed at some crap hotel on the south side of the city for two/three nights. The games were on Friday/Sunday, so we tried to go out in the city on Saturday. There was – literally – no where to party. The city was absolutely dead.
Luckily, the worst part of the trip, the RCA dome, is no longer. That stadium was dark and unimpressive. This was the last year Ohio St. went to the Final Four and I had to deal with 70% OSU fans in the stands for their 1st/2nd round games. It was hard to watch without throwing up a little bit in the back of my mouth.
I think Indy is absolutely no fun.
This game should be outdoors only. Case closed.
"this was the last year Ohio St went to the Final Four"
didn’t they play in the championship game back in 2007?
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't care if its played in Argentina
As long as its prevents people from claiming conference championships they didn’t earn.
McGloin Despite Them
Preaching the McGospel since Aug. 2nd, 2010
by millzners on Aug 6, 2010 8:04 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.....
and good luck if WE all think that the game will be played outside…..by the time you offer tix to all 12 teams and allow Press passes etc., 63,000 seats won’t go too far…but do you really think that this will stop our neighbors from Ohio from claiming they win every year.
i believe like 2 or so years ago
Texas claimed a share of the Big XII without playing in the CCG? or am I making that up?
I'm probably a bit mistaken
and don’t care enough to look it up, but from what I recall they put some star on a wall that indicates the number of championships they had won (or something like that). I also recall that they may have taken it down. Yay for solid reporting!
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Sort of
There was a three-way tie in the Big XII south between Texas, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech. Texas beat Oklahoma who beat Tech who beat Texas.
The tie breaker rules for the division said the team ranked highest in the BCS went to the Big XII championship game. That was Oklahoma b/c Texas lost to Tech late in the year. Texas fans were PO’d because they beat Oklahoma head-to-head but the Sooners got to go to the BXII championship game and eventually play for the national championship where they layed an egg against Florida.
The following spring Texas floated the idea of putting numbers on a wall somewhere signifying they were co-Big XII champs that year, but they decided against it.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
If that ever happens, it would be a huge victory
against wishful thinking by Buckeye fans.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Indy is meh...
Just have it in Chicago. Green Bay is nice in theory, but there isn’t a whole lot to do in Green Bay.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
Ah, beer, my one weakness. My Achille's heel, if you will. - HJS
Yeah, I don’t get the idea of slamming Indianapolis and then suggesting Green Bay. Green Bay might have some novelty value, but it’s a lousy place to hold a CCG, which is supposed to be a showcase event. And I’m not sure they’d even have the infrastructure to host such a thing anyway.
not sure they have the infrastructure?
They host an NFL game at least 8 times a year
Let's Go State!
Indy, Detroit and Chicago are the only options
The Big Ten Conference championship game can’t be held anywhere else. And even Detroit is a bit of a stretch because of the condition of that city. Yeah Green Bay sounds like a nice idea if Wisconsin is involved in the Championship game. Heinz field is a great idea is Penn State is playing in the game. But what if the two teams playing are Iowa and Michigan? How many Iowa and Michigan fans are going to make the trek to Pittsburgh to see their teams. How many people in Pittsburgh are going to give two craps about seeing the Buckeyes and Wolverines play?
Face it, the game needs to be played in a centrally located place on the Big Ten map. The only three cities with large stadiums and large enough to host a large event are Indianapolis, Detroit and Chicago. And personally having been to all three cities, I would say Indy and Chicago are the only two real options.
Why not Minneapolis? I mean, it’s not central, but it’s has a busy airport and it’s definitely a large enough city to handle the event. Of course, the downside is that the Metrodome is supposively a dump.
you nailed it on the head with the Metrodome
perhaps if/when the Vikings get a new stadium, Minny will be back in the picture, but until then….
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Its actually not that bad for Football.
There’s nothing distinctive about it, but as far as seating and seeing the field its not that bad. something like 60K and it can get extremely loud with that damn lid on the place, even with only 30K yelling at any given time. As long as youre not too interested in ammenities, its sufficient.
