Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Big Ten, Pac-12 Partner Up, Awesomeness Ensues

The Big Ten and Pac-12 have announced that the two conferences will join together in a partnership that will include everything from TV rights to out-of-conference scheduling. The partnership will include not only football, but also basketball and other Olympic sports.

This is a massive, massive win, not only for Penn State, but for the fans. We've long complained about Penn State's lack of courage when it came to out-of-conference scheduling, and this deal will help lay some of those complaints to rest. Starting in 2017, Penn State will play at least one Pac-12 team every year. Basically, those who have suggested there be a football version of the Big Ten/ACC Challenge just got their wish. It was also announced that the conference schedule will remain at eight games for the foreseeable future.

Aside from scheduling, this deal represents just how forward thinking the Big Ten and Pac-12 are. It's been suggested that the conferences will create another bowl game, which I can only imagine will be owned by the conferences, thus cutting out the middleman bowl executives that cause teams like Clemson to lose almost $200,000 by accepting a bid to the Orange Bowl. The potential from here on out is just crazy to think about. Jim Delany may not be the most lovable man in the world, but the man's business hustle is undeniable.

So, first thing's first. Which Pac-12 team would you first like to welcome to Beaver Stadium?

Poll
So, first thing's first. Which Pac-12 team would you first like to welcome to Beaver Stadium?
Arizona
7 votes
Arizona St.
10 votes
California
12 votes
Colorado
7 votes
Oregon
100 votes
Oregon St.
6 votes
Stanford
73 votes
UCLA
21 votes
USC
150 votes
Utah
14 votes
Washington
12 votes
Washington St.
14 votes

426 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 175 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

IT'S A MUST

I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive

by Peter Gray on Dec 28, 2011 3:40 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

To your question

USC to visit State College. UW for the first away game that I would attend.

"WHY IS EVERYONE THE FREAKING STUPID?" BMAN13

by kijana's acl on Dec 28, 2011 3:41 PM EST reply actions  

Good call

jtothetweet
Make sure this dead horse doesn't move while I go get my beatin' stick.

by jtothep on Dec 28, 2011 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Where is that?

Ed Snider is a crotchety old fuck.

That is all.

by EREX21 on Dec 28, 2011 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you.

I thought so based on the sides of the stadium but it looked orange and blue in there which made me think of Florida, and with it called the Swamp, it sort of fit but the stadium didn’t fit right.

Ed Snider is a crotchety old fuck.

That is all.

by EREX21 on Dec 28, 2011 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

As long Oregon brings their cheerleaders

i won’t really notice what their football players are wearing

by PhilaLion on Dec 28, 2011 6:00 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Ah.....

I’ve seen the USC squad at the Volleyball Final 4 a few years back at PSU…..they aren’t too shabby. I believe they are called the Dance Girls, but I may have been blinded by their obvious beauty to remember a name….sorry for the NON PC comment, but the truth’s the truth.

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure they are the "Song girls".

They wear sweaters. Not that I’ve noticed or anything.

by Btd121 on Dec 28, 2011 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

It's Song Girls.

And nothing should look that good.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

not for nothing

Song Girls are beautiful, but Oregon cheerleaders are smoking frickin hot.

by PhilaLion on Dec 28, 2011 10:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

USC or UCLA to State College

I’d go to either Washington or Colorado for a road trip.

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 3:42 PM EST reply actions  

Oh man, I'd love to go to Boulder

No reason.

I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive

by Peter Gray on Dec 28, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

A good place to visit

Living there is weird, between the students, the noveau riche and hippies, would be a bit much after a year or two. I really enjoyed being there for a week though. It is a trip I’d love to take again.

Washingtonian and heartbroken Penn Stater -- My blog features the triumph of hope over experience that is being a DC sports fan (especially the Nats) as well as the Nittany Lions, life in BeltwayLand and other things I find interesting. @doubleuefwhy

by WFY on Dec 28, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Not quite

The hippies are unemployed art and english majors

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Or like my friend

who actually majored in “Music.” Not performance…not education. Just Music. Ah, Boulder.

by ChicagoHoosier on Dec 28, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

It looked like my brother was going to live out there

Not in the People’s Republic mind you, probably closer to Fort Collins. Would have loved visiting once or twice annually, especially in the winter. I was there one spring break and don’t think I saw a cloud. We had lunch outdoors most days, went skiing once. I’d love to see a ball game there too.

A Penn State game would be an excellent reason to go out there, but it might not happen for 24 years :\ if at all.

