The Big Ten And Bowl Games: Could Have Gone Better
I'm on the record as saying that bowl games are stupid. They're a relic of a bygone era, and serve little purpose besides lining the pockets of bowl executives. They're also a poor measuring stick for determining if one conference is better than another. Unless you think one-off, neutral site games one month after the regular season ended have a lot of probative value. I'm not trying to say that the Big Ten is the best football conference in the country. Far from it. I just don't think the small sample bowl results provide prove much of anything.
But yeah, the Big Ten didn't do great this year. 2011 was undeniably a step up from the disaster of 2010, but going 4-6 in bowls isn't really something to be proud of.
Little Caesar's Pizza Bowl, from lovely Detroit, MI
Purdue Boilermakers 37 - Western Michigan Broncos 32
Purdue held on against a fairly frisky MAC team. The Boilers turned the ball over four times, but Western did so seven times. THAT'S A LOT OF PEPPERONI!
...Or something. Whatever. Let's go.
Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl, from the actually lovely San Francisco, CA
Illinois Fighting Illini 20 - UCLA Bruins 14
I think it's probably for the best if all copies of this game were destroyed. Two teams with already fired head coaches gummed each other to death in a baseball stadium. Nathan Scheelhaase went for over 100 yards both passing and rushing, but that's about all you can say. Illinois won with only 326 yards of offense against the country's 88th ranked defense. Fun.
Insight Bowl, from the chain restaurant of cities, Phoenix, AZ
Oklahoma Sooners 31 - Iowa Hawkeyes 14
AIRBHG returned once again, as both Marcus Coker and Mika'il McCall both missed the game because Iowa running backs aren't allowed to use facebook or breathe or something. Even with both of them, Iowa probably wasn't going to beat Oklahoma. The Sooners had them in a 21-0 hole before they even got on the board in the fourth quarter, and by then it was too late.
TicketCity Bowl, from stupid Dallas, TX
Houston Cougars 30 - Penn St. Nittany Lions 14
Moving on.
Taxslayer!!!!!!!!!.com Gator Bowl, from the execrable Jacksonville, FL
Florida Gators 24 - Ohio St. Buckeyes 17
Neither team had more than 300 yards of offense. If we're going to get rid of the Illinois-UCLA game tape, we should probably ditch this one too. Horrible game between two impotent teams.
Capital One Bowl, from the 1998 of cities, Orlando, FL
South Carolina Gamecocks 30 - Nebraska Cornhuskers 13
The Huskers came out great guns forward in the first quarter, but were shut out in the final three. Kind of weird how playing a one dimensional offense against a very good defense like South Carolina's can backfire, no? The game was actually pretty close until Carolina scored twice in the fourth quarter to put the game out of reach. Oh, and this happened.
Outback Bowl, from the giant strip club known as Tampa, FL
Michigan St. Spartans 33 - Georgia Bulldogs 30 (3OT)
Playing for field goals is a winning strategy. Just ask Mark Richt.
Michigan State didn't play their best game of the year by any stretch, but they took advantage of sloppy play on the part of Georgia to get back in the game.
Rose Bowl, from the quite lovely Pasadena, CA
Oregon Ducks 45 - Wisconsin Badgers 38
Everyone's prediction of "Whoever has the ball last wins!" was almost right. Then Oregon's defense had to go and mess things up by holding Wisconsin's offense scoreless in the fourth quarter. Both offenses put on an absolute show in this game. I would pay good money to see this game made into a best of seven series.
Allstate Sugar Bowl, from the delightfully filthy New Orleans, LA
Michigan Wolverines 23 - Virginia Tech Hokies 20 (OT)
Michigan had 184 yards of offense and won the game. Denard Robinson was held to 13 yards rushing. How did they win then? Well, because they are apparently immune to penalties, and because Virginia Tech was calling plays like they didn't know they had a 6'6" battering ram for a quarterback. Also, was this a touchdown by Danny Coale?
I'm still not sure, but I kind of think it was. Coale was probably the star of the night. Not just because of that. He had 117 yards receiving, and also was responsible for the single greatest fake punt DERP of all time.
Be sure to become a fan of BSD on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter!
158 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hate the bowls.
I only watched Penn State’s this year and honestly almost didn’t (and after the way it went kinda wish I hadn’t!).
I have ZERO interest in any other games (watching them or the results of them), including the so called “national championship” game.
A playoff system, while obviously not perfect yet still infinitely better than what we have now, can’t come soon enough for me.
The only thing worse and dumber than the bowl games is judging conferences by how they do in the stupid bowl games.
I did the same.
I was in full boycott of the bowls this year and have not watched anything outside of Penn State. Even that was difficult to do for obvious reasons.
The BCS is ridiculous system and the remainder of the other bowls are just another game — mostly meaningless.
I’m done with watching bowls going forward until a playoff is adopted.
_______________________
I actually really like the concept of the bowl games
but they’ve gotten so watered down now that you have 6-6 teams playing. A playoff would be better for naming a national champion but you’d still lose out on a lot of what makes the bowls cool. My solution is to just not name a national champion at all. Win your conference and go play a good team…be happy with that.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 9:53 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I didn't see you posted this
I posted something similar below. How about instead of 35 bowls, we have 10 or so and cut the other meaningless ones out. And all of them are played on New Years day.
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
From a competite standpoint 10 makes a lot more sense, maybe 13
So that all the top 25 teams at least have a chance. The exact number isn’t all that important. But we all know this isn’t about competitiveness, it is about money, and as long as the bowls and their sponsors make money, they’ll find excuses to keep playing as many as they can. The only solution is to not watch/go.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
At least you didn't go to Detroit
Although it was admittedly a little fun to watch Purdue and WMU try to out-turnover each other. Where else can you get two turnovers on the same play TWICE
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
The two turnovers in one play plays in that game were amazing
One person can see a play and say it’s good football, another person can see the same thing and call it bad football. When a guy catches someone returning a turnover and punches the ball out, I am always thrilled. I think that’s good football by virtue of awesome effort and a refusal to accept this terrible disaster.
I am also really glad Purdue won.
