Having Fun (I Forgot What it Feels Like)
Well now. Raise your hand if that tasted better than a Baby's strawberry milkshake. It's nice to remember how fun classic Big Ten Football can be. Equal parts nailbiting, preposterous luckiness, tough physical play by both teams on both sides of the ball, coaching sometimes way outside historical comfort zones--by both staffs, low-scoring with the end in doubt until a final, uber-manly fourth-quarter scoring drive by the winning team. Kudos to the lads followed by our Gold-Pants-ed friends for fighting hard throughout. On this day and contrary to recent history between these two teams, it turned out that they were the ones just slightly overmatched in the end, and they were unable to continue the awful win streak against our Nittany Lions.
Browsing through the stat sheet is really fun this morning. Iowa came in with a brand new passing attack, a new strong-armed QB and one of their better WR trios in some time. Meanwhile, and unnervingly familiarly, Penn State came in with a clusterfuck and a track record of red zone chokes. And yet, our QBs completed 15 passes (on 26 attempts, for 58%) and theirs completed 17 (on 34, for 50%). The two offenses differed in other important categories (Iowa 2 INTs, 0 TDs; PSU 1 INT, 1 TD), but the running stats provided the starkest difference. The Penn State O-line was finally able to assert some willpower against a vulnerable run defense and rang up 231 rushing yards on 46 carries, while the defense remained stalwart in holding Iowa's Marcus Coker to a net 74 yards on 18 carries. What the defense did to Iowa's QB, tho, is what prompted me to post today. I'm having trouble deciding what my favorite part of the stat sheet is and I thought my BSD brethren & sistren might have a little fun helping me out.
Candidate One
At the start of the fourth quarter and after exchanging multiple possessions, very few of which affected the scoreboard, Penn State led Iowa 6-3. At this point on Twitter, Zach Mills had already weighed in and Jacobi was reminding us that a 6-5 final score was still in play. Iowa was driving into Penn State territory, when Tom Bradley dialed-up (/cliched!) a perfectly-timed blitz on 3rd & 7 and LB Gerald Hodges executed it to perfection, sacking The Dawson and forcing a fumble which was recovered by Nate Stupar. And then things got pretty. Let us bask in its glory:
| Psu | 1-10 | at Iowa49 | Redd, Silas rush for 5 yards to the IOWA44 (Kirksey, C.). |
| Psu | 2-5 | at Iowa44 | Redd, Silas rush for 8 yards to the IOWA36, 1ST DOWN PSU (Binns, B.). |
| Psu | 1-10 | at Iowa36 | Redd, Silas rush for 7 yards to the IOWA29 (Morris, James;Bernstine, J.). |
| Psu | 2-3 | at Iowa29 | Suhey, Joe rush for 6 yards to the IOWA23, 1ST DOWN PSU (Morris, James). |
| Psu | 1-10 | at Iowa23 | Dukes, Curtis rush for 5 yards to the IOWA18 (Nielsen, Tyler). |
| Psu | 2-5 | at Iowa18 | PENALTY PSU holding 10 yards to the IOWA28. |
| Psu | 2-15 | at Iowa28 | Dukes, Curtis rush for 11 yards to the IOWA17 (Miller, Tanner). |
| Psu | 3-4 | at Iowa17 | Dukes, Curtis rush for 4 yards to the IOWA13, 1ST DOWN PSU (Daniel, Lebron). |
| Psu | 1-10 | at Iowa13 | Suhey, Joe rush for 1 yard to the IOWA12 (Binns, B.). |
| Psu | 2-9 | at Iowa12 | Redd, Silas rush for 4 yards to the IOWA8 (Daniel, Lebron). |
| Psu | 3-5 | at Iowa08 | Redd, Silas rush for 6 yards to the IOWA2, 1ST DOWN PSU (Morris, James). |
| Psu | 1-G | at Iowa02 | McGloin, Matt pass complete to Haplea, Kevin for 2 yards to the IOWA0, TOUCHDOWN, clock 08:08. |
If you're counting at home, that's ten straight rushing plays, a PSU penalty, and four first downs to get to the Iowa 2, followed by a just beautifully called and executed play action touchdown pass to the tight end (the tight end!). Now, if you've been paying attention to the coverage at our favorite Hawkeye blog, you'll know this year's Iowa defense is a little less talented than the past few years, and far less deep. Throw in some injuries to their best linebacker and lineman and you've got a recipe for vulnerability. Still, the Penn State offense. They hadn't yet provided any even brief suggestion that they had this kind of drive in them. We knew they had talented tailbacks. But even with a traditional upperclassman-heavy offensive line, they hadn't demonstrated that this was possible. On this drive they did. And, oh my, was it glorious.
