Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Ed DeChellis Has Earned More Time To Build Penn State Basketball


It's no secret that there are a lot of people out there who think Penn State would be better off with someone other than Ed DeChellis coaching the basketball team. They might be right. Heck, there I've been known to suggest it myself. One trip to the NCAA tournament in eight years isn't very impressive on its face. And now that Talor Battle, Jeff Brooks, Andrew Jones, and David Jackson have run out of eligibility, Penn State is facing a multiyear rebuilding project that many fans don't have the stomach for. So the calls for cutting our losses now and going in a new coaching direction have been bubbling under the surface for the past several days ever since Penn State lost the heartbreaker to Temple in Arizona.

But of course, it doesn't matter what we think. It only matters what Tim Curley thinks. Cory Giger from the Altoona Mirror had a conversation with Curley, and the head of Penn State's athletic department gave DeChellis a ringing endorsement.

Saying the future of the men's basketball program is "bright," Penn State athletic director Tim Curley gave coach Ed DeChellis a vote of confidence following the school's first NCAA Tournament appearance in 10 years.

"He just runs a class program," Curley said, "and I'm supportive of everything he's doing.

"I just hope people will support Ed and his staff," Curley added. "They've done a fantastic job."

When the article hit twitter last night you can pretty much anticipate the response it got. To a lot of people, this endorsements sounded a lot like George W. Bush standing in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina saying, "Heckuva job, Brownie." (To be fair and balanced before you conservatives flood my email defending Bush, substitute the last sentence with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano saying "the system worked" after the bomb in Times Square failed to detonate. Now let's leave the politics at that.)

More after the jump.

Star-divide

I've always been one to make excuses for Ed. He took over a horrible situation. He had no talent to work with. The facilities were horrible. The fans didn't care. The culture was broken. Then when Penn State started winning, there were injuries. Players transferred. There wasn't enough depth. The schedule didn't work out the way he thought it would.

But through all of that, in watching this senior class come together, I've been saying for the past two years that it was the NCAA Tournament or bust in 2011 for Ed DeChellis. If he couldn't get to the dance with this group of players, there was no hope. After the loss to Maine, I'll admit I gave up on Ed DeChellis. After they beat Illinois and Michigan State I thought maybe they could play their way through it, so I reluctantly got back on board. Then they lost to Michigan along with some other losses and I quit again. I didn't think there was any hope this team could make the tournament.

And yet they did.

Some people call it lucky. Some people say a team with four seniors shouldn't have to fight through the bubble to get to the tournament. Some people say one first round tournament exit does not erase seven years of failure in making the tournament. All of these statements may be true. But I have to say, I agree with Curley in this case. Now is not the time to fire Ed DeChellis.

Yeah, I know next year is going to suck. Yeah, I have seen Ed's poorly drawn up "money" plays. Yeah, I have witnessed more than a few of his coaching decisions that left me shaking my head. Yeah, I doubt Ed is the going to be the guy that can make Penn State a regular in the Sweet 16. I'm not disputing any of that.

My concern is the message it would send to cut Ed loose now. He was hired with one purpose: Get Penn State to the NCAA tournament. It took eight years. Eight very difficult, frustrating years. Maybe he didn't do it fast enough to our liking, but the guy did it. And you can't deny him that. He overcame the obstacles, and he took Penn State to the NCAA tournament.

What kind of message would it send if we fired him now? Name me a coach in America who would take the Penn State job after we tell Ed his goal is to make the NCAA tournament, and then fire him after he does. We preach "Success with Honor", and yet we shouldn't honor contracts for people who accomplish the things we ask them to accomplish? If we do that, the Penn State job suddenly becomes a very undesireable one. It becomes a job where a coach is asked to work miracles for unreasonable fans with unreasonable expectations. Good luck hiring a big name coach.

We're Penn State, people. We're not North Carolina or Kentucky. We have no basketball tradition. We have no right to demand final four teams at this point. Maybe some day down the road, but not right now. Our goal since the day Ed was hired was to return to the NCAA tournament. He did that. You may not like the way he got you there, but he did it. You can't move the goal posts on him now.

That being said, mission accomplished. Congratulations, Ed. You made the tournament. You reached your goal, but now it's time to turn the page. The next step is capitalizing on the success.

Next season is already looking like a bad one due to players who gave up and transferred after last season's setback. With the program and tradition Penn State has, we have to expect multiple-year rebuilding projects. Someday, maybe we can grow out of that. But that's the reality we live in today. So next year I won't be judging Ed solely on wins and losses. I'll be paying attention to recruiting and player development. My eye is on 2013 for a return to the NCAA tournament. If that doesn't happen, I'll revisit the "Fire Ed DeChellis" debate at that time.

Comment 233 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Have to agree

It’s a deal with the devil: Give Talor Battle one shot at the tourney in exchange for a minimum of two more years of DeChellis. Can’t fire Ed after making tourney, but next season will be BRUTAL. If 2012/13 is bad too and there’s no hope on the horizon, hopefully they’ll start over.

Oh, and when hockey starts in 2013, basketball better have some relevance or the attendance will really tank…

by Wildcatamounts on Mar 22, 2011 10:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Next year shouldn't be brutal if Ed's done any kind of building here.

Frazier is about to become an exceptional point guard. He’s athletic, a great distributor and will be a great scorer if he takes the next step.

Ed’s recruiting has been decent these past few years, and this year he’s bringing in at least 4 guys (could be 5-6, including a JUCO or late qualifier), 3 of which are clearly legitimate prospects, one of whom basically plays the Talor Battle position and is the co-player of the year in Ohio.

They may suck early next year, but if Ed’s doing the job that we hope he’s doing, he needs to show growth by the end of next year that makes this team an tournament contender in 2013.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not on a Fugi

level of zealotry, but Frazier has me a little more opptimistic about next year. If we can start with leadeship from the point a little bit of the learning curve for the rest of this young team could be excelerated.

Everything else to say follows the words, IF, Hope and Maybe so I’ll leave it at that.

"You're holding my hand Chuck - you sly dog!"

by rahpsu92 on Mar 22, 2011 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

For summarizing my thoughts.

Luring recruits with my new "Posting HD" scheme since '08.

by 06Lion on Mar 22, 2011 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

The local knucklehead

that does the afternoons on ESPN here in Hampton Roads has been droning on for weeks about the money that the three CAA schools bring to the conference for every NCAA tournament win – something like $1.4mil/win.

At this point PSU MBB is nothing more than the KC Royals, or for you locals, the Pirates- soaking up the salary cap/luxury tax money from the spendy teams to an extent that as long as we run the ship cheap enough we can make money off everyone else.

"You're holding my hand Chuck - you sly dog!"

by rahpsu92 on Mar 22, 2011 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Given that he’s been pushed into not caring by eight years of “oh, we’re rebuilding, let’s see how the team looks in three more years,” I’d say it’s pertinent.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry

I just get a little irritated when I spend an hour working on a post and somebody takes the time to say “I don’t care.”

Some people do care, and we try to provide them with a forum to talk about it. I wish people wouldn’t make so much effort in reminding us a lot of people about Penn State basketball.

by BSD on Mar 22, 2011 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

that is to say, I wish a lot of people wouldn’t make so much effort to remind us a lot of people don’t care about PSU basketball.

It serves no purpose other than to discourage people.

by BSD on Mar 22, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's fair

But at the same time, this is a discussion about the future of the program, rather than a discussion about “PSU X, Mich Y last night.” In a discussion about the future of the program, feelings of helplessness and the opinion that the athletic department simply does not care about the sport are relevant.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

the statement wasn't "the department doesn't care" though

it was “I don’t care”.

If it wasn’t Rambler, I would have said, “then why bother to read it?” but since it is Rambler I know that he would write a minimum of 50 comments in a post about who is better, Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez, or Merle Haggard.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

'Penn State’s official position is basically "We’re making money, so whatever."'