Washingtonian and heartbroken Penn Stater -- My blog features the triumph of hope over experience that is being a DC sports fan (especially the Nats) as well as the Nittany Lions, life in BeltwayLand and other things I find interesting. @doubleuefwhy

by WFY on Dec 28, 2011 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I love living in Boulder

But then again, I don’t hang around with hippies. Can’t beat the location or scenery though! There are lots of PSU alums out here in the Denver/Boulder/Fort Collins area too (especially from meteorology, like me). Pat’s Cheesesteaks down in Denver shows PSU games every Saturday during the fall and is pretty fun.

Let's Go State!

by Gopher Broke on Dec 28, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Watched Michigan-PSU '05 in some big sports bar with hundreds of PSU fans

Left in silence. I didn’t speak to my future wife the entire ride home. That’s when she figured out how crazy and angry this dumb stuff makes me.

by Chris Grovich on Dec 28, 2011 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Watched it in Pentagon City

We were dejected, decided to have an Irish wake at Sin’e. While we were outside eating our potato soup and drinking our Harp, Reggie Bush pushed Matt Leinhart into the end zone. The waitress told us people inside were crying.

The combination made us of all of that made us feel a little better.

Washingtonian and heartbroken Penn Stater -- My blog features the triumph of hope over experience that is being a DC sports fan (especially the Nats) as well as the Nittany Lions, life in BeltwayLand and other things I find interesting. @doubleuefwhy

by WFY on Dec 28, 2011 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

They hate the screaming

Silence is scary.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Boulder is fantastic.

That is all.

Ed Snider is a crotchety old fuck.

That is all.

by EREX21 on Dec 28, 2011 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

If youse guys are talking about.....

Boulder Dam, I would like to go there as the 3-stooges played for them in the mid 30s.

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Boulder was overrun by the damn hippies

There are much, much, much better places to visit in Colorado.

Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?

by psuphysicist on Dec 28, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

FTFY
And bring the student body bodies.

by swiggy04 on Dec 28, 2011 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd pay to find out.

"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.

by OctaShields on Dec 28, 2011 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Easy, easy, down Boys!

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:44 PM EST up reply actions  

From left to right:

Madison, Chelsea, MacKenzie (“Son of Kenzie”), Ashleigh, Ashlee, Ashley, Madison

"Woop woop." - Waylon Jennings

by ReadingRambler on Dec 28, 2011 9:04 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I taught a class about a decade ago

which rostered five Brittanys, each with a different spelling.

"The limits of my language mean the limits of my world" -- Ludwig Wittgenstein

by SubLime on Dec 28, 2011 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I was just like:

“freakin A, someone on BSD knows these chicks?!?!?”, then got to name 4 and 5 and LOL’ed

then saw the commenter’s name and REALLY laughed at myself for thinking that

"my dad says Michigan used to be good"

by hbeach08 on Dec 29, 2011 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't wait to play Texas

when they eventually cave and join the Pac-16.

Follow my antics: @djv5030

Its the name on the front of the jersey that matters most, not the one on the back. -Joe Paterno

by Dan Vecellio on Dec 28, 2011 3:54 PM EST reply actions  

Yawn

If you dealt with Horns fans daily you’d be less excited.

Do internet trolls live under internet bridges?

by stp147 on Dec 28, 2011 8:43 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Rec'd

For the chronically underused ‘yawn.’

jtothetweet
Make sure this dead horse doesn't move while I go get my beatin' stick.

by jtothep on Dec 28, 2011 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, we know our Horns fans.

Right, ShaggyBevo?

"Woop woop." - Waylon Jennings

by ReadingRambler on Dec 29, 2011 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

For obligatory Aggie reference.

Do internet trolls live under internet bridges?

by stp147 on Dec 29, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

THE PACT OF STEEL

Year one of the PACT OF STEEL I want to see:

Oregon vs. Michigan: Michigan needs payback from that RichRod era crapfest. Hopefully by 2017 Michigan will be legit enough to handle this big boy match up. Or maybe Oregon will be back in the dumpster, in which case, satisfying payback blow out.

Ohio State vs. USC: Payback for their Pryor-era beat down losses.

Oregon State vs. Michigan State: The little brother schools can have the Little Brother Bowl and Michigan State can show it is the much, much bigger little brother.

Wisconsin vs. Washington: By 2017, Washington will be Texas Tech 2, and we can see the greatest dichotomy – Leach spread offense vs. B1G steamroller running game. This will be another affirmation that our system, our glorious culture, our way of life is superior! We must bury them!

Penn State vs. Arizona State: Most people won’t be excited about this match up, but imagine it’s five minutes before our first PAC-12 game in the new PACT OF STEEL. You don’t know who we’re playing yet, it’s a secret. You look into the eyes of your best Penn State watching friend. He/she tells you Penn State gets to play Rich Rod again, in a hyped game, to open a football season. Tell me you don’t beam with joy.

