Michigan Blows By Penn State, 71-53
And so is life on the road in the Big Ten. Penn State got smoked in their Big Ten opener at Crisler Arena in a game that was never really in doubt after the first 10 minutes. No one on PSU's roster could match up with Tim Hardaway Jr, who torched PSU for 26 points despite lacking a jump shot. Hardaway was just 1-7 from three, but he was unstoppable on the interior as he went 10-11 on his 2-point attempts.
Trey Burke had a remarkable debut for the Wolverines as well, drawing the defense and making plays. He finished with 13 points (7-7 from the foul line), 5 rebounds, 7 assists, and no turnovers. Evan Smotrycz got a double-double with 10 points and 10 rebounds. Michigan posted a 54.7% eFG%, while making 60% of their 2's.
There are going to be more games like this for Penn State, unfortunately, but it's important to not lose sight of the positives from these dismal contests. I was excited to see Jon Graham for the first time since last month. I love the energy Graham always seems to bring to the floor, and it showed up in the stat-sheet. Graham grabbed 6 rebounds in 14 minutes in his first action since the St. Joseph's game. Trey Lewis also made some really nice plays on offense. All three of his FGs came on strong, aggressive moves to the rim.
Tim Frazier paced PSU with 20 points, 4 assists, and 4 rebounds, but it seemed he lost trust in his teammates at times. While PSU went through their usual scoring droughts, Frazier seemed pressured into carrying the load himself. He again had five turnovers forcing the issue. Billy Oliver had more fouls than points or rebounds in 26 minutes. Billy has to provide more than that if this team is going to be competitive. It didn't help that Jermaine Marshall was in foul trouble all game long, picking up three offensive fouls on charges. This will seemingly be an issue with Jermaine until he grows out of it. He too often puts his head down and attacks the rim relentlessly. This has gotten him in trouble more times than not. Despite never getting into the flow of the game, he did finish strong with 9 points on 4 shots. Ross Travis played 18 minutes but wasn't productive. He's got a long ways to go on the defensive end.
| Team | Poss | Score | PPP | eFG% | OReb% | TO% | FT Rate |
| PSU | 61 | 53 | 0.87 | 43.4% | 31.4% | 21.3% | 22.6% |
| UM | 61 | 71 | 1.16 | 54.7% | 27.8% | 14.8% | 28.3% |
None of these numbers were unexpected, although I'm disappointed PSU couldn't force a few more turnovers on defense. They tried different looks, but the zone and 1-2-2 were pretty ineffective. Michigan also did a solid job keeping PSU off the offensive glass. I felt for the most part, PSU didn't do much in that department until the game was very much decided.
I was actually encouraged by PSU's shot selection. They only shot 15 three-pointers, their lowest total in a game on the season. While they still didn't shoot well, it was nice to see Frazier, Lewis, and even Matt Glover taking it up strong. There wasn't much back-to-the-basket action, but they burned UM on some pick and rolls as Frazier drew the double team.
I was fairly annoyed by Mike Kitts' officiating crew, but it didn't matter. Like I said, such is life on the road in the Big Ten.
Next up for Penn State is another road game on Sunday, but against a team they've had plenty of success against in recent years. Northwestern surely is glad to see Talor Battle gone, as PSU has won 6 in a row against the Wildcats over Battle's 4-year career.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Saw all of 1 min of this game
Gut wrenchingly awful. That’s all I needed to see until next year.
by PSUinOH on Dec 30, 2011 6:54 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The way I look at it is this:
I will sit through every single bad game not just because I love Penn State, but also because when Coach Chambers and his squad finally break through, I know I was there through thick and thin.
Seeing the worst of times makes the best of times that much better.
by TheSwish on Dec 30, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
This is so true.
Rec’d.
And the joy we’ll get when we upset somebody will be much more than the apathetic will ever know.
That kid who tackled Talor Battle.
by Eric Gibson on Dec 30, 2011 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
At the '08 Michigan State game...
…I was with a friend who could not understand why I wanted to get on that court so bad. ‘06-’07 was such a crushing season with Penn State going 2-14 in conference play and Geary ending his PSU career prematurely. Team had so much more pontential with him on the floor.
