Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

Penn State – the 2nd private school in the B1G?

http://www.centredaily.com/2012/02/08/3082315/psu-funds-slashed-districts-escape.html

Would it be possible to amend Penn State’s charter and become a private school?

I’ve been toying with this idea for years because for as long as I can remember, the president had to battle it out with the state legislature over budget issues. Based on 2011 numbers, state funding accounts for 6.6% of the total budget and 14% of the general education budget. The 2012 budget proposes a 30% cut. To be fair, this is not targeted specifically at Penn State, but state-related schools in general (Pitt, Temple, and Lincoln). The budget calls for 20% reduction for state schools.

As we have all known for years, and as recent events have dramatically brought to the forefront, the relationship between the administration and state politicians is extremely complicated and seemingly rarely focused on providing the best possible education. With all relationships, it’s a two way street and I do not trust either party. The politicians are going to manipulate the university for political gain, while the administration, specifically the BOT, will do the same for business reasons. Neither party is innocent. But wouldn’t it be better to at least remove one half of this mess?

I understand the concern that should Penn State go private, there are two obvious issues. First, the BOT will probably be able to do its business under the cover of darkness, as it will no longer have political pressure or be required to submit to “right to know” regulations. I don’t have a good solution for that.

Second, tuition will go up. If I did my math correctly, 14% of the general education fun divided over 80,000 students results in approximately $3,000 in subsidies per student. (Side note, as an out of state student who paid double the in-state tuition rate, this $3,000 subsidy does not seem add up. I’m pretty sure I paid at least $12,000 more. Someone will need to explain this to me). With a 30% increase, that’s only $900 more per student. Yes, $900 is a significant amount of money.

But let me ask you this: Is $900 worth the huge food fight we might see played out in the media? Is it worth commissioning a new panel to research higher education in the state and possibly reduce the number of branch campuses – which, by the way, reduces the cost of education by allowing students to live at home while pursuing a quality degree? Is it worth all the finger pointing and smear tactics we have seen over the past 3 months? Is it worth all the threats of investigation and interference that in the end could simply be a game of smoke and mirrors for the governor? Is it worth all the strings and regulations? Lots of questions, but not many answers.

We have to admit, 6.6% of the general budget and 14% of the general education budget does not amount to much and hardly qualifies us for being a “state-related institution.” With the proposed budget, that would bring state contributions down to 4.6% and 10.8%, respectively. To me it seems like they are giving us just enough to placate us while requiring a whole lot more on our end. Truly, how do we benefit? Why stay in a relationship when, from all appearances, it is very one sided?

I’m interested to hear your opinions as this topic hasn't been discussed much.

Note: I have no experience with university budgets or legal expertise in anything, and I’m sure there are many other details involved with changing a land-grant university to be a private institution.

Aww, look at you. You created a Fanpost! Any content from a premium site that requires a subscription will be deleted once we catch wind of it. If you simply want to share a link, quote, or video, please consider using Fanshots instead. Thanks.

Comment 62 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm not opposed to this...

Here’s another related article:
http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2012/02/06/corbett_calls_for_tying_aid_to_open_records_.aspx

I think it seems like a very interesting idea. But it’s a very complicated issue. I do agree that the administration needs to be more honest about what it is doing. I do NOT think that it is the state government’s business. If the administration is going to be more open, it is because it is responsible to US, not to some politicians.

If the state continues to give less and less funding to Penn State, I do not see why PSU should feel obligated to do anything. To me, this is creeping towards extortion and/or blackmail, as well as being extremely political. Penn State should have NOTHING to do with politics and everything to do with providing education.

If you read Erickson’s statements (albeit out of context), they seem to be leaning towards privatization, too, in addition to the student BOT member’s statements.

I would like to see a study done by the university that says, “This is what it would take for PSU to become a private institution, and this is how much extra tuition would be required by the students right now, etc.”

"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things." - JoePa

by tadhg on Feb 8, 2012 8:42 PM EST reply actions  

If there was some way to actually enforce transparency

I would be in favor of ditching the state funding. I think PSU could do without the money by cutting some spending and raising tuition (which happens anyway, at a ridiculous pace). But I have no faith the leadership of PSU would structure things in appropriate, balanced power structure if it went fully private.