Colorado vs. Nebraska: Both fan bases will hate this. Colorado because they’ll lose so bad it’s not even funny. Nebraska because they left the Big XII to get away from these teams and will feel like short-changed outsiders in the B1G. “They’re still treating us like the new guys!”

Washington State vs. Indiana (conference doormats), Northwestern vs. Arizona (kitty cats), Purdue vs. UCLA (meh), Illinois vs. Utah (Indian mascots), Iowa vs. Cal (meh), Minnesota vs. Stanford (because I seriously couldn’t remember the last two teams in these conferences, and these are them)

by PSUCharmas on Dec 28, 2011 3:55 PM EST reply actions  

Oregon vs. Michigan, you say?

Brings back my favorite picture of anything, ever:

(Sorry, can’t re-size from here.)

by Chris Grovich on Dec 28, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, there’s nothing wrong with the size. It’s one of the best there is.

by Kevin Powers on Dec 28, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUCK YOU LLOYD CARR

I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive

by Peter Gray on Dec 28, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

And the Whorse you rode in on....

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

re: Oregon vs. Michigan

Now that I think about it, that might have been the 2007 post-App State Crapfest feat. Lloyd Carr. Still need their payback, though.

by PSUCharmas on Dec 28, 2011 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoops!

You caught me, that’s how low on the radar both Washington and Washington State are for me. Reverse them, then. I know Washington is not currently the doormat they recently were, but maybe by 2017 they’ll be back down there.

by PSUCharmas on Dec 28, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I hear ya.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Ew, she's presenting like a mandrill!

by icavalera on Dec 28, 2011 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

What's the difference?

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously.

"Woop woop." - Waylon Jennings

by ReadingRambler on Dec 28, 2011 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish I could delete/edit my post

That’s what you get for skipping lunch and drinking twice as much coffee as usual during work.

by PSUCharmas on Dec 28, 2011 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Start listing your preferred neutral site game locations...

In no particular order…
Heinz Field
Lambeau
Soldier Field
Rose Bowl
San Diego (great city)
Seattle (also great city)

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 3:57 PM EST reply actions  

Medowlands

Yankee Stadium
Anywhere close to NYC, because I’m lazy.

by misdreavus79 on Dec 28, 2011 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

You must use Heinz Field.......

“the greatest venue for college FB ever” according to the sPitt PR people…..it must be since they draw an average of 24,000 when they play there.

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

24,000?

Isn’t that a little high?

Do internet trolls live under internet bridges?

by stp147 on Dec 28, 2011 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a High School game.

And you know it.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Uh huh...

Paterno won’t let then have the state title games at Beaver Stadium, while at the same time every kid within 75 miles of Pittsburgh dreams of playing at WPIAL title game at Heinz Field. Oh, and Pitt works it out so it’s the Pitt stuff that decorates the field, not the Steelers stuff.

Who’s an idiot. Credit, give it where it’s due.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 29, 2011 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

They tried

They had the state title games at Beaver Stadium a few times. It was lame. Even a big crowd – 40,000 – just rattles around in there. Hershey is more appropriate.

Edmonton has a big stadium. I’d love for us to play one of those southern teams up there in winter and see how they like it.

by reedjohnmiller on Dec 29, 2011 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm hoping for Arizona

Good memories from 1999 and my cousin is an alumna — family rivalry is always fun.

Washingtonian and heartbroken Penn Stater -- My blog features the triumph of hope over experience that is being a DC sports fan (especially the Nats) as well as the Nittany Lions, life in BeltwayLand and other things I find interesting. @doubleuefwhy

by WFY on Dec 28, 2011 3:58 PM EST reply actions  

Same

I’m in the bag for Arizona for personal reasons.

I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive

by Peter Gray on Dec 28, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I vote not Arizona...

… because my cousin is in one of those “hot coeds of X school” pictures for Arizona and that is NOT OKAY.

by Tezcatlipoca on Dec 28, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds ok to me.

Do you have a link to said picture?

Ew, she's presenting like a mandrill!

by icavalera on Dec 28, 2011 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

NO

Go look at other people’s cousins.

by Tezcatlipoca on Dec 28, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

She's not OUR cousin.

We want pics.

What the hell just happened?

by Pete the Streak on Dec 28, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Too Good

Seriously might be one of my favorite responses to close the year..

by Swiddy on Dec 28, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Which one is she?

Ew, she's presenting like a mandrill!

by icavalera on Dec 28, 2011 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

From left to right:

Madison, Cerra (Pronounced “Sarah”), Sierra, Britnee, Taylor

"Woop woop." - Waylon Jennings

by ReadingRambler on Dec 28, 2011 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously,

you must have hacked my class rosters.