Now for baseball, thats a totally different animal. IT WAS TEH SUX!
I love how it was the Twins that were able to exploit Tropicana Field's catwalk last night
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
If the Big 10 expands eastward again
Pittsburgh might be an option. For now though, I’d agree that it’s not.
I’ve never been to Chicago, so I’d love to see PSU play in a championship game there some day.
the fact that Cleveland is such an afterthought should give you your answer
and I have no idea what it is like as a city, but what about Cinci?
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
though I guess that'd just be like a lesser Pittsburgh
city no one wants to go to that is home if a Big East team
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
I dunno
They got the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame….and Drew Carey.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 6, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Indianapolis at least assures a neutral field
when would Purdue or the Hoosiers ever play in this game?
I thought Indiana played in their home games in Landover, Maryland.
by Cairo on Aug 6, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I need to create a couple more accounts so I can personally make this comment green.
"Nothing turns me on like doe estrus." - ReadingRambler
by leeharvey418 on Aug 6, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Selling a home game to Dan Snyder's pretty bad.
Now it’s a “home game”against a team they’ve never beaten.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions
with a billion fans in the area the stadium is in
Ia ora te natura, E mea arofa teie ao nei
Ua pau te maitai no te fenua, Re zai noa ra te ora o te mitie
SAVE THE GULF
on the flip side
if they are already expecting to lose the game, might as well sell out and make the most $ out of it.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Flights
I am all for rotating the game for the sole reason that I think it would be a lot of fun to visit different stadiums and cities.
Also, I just checked flights from NYC to Indy for what would be the weekend of the game this year if it was being held. $165!!! Now that definitely makes Indy a bit more appealing.
Yeah, because no way would tickets be more expensive if there were actually something going on.
/snark
"Nothing turns me on like doe estrus." - ReadingRambler
by leeharvey418 on Aug 6, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Indianapolis
In all honesty, I think some of you are taking an unfairly dim view of Indianapolis. I lived there for five years, and while I’m not here to tout it as a city on par with Chicago, the old “India-no-place” joke simply isn’t apt any more, and hasn’t been for a while.
The problem is Indianapolis is an exceptionally spread out city. In some ways this is appealing, as you don’t feel overwhelemd and crowded in as you do in other places, but it’s a long way from downtown to other areas one might go to eat/drink/carouse. And public transportation there was lousy (thought perhaps in the ten years I’ve been gone that’s improved).
Again, I don’t propose that Indianapolis is going to offer all the excitement and cultural opportunities of many other cities — and, yes, much of the downtown suffers from a very anonymous, chain-laden feel (but, um, hey, poke around off the beaten path a bit).
But it’s an exceptionally well equipped city for major athletic events, for logistical reasons people have already touched on. This won’t be a summer vacation, but a late November/early December trek to watch a football game; it’s not like you’re going to be strolling along the river or spending an afternoon in an art museum if it’s in Chicago.
If your objection is the dome, I’ll join you. If your measuring stick for a city’s appeal is Chicago, then Indy will always fall short. To characterize it as a “larger Des Moines,” however, is lazy and misinformed.
That all seems fair. But it seems odd to me that it would host both the football CCG and the basketball tourney. If they end up committed to Indy for football — and, yes, I realize this is just for one year and they could very well rotate it — then I’d hope they’d at least put the hoops tourney somewhere else (like in Chicago where it’s been before, or any of the myriad of other cities where it could work like Detroit, Cleveland, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, or even Pittsburgh (which has a nice new arena)). Just a thought.
Hey, *I'm* not the one who characterized it as a larger Des Moines.
But I was sold on the outdoor venue idea from the start, I like repeating cheesy jokes until they die, and that stadium in Indy is boring. So there you go.
But anyway, if Chicago is right in our backyard we should very well use it.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Gotcha
I know you didn’t say it was a larger Des Moines, and I’m with you on the outdoor venue, and could certainly be convinced that Chicago is a better option.