Candidate Two
Now, as manly as the touchdown that gave Penn State the two-possession lead was, the offense was subsequently unable to put the proverbial nail in the coffin after Malcolm Willis and then Nick Sukay gave them two more chances. Each resulted in 3 and outs, and Iowa again had the ball with 3:18 to play. Down two scores, it was desperation time for The Dawson and Penn State's defense and crowd knew it. After allowing a first-down QB scramble, the pressure really came. Solid downfield coverage by the secondary (including true freshman Adrian Amos, who played superbly against Iowa's talented receivers), allowed first Sean Stanley and then Devon Still and then Khairi Fortt to record back-to-back-to-back sacks. Iowa helped out with an (exhausted? crowd-induced?) illegal procedure penalty and the drive which began at the Iowa 20 was now at the Iowa two. On 4th and 39, they completed a 25-yard pass and the game was finally over.
We've known the Penn State defense is championship-caliber, and they showed it again today. But we had no idea if the offense was capable of putting together a Manball touchdown drive with the game on the line, and today they showed it. When surprise jumps up and fills you with joy, it's somehow doubly sweet, so for this reason, I'm going with the winning touchdown drive as my favorite part of this morning's stat sheet. What's yours?
Aww, look at you. You created a Fanpost! Any content from a premium site that requires a subscription will be deleted once we catch wind of it. If you simply want to share a link, quote, or video, please consider using Fanshots instead. Thanks.
72 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What lucky breaks?
Jtot, I know you’re too accurate a writer to say these “lucky breaks” were “unquestionably” the difference in the game.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 9, 2011 4:41 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Rambler, there were lucky breaks in this game.
Not that I think they were the defining factor, but sometimes weird things go your way and sometimes they don’t (like at Indiana). I mentioned the ball off of the ref’s foot and Redd’s fumble back to himself in the other thread. But also, didn’t Suhey come down with a tipped ball? We recovered the fumble, etc. At Indiana, we didn’t recover fumbles, tipped passes generally came down in the Indiana receivers’ arms, and a field goal attempt hit the uprights and bounced out (why couldn’t it bounce in?)! Those are the types of breaks that I’m talking about and during the first half, they all seemed to go Penn State’s way. I think you’re just being obstinate here.
"It's never a bad thing thing to vote for the suckiness of tOSU." -RWReese
Follow @Paige2PSU
After the first drive, there wasn't much luck.
I just have a very hard time chalking stuff like Moye’s circus catch to luck. And I refuse to chalk up the Hodges forced fumble to luck. After the first drive, what looked like luck was Penn State playing well.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 9, 2011 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't count either of those as luck.
But also recovering fumbles isn’t always about skill. Forcing fumbles is, but you never know exactly how the ball’s going to go once it hits the ground. And what I consider to be the good breaks all came in the first half.
"It's never a bad thing thing to vote for the suckiness of tOSU." -RWReese
Follow @Paige2PSU
Yeah, there was luck
But that’s okay. I believe in luck. Napoleon, before bestowing a Marshall’s baton on a general would ask if the general believed he was lucky. If he said no, then no baton. Luck helped the team in several instances. I’ll take luck, and if you match it with solid line play, WRs actually holding on to the ball, RBs with wicked zhu-zhu moves, and a defense that is suffocating, then it’s even better.
"Illegitimus non Carborundum!" (Don't let the bastards wear you down)
This
The catch off the ref’s foot was nice, but other than that, what lucky breaks? Iowa was holding A LOT and it didn’t get called, and the holding call on Zordich was BS and took a TD off the board. It ended up not mattering, but PSU had to make great plays in order for it to not matter.
The Moye catch in triple coverage wasn’t lucky, it was a perfect throw to a tall guy surrounded by short guys. And a great catch.
Both teams dropped a probable pick-6, so that lucky break cancels out.
Iowa had a lot of drops, but nearly all of them were balls being fit into tight windows with good coverage. That isn’t luck.
PSU has just been so unlucky in the last 5 weeks that when a game happens when PSU isn’t inordinately unlucky, it just feels lucky.