But I promise to stop the textual analysis of Rambler posts from here on out.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

right

followed by “I don’t like the sport anyway” which in my analysis of the Rambletext I took it as [insert 10 page dissertation here]. So as you can see, the id and the ego play an important role in basketball.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

For ‘facetime with these clowns.’

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

You may not want to, but you just did.

Thanks.

"Use their guts to lubricate our single leg attacks!" - Lycurgus

by ReadingRambler on Mar 22, 2011 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

TMZing?

Not really sure what you mean by that, or what it has to do with the quality of basketball being played. Sure, LeBron and Wade don’t seem to appreciate the importance of a true team, but the NBA is having one of its most exciting years possibly since the 80s. The Lakers, Spurs, Bulls, and Celtics all put the team ahead of the individual and they happen to boast the league’s best records. But yeah, the media likes to get interviews with and soundbites from them (I think that’s what you meant) so the product on the court sucks. If you don’t follow something, don’t include it in your comment.

by mgat89 on Mar 22, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Lakers put the team ahead of the individual?

What games are you watching? Phil Jackson may talk about the team play but he let’s Kobe run the the show for himself. They have an immense talent superiority over the rest of the league thanks to the Jerry West sleeper agent deal getting Gasol from Memphis. Why don’t you come back to me with the stats on how many games the Lakers have lost due to turnovers and missed bad/forced shots from the anal rapist versus the number he actually converts. I chuckle everytime someone comments that he’s the best defender in the league while the guy has no concept of team defense and the Celtics are able to use him as a double screen to get open looks.

I will give you the Spurs here and hopefully, they’ll put together a decent playoff run. But I don’t need you to tell me what I should and shouldn’t comment on because my wife will tell you I follow the NBA way more than I should.

As for the TMZ comment, the focus on the celebrity status of guys like LBJ and Kobe is only feeding the monsters that drive the game into the dirt.

I'm your late night evening prostitute

by Frank O'Brien on Mar 22, 2011 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

BOOM!

Frank O’B with the pwney retort!

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

On the TMZing part

With the Wade and LeBron being all about themselves with no concept of the team game…

This actually makes the NBA more enjoyable to me, watching those guys get punked by the Celtics each year in the playoffs after they and the media have informed me that they are unstoppable monsters who are the greatest ever. It brings a smile to my face.

WE'RE DANCIN!!!

by bigs26 on Mar 22, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

True facts,

It has really started to annoy me, and I have watched more NBA than College the last few years because of this. There are very few star players who seem legit. All you Duke haters may not like me for this, but I really appreciated Kyrie Irving (top rated recruit, possible #1 choice) this year. After he got hurt, many players of his caliber would disappear, not care about the team, and show up for the draft. He went to all the games, on the bench and really was into it. Worked hard and now has gotten back to play in the tournament.

Unfortunately he seems like an exception instead of the rule, we have too many of the Rose, Wall, Mayo etc. that are using college as an extended combine and if we happen to win good for us.

WE'RE DANCIN!!!

by bigs26 on Mar 22, 2011 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, just because as a likely one and done

he actually seemed to care about the program and team. Whereas others could care less if they aren’t out there. During the UNC game he was living and dying with the game, the first one to run out and celebrate with the team after TOs and such. I would guess he will probably be a one and done, but who knows with whole NBA possible lockout situation.

WE'RE DANCIN!!!

by bigs26 on Mar 22, 2011 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I almost wish that the NBA didn't have that rule forcing kids to go to college for a year.

Sure, it is a good money decision for them, but it forces the college game to be a minor league NBA and in turn creates the one and done players. If they are truly going to do that then it should be a minimum of 2 or 3 years in college before going pro.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

absofrickinglutely

I'm your late night evening prostitute

by Frank O'Brien on Mar 22, 2011 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry if I gave you that impression.

I read all of your post and that was all I could come up with. This whole thing pisses me off. So, again, sorry I’m going to stay away from basketball from now on.

"Use their guts to lubricate our single leg attacks!" - Lycurgus

by ReadingRambler on Mar 22, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, we always have wrestling….

by OmarLittle on Mar 22, 2011 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

He may have just decided after commenting to no longer read the thread.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tomatoes?

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

In March?

No.

"Use their guts to lubricate our single leg attacks!" - Lycurgus

by ReadingRambler on Mar 22, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rhubarb?

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

No!

"Use their guts to lubricate our single leg attacks!" - Lycurgus

by ReadingRambler on Mar 22, 2011 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you tell me your herb garden, you get a smack

Across the face.

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Will the rain hurt the rhubarb?

Gus, don't be a gooey chocolate chip cookie.

by IcersGuy on Mar 22, 2011 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Ed

I pretty much agree with what you wrote, Mike. DeChellis is a class act who, on the whole, has steadily (if slowly) improved the program. Back in Ed’s first couple years, if fans would’ve been told that in a three-year span he’d be the coach of Penn State teams that won the NIT championship and made the NCAA tournament, I’m sure everyone would’ve been thrilled. We need to continue to give the man a chance to build on his successes, and build Penn State into a program that at least has some respectability and is not viewed as a perennial doormat. I think he’s done a good, but not great, job at Penn State so far in his tenure overall, given the difficulties he’s had to overcome here.

Let's Go State!

by Gopher Broke on Mar 22, 2011 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Good basketball schools

turn down invitations to the NIT becuase it’s viewed as an insult to the program.

The fact that we brag about being the NIT champion speaks volumes about PSU basketball.

by psu85 on Mar 22, 2011 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Name me the last team that turned down an invitation

It’s a chance for these kids to possibly play bball for the last time in their careers. Give me a break. I’m not even a huge supporter of Ed’s but your arguments are so logically flawed that I can’t help but say something.

It's even possible that Jim Tressel drinks out of the toilet

by jman07 on Mar 22, 2011 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's funny.

I seem to remember North Carolina playing in its last season.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Oh, and they didn't win it, either.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

UNC isn't elite, though.

And, unfortunately, Virginia Tech got knocked off by Wichita State on Sunday :’(

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

The NIT hate irritates me

Better programs than Penn State fail to win it every year. And sure, some of those programs might phone it in once they get there, but PSU had every reason to do the same that year and didn’t. It means something, especially to a program that had never managed to win it before and those who suggest it doesn’t are holding the program to an illogical standard.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course it does. Just ignore them. The argument they always use boils down to,

“Heyyyy, we’re the 66th best team in the country! Har-har-har.”

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

now the 69th

but is that really that bad a position to be in?

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not, considering our history.

It’s also not really true, given the conference champion bids given out in the NCAA tournament. The winner is probably more like the 40th best team in the country.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh? UNC is not elite?

Or is my sarcasm meter broke?

Joe Paterno Apologist

by Joe 96alum on Mar 22, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

No one will ever be as elite as Va Tech and all of the

national and conference championships they have played for.

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

They couldn't even get out of the 2nd round in the NIT

Yeah, I took the time to look it up.

I'm your late night evening prostitute

by Frank O'Brien on Mar 22, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a reference back to what one of the three letter three number guys said in the fall.

No team in ANY sport at Va Tech has ever won a national championship, but due thought they were perenially elite.

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I knew where you were coming from with that, it just peaked my curiousity as to VTs NIT performance

Like the comment below, only Fugi and a few interested alums follow the NIT

I'm your late night evening prostitute

by Frank O'Brien on Mar 22, 2011 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I see.

For once we are eliter than Va Tech!!! LOL!!!

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, Maryland would have played this year had they gotten an invite.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, what's up with that?

People were going NUTS for… well, only a day… down here about that

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

They probably should have. The fact that they didn't even get an invite is insulting.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

First time since 1993 they didn’t play in either tournament

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

there werent many spots open

NIT has a rule where if a team wins its regular season conference title but fails to make the NCAAs, they get an auto bid to the NIT. normally about 8 teams fit that criteria, but this year there were a ton of upsets in the mid major conference tournaments and 14 teams got NIT auto bids, almost half the field.

so there weren’t many spots available.

by Loretta8 on Mar 22, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's just not true

And if you were a part of that season there was nothing not to be proud of. If we can’t be happy until we win the national title then we’re missing out on a lot of good that this program does actually do.