Consider this my official declaration of non-support of child molestation.

by 06Lion on Feb 9, 2012 8:28 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Funding is only part of the equation

to having a reasonably priced education. There has to be some cost control as well. Universities act like every dollar lost in revenue has a negative impact on research and education, yet somehow it was a good idea to build a building over a road. PSU (like many universities) went on a building spree as part of the educational arms race to have the nicest of everything, and now the costs of maintaining all of that infrastructure have come home to roost. At some point there has to be some reckoning in this country’s higher education system about expenditures.

For example — I send my kids to a K-8 parochial school where the building is ancient (they don’t even have a proper gym) and the technology is sparse, with one computer per classroom ,and the tuition is quite reasonable, especially compared to other private schools in the area and the public system that has fancy new buildings with technology everywhere. Yet, the kids at this school crush all of the quantifiable measurements (re test scores) by many grades, and all of the alums I talked to when I was checking it out said that high school was a piece of cake, mostly because they had already been exposed to and mastered much of the 9th-10th grade curriculum. Which means that great education can be done on the cheap because it’s the teaching that counts, not the dollars spent (this is not meant to get into a public/private elementary school debate, I realize the public schools have many more constraints).

Would more state funding make PSU a better school? Maybe. Would a true commitment to improving the actual teaching there by reviewing lecture methods, incentivizing professors better, improving the feedback forms, and paying more attention to the quality of TAs make PSU a better school? Absolutely.

by PSU Mudder on Feb 9, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

There has to be some cost control as well. Universities act like every dollar lost in revenue has a negative impact on research and education, yet somehow it was a good idea to build a building over a road.

This times a billion (and I was an IST major). Stop complaining about the loss of state appropriations/increasing tuition AND building such freaking expensive buildings all the time. It’s ridiculous. The administration are just as bad as the politicians. If PSU didn’t spend money it didn’t have, it wouldn’t be as dependent on state appropriations and wouldn’t need to increase tuition by 15% every year*.

*This statistic is totally made up but I don’t think it’s too far off the mark.

by PSUMark2008 on Feb 10, 2012 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

while it is true that you don't need the great facilities to give a good education, you just need great teachers,

it is also true to some extent that the great teachers are going to be more easily lured if you have better facilities than elsewhere. Of course personal compensation will probably be the biggest lure (followed closely by school reputation)

by The JuggerNitt on Feb 11, 2012 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

This was always one of Spanier's goals

I don’t know if he ever stated it publicly, but it was.

Penn State is in every practical way a private school that has a contract with the Commonwealth of PA that calls for lower admissions standards and tuition for in state residents in exchange for some tax dollars. The economics, Constitutionality, and other general what-have-you of such an arrangement are things that (1) I have an opinion on and (2) won’t share in this forum. But that’s how it is.

What’s good is that if Penn State feels that it’s in the best interest of the institution to cut those ties, they’re free to do so. What’s bad is that there’s a BOT that has very ably demonstrated that the true best interest of the institution is not something that either (1) they know or (2) they care about.

GO IOWA AWESOME

by ckmneon on Feb 9, 2012 5:14 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting

My experience is Graham was dead-set against privatization. On Tuesday evening I was speaking with a trustee and an ex-trustee (who I’ve known for a few years) about a number of topics (you can imagine) and they both know that I have long been in favor of privatizing the U and stopping this charade. We all agreed a Cornell-styled system was an excellent model, decide which branches to keep (all, some or none) and give what’s left back to the state. Corbett essentially threw the gates wide open and the gauntlet down a week or two ago when he made a comment that PSU needed to decide what it wanted to be – public or private. He seemed to be saying, “please, decide private.” We immediately go from the most expensive “public” institution in the country to a damn fine value in private education (even with a large tuition increase).

Humanum est pati.

by Smee on Feb 9, 2012 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Not keeping any branch campuses?

How would that work? Hardly any of the branch campuses could self-sustain, I would think.

I agree about Spanier. My general impression was that he favored the land-grant ideals of the university.

I've been downhearted baby, I've been downhearted baby, ever since the day we met . . .

by Joe 96alum on Feb 9, 2012 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

My belief had been the branches

mostly ran at break-even. The ex-trustee (a financial guy) said several (Behrend for example) do turn a “profit” but most lose bucks every year. The primary reason they are kept around is for the legislative support — reps and senators with a branch in or near their district are more likely to support PSU appropriations. If PSU is private there is little motivation to keep any that don’t run in the black.