GO IOWA AWESOME, now and forever
Except Saturday
Beat Iowa
by ckmneon on Oct 9, 2011 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
PSU has just been so unlucky in the last 5 weeks that when a game happens when PSU isn’t inordinately unlucky, it just feels lucky./blockquote>
Which makes us lucky.
by Mr. Rosewater on Oct 9, 2011 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Uh, no.
We played better than Iowa on almost every play and while there is some sort of luck in college football, it’s very much possible for a team to play well enough to remove it as a factor.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 9, 2011 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Luck raised their spirits and they played beautifully if not consistently for the rest of the game
This is a subjective debate anyway.
by Mr. Rosewater on Oct 9, 2011 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Especially with the way it's been shaped by the arguers.
For this, I take responsibility. Hopefully Mr. Wordsmith from Northern Virginia (Out of the 717) can help us out.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 9, 2011 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Now Stanford...
that’s a college football team with Luck on their side.
"I don't think you can progress in this game unless you know about the past."
-Silas Redd
by PSU_Buch on Oct 9, 2011 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
No such thing as luck....
….“it’s just a bunch of stuff that happened”.
Yo
I’ll take your lack of response at BHGP as a sign that you don’t have an email you can share.
Also, this is one of those comments that sounds so much better in real life because I can’t really use tone in text.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 9, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Right, thanks
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 10, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I just sent you an j an email about squirrels.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 10, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I can just hear McGloin in the huddle
“Ok guys, pass play – I’m gonna throw it to the tall guy and hope the short guys don’t catch it.”
Later he throws it to the short guy in the end zone for an INT.
we're all here, but we're not all there
The 'unquestionably' was included to see who might bite, given that phraseology
The whole choice was last for a reason. Some might call it trollish. They might be a little right.
Cookies crumbling are part of every game, and definitely part of this game. We here, in this living room, have bitched about and been (correctly, imo) admonished/corrected, if a little sensitively iirc, by our gold-pants-ed friends for not giving enough credit to the vanquishers for having caused/forced/prompted the mistakes by our team that we were lamenting in losses the past couple years. So I’ve learned from them, and wouldn’t dare do the same to our team on the heels of such a victory by our own lads.
All that said, there was some crazy ass shit that took place out on the field yesterday.
Where the hell is the tO$U sucks!?!
The problem here is that I loved ALL OF IT. There is no one that is preeminent (I did vote for the ten straight runs) so I would want to default to a “I loved it all and tO$U is the personification of suck” or something to that effect.
"Illegitimus non Carborundum!" (Don't let the bastards wear you down)
Intentionally excluded
Operating this year on a level playing field (caught cheating coaches and players banished), I prefer to focus on our own goodness and wholly ignore the brutus.
by jtothep on Oct 9, 2011 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Still said on twitter
that he was the one that recovered the fumble. I think he was, but the stat sheet said Stupar. I went with the 2 interceptions and 3 sacks to end the game. I didn’t vote for the first one because of the holding call. We have to quit making those mistakes.
"It's never a bad thing thing to vote for the suckiness of tOSU." -RWReese
Follow @Paige2PSU
The first choice has to be the one.
They not only sustained a drive with the run, they did it at money time. Look how new opportunities then opened.
And tOSU sucks in a violently-collapsing-lung sort of way after last night.
"The limits of my language mean the limits of my world" -- Ludwig Wittgenstein
My vote is actually for the TOP
The best thing the offense can do (other than, you know, score more points than the other guy) is to stay on the field for long stretches of time to keep our D from running out of gas. So, it was a toss-up for me between the overall time of possession and the four long drives. I went with TOP because it not only kept our defense fresh to the very end of the game, it had the added benefit of totally wearing down the Iowa D, making that glorious TD drive possible.
ACCEPTS THE PAYPAL
Hello, everybody, coach get old, the new coach approaching, click in.
Welcome to http://www.pennlive.com
by newenglandnittanylion on Oct 9, 2011 5:24 PM EDT reply actions
GLORIOUS!!!!!
New meme?
"It's never a bad thing thing to vote for the suckiness of tOSU." -RWReese
Follow @Paige2PSU
PSU showed quite a bit of new stuff on Offense and Defense Saturday.
The playbook expanded on both sides of the ball.
I doubt that they will do much new for Purdue or Northwestern, but these coaches ought to be able to start to expand the play book on both sides again for the Illini.Nebraska.Osu, Wisky games.
Elizabeth, with Vin Scully, only folks working longer than JoePA at same place!
by joefromboalsburg on Oct 9, 2011 6:06 PM EDT reply actions
Agreed
Can’t wait to watch this fucker again.