Now that the celebration's over, lets go beat Ohio State--Joe Paterno
@Ben_Jones88

by Ben Jones on Mar 22, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also known as, "Paterno Derangement Syndrome."
If we can’t be happy until we win the national title then we’re missing out on a lot of good that this program does actually do.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Bottom line...

PSU never was and never WILL be a basketball power…as long as the football team is flying right, no one really cares about the B-ball team.

He’s not cheating…he’s not letting the players get away with murder (or selling autographs) and he’s graduating players….Enjoy this past year for what it was…it looks like a bumpy ride for the next few….

by PawPrintz on Mar 22, 2011 11:45 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with this, but there's no reason the 5-year trajectory can't look like this:

2 NCAA appearances
2 NIT appearances (with at least one of them looking like a bubble team)
1 complete rebuilding year.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

no reason?

how about the other 68 teams competing for those spots, the level of competition in the B1G, and the level of recruiting competition in our recruiting areas?

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Obviously that would be among the "Good scenarios"

It’s just as likely that it could be 0 NIT 0 NCAA appearances.

However, our recruiting has been solid as of late so don’t knock that. DeChellis is recruiting top players in their respective states

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well... cities anyway... but BIG cities

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lots of other teams face similar situations. That's a totally reasonable 5-year plan

I’m even willing to substitute one of the NIT appearances for a rebuilding year.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to pull out the "name them" card

but what other teams are in the same situation as Penn State that also has that as their cycle? I’m not saying they don’t exist, but I’d bet it is the minority for teams in the similar situation (ie “worst” team in given recruiting area, no name brand appeal in the sport, no history in the sport, etc).

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can think of plenty of Midwestern schools that have similar issues.

Most major conferences have tough competition (the Big Ten is in an up-cycle, but will cycle back down next year most likely). Many schools are not in urban centers or close to historic basketball sites, and they’re competing with plenty of major conference schools for their services.

The problem is really our history, but we’re in control of that. Make the history and we’ll start to see a pattern. My outline is best case scenario (without becoming a basketball power). I wouldn’t say it’s likely or unlikely; it can be done (and I hope it is).

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't agree

people say “Oh football is king so it’ll never work” What about florida, ND, Michigan, Ohio State, Texas Tech, Texas…lots of schools have winnning programs on both sides of the ball.

Now that the celebration's over, lets go beat Ohio State--Joe Paterno
@Ben_Jones88

by Ben Jones on Mar 22, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

And without Ed

the team probably doesn’t even make the tournament. You can’t tell me that 4 seniors would have played harder or better for another coach. Ed was their guy so they poured their heart and souls out, not just for themselves but for him too. Ed is being held responsible for 5 terrible years that has proceeded the last 3. He won an NIT (it’s still something) and he took the team to the tourney. You just said yourself, that why would a coach want to come here? Ed is moving in the right direction, albeit slowly. So you’re going to fire him to hire somebody on his level or a step below? After 8 years? What a fool proof plan that is.

It's even possible that Jim Tressel drinks out of the toilet

by jman07 on Mar 22, 2011 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure about that. Sure, Ed was a big part but these kids played hard for themselves.

Those kids at St. John’s busted their butts for Lavin, and he didn’t recruit them.

I actually agree that we should have removed Ed last year, but since we kept him this year and he’s been successful, it’s appropriate to ride this thing out for the reasons that Mike lists in the article.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

re "mediocrity with honor"

This depends on your definition of mediocrity vs. the Success of our mantra. I view the “Success” we tout as not solely victories on the field or court, but off it. And I think DeChellis has done a great job off the court, helping his players become men and giving them a foundation to succeed in life, if not in basketball.

Fire Dan Snyder

by Cari Greene on Mar 22, 2011 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but lots of coaches can do that and lose.

That’s why the Grand Experiment was such a big gamble and why it paid off. Division 1 athletes can be both elite performers on the field and in the classroom. We should expect both, not just one or the other.

PSU basketball, despite my passion for it, will never be an equal partner at this school. What it can be is a perfectly acceptable mid-level league/bubble program, which it has been for 2 of the last 3 years. It’s too bad that we didn’t go .500 last year because this discussion would be entirely moot.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm under no illusions that the AD will drop ED after this tourney appearance

But that doesn’t mean I have to like it or agree with it. 0-1 in the NCAA tournament over 8 years is not “Success With Honor,” it’s not even (as noted above by psu85) “Mediocrity With Honor,” it’s failure.

Yes, the facilities suck. No, nobody in Central PA cares about basketball. But it’s not impossible, even under these conditions, to make the tournament on a consistent basis and be competitive in the years you don’t. This team will not, pace Fugi, be competitive next year. It will probably not be competitive in 12/13. The ceiling for this program with ED is what you saw this year — get a group of seniors who’ve played for four years together with one transcendant player to sneak into the tournament for one appearance.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Please describe to me

How you make the consistent basis when “the facilities suck and nobody cares about basketball”? I just don’t understand how people think you can take a turd and turn it into a diamond.

It's even possible that Jim Tressel drinks out of the toilet

by jman07 on Mar 22, 2011 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

And yes, I'm counting Dunn's first couple years as his

“Consistent” doesn’t mean every year. It means that there’s a repeatable path to success. I expect PSU to be a program that has to rebuild every couple years, not a superpower. But at the same time, I expect them to be as least competitive in the off years.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

If, as you note,

“nobody in Central PA cares about basketball” what would the AD’s motivation be behind replacing Dechellis? Sure, the next guy may be more successful, but he may also cost more and somehow bring embarrassment to the University. If no one cares, why take the risk?

by mancobob on Mar 22, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hence the title of my initial post

I don’t think AD will. I’m just noting that I don’t like it.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ahhhhh,

So you’re just like the man that complains about paying taxes every year, because he feels it’s necessary to be heard about something. And if it’s something that won’t change they can’t be proven wrong.

by mancobob on Mar 22, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also enjoy complaining about:
  1. The starting QB
  2. Our out-of-conference schedule
  3. Old Man Euler
  4. The weather

No, I do not plan on stopping.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

what about the student section?

I heard they don’t always show up on time

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't usually complain

But when I do, I drink Dos Equis. (Maybe that’s why I’d been complaining).

But srlsy, I prefer to praise and to hype and to have fun. And while I occasionally find performances (players’ and coaches’) worth criticizing, it’s the regular complainers who can get me to switch from criticism to complaint. Worst among them are the insidious, snide or vaguely covert ones. The out and outers are easiest to ignore.

That’s a long way around to the rec you earned for your ironic twist.

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Piggy back rec.

I didn’t realize the beauty of this comment until you pointed it out.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

a) “Probably”
b) By looking at the roster
c) By looking at the track record of underclassmen under DeChellis’s tenure

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm...

So you’ve seen Ross Travis, Trey Lewis, Peter Alexis, Patrick Ackerman, Sasa Borovnjak and Jonathan Graham play extensive minutes? You know what types of players they are now and will be in two years? Man, you’re a much bigger fan than I thought.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I assume you have those players' names in your copy/paste buffer

Given that you basically parrot them in every single basketball thread.

The fact remains that, conference-wide, first-year players do not perform well in the Big Ten and underclassmen in general have not performed well under DeChellis. All of our minimally successful years have been on the backs of groups of seniors.

Those players may well turn out to be good eventually. I promise you, they are getting their teeth kicked in next year.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

so basically ED will fail

because the team is full of underclassmen? While that is probably true (as you said, they don’t tend to perform well, especially in the B1G), in a couple years they will be upper classmen. Wouldn’t it be a better strategy for Penn State basketball to have a run of upperclassmen every few years than to struggle with underclassmen in key roles every year?