It was the same player both times too
one was the result of Gooden carrying the ball like a loaf of bread, the other was solid defense
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I don't want a playoff
I want a maximum of 10 bowl games. That way its actually a privaledge to play in a bowl game. 6-6 Florida versus 6-6 Ohio State is almost as retarded as 7-5 Florida versus 7-5 PSU.
The size of the pool for college football is so large that even a playoff wouldn’t really provide any sort of consensus national champion. Lets keep college football college football. Rivalries should continue to matter more than bowl games, and winning your conference should continue to be a bigger deal than playing in some one off bowl game.
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:05 AM EST up reply actions
I loved the bowl games back when there were about that many of them.
Rose, Orange, Sugar, Cotton, Gator, Liberty, Sun, Peach, and Bluebonnet – those were enough for me.
Add in Holiday Bowl
and I agree. Unless Bluebonnet became the Holiday Bowl….
I looked it up.
Bluebonnet Bowl ran from 1959 – 1987. Holiday started in 1978. Yeah, add the Holiday for an even ten and that’s it.
Exactly, keep the older bowls, and maybe a few new ones to round it out
The think I like about the bowl games is the history. There is no history in the Little Caesar’s Bowl. If they really want to add a few new bowl games, how about The Man Up Bowl, and play it outdoors in the north.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
Yes of course
They’ve been good to us over the years
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:35 AM EST up reply actions
There is some recent history for the Little Caesar's Bowl
it was started in 1997 as the Motor City Bowl. As far as bowls go nowadays, 14 years isn’t THAT bad.
Fire Dan Snyder
I totally agree with this as far as why I hate a playoff system idea and like bowls
But rather than cap the number of bowls overall, I would rather just have a higher W/L record bar. Like you have to win 8 games. That might bring down the overall number of bowls, but wouldn’t lock out the 2nd tier teams from having 2nd tier bowls. There can still be 25 bowls or whatever, and Tulsa will still play Cincinnati…or whatever…while the 1st tier conference bowls would only be picking teams that we’re interested in seeing, i.e., Wisconsin v Oregon would still be played (I thought this was a pretty thrilling game) as would Michigan State v Georgia (this was also pretty good), but no 6-6 OSU or 6-6 Illinois.
With a playoff you could still have the bowls.
Make the “top” bowls the sites for the playoffs on a rotational basis for the semi-finals and final. All the other bowls could still exist, just like the NIT in hoops.
If they are playoff games, they stop being bowl games
A playoff solves the problem of naming a national champion, but that is about all it does.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:18 AM EST up reply actions
I really don't see the difference between having
Pitt play in the BBVA Bowl under the current system or if there’s a playoff. Either way it’s a meaningless game.
And there are currently about “total bowls – 1” right now that are meaningless. All of those, sans the ones with the playoff teams (which should be limited to a field of 16), would be just as meaningless under the right playoff system.
None of the bowl games I've attended
have been meaningless to me. I remember all of them. I am proud of the ones PSU won. They were memorable experiences for me, so I’m sure they were memorable experiences for the PSU players in them, especially the majority of them who graduated and went on to real life. And I’m not just talking about the Orange Bowl or the Rose Bowl.
But if we adopt a playoff system and kids grow up truly believing all the bowls are “meaningless”, except for the ones you string into a playoff or whatever, it would certainly lessen that aspect of college football. In my opinion, the bowls are only meaningless if you 1) constantly state that they are meaningless, which some of my friends do, and 2) only care about having an NFL-style champion in an epic game akin to the Super Bowl, rather than having many, many teams worth of college athletes play in a postseason which gives fanbases an excuse to have fun bowl trips or watch their teams on TV with family and friends over the holidays.
I say it below but I'll re-emphasize
let the bowl games exist separately. Who cares if they want to continue, let em do what they want. If the Orange bowl still wants to be all Orange Bowly, go for it. Put a 2 week break between the playoffs and the Championship game and let the big bowls play with the teams that got knocked out. Or have them earlier and include some teams that didnt make it in. You’re still going to make money. People love football and will watch it no matter what.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
I've heard this before
As I’ve heard many playoff scenarios. I used to be on the fence, because the desire to have a playoff do the best possible job (seemingly) of “fairly” determining the national champion is alluring. But that’s never really been what college football is about. The status of being undefeated, the total disappointment of having an undefeated run end with a regular season loss, those are things I love about college football. One big game is all that matters each week. That’s why I am way less interested in pro sports and find the college basketball regular season unwatchable, and why I HATE this LSU v Bama BS. It is the antithesis of what I find most attractive about college football.
Considering that’s my biggest draw, there is no playoff format that is acceptable for me. Add to that the likelihood that any playoff format would expand and require semi-pro conference realignment to have even divisions, and it’s basically like pro football. Since it’s probably heading that way anyway and much of what I like about college football will eventually be gone, it’s kind of useless for me to even argue about it anymore.
by PSUCharmas on Jan 5, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with all of this
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
I dont see why we cant have 10 bowl games
and a playoff. Let the playoff determine the national champs, and everyone else gets to compete in the bowls. Have the bowls towards the playoff finals or after the NC game and the teams that didnt make it get to play in those so you dont have only bowls with crappy teams.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
The bowls will become the NIT
and who cares about the NIT? Of course, based on the comments on this thread, it is pretty clear a lot of people already don’t care about most of the bowl games already, so maybe we aren’t losing all that much…
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
Newsflash.
The bowls already are the NIT of football.
Only ONE game matters….the rest are all exhibitions.
and this year the ONE game doesn't matter
It was already played in November and determined the SEC west winner.
I just read.
I disagree
There are still some prestigious bowls that match up two good teams. Those matter to me, at least. If Penn State didn’t win a MNC but still had a chance to win the Rose, Orange, Sugar, or Fiesta (hell even the Cotton and some of the other older bowls), I’d be stoked. If they had a chance to win the Little Caesar’s Bowl, my reaction would be, meh. I’d hope they’d win but it wouldn’t really excite me one way or the other.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
But why couldnt those bowls exist with a playoff?
