I know that any testimony at the GJ has to re-testified to in court. Just like any evidence that is collected by police has to be entered into court. The GJ is just a way of collecting evidence, in Pa., for wide ranging crimes, like organized crime or someone that committed crimes over many jurisdictions (magic force fields) like drug cartels. This case did extend to multiple jurisdictions and the original DA, Madiera had to recuse himself because of his 2nd Mile and Sandusky familiarity. When the AG got the case, he realized it may extend to many areas and entities including 2nd Mile and PSU.

I meant if it’s 6 that’s obviously something. But there could be all 8, and it would not logically follow that what testimony comes from the 8 would be any different than the testimony that comes from just 6. You can’t assume the victims that didn’t testify to the grand jury will testify to anything specific, since we’ve never heard anything from them yet.

Because
aurabass was all over the other threads insisting that since we now knew Victim Two was going to testify for the defense (based on what Lionel Hutz said) that Joe was innocent of every shred of everything ever said against him. That’s why.

Now M1EK has to show us where I ever said anything more than we should not rush to judgment until all the facts are in. This obviously flawed report tells us nothing about VICTIM 2 and what VICTIM 2 might say. The defense remarks could easily be as wrong as the prosecution’s Grand Jury Report. But M!EK as always wants us to rush to judgment based on the most ambiguous of TV reports.
M1EK is already known for agreeing with the ESPN Media Frenzy that fired Joe.
I stand by my “wait and see” suggestions and continue to propose that the defense could be right about VICTIM 2 – we just don’t know.
But we do know that M1EK is WRONG about my position and his remark is a blatant LIE.
Not that he would every admit being wrong.

All Eight Sandusky Victims To Testify

Looks like the claims that Victim Two was either not going to testify or found by Sandusky and going pro-defense were just Lionel Hutz-isms.

This is your tag line for the absurd headline you used in your fan shot. Seems quite celebratory as if this makes the defense attorney an automatic liar and the broadcast the truth. No "if this story proves to be the truth" or "we should now wait and see if this is accurate". NO you characterize this story as accurate and mock the defense. That is quite celebratory – you could not wait to see if there were alternate published or broadcast versions of this situation – which there were. You immediately put out a Fan Shot and posted the same thing in more than one thread on BSD.

No reservation
No contemplation
No equivocation
M1EK believes in JoePa’s guilt because the campus police are not cops and this bogus TV story

This could serve as my constant reply to every M1EK post:
As the collective “we” that you accuse of collaboration agrees –
1) We remain unconvinced by what little we know.
2) We choose to wait and see
3) We choose to NOT rush to judgment
4) We choose to consider Joe Paterno innocent of any wrongdoing or potential moral failure until we know the full facts.
5) We choose to hope that he is vindicated and this stain on PSU is erased when it is revealed that Victim 2 was perhaps not sexually assaulted and the charges attributed to that incident are dropped.
6) We hope for the best for Penn State and the honorable coach who did so much good because that would be a good thing
and
7) We dislike and disassociate ourselves with your celebratory glee and rush to judge and post the slightest crap that might possibly undermine that hope that PSU and JoePa did indeed do the right thing.

That seems to be what you are up against here M1EK
Your hope that PSU and JoePa are guilty against our hope that they are not. WE REMAIN UNCONVINCED OF THEIR GUILT and it is abundantly clear that you disagree with US.