I'll always believe
That if Claxton stays healthy, that’s an NCAA Bubble team / very good NIT team
GO IOWA AWESOME
Some thoughts on the game
—This Michigan team will not get past the sweet 16, if they even get there. At home, against a meh-at-best team who couldn’t shoot, and hitting about 3 or 4 very ill-advised 3’s, they won by 18. Penn State will give them a game in State College on March 4.
—The difference in the game was the play of Tim Hardaway Jr. Remove him from Michigan’s lineup, and this game becomes a toss up.
—Penn State seemed to make a conscious decision, “If Michigan is going to shoot the ball from 5 feet beyond the arc, early in the shot clock, with no penetration…let ‘em. We need them to miss that shot if we’re going to win.” And it was probably a good call. It just didn’t work.
—Michigan plays chicken shit bitch ball, and Penn State will reach a final four before a John Beilein coached Michigan team does.
GO IOWA AWESOME
Harsh.
But mostly truth, although I think you sell Beilein ball short. I have a ton of respect for that man.
That kid who tackled Talor Battle.
by Eric Gibson on Dec 30, 2011 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
Give him credit for his commitment to the pass around the perimeter and chuck it offense
and for bringing in the guys to run it. And if he’s demonstrated anything, it’s that such a system can revive programs and make them NCAA tournament teams. But he’ll never take a team to the final four doing it.
His offense completely castrates Jordan Morgan (who has a ton of talent) and Tim Hardaway Jr. is a great player only when he deviates from it.
Novak, Douglas, and Smotrycz all seem to be in a contest to give Shurna a run for his money in the “dirtiest B1G player that stays out of foul trouble because referees feel sorry for sad looking white guys who couldn’t win a fight against a stuffed poodle” award.
GO IOWA AWESOME
Disagree.
Michigan leads the country in 2P%, which is a characteristic of John Beilein teams. I don’t think that’s a fluke or sells any of his players short. Sure they could shoot more of them and their percentages would drop, but Beilein ball at its prime is highly efficient.
Also, if THJ sticks around after this season, I’d be willing to bet UM makes the Final Four next year.
That kid who tackled Talor Battle.
by Eric Gibson on Dec 30, 2011 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
Very misleading stat
They’re #245 in % of their points that come from 2P, and #337 in % of their points that come from FT. They’re #13 in 3PA / FGA.
What does that mean? They’re good at putting back the long rebounds that come from missing 3’s, but that and THJ are where the 2 pointers come from.
GO IOWA AWESOME
In contrast
the B1G teams who actually have a chance to go to the final four this year (in the KenPom top 10):
Ohio State: #21 in % of points that come from 2P, and #318 in % of points that come from 3P
Indiana (who is #1 in 3P shooting %): is #225 in % of points that come from 3. They’re #59 in % of points that come from FT
Michigan State: #298 in % of points that come from 3, #51 in % of points that come from FT.
Wisconsin actually has numbers very similar to Michigan’s in terms of point distribution, and while comparing the offenses is pretty fair, comparing the teams is not. Wisconsin is getting it done with defense and ball security. Michigan is #95 in KenPom defensive efficiency and only +1.4% in TO% margin. Wisconsin is #1 KenPom defensive efficiency and +7.3 in TO% margin.
The bottom line is this: good teams get it done with 2Ps, FTs, and defense. Michigan does not.
GO IOWA AWESOME
So Michigan isn't a good team...
Because they shoot a lot of threes? I didn’t think they shot particularly well from 3 yesterday and missed open looks. What would’ve happened if they were on point?
I mean, I totally understand that the safer way to be more consistent is to play defense and get to the foul line. But that doesn’t determine every team as ‘good’ or ‘bad’.
That kid who tackled Talor Battle.
by Eric Gibson on Dec 30, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
Not because they shoot a lot of 3s
but rely on points from those 3s and, in contrast to Wisconsin, don’t play good enough defense to offset a bad shooting night.
GO IOWA AWESOME
A Final Four next year would be something.
Getting a Big Ten Title with Hardaway, Burke, Smotrycz, and the number two recruit in the country (Mitch McGary) wouldn’t be surprising, but a Final Four is a lot to ask for. I appreciate your faith in Beilein though, he’s becoming an elite coach. I’m not sure why ckmneon is criticizing our offense (29th in the country per KenPom) instead of our defense (95th). Beilein’s offense is very, very good.
Covering Michigan Basketball for Maize n Brew.
Twitter

by 