And really, the only game that does “matter” to all of college football is the MNC game. Only because it crowns a champion. The rest are only as meaningful as we make them. So people put a lot of credence in winning a BCS game, but what do you get from it? A chance to brag and the university and put it in the next years media guide (though they can do that with any bowl they win). Let them exist as a consolation prize to the teams that lose in the tourney, or to the teams that didnt get in but still had good seasons. Hell, let them compete with the playoffs if they want. Though I dont see that working out well for them.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
I don't understand how the BCS National Championship Game is not an exhibition
I get that you want a playoff and that you don’t want to watch any bowl game except for the BCS National Championship Game, but why do you even give THAT game credibility? This year it’s a rematch which, for me, pulls the rug out from under the notion that the BCS rankings successfully pulled the true #1 and #2 teams this year. I don’t care that much about it.
On the other hand, I thought watching both Wisconsin and Michigan represent the Big Ten against premier teams from other conferences were infinitely more watchable. For those who abjectly hate these teams, hell, isn’t watching to root AGAINST them more interesting than basking in the faux glory of watching an SEC West rematch?
Note that, if we had a playoff system, we might have a more “fair” determination of the national champion, but there could theoretically be an SEC West rematch every year, or every few years, and I prefer a system that prevents that in favor of only-once-a-year games between any two teams and competitive bowl matchups. That’s just my opinion, but I also think that’s a reflection of traditional college football.
you're going to lose bowls like the Beef O'Grady Bowl or whatever
but who cares? The big bowls will still draw in people. I mean, if you have a 12-16 team tourney, there are still teams that wont be getting in (like Penn State). Maybe have them play in the Cap One Bowl against another team that didnt get in. Or have the bowl wait until the second week and take some of the people that got knocked out. Sure, the focus is going to be on the playoffs, not the bowls, but thats what it should be. Thats the reward for doing well. But you can still have Bowls and teams getting rewarded for a decent season. I dont see why we have to have some sort of compassion for crappy little bowls. Tradition went out the window a long time ago when they kept adding stupid bowls like the San Diego Credit Unioin Pointsettia bowl.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
I'm pretty meh on determining a national champion
I care much more about winning the conference against teams that I have a natural hate for. I like seeing good match-ups, which is exactly what having fewer bowls would do. But a play-off would just drag the same shit out, and after the first round I wouldn’t care, unless PSU was still in it, and then I’d only kind of care.
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
Agree
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
I agree with Breezy
I used to love New Year’s Day when the 4 major bowls were on. Maybe a couple of "minor’ games the week between Christmas and New Year’s. Now we have Bowls for a month before Christmas (even on Christmas), between Christmas and New Year’s, and after New Year’s. I am tired of it and have watched limited games.
Still have 5 days before the MNC game. And it sucks that it is a replay! I will probably watch some or most of it, but the last thing I want to see is two SEC teams playing.
Of course, all the PS bs has me so depressed, I don’t care about anything else until we get some leadership up there.
If you are tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department normally uses water.
yeah
I’m a little burned out on bowl games this year. I havent watched nearly as many as I have in the past, and I’m ok with that right now. I think its probably just from being a little worn out after this whole season, but I have to say, college football has definitely not been as awesome this year as in the past. I’m looking forward to what is hopefully a much better 2012.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
Even worse than the title game being so late...
…are the bowl games AFTER it! Those are an even bigger “I don’t give a d*mn!” to me.
No doubt we're all bitter with how much BS we've dealt with this season
It’s soured my football palate a lot. I still watched a good number of bowls – I watched as much as I could on Jan. 2nd to see all those B1G teams and as usual had a lot of disappointment.
One thing I always try to remind people who hate the “too many bowl games” or “everyone gets in bowl games” phenomenon is that bowl games are a reward for players and schools. If Tulsa gets in the Lockheed Space Race Bowl and they play on Wednesday, Dec. 19th some year, because they were 9-3 in a conference that you don’t even watch, why are they even on your radar screen? If you don’t think that’s a good game, don’t watch it. There’s no sense in complaining because teams with winning records from 2nd tier conferences get to have a postseason with whatever revenue they get out of it. Wishing “all these bowls” would go away, just because most of us don’t want to watch them, is not significantly different than wishing that Tulsa was barred from having an NCAA football team because most of us don’t want to watch them. If they’re allowed to have a 2nd tier conference, why can’t they have 2nd tier bowl games?
And I realize that a lot of people want to cut deeper. Only have 4 bowl games. Or 1. Whatever. The same logic tells me that I have no grudge against bowls that offer a postseason to also-rans in big conferences. Those of us who regularly attend bowl games get a cool trip out of it and another month of thinking about our favorite team participating in our favorite entertainment pastime.
by PSUCharmas on Jan 5, 2012 9:54 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Don't some teams actually lose money on bowl games, though?
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:00 AM EST up reply actions
Most do
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
That just makes my point even better
If a school like Tulsa is wiling to lose money on sending its team to a 2nd tier bowl game, to reward its fans and players, how can we, fans of a 1st tier conference school, say with a straight face, “I don’t like that there are so many bowls. All the bowls that you could make are cancelled forever. Might as well just cancel your program because unless you can become the next Boise State, even if you win 10 games a year you can’t have a postseason.”
Someone suggested raising the threshold
That would be better. Must win 8 games to be in a bowl. Then small schools get to play other small schools and we don’t have to watch undeserving teams play in bigger bowls than those small schools anyway
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions
I see your point
But honestly, if I were a fan at a school like Tulsa, I think I’d rather drop down to FCS and try to compete for a national championship than play in some mostly forgotten bowl game that can’t even fill a stadium. I’d see it as a patronizing. I guess you can hope to become the next Boise State/Utah but how often does that really happen. I’d actually like to hear the perspective of a fan from a school like Tulsa.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
Wow Clemson got rocked!
But in the big picture nobody outside the state of S. Carolina, unless you’re a USC or Clemson fan, cares about that. So, embarrassing as it is to Clemson, after today’ the rest of us will forget how bad that was. But, it was the Orange Bowl, in prime time and on that obscure sports network, ESPN.
Our game was awful. However, outside PA and PSU, Pitt and maybe OSU and Michy fans, nobody gives a rat’s ass. At least the Tickey City Bowl was at 12:00 before the parades were over, on an obscure channel and nobody cared (except for our fans) about the game before hand.
If you are tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department normally uses water.
Personally, playing the Orange and Sugar bowls in the middle of the week seems to downgrade their importance.