"The limits of my language mean the limits of my world" -- Ludwig Wittgenstein

by SubLime on Dec 28, 2011 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Close

Probably needs a Kaitlyn

365 beers from 365 different breweries in 365 days. Game on.
http://www.blognamedbrew.blogspot.com/

by Tailgate Shogun on Dec 28, 2011 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a little disheartening

To walk into my mother’s child care center and see a toddler class full of future skrippas.

jtothetweet
Make sure this dead horse doesn't move while I go get my beatin' stick.

by jtothep on Dec 28, 2011 10:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I like the idea

But the Pac-12 is not necessarily my first choice of which conference to partner up with. I would love to see a Big 10/SEC Challenge type of format, but I think this arrangement will create some cool road trips in the future. To answer the question, I would prefer USC to come into Beaver Stadium, but I would like to make a trip out the Rose Bowl for a road game.

by mundyscorner99 on Dec 28, 2011 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

SEC is too smug

to even listen to a proposal like that for football

by swiggy04 on Dec 28, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

F*ck the SEC

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

My point exactly

The hate would be much stronger in a challenge vs the SEC. Any chance to take them down is something I would like to see. Whether Purdue beats Washington St is not as interesting to me.

by mundyscorner99 on Dec 28, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

But beyond that, this is more than about football

Yes, football is far and away the primary consideration, but this also involves other sports and some academic cooperation (as mentioned in the article). The Pac-12 and Big Ten jive much better in that regard than the SEC and Big Ten.

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Good points, but it is too bad some match-ups cannot happen every year or very often...

the home and home in the 80’s between LSU and OSU was awesome, 87 and 88 (sigh). Bama vs Penn St. just makes too much sense: classic match-up. Well, I grew up in the 80’s and SCar was not part of the SEC but I remember the ’85 Michigan vs S Carolina game back then and thought that one had some potential to grow into a rivalry. (SCar looked much better with red helmets I thought)

Reporter: What would you say a Greg Studrawa offense is like? Stud:

"Attack and be very physical…fly around…attacking, come after you and come after you and come after you…." Me: I love this answer.

GET TO THE RIM HEAT (and SKY)! ATTACK THE PAINT!

by mjtig on Dec 29, 2011 4:44 AM EST up reply actions  

They have too much speed so.....

you’l never be able to catch them.

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps

But I think every opportunity they get to have everyone think they are the greatest conference ever they would probably consider.

by mundyscorner99 on Dec 28, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

they already have that opportunity

they signed a contract with ESPN which, according to the terms, must force-feed that sentiment down the public’s throat no matter how uninformed it is.

by swiggy04 on Dec 28, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Considering...

Florida hasn’t played a non-conference road game outside of Florida since they played ‘Cuse in 91, I don’t see that happening.

11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.

by Esteban d' Amur on Dec 28, 2011 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

The SEC already worked out a plan with SoCon and the Sun Belt

No room for a deal with the Big Ten

Follow my antics: @djv5030

Its the name on the front of the jersey that matters most, not the one on the back. -Joe Paterno

by Dan Vecellio on Dec 28, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, does the SEC have the same amount of Olympic sports as compared to

The BIG and the Pac 12? Since thsi deal will affect them alot I don’t htink the SEC has the same level or amount as we do.

Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose - Janis Joplin

by AriesGD on Dec 28, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

If I recall,

the SEC school average is something like 10 fewer non-revenue sports than B10 schools.

Leaders Co-Champions

by PSUinBOSSton on Dec 28, 2011 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

SEC?

They don’t like playing football when the temperature drops below 60. Brrrrrr!

by CDRS on Dec 29, 2011 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Too bad we're not playing the SEC in Dallas

I hear it’s barely going to hit 50 on Monday. Better break out my winter coat, gloves and hat.

Do internet trolls live under internet bridges?

by stp147 on Dec 29, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I am the only person that doesn't like this deal.

Not that I’m against playing Pac 12 schools, but I definitely prefer to have teh independence to schedule whomeverTF we want, wheneverTF we want for our non-conference slate. This pretty-much ensures that we will have no good eastern or southern schools on the schedule in the foreseeable future.

by rodney20 on Dec 28, 2011 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

I actually think it ensures

at least two solid opponents per year. A MAC, a 1-AA, a Pac 12 and another solid team. This doesnt go into effect until 2017 for football, by then the commitments will all be up and you can start fresh. schedule home and home with a school, and make sure you are home the same year that you are away versus the Pac 12, and vice versa. Youll get the same amount of home games youd normally get.

The only thing i worry about is that when they say “\they play no one” They will disregard the Pac12 game the same as they do conference games.

by swiggy04 on Dec 28, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Works in theory...

won’t work in practice. PSU, OSU, Michigan & Nebraska aren’t going to be scheduling anyone decent for a home-and-home once this thing starts. They have too much $$$ to lose.