Hell, I don’t even have much of an allegiance to Indy anymore. I had some good times there, but I’ve had better times elsewhere. I just thought people were piling on, some without much investigation. I think Indianapolis is a better city than most think, and is quite adept at handling large sporting events. That is all.
by tuscaloosalion on Aug 6, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Indianapolis
is close to casinos and last call’s at 3:00. Good enough for one game.
They’re not asking us to move there. Seems like a fine decision—and the obvious one. Its the nicest dome in the big ten footprint and even if we want outdoor CCG in the long-term, they weren’t going to host the first one there.
I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.
This is true
I can personally attest that the bars are open until 3 AM…or so I’m told.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 6, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll predict...
… that after careful consideration, involving extensive on-site observation by Big Ten officials of multiple sites, the Big Ten will decide to sign a long-term deal to play the game in Indy. At the end of the day, there’s a new NFL dome there, it’s centrally located, and no one likely to be in the game has de facto home field advantage there.
except for the dome part, Chicago also fits that bill, and is a nicer city
I’m happy with either option, and hell, I don’t even really care if it is in those other cities on occasion.
by The JuggerNitt on Aug 6, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm not happy with this option.
Playing in a dome is stupid, boring, and boring. I hate this for some rational reasons with a lot of irrational reasons. I don’t really care about the CCG anyway because I would rather watch Penn State at a real venue (East Lansing, Kinnick, Bryant-Denny, Camp Randall) than in the NFL stadium they’ll end up playing this game in. But we’re the Big Ten, we’re supposed to be better than trying to take weather out of this equation. And I guess I’m annoyed because I think drothgery is right.
I don’t like Peyton Manning either.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
If one of the teams in the Big Ten goes undefeated
how about THAT team gets to host the title game?
The MAC does it all the time…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought it was just CUSA...
… that played its conference championship @ the team with the best record. It makes a lot of sense for a mid-major (which will never get neutral fans at the stadium anyway), or just possibly a very geographically spread out conference like the Pac 12 (where probably the best fixed location would be LA, but as that’s USC and UCLA’s home city, no one really wants to do that but USC and UCLA), to do things that way.
The MAC used to do that before Ford Field took over.
The team with the best record hosted the game.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Indy is the safe choice
It’s centrally located, and the Big Ten already has a strong relationship with Lucas Oil Stadium through the B10 Basketball tournament. I think it’s good they signed a one year deal so they could buy some time to solidify a long term deal.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Aug 6, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions
There's another problem I have with this.
The name of the stadium is Lucas Oil Stadium.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Cmon everyone,
the CCG can’t be at Heinz field, so rule that out. It’s obvious that Pittsburgh is not a college football town, they have a team there that has won 38 MNC and they still can’t fill up half of that stadium…
What's up with the haters?
Indianapolis is not New York or Chicago but you do not have to move here (which I would advise against). It is a lame town when you are stuck here all year BUT downtown has gone through huge changes in the last 10 years. Downtown has a decent variety of nightspots (including pubs, sports bars, martini lounges, and nightclubs) tons of great restaurants (both local and national chains) and downtown is safe for walking (even at night). The Midwest, in general, is a crummy place. Look at the old factory towns of Detroit and Cleveland as examples.
For all those people who have commented there is nothing to do, I have a couple ideas: you have not been to Indy for years, you were too cheap to stay downtown or you were too lazy to ask your hotel for suggestions.
Rock on Indy – Nice score. Let’s add this to the long list of events: Indianapolis 500 (world’s largest single day sporting event for 90+ years), Super Bowl 2012, NCAA Men’s Final Four 2010, NCAA Women’s Final Four 2011, Men’s/Women’s Big Ten Basketball 2011 (just to name a few). Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Minneapolis, or any other Midwestern city cannot even compare to this impressive collection of sporting events.
The Final Four is there because the NCAA is run by crazy people who think it's a good idea to play basketball inside a football stadium and because the NCAA is in Indy.