I thought it really took away from the supposed importance that used to be associated with the major bowls. Also, Clemson/WVU was actually a BCS bowl? When Boise St played two weeks ago? Neither team deserved in a BCS ahead of Boise, though at least WVU won their conference. Clemson was the 2nd place ACC team. The BCS needs to be scrapped. Just go back to the old system and their will be better bowls and matchups.
I just read.
by BMAN13 on Jan 5, 2012 8:22 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Actually, didnt Clemson win the ACC
and VT didn’t?
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
well nobody cares about clemson
I can guarantee that.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
sorry, fucked up and guessed on the wrong one
I forgot how solid Clemson was all year and deserved to be there.
I just read.
so I guess you feel that Clemson/WVU was a worthy Orange Bowl match up?
I didn’t think either team was good enough to be there, whether they won their conference or not. It was a total blah game, in my opinion. I am sure fans of each school feel differently but I felt there were better teams that could have been chosen. Just think how many Houston could have scored on Clemson. That game may have had 150 total points, more than Baylor and Washington.
I just read.
Any BCS bowl featuring the Big East Champ is blah
and has been for some time now
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
Has been ever since Miami left.
Sorry WVU, but that’s the truth.
Big East actually...
wins BCS games. The ACC is truely terrible in them.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Well
The Big East champ is usually playing the second or third place finisher in some other conference. And even that doesn’t always work out so well for them (See Florida versus Cincinnati)
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
so...
they still win. Clemson was the ACC champion.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
They may have won the ACC, but they were only ranked 15th.
Who you play definitely matters. The BE does not regularly draw top teams in their BCS game.
BE is 7-7 all time in BCS games. Three of those wins were by Miami, a team that’s been out of the conference for 8 years.
Big East got slaughtered in some BCS bowls against top ranked competition (Florida, Oklahoma) and have usually won against lesser teams (Wake, GT, Clemson, etc.). They also have been slaughtered by a non-BCS conference team in Utah. Their best wins by a team not named Miami were WVU’s wins over Georgia and Oklahoma.
Since 1998 (BCS inception) the BE has been in only 3 championship games (Miami twice and VT once, winning only once) and have been in none since ’the defections" in 2004.
To sum: The BE has never had an at-large BCS bid, usually gets embarrassed against top ranked teams, hasn’t been in a NC game since the 2002 season and hasn’t won a NC since the 2001 season. I think that pretty much shows where the BE stands in the grand scheme of things.
WVU...
is 3-0 and has beaten Georgia, Oklahoma and Clemson. The Georgia win was in Atalanta. Is the BE great? No. Are they better than the ACC in BCS games? Yes.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
I thought it was the other way around, either way, one of them did not deserve to be there.
Also, the entire qualifying conference thing is a joke. The entire BCS is a joke and if you disagree that is fine. But as long as it exists as it currently is, we might as well go back to the old system of major bowls since there is no push among the media or NCAA to junk it and go to a playoff. The media wouldn’t be able to set a championship based solely on hype, so they would lose $$$$ in advertising and spin coverage and of course the bowl execs wouldn’t be able to line their pockets and hold meetings in strip clubs based solely on the television dollars for games. Guess they could still meet in strip clubs to decide if teams had moral issues.
I just read.
I would love to go back to the old system
and scrap the bcs, and especially this ridiculous schedule. I don’t want to see football after new years day, except for MAYBE one game.
the hype for the championship is stupid. just play the game. FIne a day after or the weekend after, whatever.
Its not a championship. Its the BCS championship and actually has nothing to do with the NCAA college football season since it based solely on the hype of teams and not on field performance. You should not be in a championship game it you don’t win your conference, Also, over a month after the regular season, neither team is playing like they were at the end of the year. This year’s rematch means nothing and is a slap in the face to LSU who took care of business during the actual season, when they were supposed to, in my opinion. If LSU loses to Alabama do they get the rematch or because Saban is the Alabama coach, he gets greater leeway to lose. I don’t know but I would bet LSU would not be there even though they played by far the toughest schedule of the best teams in the country.
I just read.
BMan.... I hate the sytem too.
And I always hated how a team that didn’t win it’s conference could get into the championship game. But just recently I thought (I’m slow) how it happens in professional sports with wildcard teams so it doesn’t bother AS much now.
Still, in the pros the wildcard teams earn their way to the title game in the playoffs. In college football what would be a wildcard team in a playoff system is simply awarded a spot in the game, which isn’t right.
back in the day there were only like 20 maybe 25 bowls
so the 6-5 teams, 7-4’s, even some 8-3s did not just go to the bowls cause they had a winning record. that made them bowl eligible, but didnt necessarily guarantee them a spot.
So teams, in order to get an invite, might schedule harder OOC games to build their resume. a 7-4 UCLA team that played Colorado, Michigan, Miami and Air Force may look better to the sun bowl than a 9-2 Utah team who played Fresno, BYU, Houston and Southern Miss out of conference.
There was an interesting article related to this a few months back that I enjoyed, I’ll see if i can find a link to it.
But the main problem is now there are 35 bowls, every team who goes 500 is entitled to the pay day. so 70 teams go, and to ensure you get one, your OOC sucks so you can get 3-4 wins (or 5 in Big East country) and you only need 1 or 2 conference wins to go. No one cares anymore if you go to teh Cotton Bowl or the Hoveround Jazzy Personal Motorized Vehicles.com Bowl. Just go, get your payday, and move on. ANd you know, if they dont care, then I dont care.
Exactly.
Games after 1/1, except for the championship game (and it should be immediately after 1/1, if at all after it….not a week later) is the way it should be.
Ironically, wasn’t the 87 Fiesta Bowl the first bowl game to be scheduled after the traditional 1/1 (when 1/1 wasn’t on a Sunday)?
I think it was.
Jan 2nd is the farthest I am willing to go.
I'm with you on the BCS
I’ve long been a proponent of a playoff system. I’m ok with auto-qualifiers, but I think if we do a playoff, every conference should get one, including the non-BCS ones. Thats just me though.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
I agree, also no wild cards. Conference champs only
If ND wants to play, they have to join a conference.
I just read.
OMD, Blasphemy!!!!
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."
They hold meetings in strip clubs?
I need to apply to the BCS.
Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?
by psuphysicist on Jan 5, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
I usually love bowl games
and try to catch some of most of them. But starting last year, and especially this year, I just couldn’t get into it at all. I didn’t want to hear the people commenting, or even see the people playing the games. Nothing to cheer for in my opinion. The only thing I care about is PSU and maybe a couple local smaller schools. The rest of it just seems ruined to me.
That was pretty much my progression, too.
I didn’t watch very many last year…didn’t even watch much of the champ. game. Now this year I’m down to only the PSU game, and to be honest if I were in charge PSU (and many teams like them) would not have had a bowl to go to after the season they had.
This was the first year I seriously considered not watching PSU’s bowl game (and it had nothing to do with the scandal, but everything to do with my disgust with the bowl system).
Also, that's the first I saw of the "catch"
And if that is the best/only replay, I don’t see enough to overturn a call either way.
Agreed
looking at it for the first time, my gut reaction was “I have no idea”.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
I saw the reply live.
The way they were calling the game, if the nose hit the ground and the ball moved it was going to be ruled incomplete. They did it at least one or two other times in the game.
Apparently the Pac-12 has the worst refs in the country. Didn’t know that til now. They lived up to their reputation, though.
"When I put on my uniform, I feel I am the proudest man on earth."
-Roberto
by blackjackfishtaco on Jan 5, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions
While not entirely fair...
bowl game performances matter in how your conference is perceived. It’s not a good thing that the B1G has 1 Rose Bowl win since Wisconsin’s last win there. Win some bowl games, especially on New Year’s, cough 1-9 last two year cough and people aren’t going to be OMG SEC!
It’s not a good thing the ACC is something like 2-14 in BCS bowl games.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
At the same time, is conference perception really that important?
Only SEC fans feel some sort of conference unity. Other schools at other conferences only care about their school.
by Mr. Rosewater on Jan 5, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions
I agree with this.
ESPN and SEC folks seem to be the only ones that ride this fairly recent “bragging rights” for best conference. But it is their way of getting the teams higher ranked at the beginning of the season, which does help as the season wears on. I think it started with basketball “conference toughness” but it is not done the same way using a complex means of actually ranking teams. There is still a top 25 in basketball but it really doesn’t mean a lot come tournament time, unlike for football where the biased confernence rankings can be used to put a team in the championship game.
I just read.
I was watching SVP
and his right hand man said something like, “If I’m looking in the mirror, I gotta wonder where the B1G stands as a conference.”
Guess what? NO ONE looks in the mirror and wonders where the B1G stands.
by Mr. Rosewater on Jan 5, 2012 9:44 AM EST up reply actions
conferences perception doesnt matter
realistically it started when the Big Ten started their network. the “Big Ten” as a brand then became a competitor to the major sports outlet of ESPN. That is the precise moment when, according to ESPN analysts, the Big Ten became a slow, boring, unexciting brand of football incomparable to the SEC, whom ESPN had just spent a boatload for the TV rights to, and also unleashed their SEC on ESPN logo shortly thereafter
I think conference perception actually started earlier than that
Maybe it has always been around in some form but it went to a new level after Auburn got left out of the MNC in 2004. I think just about all SEC fans took that as a slight, and here we are today.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
maybe SEC fans got all juiced then
but it really didnt become a national perception thing until the news media started talking about it. And that was right around 2007 when Big Ten Network was announced. OSU had just lost two straight BCS championship games to SEC teams in 07 and 08. Prior to ’07, the SEC had been to 1 BCS championship appearance since 1998 (LSU in 04), So its not like the SEC hads been overly dominant to this point. in 2008 ESPN poured 2.25 billion dollars into a 15 year contract with the SEC, they had to build up their brand, so the talk became about back to back winners from the SEC (over the big ten) and we were off and running…
I certainly dont give a shit about the B1G anymore
the only time it comes into play is trying to get into the MNC or BCS games. Hopefully that goes out the window and we get a playoff. Otherwise, its just so people can yell at each other about something you can never really prove.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
I never felt anything for other big ten schools.
I understand how their winning could help PSU in voter’s eyes, or more importantly their losing hurt, but I could never bring myself to root for them. I just don’t like any of them, but then again I hardly like anybody.
I feel a great deal of Big Ten unity
And while attending law school at another B1G school (other than Penn State) met people from almost every other B1G school who felt the same way. Maybe people who are from PA and lived their whole lives there don’t feel any of this unity because it’s a big state and the closest B1G school by far is hated OSU. I think that’s one of the negatives of geographically dissonant conferences, particularly the new Big East supernational conference.
I try to buy into Big Ten unity
I like the notion that you play a team hard on the field and then give them and their fans hospitality and respect when the game is over (actually respect during the game too). After Ohio State’s fairly classy reception to Penn State this year, I can’t even really say that I hate them enough to want to see them lose ALL the time. In fact, the only Big Ten school I think I feel that way about is Wisky, and that has more to do with Bielema than anything. Even Michigan doesn’t draw out the HATE in me since we don’t have to deal with them on a year-in year-out basis. Their more like that girl at the prom that thinks she’s way prettier than she actually is…I just don’t care.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 9:58 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
the reason I dont root for teams from the B1G is the same reason
I dont root for the vikings, packer or lions; the same reason i dont root for the brewers or cardinals or astros. Etc.
I dont want teams to be better than my favorite team. I am not rooting for wisconsin or michigan or Ohio State after we lose a bowl because I dont want them better than my team. I dont root for OSU or MSU or Illinois in OOC games early cause i dont want them to end up with a better record than PSU. Its natural.
I once saw South Carolina fans chanting SEC! SEC! in a bar as they watched Alabama win a game in September. I could never imagine myself chanting for the B1G as Michigan was winning. In fact I remember openly rooting for Appalachian State and Utah and whomever else.
You dont have to “hate” these teams or schools not to root for them. You just have to love your own more.
I've written this before.
PSU played ’Bama in hoops prior to the national title game against Georgia. When ’Bama took of their warmups in Rec Hall, they had on t-shirts that read “Beat Georgia”. My buddy and I thought it was really cool. None of that “SEC! SEC!” crap back then!
The chanting crap is new and is something the media has more to do with agitating fan bases.
If there was a playoff, the conferences could go back to hating their rivals. Fuck the BCS championship, it really means nothing because you really don’t know if either team is better than anyone else and this year we already found the winner when the game really mattered in November.