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Underclassmen, with no experience

In an ideal situation, a group of seniors could leave and be replaced by sophomores and juniors who got good backup minutes and could be competitive in their first year, and make a run in the next.

Instead, we have Tim Frazier (who is that and more), followed by our bench that was too crappy to use, Sasa coming off an injury, and some freshmen.

I don’t mind that the team is getting younger (like you say, we’re better off competitively with runs of seniors), and I don’t mind rebuilding, but we’re in full bare-cupboard mode because ED’s recruiting and retention over the last few years has been bad.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd argue 2011 was the bare-cupboard year

Talor Battle, Jeff Brooks, three average starters and nothing.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

You would argue that

And most people would look at the four seniors, including the best player PSU has ever had, and consider your argument a little bit stretched.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love the "four seniors" schtick

It completely ignores any possibility that the freshmen could be more skilled than the very average David and Andrew Jones ever were.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Compared to the "four high school players" schtick, it's a winner

What makes you think any of the newcomers are going to be more skilled than guys like Brooks and Jones who were also just as hyped coming in?

It’s kind of insane that you’re using “none of our guys have any college basketball experience” as an argument that we’re going to be better.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jones was hyped?

By whom?

I’ll give you that Brooks and Battle had people excited, but, surprise surprise, they’re the ones that developed into impact players. I’ll take my chances with two 6’11" forwards replacing Jones and a fairly touted three in Travis replcing Jackson.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jones vs Ackerman/Alexis

Jones was not heavily hyped, but neither are the two incoming bigs. I can’t see any reason other than blind optimism to believe they’re more skilled than he was.

Jones: “the former Abington Friends standout chose Penn State over Iowa, La Salle, and Florida Atlantic”

Ackerman: “Turned Down: St. Bonaventure, Siena, Bucknell, Minnesota, Ole Miss”

Alexis: “Turned Down: WVU, Texas A&M gave him a looks but no offer.”

Please don’t tell me that “offer lists don’t mean anything.” I’m pointing to a list of like-for-like comparisons as a stand in for the undefinable “hyped.”

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only crap program on either list is St. Bonnies

If I were in the offer sheet game (which I’m not) I’d look at both guys and say they were much more highly touted than Jones.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

By whom, exactly?

Penn State isn’t the only team getting a lot younger. Most of the other conference teams will be as well. That’s not to say Penn State is going to sniff the bubble or even make the NIT. I just think it’s silly of you to suggest “teeth kicked in” before you’ve seen any of these guys play a minute. Maybe you like jumping to conclusions, but I’d like to see the players on a court before I pass judgement on two years down the road.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

seeing as they are playing for Penn State

I would gather they’re not very good. Just like I know Indiana will likely be fielding a sub-par football team 2-3 years from now.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Was Talor Battle not very good?

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cornley? Claxton? Brooks?

Indiana needs 10-15 solid kids to have a chance at being good. Ed needs one or two. All four of the freshmen have promise. Let’s just see how things play out.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh, and also

we’ve had Cornley, and Claxton, and never reached the tournament with them (yes, we should have with Conley, and if Claxton didn’t get hurt, who knows). It took having a senior Battle, with Brooks, and Frazier stepping up his game for us to get to the tournament (and lose in the first round).

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, this is a losing argument. Every year since DeChellis has been here, the talent level has

increased. Claxton was recruited and was our only impact guy and was surrounded by virtually nothing for 3 years, then blew out his knee in his 4th. By that time, Cornley had shown up, Jones and Jackson would redshirt, then Brooks. In the interim, we had success finding guys like Travis Parker (a personal favorite) and Stanley Pringle. Now we have Frazier.

Having Talor Battle is winning the lottery, just like having Jimmer Fredette or any other player of that magnitude. But that doesn’t mean that the guys after him won’t be at the very least competent Big Ten players. The trajectory shows that to be true. If it’s not, then we’ll know to go a different direction.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

for what it's worth, I believe ED has grown the program.

I also believe we’re still a consistent bottom 3 team in the B1G (well, 4 now that Nebraska has joined us) even with those improvements. Sure, we’ll have our years when we’re senior laden, and happen upon a year when some typical top teams are struggling, and we’ll maybe work our way into the top half, but I just don’t think it is reasonable to think that Penn State will be a consistently good team any time soon.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Define consistent.

Because 2 out of the last 3 years, we’ve finished 4th.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

a decade+ run of finishing better than bottom half

with only an occasional “bad” rebuilding year (and in this definition of consistently good, I would consider a “bad” rebuilding year to be pretty much the average Penn State season of the past 20 years)

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Easy, easy rec.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

with the article. Anyone who pays attention to my posts knows I am firmly in the fire Ed camp. But, now is not the time for reasons stated in the article. No matter how we as fans define “success” this season was a total success to the administration and basketball team.

But, to play devil’s advocate…did Ed lead us to the NCAA tourney or was it the best player to ever put on a PSU jersey? I feel it is the latter. Battle is the reason we made the tourney. Striking recruiting gold once in 8 years is probably the best we can hope for at PSU. Our roster consists mostly of guys that wouldn’t even get playing time at schools like Butler, Xavier or Wichita St. That’s why there is little hope.

by Offside Clyde on Mar 22, 2011 12:31 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Ed recruited all the kids on the floor.

He needs to be given some credit. He put the team together, he created the offense and defense.

I still think this is a clear exaggeration:

Striking recruiting gold once in 8 years is probably the best we can hope for at PSU. Our roster consists mostly of guys that wouldn’t even get playing time at schools like Butler, Xavier or Wichita St. That’s why there is little hope.

Battle, Brooks, and Frazier would all, at a bare minimum, play at any of those schools. Jones and Jackson would see time. Billy Oliver clearly wouldn’t, but I’m less sure about Marshall (who has a real chance to be a quality guy) and Woodyard (who at least provides some semblance of depth). Additionally, you’re cherry picking mid-majors who have had massive amounts of success over the past few years. It’s not like you’ve just picked out some random schools.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're correct

I did pick schools that have had success. I did this because they are recruiting the same caliber player that PSU gets. I will give you Battle. He would star on any of those teams. But, Brooks had 1 good season…and Frazier has had 1 good game. Frazier and Marshall still have a lot of potential, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Woodyard is nothing more than a jersey. For a guy who is supposedly the best pure shooter we have, he certainly doesn’t make many shots. But, I guess you have to see the floor to make any. So, I still fail to see how my quote is an exaggeration. We are basically a mid-major team…playing in a major conference.

As for our offense, I can tell the team to pass the ball around for 30 seconds and then give it to my star player with 10 seconds left on the shot clock. Then he can juke a guy and throw up a 26 foot jump shot as the clock expires. That really is a great offense.

As for defense, well…other than a few blocks from Brooks, we don’t really play any. We run after guys and hope they miss the shot. Then we hope that our 6ft guard can grab the rebound since our center is Charmin soft.

So, you are right….Ed does deserve credit for this.

by Offside Clyde on Mar 22, 2011 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Keep in mind

that we should have been in the NCAA two years ago, but we got jobbed. So that’s two of three years we were good enough to be in the tourney.

This will sound nutty, but if ED was Pitt’s coach this year I would not have hesitated to put the Panthers in the Final Four in my bracket. This team did get some wins it needed, and it beat teams of similar talent on its way to the NIT title.

The most legitimate criticism is that there’s not enough depth of talent and that comes down to recruiting. To that end, the AD needs to revisit its approach to non-conference scheduling and get the team on the road more often to raise the visibility of the program. This year the Pennsylvania State University played no road games in Philly or Pittsburgh. Beyond that, every season we should play at least two road games amongst the cities of Pittsburgh, Philly, DC, and NYC. That’s our home base.