The Indianapolis 500 is overrated. The Super Bowl should never, ever, ever be played in a cold weather city. I don’t know why they’re playing it there. Frankly, I don’t care. I just know in this economy I wouldn’t buy ridiculously expensive tickets so I can go to Indiana in the dead of winter. I’m already in Pennsylvania in the dead of winter.
There’s not so much haters as there are people who find that stadium very boring, Indy boring (For me, this is a very, very minor point), and the idea of an outdoor championship game awesome.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions
The thing is...
… you’re thinking you want an old-school Penn State or old-school Big Ten football game. But a conference championship game is, first and foremost, a media event designed to give the conference champion an platform to make its case for the BCS title game. Looking good matters. And it’s hard to look good in a blizzard (or even in rain, which is why the SEC plays their game indoors, and the Big 12 was before it became unnecessary).
I'm not sure you know what I think.
Ohio State-Michigan games were regularly boring. Old school Penn State games were almost always boring. Penn State 17, Maryland 6. Well, great.
And anyway, our teams spend several weeks playing weather that is often poor. If the media wants to screw over a Big Ten team for playing boring games, they’ll take their chance when unnamed Big Ten team only beats Minnesota by seven points in bad November weather.
I realize the Big Ten is probably trying to “look good” and that aggravates me. Why should we care about the media’s opinion? If a team can win the conference in bad weather, I say they’ve really earned it.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions
1. I think it’s awesome that the Final Four is now played in football stadiums. They can sell the seats, so why not have huge venues where a ton of spectators can be accommodated?
2. What’s wrong with having the Super Bowl in a “cold weather city”? I can understand the criticism of having it outdoors in potentially poor weather in such a city, but what’s wrong with a dome hosting it? It’s silly to not spread it around to cold weather cities — maybe you won’t go but plenty of other folks will. There’s nothing wrong with visiting “cold weather cities” in the winter and it’s not like they just shut down once December hits.
I mean, I’m totally cool with the idea of an outdoor CCG and actually support that. But I don’t really get the hate here for never having games in indoor venues.
They can sell the seats, so why not have huge venues where a ton of spectators can be accommodated?
1) Because they’re designed for football, not basketball. 2) The seating isn’t made for basketball. 3) I have heard rumors that they’ve been having some trouble selling out these tens of thousands of seats. 4) See point number 1. For instance, I believe the Duke-Purdue game was ugly because the players are used to shooting in the smaller basketball arenas. How close are these football stadiums to having something nearly like wind? Everyone decries the idea of a 96 team tournament, whereas the NCAA likes it because they can make more money. I believe the same thing holds here.
What’s wrong with having the Super Bowl in a "cold weather city"? I can understand the criticism of having it outdoors in potentially poor weather in such a city, but what’s wrong with a dome hosting it? It’s silly to not spread it around to cold weather cities — maybe you won’t go but plenty of other folks will. There’s nothing wrong with visiting "cold weather cities" in the winter and it’s not like they just shut down once December hits.
It’s personal preference mostly. 1) I feel that outdoor football games are inherently better than indoor games. Football is almost always made more interesting if played in changing weather conditions. 2) Miami, Pasadena, New Orleans, all are excellent cities. But then…Houston? Detroit? Minneapolis? I guess I just think the Super Bowl should be a reward for the teams and fans involved and I really find spending days in Detroit in nasty weather to be less of a reward. Sure, I won’t go, but I’m also confident warm weather cities won’t attract the same number of fans.
"The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here"
by ReadingRambler on Aug 6, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions
They need to move the Super Bowl back to Pasadena
because the rule keeping it out is kind of…dumb.
Why on earth WOULDN’T the NFL want to sell out 100,000+ seats? Heck, move the game to State College. Imagine how much revenue you could get out of that game.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 7, 2010 3:51 AM EDT up reply actions

by 



