I just read.
with the common argument that "playoffs lessen the value of the regular season"
I find it incredibly ironic that the BCS has done the same exact thing. That matchup between the two is meaningless now because one team lost and they still get to play each other for the championship. At least with a playoff (with seeding based on conference winners or BCS rank) they would have been playing for a better seed in the tournament against an easier matchup/home game.
I'm on the Internet cause I'm an Internet thug.
#OccupyESPN
Follow @134Lounge
It has nothing to do with not loving Penn State enough
I want Penn State to beat every team it plays always. I want them to go on a run of 13 straight National Championships. But I don’t want them to finish ahead of other teams just by virtue of those other teams losing. Not only is that not exciting, it isn’t rewarding. I want Penn State to finish ahead of them by virtue of Penn State winning. I want to know that we are better than good teams, not better than bad teams.
That which we are, WE ARE...PENN STATE.
Forever.
by Nittany_Ryan on Jan 5, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
when i said
you just have to love your own more.
I didnt mean you specifically. I just meant I dont root for Big Ten teams because I hate them, I just root against them because I want to end up better than them. And one of the ways I judge that is by them losing as many games as possible, especially to Penn State
Agreed
There is a lot of Big Ten unity in Chicago, where alumni from all of the schools mix and pretty much dominate the college sports scene. There’s even a B1G charity bar crawl every year among the various alumni groups to kick off the football season, and lots of alumni from all 12 schools participate (although I did notice Penn State was the least represented, which I’m sure they are overall in Chicagoland.) There is a feeling of common experience here where most people under 40 didn’t grow up in the city, so when you meet someone who went to another B1G school, you at least have that in common. I even had a friend who is a Texas grad and huge Longhorns fan tell me that he feels left out sometimes because he’ll never get it.
by ChicagoHoosier on Jan 5, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
Had that experience in Champaign
I think the sheer distance for both Nebraskans and Penn Staters makes it hard for them to develop this kind of shared experience and commonality. For instance, when I first heard Illinois people talking about how profoundly they loath Michigan, it was the first time I felt at home in a new state.
A lot of Nebraska fans in Chicago, though
There was actually an article before the season in the Trib interviewing Nebraska alums here and they were talking about how much they were looking forward to actually fitting in now.
by ChicagoHoosier on Jan 5, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
Of course you don't think conference perception is important
because our conference’s perception sucks. If the roles were reversed with the SEC, you would think conference perception was quite important and revel in the fact that ours was the best.
"The only difference between a brown-noser and a shit head is depth perception"
-PSU_Lions_84
Yeah, I thought about that
but do I really want Ohio State or Michigan to win just to improve conference standings? I would want them to lose no matter what.
by Mr. Rosewater on Jan 5, 2012 9:45 AM EST up reply actions
Agree compeltely with that.
Never can I cheer for them to win.
I always cheer for them to
win their bowl games because when I choose to back them they inevitably lose and I think my rooting for them somehow has something to do with the result.
He completed 17 of individuals 26 passes for 192 lanscaping your yard and two touchdowns - Chan Luu
If you never want to win a national championship, then go ahead with that.
I view it more as a win-win. If they win, great it makes Penn State’s schedule look better. If they lose, then I get to enjoy the fact that a rival team suffers.
"The only difference between a brown-noser and a shit head is depth perception"
-PSU_Lions_84
Also
do we chant “Big Ten” at games? Has that ever happened at a Big Ten game?
by Mr. Rosewater on Jan 5, 2012 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
That's conference unity, not perception.
"The only difference between a brown-noser and a shit head is depth perception"
-PSU_Lions_84
I dunno about that
Im a Big East basketball fan. I have to deal with people tell me how overrated the Big East is. Doesnt make me root for Villanova or Pitt or Georgetown, like, ever. I still smile when Pitt is bounced inevitibly prior to the Final Four. It still drove me up a wall to see UConn win a national title last year.
I tend to agree...
with the basketball thing, but the Big East’s perception as the best basketball conference gets it 11 teams in the tourney and favorable seeds. It does say something about the strength of a conference when it’s 9 place team wins the tourney and doesn’t lose a game in the non-conference.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly.
I’m not saying we’d buy into conference unity like the SEC, but we’d all certainly take a better perception of the B1G as a whole. Even though the current BCS system sucks, we have to play within its parameters, and a better conference perception leads to more votes and better SOS computer numbers.
"The only difference between a brown-noser and a shit head is depth perception"
-PSU_Lions_84
ok but
the SEC has the chance to go 6-4 in bowl games this year
They will still be called “The best conference EVAR” becuase all that matters is who wins the MNC game. The only thing I actually rooted for this year was maybe Wisconsin getting a shot for National Title and winning. and I think the only reason Id root for that is just to shut everyone up about the SEC. Its the same reason I wanted Okie State to get a chance. an SEC/SEC game is the worst case scenario for people tired of the overrated SEC.
wrong
during the 90’s no one gave a shit about which conference FSU or Miami were in. In fact rival teams rooted against them in their finals. It is a very new media based perception that conferences should care what their brothern do. And makes no sense. I want my rival to lose. Did many no Pittsburgh, PSU fans root for Pitt to win in the 70’s, I sure didn’t. I put the qualifier in there because I can see people rooting for a team that has local players. I only root for a BIG team if I don’t like the opponent, that and I usually root for NW and I kind of like Iowa. But watching Pelini blow up against USC was kind of fun until the chanting started and then I thought, what a bunch of losers.
I just read.
You're mistaking conference perception with conference unity
Never said you’d start rooting for rivals. All I’m saying is that all of us would rather see ESPN talking about how great the Big Ten is rather than the SEC. This would lead to more votes our way, better computer SOS numbers, etc.
/cue the “I couldn’t care less what ESPN thinks” responses.
"The only difference between a brown-noser and a shit head is depth perception"
-PSU_Lions_84
Conference..
perception is why you have Bama vs. LSU and not LSU vs. Okl. State. It matters in recruiting.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
I cant buy that at all
as of right now the Big East, C-USA, and MAC are all 3-1. Am I to believe they are the best conference out there?