Actually, no idea how much that Underdogs cat reads BSD or what his screenname is here (Cairo/Jschnauzer if you’re reading, send him a link please), but consider this an open letter to him to make more posts out of his re-watch analysis. I read the Indiana State breakdown and see this one on Twitter, but if he’s gonna spend that much time re-watching and taking notes, please take an extra hour or two and make a post out of it? Here’s the link to all anyone needs to download and carve up video; would love to see more play by play observations, with a few video splices thrown in.
Urban Meyer & Chris Spielman were great. Great! Can’t wait to re-watch and re-listen.
Ummm
Link to free video cutting software I’ve used in the past.
Plea to anyone who already downloads vids or any oldheads who may still lurk (Flynn, you there?), or any current authors or readers: THIS GUY will read any half-baked analysis attempts you organize, and if you cut video, load it to youtube and embed it in your post, I’ll buy you an Internet Beer and link it all around the internets.
love,
a fan
It was interesting to see how often they went with a 4-2-5 look
Fortt and Hodges were fantastic all game. You could see on Iowa’s first drive that they were targeting whatever WR was lined up against Astorino. So it looked like Bradley made a change and brought Willis in for a linebacker to help matchup the secondary better against the multiple WR look Iowa was playing. Felt nice to see that Bradley was making some changes on D.
by GMac14 on Oct 9, 2011 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
THIS
Fortt and Hodges were fantastic all game.
Fortt = soph, Hodges = junior, Carson = soph, Hull = frosh. Sick. The stockpile of talent at LB is almost embarrassing.
"I don't think you can progress in this game unless you know about the past."
-Silas Redd
by PSU_Buch on Oct 9, 2011 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Almost
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
by OctaShields on Oct 9, 2011 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
When Mauti went down I had some vaguely-formed notion I wasn’t able to work into a post, but it was along the lines of ‘I can’t remember ever feeling like losing a potential All-American LB wasn’t a crippling loss.’
Now that’s still unformed and sloppy and a huge disservice to Mauti, who would’ve made this Defense just sick by end of year, but you get the idea: there’s a lot of very nice depth at the position right now.
by jtothep on Oct 9, 2011 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That TD drive...
I like to picture Joe sitting up in the booth, scotch in hand, saying “Run. Run. Run. Run. Run. Run. Run. Run. Run. Run. And now we pass.”
I have to believe, much like we were ramming the ball down Iowa’s throat, Joe was ramming “you’re better than you think you are” into the offense’s head.
by esteele on Oct 9, 2011 7:39 PM EDT reply actions 5 recs
Hey, I love it
But this assumes Joe is making play by play calls, which many followers would not believe accurate, given the little we know about an admittedly wacky offensive play-calling arrangement.
Joe did admit in the post-game presser, tho, that he had been ‘disappointed’ in some of the Oline players play (he refrained from naming names) and that they (the coaching staff) ‘challenged’ some of them this week in practice. So, to me, it’s clear that Joe Paterno had his thumb on the pulse of that drive. I mean, I can’t imagine it’s that hard for even the deepest of PSU cynics to admit that these kids want to play hard and perform for JoePa. The Oline and the ‘young backs’ certainly did so on that manly drive.
Here’s a nice link to WFY’s post-game video links which include the post-game presser. Note the hilarious empty pause about the 8-minute mark where none of the beat writers had any fucking questions! (this is hilarious to me b/c it’s on the heels of last week where all the inquiries were of the drown-the-witch variety).
Their stories were already written
prior to kickoff, so they were totally baffled when their desired narrative didn’t play out. All the Urban Meyer stuff this weekend was interesting, but rumors I would really like to hear would involve some new print and radio guys to cover this team.
"I don't think you can progress in this game unless you know about the past."
-Silas Redd
by PSU_Buch on Oct 9, 2011 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Yeah, it cracks me up
I mean, Joe is a very interesting conversationalist. He’s nicely educated, he’s very, very well-read, he’s old as dirt, has a long & sharp memory and he’s a great freakin story-teller. What more could you want? Sure, he’s stubborn and smarter than you, so it’s gonna be frustrating trying to get him to say something you want him to, but which he does not, so why not go the other route and ask him about Aeneas or something.
The best part of this week’s should be credited to the guy who knew enough to ask Joe about the passing of Al Davis, even if it was about dying:
Q: Al Davis died today and you were a pretty good friend of his. Can you say a few words about him?