Joe Paterno Apologist

by Joe 96alum on Mar 22, 2011 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Ed's Recruiting Strategy

Ed can’t go into Philly and get top talent. There are too many good schools there. I might be wrong, but I don’t think Pittsburgh has much local basketball talent. I bet if I looked at Pitt’s roster, most of those kids either came from Philly or out of state.

Ed’s strategy has always been to go to the backyard of a powerhouse and take their Plan B kids. He got Claxton from under UConn’s nose. He got Cornley from Columbus. Brooks was a Plan B for Kentucky. Battle was Syracuse’s Plan B.

You can build a very respectable program from Plan B kids. But when you are taking kids a powerhouse would consider a Plan B kid, you are never going to consistently beat that Powerhouse that has Plan A kids. At some point, Ed has to change the strategy. He has to gamble and go after those Plan A kids. If he strikes out it could mean a year or two where he has a weak class which could lead to the end his career. But if he lands one or two of them, it could be a program changer.

by BSD on Mar 22, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a valid point,

but the question is when does “at some point” occur. I think you need some sustained success first. The sad thing is, had we not gotten screwed out of the last bid, we might be there. 2 out of 3 in the NCAA and playing in the B1G might get you to pull that special player. An NIT championship and NCAA in 3 years probably doesn’t. I say when the team gets in the 2013 tournament, that will be the offseason to go for broke.

The bottom line is there is no reason to make the switch now. You would just be starting over with a new strategy. No coach is magically making this program a yearly B1G title contender right away. There is a pretty good class coming in, give him two years to show he can make them competitive.

What is the flip side? This AD is not bringing in the coach that pulls a program changing player right away based on his name. A new coach risks further setback. We have waited 156 years for Penn State to put out a consistently competitive basketball team. We will be ok sparing Ed another 2 now that he has shown us some growth.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is the difference, really?

Between an NIT title and an at-large berth and first or second round loss in ‘09? Do you really think a recruit would pass on Penn State because it just missed the tournament in ’09 and won a championship in the other tournament instead of making it? I don’t think they’re that short sighted.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think a big time basketball recruit

would focus on one tournament bid in ten years, yes. I also think they would dismiss an NIT championship without any thought, yes.

I am talking about the “Plan A” players Mike referenced above. These are 18 year old basketball superstars, and you don’t think they can be short sighted? You are giving most too much credit.

I think 2 NCAAs in 3 years, and a chance to be the only star at that school in a big conference would give us some chance to grab one. One NCAA in ten years would not.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think a decision would ever come down to that.

If it did, I’m not sure that’s the kind of player I want making decisions on the basketball floor.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you never want to go after a

big time school’s Plan A player?

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not if he's stooopid

The NIT team was better than this year’s team. Anyone with an ounce of basketball sense realizes that and if Ed can’t sell a kid that the NIT title was significant, the kid wasn’t going to come here any way.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does Ken Pomeroy have an ounce of basketball sense?

2009.
2011.

I don’t know how you can repeatedly claim that the 2009 team was plainly better than this year’s team. It’s really close. The 2009 team feasted on the NJIT’s of the world and got #212 Indiana THREE times and Iowa twice.

Both teams were two really good players and some spare parts.

--
A T-bone steak, cheese, eggs, and Welch's grape.
@scrappled
Slow States - Football, music, craft beer, and podcasts with an industrial slant.

by Run Up The Score on Mar 22, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with this.

It looks like the 09 team had better depth, but Brooks was a head case and Frazier didn’t exist.

The only player I’d realistically take off the 09 team is Jamelle Cornley. Morrisey is a nice story, but we had guys on this team that could create their own shot. I was just as happy was Jackson shoot a 3 this year as I was with Danny in 09. Battle is better now than he was then, and Frazier turned into a very good PG by year’s end.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really liked Pringle.

Great three point shooter, could’ve let Frazier have a rest. Morrissey was pretty awful his senior season, as I recall.

--
A T-bone steak, cheese, eggs, and Welch's grape.
@scrappled
Slow States - Football, music, craft beer, and podcasts with an industrial slant.

by Run Up The Score on Mar 22, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's true. I liked Pringle. I'd rather have him than Marshall coming off the bench.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Marshall looks like he could be very good with some experience

I’d rather have Pringle than… Cameron Woodyard for sure

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pringle was the man

kid could flat out play

Now that the celebration's over, lets go beat Ohio State--Joe Paterno
@Ben_Jones88

by Ben Jones on Mar 22, 2011 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup. Wish we had him for 4 years.

--
A T-bone steak, cheese, eggs, and Welch's grape.
@scrappled
Slow States - Football, music, craft beer, and podcasts with an industrial slant.

by Run Up The Score on Mar 22, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those rankings are in comparison to peers that season.

They’re not objective.

That said, the stats are remarkably similar, so I’ll give you that. However, I still think that if Ed can’t convince a kid the NIT team was significant, then the kid wasn’t coming here anyway.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

So then your answer is

No, you don’t want to ever shift strategies and go after Plan A players. You could have said that straight out instead of arguing the merits of an NIT championship.

And if we are doing that, you are completely refusing to acknowledge that a top HS basketball would feel that way. And you know what? That wouldn’t make him stupid, failing to deeply evaluate the merits of one versus the other. A very intelligent HS kid with a high basketball IQ would STILL probably feel that way. And if his goal were to get maximum exposure and competition for a potential pro career, I would call that a wise decision that goes beyond the surface. If the selection committee overlooks a “good team” consistently, then that should be taken into account when deciding where to get your education and play your college ball.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

It overlooked a good team once

Not consistently.

And I’m not arguing Ed should be ignoring Plan A guys. I agree with the consensus that at some point, you’ve got to make the most of these scrappy, overacheiving teams we’ve had over the last few years and get something sustainable. That said, if a kid is dumb enough to say “Well, I really like this program, but I just can’t choose a team that won the NIT instead of bombing out in the first round of the NCAA Tournament,” then I’m not sure that kid is going to be slam dunk for the program.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are making that statement out to sound much

more unreasonable than it actually is. A HS player wants to know how many times he will play in the BIGDANCE!!!! He doesn’t dream about playing in the NIT, at all. Do we really need to do a survey of HSers to figure this out? A stat that the team has recently made it more times than not would be much more compelling than one time in ten years (or two times in 17 or however many that would be).

You are bordering on rediculous at this point. If winning the NIT was more helpful to a program than making the NCAAs, then bubble teams with 11 and 12 seeds would turn down the invitation and go take their chances in the NIT.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did I say an NIT title is better than an NCAA Tournament?

No. Don’t put words in my mouth. I just dispute the idea that Ed can’t possibly sell a kid that the NIT title team was at least on the level with the 2011 team.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, as good as? Better?
That said, if a kid is dumb enough to say "Well, I really like this program, but I just can’t choose a team that won the NIT instead of bombing out in the first round of the NCAA Tournament," then I’m not sure that kid is going to be slam dunk for the program.

You are calling kids dumb if they don’t value an NIT championship as much as an NCAA bid. I think it would be totally reasonable for a kid to say “I really like the program, but they haven’t showed any consistent ability to get an NCAA bid.” If you disagree, then you are saying that the NIT is at least as good as an NCAA bid.

One more bid would show at least a trend towards NCAA consistency. Until that happens, I don’t think we have a chance with top players. You convince top players by showing them they will be on the biggest stage with the biggest stakes. Not by “convincing” them that the tournament nobody but alumni watches should be valued just as highly.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're a bubble team either way.

Kids are smart enough to realize that or they aren’t. You’re creating a huge chasm where ther is none.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 2:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It's just not true.

They count NCAA appearances, records, memorable moments etc. They do not go back and see whether you were on the bubble or not. There are plenty of NIT championship teams that were not on the bubble I’m guessing. But do you know why I can’t be sure? Because no one keeps track of NIT championships nor bubble teams that didn’t get selected.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Invitation_Tournament#Men.27s_Post-season_NIT_Championships

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of which... did we "win" the 1998 tournament

since Minnesota vacated it?