No...
but how is winning 1 Rose Bowl in the last decade not a bad thing for the B1G? How is 1-9 in the past 2 years in the New Year’s games not a bad thing? If you are going to play the games, might as well win them.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
im not sure location has 0% to do with that
I wont pin all the losses on location, but put 2 similar teams in a game 50 miles from one team and 700 from the other and it isnt an easy game.
The B1G lost 6 games this year…. Oregon in California, Florida in Florida, South Carolina in FLorida, Houston in Dallas, Texas A&M in Houston and Oklahoma in Arizona.
I wont blame it all on that, but its no surprise the two best major conferences (outside the Big East) are where all teh bowl games are played.
I don't buy the location argument..
very much. This year, the B1G lost 6 games because it generally stunk as a conference this year. Oregon had no homefield advantage, Iowa had more people in Arizona than Oklahoma. PSU had as many people as Houston there from what I can tell. Nebraska travels really well.
The location argument is a weak one in my opinion.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
The PSU team..
I saw would’ve lost to Houston on that day no matter where the game was played. I can buy location with respect to USC in the Rose Bowl, but not in this bowl game.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
its not just about fans
travelling, living out of a hotel, etc for players and coaches is not that easy. It can make a difference, particularly when two teams are close.
And its not just the B1G either. Look at other bowl games, theres pretty much at least one team that is playing close to home. You dont think there may be a different outcome if Georgia Tech plays Utah in Atlanta instead of El Paso TX? Again, im not saying its THE definitive reason, Im saying I think OSU/Florida can be a different game in Cincinnati, Wisconsin/Oregon can be different in Green Bay, and Penn State/Houston could be different in Pittsburgh.
Not if Rob Bolden is the QB.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
by Esteban d' Amur on Jan 5, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
Well, at least judging by attendance at the actual games...
it seems like a lot of people are getting burnt out on bowls, including most teams own fans. [insert bowl executive excuses about the economy being bad]
I know I’ve watched a collective 1 quarter of football other than the PSU game (and not counting glancing at the other games on other TV’s during the PSU game).
Honestly, the sheer number of bowls is ridiculous. Not only does it water down the accomplishment of making it to a bowl, it also diffuses my interest in even the good games. Slap a ridiculous system for determining a national champion on top of that (and this year’s uninteresting all-SEC championship game that is a rematch of a dreadfully boring game -at least according to anyone that doesn’t like low scoring games), and me being a little bit pissed (fairly or not) at most of the B1G about the whole trophy name thing, and I’ve just got a whole lot of apathy.
The only thing that might make me care is if I was in some type of football pool, but I’ve always thought that if you need to bet in order to make a football game interesting enough to watch, you might just be looking too hard for reasons to sit around all day on the couch. I can do that without betting by watching something else that is actually interesting.
Slapping BCS bames in the middle of the
week has to hurt attendance. I just burnt a week of vacation to visit my family for the holidays. Meanwhile my pile of work is waiting for me becasue I didn’t remote in like I said I would becasue I was too busy eating and drinking myself into a nice happy coma.
Yeah, I’m going to come back to work for a day before jetting off for a few days more for a football game.
Sometimes you have to choose, Family, Work, Football game. I’m not saying its and easy choice, but it’s a choice.
He completed 17 of individuals 26 passes for 192 lanscaping your yard and two touchdowns - Chan Luu
What's this mess?
Where did my comment go?
He completed 17 of individuals 26 passes for 192 lanscaping your yard and two touchdowns - Chan Luu
The refs...
last night (the Wivoet (sp?)) were actually good. They didn’t blow plays dead too quickly. I was shocked. Shocked.
11/9/11 - the day the music died.
The bitter with the better.
Munchak is gonna be on Mike and Mike at 9:30 for those who care enough to listen/are not extending their ESPN boycott to radio programs as well: link
Never ever ever ever
will I listen to that shit show. Rarely did before, but never again.
I don’t listen to the show. But I am curious to see if they try to make it awkward for him or anything
Oh I am sure......
that the pompous duo will indeed connect the dots to JS and JOE. What do you think..Hell it’s tWWL!!!!
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."
I would love to see Munchak
call them a bunch of assholes. But I doubt it.
I’m not aware of Mike and Mike’s reaction to the scandal. So not sure Munchak has any cause to do such a thing
On the drive in to work on the first day after
after being appaled by the reaction on 94 in Philly, I flipped over to them real quick and the best way I can describe it was they seemed to open up a lot of speculation that Paterno was directly responsible for what happened.
Their reaction
was pretty much the same as the rest of the ESPN chucklefucks, IIRC.
"Every time you go to that cook-off you get drunk as a poet on payday!"
Let us know how it goes
IT says we’re not allowed to stream radio at work anymore.
"Every time you go to that cook-off you get drunk as a poet on payday!"
It was "slowing down the network"
and now my workday is even more boring. Yay.
"Every time you go to that cook-off you get drunk as a poet on payday!"
I don't know what I would do without
my choice of listneing alternatives. And we get horrible actual radio reception where I am.
Sure
Said it was flattering that his name came up but it was a problem that it came up in the middle of the season. Considered himself “blessed” to have two jobs he’d love but is happy where he is/has work to do in Tennessee. Appears to be moving back to NFL talk now
Well that sounds like a good response.
I mean, classy and all that stuff. Not good if you were hoping for him as a coach, and based on the names we have ehard he would be near the top for me.
Stupid Dallas?
Hey, I did find out that some guy named LeeHarveyGriswald kilt my President JFK. And they parade the cattle through the streets and you can select the cut of your steak from the line. And the Grassy Noll has a sign on it, designating its place. What the hell is the Grassy Noll? And Cowboy Stadium! Now there’s a cathedral. And “they” academics since an attraction is the School Book Suppository. And the local women aren’t as intelligent as you think. Some of them fell for my BS. And speaking of BS, both President Lackey and Davey DisJoyner attended the PSU Pep Rally and were rightfully “booooooed”. Tom Bradley had a sustained 2 minute standing “O”. You figure it out. AND WELCOME to Day 5 of 2012, NHC* (that’s *NoHeadCoach) in case you missed it the other day.
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."
by DerryPharmer on Jan 5, 2012 9:17 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Derry’s remarks are direct anecdotal evidence from his daughter … me
And I didn’t waste any money in Dallas – I was proud to be there & support the people who deserved my support.