Seriously, when is the last time we played two good non-conference games? Temple, while respectable, doesn’t count as a good non-conference game in my book. I’m talking about a marquee non-conference game.

by rodney20 on Dec 28, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

It depends how you define "marquee non-conference games."

We played two BCS conference schools in 2008, Syracuse and Oregon State. Those aren’t exactly top tier programs, but I don’t think any school from the Pac-12, outside of USC and possibly Oregon, could guarantee any higher profile when the game is scheduled years in advance.

by VVeRPennState on Dec 28, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I would define Syracuse as a marquee match-up...

but you’ll be very pressed to find that type of scheduling in the future. Oregon State Agree to play a home-and-none that year to fill PSU’s scheduling void. Neither Syracuse, nor any other program with reasonable name recognition is going to agree to do a home-and-none with PSU in the future.

by rodney20 on Dec 28, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

2020 and 2021

We have a home and home with Syracuse, do you expect us to break that agreement?

by SCsprinter13 on Dec 28, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Just IMO?

I doubt it. It’s possible, but I doubt it.

I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive

by Peter Gray on Dec 28, 2011 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm happy to hear that...

But I would wager that has more to do with the contract already being in place prior to this deal with the Pac 12. I wouldn’t look for that to happen in the future.

And let’s not forget, PSU paid out the a$$ to have Oregon State come to Happy Valley for a home-and-none to fill their scheduling void. I seriously doubt PSU will be willing to do that again unless we have another scheduling problem.

by rodney20 on Dec 28, 2011 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

youd have to think the schools took this into account.

I doubt they all signed off on it knowing their OOC schedules would become stale. I think they are prepared to beef up their schedules. I think this is solid evidence to that effect

by swiggy04 on Dec 28, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

It probably makes scheduling easier. It's one less school to coordinate.

But I don’t look for PSU to be scheduing any beefcakes in years when they have to play Pac12 teams.

I hate the inflexibility it poses.

by rodney20 on Dec 28, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

It is funny watching all these conferences trying to edge each other out of existence.

Odds are this move is just the first small step in the distancing of big time college sports and the NCAA. It starts with the Big 10 and Pac-12, but it is only a matter of time until the SEC and the remnants of the ACC/Big12/Big East join in.

by VVeRPennState on Dec 28, 2011 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

Just a thought

but would people rather have a rotating schedule, a schedule based on who finished in what order the year before [i.e. 1 plays 1, 2 plays 2 etc.] or a set rival from the Pac 12 that we play every year. Depending on who was our rival, I would prefer the set game.

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 4:20 PM EST reply actions  

Not a fan of the fixed rival

Enough of those in-conference…I want the OoC game to be a marquee matchup. I’m intrigued by the idea of 1 vs 1, 2 vs 2, etc. That could be pretty cool, but it might also be cool to travel to other locations every now and then.

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Although the 1 vs 1 scheme would limit the marquee matchups to the top 3 or 4 teams, usually

I’m not sure that matters. There is no such thing as a marquee matchup involving Indiana.

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

I think it makes more marquee matchups. What would you/tv execsrather have USC vs Indiana and Penn State vs Oregon State or USC vs Ohio State and Penn State vs. Washington

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Are we saying the same thing?

The equal ranking scheme (1 vs 1, 2 vs 2) creates marquee matchups (i.e., two good, closely matched teams) but probably only down to the 3rd or 4th ranked teams. Beyond that, the teams are evenly matched but not very good (in most seasons). USC vs Indiana isn’t marquee because Indiana sucks and the final score is pretty much a foregone conclusion.

That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.

by Nittany_Ryan on Dec 28, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

ok yeah then

I thought you were saying would get more marque matchups by going randomly

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

and another thought

USC, Michigan state, Michigan etc. having to commit this game and is it 9 conference games that they play? Where does this leave ND? hopefully begging a conference to let them in and all conferences telling them where they can go

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 4:21 PM EST reply actions  

This puts the squeeze on ND big time

Because their elbow room in USC, Sparty and UM’s non-con slate just got a lot smaller.

I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive

by Peter Gray on Dec 28, 2011 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

And Purdue to that as well.

Follow my antics: @djv5030

Its the name on the front of the jersey that matters most, not the one on the back. -Joe Paterno

by Dan Vecellio on Dec 28, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Looks like conference play will remain at 8 games

A quote from the post:

“It was also announced that the conference schedule will remain at eight games for the foreseeable future.”

I read this to mean the B10 will defer/abort the 9 game conference schedule announced earlier in the year.

by ageing lion on Dec 28, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

SO HAPPY.

Would love road trips to Colorado & Arizona State. Easy to fly into, interesting things to do. Maybe add Stanford in there as well.