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes,

we get credit for 1998.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

What are they toddlers?

If you want to play black or white, good for you. I’m find here.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 2:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I mean done

Fricking autospeller

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 2:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Toddlers?

Tell me who won in 08 then? Scratch that, tell me who is still in it NOW? The bottom line is you remember so well because you love Penn State, That’s fine, I do too. But I don’t think there are a dozen non alums who can name a single NIT champion from the past 5 years. I don’t think there will be a dozen who will be able to name the 2011 NIT champion in APRIL.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

West virginia

And I didn’t look that up. I’m sitting in a lecture with my iPod. It’s not a black and white issue as you paint it to be. Few things are. If you’re a good basketball player seriously considering Penn state you’re not going to make such a simplistic decision.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 3:03 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

No, Ohio State, actually.

But that wasn’t the real point. These players aren’t already interested in Penn State. That’s the real problem. I would agree with you, it shouldn’t make a difference if there genuine interest is in the University. But we are talking about the top players, ones without any predisposition to come here.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok well

Then I’d agree with you. Nothing to see here.

Adam
Black Shoe Diaries, SB Nation Pittsburgh, Daily Collegian Sports, BT Powerhouse, @fugimaster24
God Created the World Out Of Nothing, Paterno Built A National Superpower On Cow Fields...

by Adam Bittner on Mar 22, 2011 3:36 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Consensus!

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes. I loved the NIT and it matters to us, but no one outside

of a very limited market cares about the NIT.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

And even less so the kids

who dream about making big plays in the elite 8, final 4 etc care about it. I am not personally knocking the NIT. But, I would say that big time players like that would rather have you not mention the season at all than mention winning the NIT. To those big time players it’s highlighting a season you didn’t have an opportunity to play on the grand stage.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shouldn't he just stay the course for now?

Plan B kids consistently lead to a top 6 conference finish if they develop. Getting a plan A kid or two would vault us into the stratusphere, but that’s a massive risk that we shouldn’t take until we’ve solidified ourselves as a consistently mid-level conference team. We’re on our way to doing that.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

My main thing about scheduling

is, what good does it do to play Maine, Mt. St. Mary’s, and Furman at home in December? They need to get on the road, do people in NYC even know Penn State plays basketball? There might be some players in the big cities that will get caught up in a numbers game where there will be starters ahead of them at their chosen Big East school, maybe those are players Penn State can pick off.

Joe Paterno Apologist

by Joe 96alum on Mar 22, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

It helps the RPI, which translates directly into post-season appearances.

More than anything, that’s what helps recruiting. Those are all winnable (….Maine….) games that improve our record and RPI without sacrificing our standing. Imagine how ugly it would be for recruiting if we got smacked around by UConn this year.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with this

I think they are short sighted in their scheduling. Give up a home game and sign a one-and-one with a powerhouse program. I think one game against Pitt or Syracuse would bring in more revenue than two games against St. Marys and Bucknell.

by BSD on Mar 22, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly, it's almost a lose-lose for them, the same reason Maryland didn't want to play us in the ACC-B1G challenge this year

If they win, meh, they’re supposed to win because we’re Penn State and we are always teh suck in bball. If they lose, then they really suck because they’ve lost to sucky Penn State.

Fire Dan Snyder

by Cari Greene on Mar 22, 2011 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think football has clouded our judgement in a few ways.

Obviously it is the dominant sport at Penn State, and likely always will be.

But in football, with the bowl system, mediocrity is rewarded. Finish with a .500 record, and you get to play in the post season. In basketball, you have to finish in the top 20% to go to the dance. An equivalent metric for football would be finishing in the top 25 (25/120 = 20.8%, while 68/345 = 19.7%).

We also play in an incredibly tough conference. We could improve the team dramatically, and we’d still be in the bottom half virtually every year, but how often is a reasonable frequency of tournament appearances for a team of our caliber and in our situation? Honest question.

Also, people keep citing 8 years that ED has had, but the first 2 or 3 he had no chance. So he’s had 5-6 realistic years to do anything with the program, and he brought them to the tournament once, and if not for Arizona getting a pity bid, and a bunch of bubble busters in 2009 they should have gotten in that year as well. It didn’t happen, but it doesn’t mean he didn’t have a tournament quality team. So 1/3 of the time ED has had tournament quality teams (top 25 postseason equivalent in football), and for the middling program that Penn State is (and will always be unless willing to cut corners. NCAABB, especially the recruiting, is a dirty dirty sport), I don’t think that is fire-able.

With that said, I would absolutely love for Penn State to somehow out recruit the Philly schools, the NYC schools, Pitt, OSU, Maryland, and WVU for the talent in the area and become consistently competitive (not just a sell our soul for a 2-3 year run followed by years of probation), but I’d be a fool if I expected that to happen, even if we had an administration that supported the efforts.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

That's the thing, you can't discredit that Ed has grown the program.

I hear a lot of “But he got lucky with seniors and Battle did it.” He brought every single one of them here. If he doesn’t get credit for that, then why didn’t the roster he started with make the tournament when it had a bunch of seniors? Because Ed was handed a brown paper bag filled with feces, that’s why.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dunn brought the whole 2001 team in

He doesn’t get a whole lot of credit for that.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

He also compiled the brown paper bag filled with feces.

If Ed’s team looks like Dunn’s 02 team next year, I could change my mind.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

he does get credit for that 2001 team

but he also gets credit for what happened afterward.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you don't take care of

 your grass you’re going to left with nothing but weeds. Dunn wasn’t a very good caretaker.

"You're holding my hand Chuck - you sly dog!"

by rahpsu92 on Mar 22, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope, terrible caretaker. Not to mention his prize recruit came with a massive drinking problem.

Jamaal Tate was a GREAT high school player. Torched my high school. Phenomenal athlete for Linden. And then……downward spiral.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I read that just as

Yellowman came on my ipod. Yes, a trip to Jamaica would be niiiice.

"You're holding my hand Chuck - you sly dog!"

by rahpsu92 on Mar 22, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think the numbers match up

Since football has I-A, I-AA, and lots of D-I schools with no football program at all, the 120 FBS teams are already preselected at the top of the 345 total D-I schools. Penn State is not competing with Villanova for a bowl bid.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Reply fail

Meant for JuggerNitt’s post above.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question for the group.

If we had fired Ed last year, and a new coach came in and performed EXACTLY the same, would you have used it as evidence that the new coach was an improvement over Ed and he needed to be fired to take it to the next level?

(Note: If you say no, you are lying)

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Followup Question For The Group:

Your wife — when did you stop beating her?

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would have lost it after the loss to Maine

I almost lost it with DeChellis—my guy— so with a new guy? I guarantee I would have been banned from BSD

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are on the wrong side of the equation for the point I was trying to make.

I’m talking about the people who refuse to give Ed any credit for this season. The only point here is to make a fair comparison of Ed vs. PSU Next Coach X you would need to remove that bias.

I’m not saying his history can’t be discussed, just that you can’t give him 0 credit when you would use the same performance as proof that a firing would be justified.

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

"the people who refuse to give Ed any credit for this season"

These people don’t actually exist. Most of the anti-Ed faction feels that this was a good season, but it’s too little, far too late.

by elefantstn on Mar 22, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

They don't exist?

People are saying that Battle did it by himself. How is that not refusing to give him any credit?

'We've got too many people analyzing everything and sometimes they don't know what they're talking about.' -Joseph Vincent Paterno

by PSUinBOSSton on Mar 22, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Curely's quote is typical of an AD operating in a vacuum

Hardly any fans or boosters are riding his back side. So of course, a “class program” is a “fantastic job”.

Anyways, well, whatever…back to waiting for football

"Life is no way to treat an animal"

by Mr. Rosewater on Mar 22, 2011 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Is All-Ohio Division I

Co-Player of the year a good thing?