A: Good ole’ Brooklyn boy. I was telling some of the guys a story, when Al got the job at Oakland, Al was one of the great recruiters of all times. In fact, when Al went to Southern Cal, he beat me on that big kid from New Jersey and he got him to go to Citadel. And the guy who was the general who kicked the devil out of the poor Italians going up the Italian Peninsula. Al was a good guy. It was amazing, Al Davis, Al Lerner, who since has died, Sonny Werblin, Art Modell, Barbara Stanwyck, they all came from the same high school, Beverly Sills. So when Al got the job, he called me up, wanted me to be his offensive coordinator, I was an assistant coach. Just got married about a year ago. He was promising to triple my salary and give me a car. I didn’t have a car. I made about 6,000 bucks. I thought about it, I said, ’I’m not going to Oakland.’ Sue was happy, so he blamed it on Sue. So he called Sue up and said, ‘You know you’re holding up your husband’s career.’ So I called him up and said, ‘Al look, leave Sue out of it, I just don’t want to take the job.’ He said, ‘Why don’t you want to take the job?’ I thought I’d have a little fun with him, so I said, ‘Al, you know what, you and I would have a tough time getting along.’ He said, ‘Why?’ I said, ‘Because I’m smarter than you and you’ll never admit it.’ But Al was a good guy, I’m sorry to see that. He’s been sick a while. Last time I was out on the west coast, when (Tom) Flores was the coach. I called Flores up and wanted to talk a little football with him. Al heard I was coming up and took me out to a big fancy dinner. He was a tough guy, a lot of people in the NFL didn’t like him because he was a little progressive. I’m sorry to see him go, I really am.
by jtothep on Oct 9, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Great story
I love hearing or reading things like this.
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
Times have changed, I suppose
There was a time when the fans would’ve immediately blamed Paterno for us running 10 straight rushing plays.
I voted for the 2 INTs/3 sacks
Because it was so much fun to see 4th and 40, and there was a legitimate shot at a safety(!) in an Iowa/Penn State game.
Formerly known as kmart93
@kmart93
Black Shoe Diaries
Yes, yes, yes!
Who knows what kind of celebratory stories we could witness if the D had one more sack in their bag, so to speak. Four straight sacks and the 4th being a safety to end the game would have been unspeakably beyond.
I thought they were gonna get him for a second.
Formerly known as kmart93
@kmart93
Black Shoe Diaries
I voted for the 4 drives
I honeslty believe the only reason our d will crack this year ia due to being tired. If our O can put some sustained drives together like they did, even if they dont put points up our defense will hold teams like they did Iowa.
by ptsyu10 on Oct 9, 2011 10:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
My favorite part was Iowa's last offensive possesion
and ALL THE SACKS. I do love me a good backward drive by the opponent
"Rabble rabble rabble; fire Joe; snarky meme; rude nickname; rabble rabble rabble
Usually a 4th and 40 is aided by penalties
Not sack sack sack
Formerly known as kmart93
@kmart93
Black Shoe Diaries
Our Defense is worthy of our exhaltation
Nick Sukay is good at football. I have noted this especially the past few games.
Also, I’ll take 2 more years of Adrian Amos, please, and then hope he gets drafted by the Steelers. He’s A TRUE FREAKING FRESHMAN. His potential is through the roof, I can’t believe how he not only looks like he belongs, but looks like he’s better than almost everyone on the field already.
When we get Lynn back (and if we had Mauti healthy), it wouldn’t even be fair. There are guys getting little or no playing time who would start at almost any other school. We have the 3rd best defense in the country.
And Devon Still? How good could we practically expect him to be? I mean I thought Odrick was unique and special. Devon Still is doing the same things Odrick did! Just an absolute game-changer with the TFL.
I posted something similar a few weeks ago, and was surprised that more people weren’t joining in my hero worship. This team has at least 6 future NFL players on it. Maybe more. (100% – Still, Mauti; 80%+ – Lynn, Amos; 50%+/- Hodges, Sukay, Fortt, Carson, Hill, Powell, maybe some younger guys without much experience like Hull)
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
We never see Derrick Thomas
But I’ve read he might be the best pure cover corner on the roster and never plays, because he’s in Joe’s doghouse. So you could maybe include Thomas in the list of future potential NFLers.
Yeah, for real.
And I’m keeping Mauti at 100%. He will have to rehab and prove he’s back to 100% speed next year and maybe people will be a little gunshy thinking he’s injury-prone, but he’s simply too good for 32 NFL teams to pass on. If he gets and stays healthy, he could play outside in a 4-3 or 3-4, at least in my non-scout opinion. Look at Sean Lee…I think Mauti is a sort of similar player, and Lee is now monstrously huge and a star in the league.