Less excited about trips to WSU & OrSU. However, I imagine they’ll “rank” these so that the big dogs play the big dogs rather than put Indiana up against Oregon.

365 beers from 365 different breweries in 365 days. Game on.
http://www.blognamedbrew.blogspot.com/

by Tailgate Shogun on Dec 28, 2011 4:30 PM EST reply actions  

Speak for yourself on PSU's (or anyone else's) "lack of courage" being a negative thing in scheduling

PSU hasn’t failed to win a MNC, in fact, no BCS team besides 2004 Auburn has not won an MNC, due to playing too soft of a schedule.

But I can point to plenty of 1-3 loss teams who haven’t won one because they played too tough of one. Just ask 2011 Oklahoma State.

GO IOWA AWESOME

by ckmneon on Dec 28, 2011 4:33 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I understand your idea but disagree with example

OSU lost to a terrible Iowa State team. They didn’t “Play too tough of a schedule” if anything, their schedules weakness is what hurt them. Bama got credit for playing LSU and us

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Okie st. played a really tough schedule...

what hurt Okie State is that they are Okie State. Simple as that. The polls count for 2/3 of the formula…no one outside of Okie wanted to see Okie State in the big game.

by rodney20 on Dec 28, 2011 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

they played Arizona who won 4 games – 2 against 1aa teams and one against ASU that couldn’t beat a HS team at the end of the season. It is argueable that the Big 12 was better than the SEC but regardless, no ne in that conference plays defense

Reporter: Can you give us a touchdown celebration, one that you would get penalized for?
Moye: I play at Penn State. I don’t celebrate.

by psupride on Dec 28, 2011 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Alabama

played 4 FBS teams with winning records, Ok St played 7. Alabama was ranked higher because they lost first and started higher. Not because they played so tough a schedule.

We Are!!!!!!

by kingofsmoke on Dec 28, 2011 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Oklahoma State also lost to Iowa State.

Not an irrelevant fact.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Oklahoma’s State’s SOS: Sagarin—#6, Colley—#5
Alabama’s SOS: Sagarin—#24, Colley—#26

Oklahoma State’s Consensus (Sagarin, Colley) top 20 wins: Oklahoma, Kansas State, Baylor

Alabama’s Consensus top 20 wins: Arkansas

Alabama had a more forgivable individual loss in a vacuum, but Oklahoma State had the schedule where an individual loss should have been more forgivable. They played more elite teams, and that wears on a team over the course of a season. That’s why it’s a perfect example. Oklahoma State played a better schedule and weren’t rewarded for it, whereas an easier schedule may very well have resulted in an undefeated team.

GO IOWA AWESOME

by ckmneon on Dec 29, 2011 1:32 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I voted Colorado

only because the Buffaloes have been my second favorite team in college football since I was a kid.

by CyphaPSU on Dec 28, 2011 4:55 PM EST reply actions  

USC- It's revenge time

Some guy at Penn State Hershey just discovered a virus that eats cancer. Where were the CNN trucks for that? Now Someone at PSU found something that could cure Leukemia. Coverage? None. THON will probably break $10 mil this year. Put that on "Outside the Lines" you sanctimonious pricks!

by ICEICETHATGUY13 on Dec 28, 2011 5:14 PM EST reply actions  

This is awesome

First of all, this is way better than a 9th conference game.

It will be like 12 ROSE BOWLS!

by newenglandnittanylion on Dec 28, 2011 5:22 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

Bowl Game...

how is this going to work? I initially thought the losers of the respective conference championship games, but that would preclude them from a BCS at large birth. Unless, the PAC 12/Big 10 are not going to be part of the BCS going forward…

11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.

by Esteban d' Amur on Dec 28, 2011 5:46 PM EST reply actions  

Unless, the PAC 12/Big 10 are not going to be part of the BCS going forward

This is what I’ve wanted for quite some time. The B1G and PAC12 commit to playing for the Rose Bowl (National?) Championship and let the rest do their thing. There is a lot of population and money within the territory covered by the states comprising these conferences.

We would with one move completely delegitimate the BCS.

The secondary bowls would fall into place.

"The limits of my language mean the limits of my world" -- Ludwig Wittgenstein

by SubLime on Dec 28, 2011 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

There were stories not too long ago that the BCS might be reduced to only cover the national title game(s) and that the other bowls would no longer be tied to BCS rankings. I am not sure if that was anything beyond a rumor, but it would theoretically fit well into this plan.

by VVeRPennState on Dec 28, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Great scenarios

for all schools as mentioned above. PSU taking the field aagainst any of the PAC12 will be fun and interesting. I see it as better than another fcs or e mich. USC, WASH, STAN,ARI, ASU, COL, ORE- some great road trips and stadiums as well.

by SMAN on Dec 28, 2011 5:52 PM EST reply actions  

HOORAY

A totally FOOTBALL THREAD.