Since Trey Lewis is coming to PSU and not going to Columbus should we look for what is “wrong” with him?

"You're holding my hand Chuck - you sly dog!"

by rahpsu92 on Mar 22, 2011 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

No idea, but I think I've heard that OSU has plenty of guards waiting in the wings.

Lewis is apparently a 2 guard, but he’ll get a chance to play here in both spots.

Yes, that award is a very good thing. Also, the Ohio Mr. Basketball (which he’s also a contender for) has been won by some guys you may have heard of before.
(hat tip to Ben for the link)

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

2011 = 2001

Brief end-of-year success driven by a senior laden team, led by an overmatched coach that ended up (and will end up again) setting the program back 5 years. At least Jerry Dunn’s run ended in the Sweet 16.

2011 NCAA appearance was a Pyrrhic victory.

I suck 'em down like Coca-Cola.

by ATLion on Mar 22, 2011 1:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't know why people are jumping all over Curley in this scenario.

They’ve made a decision to keep Ed, obviously. It’s Curley’s job to sell that in the most enthusiastic way possible. It’s like when we dissect the Paterno press conferences…and inevitably get back to “duh, what did you think he was going to say?”

--
A T-bone steak, cheese, eggs, and Welch's grape.
@scrappled
Slow States - Football, music, craft beer, and podcasts with an industrial slant.

by Run Up The Score on Mar 22, 2011 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Except we can't make a drinking game

out of Curley’s comments. Man, I need to get started on the rules for the Spring pressers.

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

that sounds like a challenge.

I made a drinking game out of Candyland…I feel I could make one out of a Curley presser.

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 22, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

It still won't be as good as the JoePa game,

but go right ahead!

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have two theories, both of which are controversial

I’ll post them in separate comments.

Background for the first theory: The difference between this year’s team and the coming year’s team is going to be the loss of Talor Battle. Brooks finally reached his potential in his senior season, but I expect that (within a few years) someone like Tre Bowman will be able to at least become Brooks-esque. Replacing this year’s DJ and Jones should be expected for Penn State University as well.

Theory: We’re not going to miss Battle that much.

This is not a knock on Battle AT ALL. I love that he came here, I love what he did here, and I’m thrilled that for the foreseeable future when I think about “Greatest moments in PSU basketball history” I’m going to think of Battle.

But when it came down to the stretch this year, Battle was not 2009 Battle. He was slower, timid, missing more shots. He was NOT the emotional leader of Jamelle Cornley. The success of the 2011 basketball team rests partly on Battle’s shoulders, but partly on Tim Frazier. It’s HIS development which I feel can make this team better in 2013 than in 2011. Frazier’s speed and his ability to move the ball around are only going to get better. Can you imagine what he could turn into if he’s also able to pull up and shoot the ball?

Battle is probably the best player that has ever played basketball at Penn State. We would not have even come close to the level of success we did without him. He single handedly carried the team last year and is the only person who met Mike’s expectations from this article of two years ago: http://www.blackshoediaries.com/2009/4/6/823606/looking-ahead-to-2009-2010

That being said, I think that Ed’s coaching IQ goes up without him. So many times we sat around whining, "Well of course the ball’s going to Battle… who else? Battle was not the one we were looking to this year to keep us close in games (most of the time). He was the one we were looking to in order to WIN them. “Battle’s having an off night… but he’ll probably drill the open three in the final seconds to put us over the top.” was said AGAIN and AGAIN. Sometimes it happened. Sometimes it didn’t. Next year, everyone knows we don’t have Battle. So who do we go to? No one knows until Ed tells them. Other teams will be guessing. Fans will be guessing. Hopefully the Penn State players on the floor will NOT be guessing.

To be sure, the loss of Battle will be a rough one, especially next year. But I’m excited to see what Penn State basketball looks like after him… it’s much different than when he came in. There’s momentum and excitement. I will forever look upon him as PSUBB’s Derrick Williams. Now let’s see how successful we can be afterwards.

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 2:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Well...

ok..

Now that the celebration's over, lets go beat Ohio State--Joe Paterno
@Ben_Jones88

by Ben Jones on Mar 22, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sigh

I hate myself for responding to this.

Down the stretch, Battle put the Michigan State game out of reach, hit clutch shots against Wisconsin, Minnesota (twice, knocking them well off the bubble), and kept PSU in the Big Ten Title game.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't take that away from him

It just seemed (though I can’t verify now that I’ve actually looked at the stats) that we were relying on Battle in 2009 to score and score a lot. This year it didn’t seem like we were as much. But statistically, my theory is wrong… at least in the Frazier / Battle part

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, welcome to Miami Heat syndrome...
So who do we go to? No one knows until Ed tells them. Other teams will be guessing. Fans will be guessing. Hopefully the Penn State players on the floor will NOT be guessing.

You need A guy. The guy that you’re going to go to. It’s not even about the other team, it’s about ours and having an identity. Losing Battle as the “clutch shot guy” doesn’t make us better because we’ll be more mysterious. It makes us worse for having to spend time figuring out who that guy is.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

No I think Heat theory is

who wants to be the biggest douche tonight?

Now that the celebration's over, lets go beat Ohio State--Joe Paterno
@Ben_Jones88

by Ben Jones on Mar 22, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's always in play

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Second theory (much shorter)

Remember when we found out that Steve Lavin said he wanted the Penn State job? Well just at the time when Lavin wanted to get back into coaching, we were sent an angel who called for Ed DeChellis’s job.

Theory: Steve Lavin is Skins4Ever

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Where is Richard Aceto?

I expected him to return.

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

He's banned

but he didn’t e-mail me congratulating PSU on reaching the tournament. Weird.

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 22, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is he banned forever now?

That is weird. Did he still want to fire Ed?

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

In all reality, there is no Forever Ban

For someone clever enough to:
- mask or vary their IP address
- mask or vary their sbnation-associated email address
- converse in a manner opaque enough so as not to out their new selves as their banned selves

i.e. NOT SCTowny, in the past. Who knows if he’s here among us these days being more subtle. Same for other bannees.

Multiple screen names exist here, too, tho I’ve got no data or access to know who is using them.

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

People like that don't do subtle.

They can’t help themselves.

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do you think Rambler is actually a pseudonym for PSUwifey to take veiled shots at Mike?

Of course that also drives up hit counts for SBN to build a better grotto.

I'm your late night evening prostitute

by Frank O'Brien on Mar 22, 2011 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I get the feeling

That when psuwifey wants to take a shot at Mike, there’s no veil involved. But she seems like a wife in love with her man.

As for Rambler, you know as well as I do that there is no pseudonym or any other word in the English language capable of expressing the essence of him. Except maybe Euphemism. One could make a decent case that his entire online presence is one giant, or a million little, euphemisms.

jtothetweet
"Cats been getting hookups on tatts since back in '01". - former buckeye Antonio Pittman

by jtothep on Mar 22, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me clavens are nigh!

"Use their guts to lubricate our single leg attacks!" - Lycurgus

by ReadingRambler on Mar 22, 2011 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

ReadingRambler in song form.

“Both heads, legs, and arms were all scattered around.”

"Use their guts to lubricate our single leg attacks!" - Lycurgus

by ReadingRambler on Mar 22, 2011 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, yes

and none of those things are terribly difficult to do. However, an alt would not carry the power of the name Richard Aceto. I wouldn’t mind his ban being lifted, truth be told, even though I got in more arguments with him than anyone. But as always, I defer to the wisdom and maturity of the admins, especially Mike.

John has a long moustache

Fugimaster24 is the better Adam.

by AdamShell on Mar 23, 2011 4:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

there are a few bans where I don't think the person necessarily deserved to be banned for what they were saying

but I did see some sense in banning them to prevent the message boards from turning into flame wars whenever they were around. Aceto was one of those types of people.