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
ACL surgeries
Strengthen the knee, not weaken it. The probability of him ever tearing an ACL in the future now that he will have had repaired both knees is…low I think. Also read that unlike previously thought, the meniscus wasn’t damaged so the healing process for Mauti should be pretty quick. We’ll see him ready to go next year.
Uh
Also, I’ll take 3 more years of Adrian Amos, please, and then hopehe gets drafted by the Steelershe goes on to a productive life typical of most great Penn State football players.
Fixed it for you.
"Who do you think you are? You’re the son-of-a-bitch that sat at that desk over there and fired Johnny Cash. Let it go down in history that you’re the dumbest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met." - Merle Haggard
by ReadingRambler on Oct 10, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd take him being the first DB Heisman since Woodson
then he gets drafted and finishes his degree via World Campus. Boom.
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
I'm going to pick apart a very minor part of a minor sentence in your post.
I hope you won’t hold it against me.
Bradley dialed up a well timed blitz? Can it be considered well timed if he sent the LB blitz on every single play? Is it still “well timed” in that circumstance? To me, well timed implies some degree of rarity. On the other hand, even if you blitz every down, I suppose the one that works could still be well timed. It would just be that all the other ones that don’t work would not be well timed?
BSD Wentworth
Co-Founding Partner
Chariman, Hiring Committee*
*Accepting Applications
I'll take it
Definitely need to watch this bad boy again. From memory, I think I remember plenty of four man rushes, but I also remember quite a few fives as well. Will have to chart it all out on re-watch to get the facts straight.
But I agree with your notion that Successful Blitz is Successful, and thereby ‘well-timed.’
Same.
I’m not sure there is a single play we didn’t send a LB. Hodges especially. Seems like he was sent after the QB every down.
BSD Wentworth
Co-Founding Partner
Chariman, Hiring Committee*
*Accepting Applications
by PSUinBOSSton on Oct 9, 2011 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I do believe
And perhaps I missed some stuff in section WD yesterday, but Hodges would show blitz often, but didn’t necessarily blitz on every play.
The team did a good job yesterday not only blitzing, but faking blitz and dropping into coverage. Helped confuse Vandenberg.
Yeah.
I don’t know about the other LBs and Ss showing blitz. But I saw Hodges fighting a tackle/guard in the backfield to get to the QB on what felt like over 50% of the plays.
BSD Wentworth
Co-Founding Partner
Chariman, Hiring Committee*
*Accepting Applications
by PSUinBOSSton on Oct 9, 2011 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
He blitzed a fair amount after the 1st quarter
but he also stunted, he blitzed through different gaps, and sometimes he’d blitz while Crawford dropped off into the flat.
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
Net rushing yards, easy
Needs moar Dukes
Sean Lee is the only tolerable thing about the Cowboys
by ICEICETHATGUY13 on Oct 10, 2011 8:37 AM EDT reply actions
Nice to see Dukes running like his size
I blame HITS
by SweepTheLeg on Oct 10, 2011 9:03 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Reminds one of Enis, or Aaron Harris.
by OmarLittle on Oct 10, 2011 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
DUKES!
is gaining game confidence, and it’s showing. Galen will go over ball security a few times this week with him.
Can’t wait for his first TD run – and of course – more TD’s for the team in general!
" When you cross that Blue Line, you are mine...Across the Blue Line, it's all football. " " And what you need to do in your life is paint Blue Lines everywhere. " - Joe Paterno 2009
by BlueWhiteLife on Oct 10, 2011 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
No one reminds anyone of Aaron Harris
Except maybe Jim Brown.
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
What a Tragedy
When Aaron Harris tore his knee up. One of the 3 worst moments at the Beav I have ever witnessed. (The other were Jerome Hayes getting hurt again against Wisconsin in 2007 and the end of the 1999 Minnesota game.)
tO$U sucks-ALWAYS the right choice!
I've said it around the BSD's before
But every time I see Peyton Hillis, I think of how awesome Aaron Harris could have been if he stayed healthy. Very similar player, Aaron Harris was probably faster.
"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.
by OctaShields on Oct 10, 2011 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions
99 Minnesota
A crowd reaction I will never forget. No one moved or spoke for an eternity after that kick… I shudder to remember it.




