Poor Utah.

Who gets to play them first, Nebraska or Penn State?

Raised on Beatings, Second-Hand Smoke, and Liquor...I know nothing!

by joefromboalsburg on Dec 28, 2011 6:10 PM EST reply actions  

Playing in the PAC-12

Utah might be in the top half of that conference by 2017. I wouldn’t mind seeing them in the Beav at some point. Washington and Colorado (in that order) would be my picks for the first road trips.

The depth of both my sadness and anger is unfathomable.

We (Still) Are...

by PSU_Buch on Dec 28, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously PSU......

because of the great Mormon concentration in Central Pa.

"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

by DerryPharmer on Dec 28, 2011 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I came up with this idea when I was 12.

Way ahead of my time. Oh, and this is the end of a college football playoff. And the BCS. We going back to bowl Dodge City.

The solution will be a plus one playoff game, with the participants being decided after the bowls are concluded.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 6:23 PM EST reply actions  

Does this mean a reduction in the amount of hot MACtion that the B1G is involved in every fall?

Because I’m all for that going away, with a quickness.

by IndianaLion on Dec 28, 2011 6:28 PM EST reply actions  

Good bye Alabama.

Nothing changes about the scheduling except the profitability of it.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

LA

for selfish reasons, but the Bay Area is pretty boss too

"my dad says Michigan used to be good"

by hbeach08 on Dec 28, 2011 6:40 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I can get behind either of the LA venues...

and drive right up the 10…

All of our comments are irrelevant - LetsGoPSU

by jaytay13 on Dec 29, 2011 2:56 AM EST up reply actions  

USC @ PSU

Would be awesome at Beaver Stadium in November.

by bbpennstate10 on Dec 28, 2011 7:57 PM EST reply actions  

I'm glad there won't be a 9th conference game.

I had no interest in seeing that.

I’d like to see Oregon here first only because I saw USC at Beaver Stadium in 1994.

Joe Paterno Apologist

by Joe 96alum on Dec 28, 2011 8:16 PM EST reply actions  

Oh, thank God.

No 9th conference game? Thank God. That would have been horrible for scheduling.

I’m still not convinced this challenge business is an especially good idea though. Considering Penn State’s past scheduling tendencies, it seems quite likely that we’ll see two MACrifices (That counts Temple), an FCS team, and a Pac 12 team every single year. That might get boring, no?

"Woop woop." - Waylon Jennings

by ReadingRambler on Dec 28, 2011 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Well....

You would know well in advance of when you were playing Washington State (although as I think about it, I can’t come with a single Pac12 team that always sucks, like say Indiana), and you could schedule more aggresively in those years.

My guess is this is a way that works in a ninth confrence game (which the Pac10 always did) without actually having to schedule it and screw-up the in league scheduling. And it secures the Rose Bowl, forever. And it makes the Big 10/Pac 12 the biggest dick at all future BCS/playoff prevention meetings.

Finally, it’s one last “are you sure guys” to Texas, Oklahoma and Notre Dame. I’d lay odds that this gets it done.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

plus, with Wazzu hiring the pirate

I’m expecting them to contend before 2017

Fire Dan Snyder

by Cari Greene on Dec 29, 2011 8:16 AM EST up reply actions  

If the Big 10 network

is a cash cow, as I’ve seen in other articles I’m too lazy to link here, hopefully that will generate enough revenue to lessen the need to FCS games. I agree I don’t want the only worthwhile game OOC every year to be Pac-12.

Joe Paterno Apologist

by Joe 96alum on Dec 28, 2011 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

If the Big Ten Network is a Cash Cow.

Add Texas, Oklahoma and Notre Dame to the mix and what is the Big 10/Pac 12 channel?

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

a large penis

"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.

by OctaShields on Dec 28, 2011 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

*figurative

"We gon' get down. We gon' do the do. I'm going to hit these mother****ers" - Dock Ellis, May 1, 1974.

by OctaShields on Dec 28, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

This is a big deal.

This is Penn State joining the Big Ten in 1991, seismic, even if you don’t notice at the time. The ripples off of this are going to effect college football for generations. Conferences are not going to poach teams any more, they are going to merge.

The people involved in this are thinking big. Take over the world big. It’s just the start. Mark my words, this deal is the most important thing that happened in college football…possibly ever.

This. Changes. Everything.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 29, 2011 12:30 AM EST up reply actions  

This...

is why I think Delany and Scott are so far ahead of guys like Swofford and Slive. The SEC wants to be the best at football. The B1G and PAC-12 want to be the best at making money.