And I wouldn’t be surprised if a certain Nebraska poster followed in his shoes, though he’s actually started to become obnoxious and cursing out other posters and using the, dare I say it, personal attack. Plus he seems to try to win arguments by volume. His points are so important that not only does he have to reply with the same information in about 5 successive posts, but even within those posts he seems to need to repeat what he’s said with “server issues”

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 23, 2011 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I enjoyed wasting a whole day to argue with Richard Aceto,

but then again, I was wrong to feed the troll. I think Andy P is getting a little out of hand with the language and personal attacks, but MainLion and ReadingRambler have handled him well so far.

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 23, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I basically stopped talking to him once the language and personal attacks started

(it also coincided with him disappearing for about a week or so. I just noticed he made a reappearance on those original threads)

by The JuggerNitt on Mar 23, 2011 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is why we will never be on top

This is the exact reason why Penn State will be 2nd to schools like OSU, Texas, Florida, etc. Because we dont hold our coaches accountable. Yed Ed is a great guy but 1 tourney appearance in 10 years is awful for a school that claims to be so proud of our “successful” program. At any of these other schools he would have been out 5 years ago but our greedy athletic department only cares about money. For some reason they dont think investing in a good coach will work out, yes they have to spend more up front but once penn state basketball starts selling out every game you’d think they would be happy with all the money they are pulling in. All Curley does is hide behind the success with honor title, its all smoke and mirrors. This is why football is going to fall off the map after Joe goes and basketball will never be good, unless we as fans do something about it. (take a look at the wrestling team)

by redd4heisman on Mar 22, 2011 3:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Who's this "we" you speak of, friend?
our greedy athletic department only cares about money.

Only greedy if you consider that the money they make goes into funding the numerous teams that we have on campus. And that the funding doesn’t come out of the general fund. But you know, I digress…

For some reason they dont think investing in a good coach will work out, yes they have to spend more up front but once penn state basketball starts selling out every game you’d think they would be happy with all the money they are pulling in.

The numbers have been debated before and I don’t want to do the math, but there’s no guarantee that (A) A new coach will win more games or (B) that attendance alone will make up for the revenue that we’ll be missing if we hire a new coach.

Look, DeChellis works for somewhere around half a million dollars. A coach that you’d theoretically want is looking for something like $1.5 million, probably more. Do you think ticket sales make up for that shortfall. I think that’s very optimistic, and what if the new coach is a complete failure.

As for football, you’re crazy if you don’t think we have either the boosters or the revenue to hire a top notch coach after Joe leaves. I don’t see how “Success with Honor” is smoke and mirrors. You’re projecting, which is fine, but I see no NCAA violations, a very successful football program (excluding this mediocre year), mutliple national championships from men’s and women’s sports, and high national rankings.

But what do I know, I’m just looking at facts…..

"I don’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the negative. I believe that having a good, peaceful mind is the basic premise for a good life."

by Adam Collyer on Mar 22, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

All i am saying is our AD like to settle for status quo because they aren’t losing any money. You cannot sit there and tell me that having a successful program wouldnt be good for the school. As for for a new coach being a complete failure, I cant see how the one we have right now isnt. His big ten overall record is below .500 in ten years with ONE appearance in the big dance. Im willing to take a chance on a new coach to try and reach such impressive numbers.

by redd4heisman on Mar 22, 2011 4:29 PM EDT reply actions  

The reply button is your friend

Also, Curley would be absolutely retarded to let the football program languish like he does the basketball program.

I want to get it out of the way— I agree with you that he doesn’t care how well the basketball team does as long as it makes money, but this is not necessarily greedy or evil. It’s just business, and that business keeps PSU athletics in the black, one of only a handful of pograms across the country can say. And that’s going to be EVEN MORE important once those funding cuts come down on the appropriations from the state— G-Span is NOT going to want the athletic department to be dipping into the general fund.

And this brings me to why Curley would be retarded to let the football program suffer the same fate as the basketball program. The basketball program can get along just fine with fans being angry about it because there aren’t that many fans, nor are there that many boosters (if any at all). No boosters to get pissed, no boosters to lose money from. Football, my friend, is a very VERY different animal. There are a lot of very deep pockets tailgating in the shadow of Beaver Stadium, and they are NOT going to be happy shelling out thousands of dollars for season tickets and box seats to go watch a team that gets to a crappy bowl game only most years. They will get angry, and the entire athletic department suffers.

Curley will spend money because he has to. He might not be the most forthcoming little weasel about anything, but he’s no moron. We’re going to do what it takes to keep this football program among the nation’s best. (I refuse to say elite, because we all know where that goes OMG VT IS ELITE)

by psuwxman on Mar 22, 2011 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I just can't help myself.

Everytime I see elite I just have to mention VT.

This is BSD, the crazy stirs itself.

by Paige2PSU on Mar 22, 2011 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is there any other reaction to have?

They’re just so far and above every other program, they truly are the elite of college football, now and forever.

by psuwxman on Mar 22, 2011 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Summed up my thoughts, especially on next year

Find me one coach not named Bobby Knight who could’ve done better than Ed did (without cheating) in the same situation.

We should revisit this in 2013, but at this point, Ed has done at least as well or better than could reasonably be expected. Anyone who thinks PSU could fire a guy who has done as well as could reasonably be expected and bring in anyone but someone absolutely desperate to be a BCS-league head coach is kidding him/herself.

I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.

by ckmneon on Mar 23, 2011 1:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Collyer and ckmneon are correct in focusing on the violations. This is exactly what Curley is thinking about. I have a PSU alum friend that knows nothing about the basketball program’s history – sometimes he comes over to watch a game and preaches to me that “Penn State should just hire a big-time name”. I just stare back at him blankly. At Penn State the goal really is Success with honor and Curley won’t take the chance of hiring a cheater to achieve a lot of wins. I’m not saying that we can’t find a perennial winner who does it clean, but the administration is scared to death of it.

I’m gonna roll with Ed because I don’t make the decision about who gets to be head coach. I think he has actually brought in good talent. In terms of keeping an upward trajectory our biggest problem has been the mass transfers. They set us back every time. Imagine this year’s team with a little more room for error in terms of foul trouble and injuries – imagine having Babb and Edwards. Not only that but they also come back as seniors next year and everyone can play the role they are supposed to. If you’re not ultratalented like us, inexperience will kill you in the Big Ten.

by Michael Kutch on Mar 23, 2011 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Black Shoe Diaries. If you haven't already done so, create an account and get involved in the conversation.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar2_small
Sad News: 717's Own, Reading Rambler Passes On
154690_10100374022013820_13900087_66639438_4085030_n_small
Breaking Down Penn State's Inaugural D1 Hockey Schedule
At_the_foot_of_a_legend_small
My Obligatory Off-Season Book Post

Recent FanPosts

Hugh_griffith_small
Food for Thursday....The PA Pineapple Company
Psukoolaid_small
Suggestions for fun in Minneapolis?
1-joe-paterno_small
Please clarify your posting policy.
A_cullen_the_bug_small
JoePa & Esquire - and other stories
Jet_ski_jump__reef_central_avatar__small
Sandusky Jury Selection Begins June 5th
Small
Kameron Miles
Small
ESPN - reporting PSU considering schedule changes
Joepa1_small
Jimmy Johnson's worst loss

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE BLACK SHOE DIARIES STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Managing Editors

Zn_avatar_small Mike Pettigano

Img110_small Jeff Junstrom

Asst. Editors

6a00d8341c630a53ef0105369fb7ee970b-800wi_small Jared Slanina

Olmec_small Devon Edwards

Baller_small Eric Gibson

Mauti_small Cari Greene

Staff Writers

Iron_armor_small Galen

New4_good_small Nick Blonde

Turd_ferguson_psu_small Tim Aydin

On_the_way_to_grad_small Kyle_Martin

N53100510_31463067_5584_small Adam Collyer

Bus-fire-bikes_small Dan Vecellio

What-a-country-yakov_small bscaff

Small Keith Platt

Small TimHyland