I'm glad
Whenever I get a chance to go to a bowl game I try to find stuff to do that I enjoy, whether the bowl game goes well or not. And as with any trip, I’ve had hassles associated with traveling and locals, so I totally sympathize with that. I think the chance to go somewhere on a trip over the holidays with thousands of other Penn Staters and, hopefully, have some good weather is what college football bowl season is all about. It’s part of what I’ll miss if college football adopts a playoff system that trivializes the bowls.
..."they" STRESS academics....
sorry…don’t have enough book learnin’.
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."
Points = good game?
I know this is a bowl recap and not some kind of philosophical analysis of football, but there’s a really strong message in the article. Points and offensive yards make for a good game. Games with very few offensive yards are messy, boring and bad games. This goes against the mantra that Penn State has a great tradition of winning with stubborn defense and the other mantra that B1G football is about tough defense that makes even good offenses look “bland” to the rest of the uncouth world.
I’m not trying to defend or reinforce those mantras, just curious if anyone else noticed the article’s unmistakable message that points and yards = good football.
by PSUCharmas on Jan 5, 2012 9:47 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I noticed it, and I happend to enjoy defense more than a track meet
This is why I watch football and not basketball (also possibly due to my being a Penn Stater). Though it would be nice to have strong defense and a competent offense – this is when football is most exciting.
This is why the ticket whatever bowl was so disappointing from a PSU perspective.
Concur in full.
"The bended knee is not a tradition of our Corps."
by ReadingRambler on Jan 5, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
its really a matter of taste
some people like pitchers duels, some like slugfests. Some people like soccer cause most games are excitingly close, some hate it cause that means its low scoring. Personally, I donty care if its 7-6 or 55-52, as long as its close. I would never call a 70-36 game “exciting” though, unless its PSU with 70
Not necessarily better, but more entertaining
Just my opinion.
I saw a girl crying tonight. When I asked why she said: "Because everybody lost."
Black Shoe Diaries
@runthedive
While the B1G didn't look good
The fact that I picked all but PSU to lose actually helped me in my family bowl poll this year. And I picked against them strictly because in my heart, I wanted PSU to be the only B1G team to win (and if scUM hadn’t cheated, I would be in first place). I am WAY over the fact that I am supposed to cheer for/root for the other conference teams. Even though that may not be the popular response, I just don’t care anymore – first of all, way too many bowls, as has been said here; and secondly, I only cheer for/root for one team – Penn State. I may hope for certain outcomes, but don’t expect me to be leading the o-h-i-o chant anytime soon. Or to see me run out & buy anything with a freaking badger on it.
I, like many of you, also did not watch any games until I was in Dallas to watch My team live. Part of it was due to my boycott of e$pn (& despising 95% of their announcers) & not wanting to hear any mention of my team if they weren’t actually playing), part of it was due to sheer apathy. And while I was disappointed with the outcome in our game, I feel strongly that the events of the last 2 months just finally got to everyone. I also want to share my first hand observations:
- It wasn’t the outcome we wanted, but I have never been more proud of a Penn State team in all the years I have been watching. The players and coaches have already conducted themselves with the utmost class and respect, and continue to do so. I spoke personally to each of the four co-captains, and I was treated like royalty as an alum. They were so appreciative of what I said & were gracious & humbled by my compliments & well wishes. I also had the unique experience of talking to many other players & coaches, as well as PSU media members (in the press room).
- Tom Bradley worked every room/field/function as if he was the host of the entire bowl experience. He is one of the absolute classiest men I have ever met. He is stronger than I will ever be. He is friendly & compassionate. And he is very passionate.
- Erickson & Joyner are the anti-Bradley. They actually received low level, yet audible, boos when they were announced at the pep rally. Additionally, while in attendance at an alumni association function on Sunday night at the team hotel (where I also stayed), Tom received a standing ovation. These two reacted like they had never seen one before, and especially not for Tom. They were actually dumbfounded as to how to react to it. And then while Tom proceeded to pose for about 200 pictures with alumni, these two jokers stood in the back of the room, for the most part, and "talked amongst themselves". My take on it was that they only talked to people if they were approached, or they spoke only with those they received as "big donors". They could have cared less about the "riff raff" like me. They should have been stopping at every table (over 600 of us were in there) & maybe at least pretend to give a shit what we think. Instead they acted as I think they truly are – Erickson is a talking head/puppet; Joyner is an arrogant, self-promoting SOB with a clear agenda-one that does Not have any regard for what any alumni think or feel. I refer to anything the two of them do in regards to anything as "Theater of The Absurd". On a side note, Joyner kept up his role as assclown by doing the following – Sean Lee was at the hotel on Monday evening. He came up to the lounge area, and was of course, mobbed by fans. Instead of letting people talk to him & get a picture or an autograph, Joyner stepped in front of some people waiting in line, and monopolized him for a good many minutes. Sean is way too decent to have said anything. Had I not met him in the lobby a few minutes before that, I would not have been so nice. I would have stepped in front of Joyner & asked him to move.
- I also learned that while I may be obsessed with reading blogs & checking Twitter every hour, I don’t believe any of it. Not until the cast of jerkwads in University admin actually make an announcement regarding the HC will I believe it. And even then, I may have to double check. I spoke firsthand with too many of the people involved to not feel any other way – as certain things were being reported as gospel on the Interwebs, I was talking to said parties & they were telling me the truth … which was generally the exact opposite of that was being "trended" in a tweet.
Overall, I enjoyed the trip with my second family (the BFF & her parents) and my Nittany Lion family. I was honored to meet so many great people, who I can now call friends. We Are and Always Will Be Penn State. God Bless.
by PghNittany on Jan 5, 2012 10:44 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
Awesome.
Just awesome. Really glad to hear all the stuff on Bradley and the team from a first hand source. Also glad you had such a good time. Thanks for the insights.
.....that which we are, WE ARE;
One equal temper of heroic hearts
He may be a battering ram, but he's also slow when he runs any direction but straight ahead.
I’m not sure it would have been a good idea to run him much more than they did against Mike Martin and Ryan Van Bergen.
"The bended knee is not a tradition of our Corps."

by 




