11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.

by Esteban d' Amur on Dec 29, 2011 7:52 AM EST up reply actions  

You know the benevolent Darth well...

As Delany noted after a dismal bowl season when the Big Ten went something like 2-7…

“The 7 losses are an issue for 7 programs to address. It’s not a conference issue.”

Proud proponent of the 52 team Uber Conference

by ProveIt on Dec 29, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

The only way it would have been better

is if it had been a three way (get your mind out of the gutter) with the ACC. Think about it: guarantee a home and away game each year with a PAC12 and an ACC team, and screw the SEC. I imagine the ACC is closer to the B1G and PAC12 than the SEC in terms of Olympic sports. This would have been the move to completely squeeze the SEC. Now? Now the SEC and ACC reach an agreement and the Big12 and BE do the same.

"WHY IS EVERYONE THE FREAKING STUPID?" BMAN13

by kijana's acl on Dec 29, 2011 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with this

I’ve seen a number of people wishing this deal had been reached with the SEC. I say fuck ‘em. The SEC is constantly propped up by ESPN and CBS for whatever reason at the expense of the rest of the country’s college football. The way I see it, the SEC has to be collateral damage in order to change the way college football works.

Right now ESPN/ABC controls college football because they put the games on TV. The B1G network proved that on a small scale, ESPN can be taken on. By combining the PAC12 and the B1G you are now finding ways to shut ESPN out during September because you can air your own games in almost every major market in the country. Combine this with the bowl game in which a middle man is cut out, and its a very good, measured approach to taking back college football.

The money stays in the PAC12 and B1G which goes directly back to the schools. Because the two conferences have their views similarly aligned in terms of academics as well, I see this as a step in the direction of taking college football back. All of this hinges on squeezing out the SEC. Hopefully the Big 12 chooses a similar deal with the ACC and the SEC does get left out in the dust.

Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?

by psuphysicist on Dec 29, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope this is less like the PRR merging with the NYC and more like the UP merging with the SP.

"Woop woop." - Waylon Jennings

by ReadingRambler on Dec 29, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I would love us to play Stanford at Beaver Stadium. This sounds like a good idea to me!

by michellemtsu on Dec 28, 2011 8:59 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

Paterno always talked about scheduling Stanford.

But it never happened.

...may we compete with fierce intensity, with the gifts that we have been given...

by jesse. on Dec 28, 2011 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Playing Stanford would have required sacrificing being a football factory for academics.

Something Paterno would never, ever do.

"This is being a Penn State fan. We’ll prove it, or we won’t. It’s not about proving it to them, it’s about proving to ourselves."

by mvrck on Dec 28, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Doesn't sound to me like they are sure yet

I don’t think they have the details yet. Delaney seems focused on competition being a key element, with Scott focused on getting the Michigans and Penn States of the world playing on the road in Pullman, Corvallis, and Salt Lake. I think a lot of the exact details need to be worked out.

My guess is if they’ll be trickling out details over the next 6-36 months as schedules get worked out. Probably start with the smaller sports, and work their way up to football.

by Sahr on Dec 29, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Black Shoe Diaries. If you haven't already done so, create an account and get involved in the conversation.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar2_small
Sad News: 717's Own, Reading Rambler Passes On
154690_10100374022013820_13900087_66639438_4085030_n_small
Breaking Down Penn State's Inaugural D1 Hockey Schedule
At_the_foot_of_a_legend_small
My Obligatory Off-Season Book Post

Recent FanPosts

Hugh_griffith_small
Food for Thursday....The PA Pineapple Company
Psukoolaid_small
Suggestions for fun in Minneapolis?
1-joe-paterno_small
Please clarify your posting policy.
A_cullen_the_bug_small
JoePa & Esquire - and other stories
Jet_ski_jump__reef_central_avatar__small
Sandusky Jury Selection Begins June 5th
Small
Kameron Miles
Small
ESPN - reporting PSU considering schedule changes
Joepa1_small
Jimmy Johnson's worst loss

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE BLACK SHOE DIARIES STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Managing Editors

Zn_avatar_small Mike Pettigano

Img110_small Jeff Junstrom

Asst. Editors

6a00d8341c630a53ef0105369fb7ee970b-800wi_small Jared Slanina

Olmec_small Devon Edwards

Baller_small Eric Gibson

Mauti_small Cari Greene

Staff Writers

Iron_armor_small Galen

New4_good_small Nick Blonde

Turd_ferguson_psu_small Tim Aydin

On_the_way_to_grad_small Kyle_Martin

N53100510_31463067_5584_small Adam Collyer

Bus-fire-bikes_small Dan Vecellio

What-a-country-yakov_small bscaff

Small Keith Platt

Small TimHyland