Humanum est pati.

by Smee on Feb 10, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Just to talk to myself

If the branch campus I went to (Beaver) got cut off, you could probably just neutron-bomb it because there’d be no reason for it to exist if it’s not someplace where people can start on a Penn State degree.

I’m now remembering that when I was at PS-Beaver there was a group of guys from inner city Philly there. The rationale was that they wanted in-state tuition while getting as far away from their home environment as possible.

I've been downhearted baby, I've been downhearted baby, ever since the day we met . . .

by Joe 96alum on Feb 9, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

First- What is Corbett’s deal with Penn State? He clearly doesn’t like the university. What does is his political gain for slamming us at every opportunity or is this just a personal thing? I would imagine that with PSU grads comprising a large percentage of the population his attitude/actions against the university would be bad for him politically.

Second – Would now or the near future be the best time to do this PR wise? I feel like we would take another significant hit with a change like this.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 10, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Corbett just seems to be for privatization across the board.

I think this is just one example of it. Without getting into politics, it seems like a recent trend from Republicans has been to aggressively push privatization and cut state reliance. I also wouldn’t surprised if he or prominent supporters of his campaign had a way of making a sizeable profit off of the privatization of the school. If the BoT becomes a board of directors, and he has control over some highly coveted spots at a crucial time, I could see it being worth his while. This would also help him in terms of the public backlash as I’m sure he’d get a bunch of campaign contributions from the people he placed on the board of directors.

/cynic

It is easy to go down into Hell; night and day, the gates of dark Death stand wide; but to climb back again, to retrace one's steps to the upper air - there's the rub, the task.

by Succss With Honor Always on Feb 10, 2012 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

If it were to go private,

I don’t see how he in a public role would have control over BOD nominees.

"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things." Joseph Vincent Paterno 1926-2012

by Paige2PSU on Feb 10, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

He has control over several of the current BoT positions/members.

The BoT would be the people to determine the structure of the privatized administration. It’s also likely that they would determine who would fill the positions they create (most likely a board of directors). While Corbett wouldn’t be directly involved in the process, having the ability to place people in those positions of opportunity is still a very big influence on the process and one he could leverage for campaign contributions, promises for future business decisions and any other lascivious political dealings you want to speculate. I’m not saying it would happen, just that it could, especially if the person is more concerned about their own welfare more than the people they are elected to act in the best interests of.

It is easy to go down into Hell; night and day, the gates of dark Death stand wide; but to climb back again, to retrace one's steps to the upper air - there's the rub, the task.

by Succss With Honor Always on Feb 10, 2012 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I realize he has control over the current BOT positions,

but if they were to privatize, I’m not sure that he would still be able to exert the same influence. It really would depend on the bylaws and how the Board would be appointed.

"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things." Joseph Vincent Paterno 1926-2012

by Paige2PSU on Feb 10, 2012 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. This was just me being a conspiracy theorist.

It is easy to go down into Hell; night and day, the gates of dark Death stand wide; but to climb back again, to retrace one's steps to the upper air - there's the rub, the task.

by Succss With Honor Always on Feb 10, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

What forum would you share those opinions

I’m interested in hearing them. I have no background to form a good opinion, but find this topic to be very interesting.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 9, 2012 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

I hesitate to say it should go private.

I understand the frustration with the annual battle over funding, but I’m afraid going private means tuition will just skyrocket even more than it already has, since the university will then be able to use the lack of funding as an excuse for more hikes. State universities are supposed to make college affordable for state residents.

But I can also appreciate the jaundiced eye many cast at what a lot of non Penn Staters perceive to be a bloated institution. The amount of new construction on the campus since I was there just boggles my mind. As was mentioned above, good teaching is more important than shiny new facilities. Someday I’d like to see an analysis of why tuition increases always seem to far outpace inflation. I mean, teaching physics and literature hasn’t changed that much, has it?

The school would become even more opaque without any kind of connection to the public through the legislature, which I wouldn’t like at all. State universities should be subject to open records laws.

I don’t know how it would affect branch campuses for things like the Cooperative Extension that work with local farmers.

I've been downhearted baby, I've been downhearted baby, ever since the day we met . . .

by Joe 96alum on Feb 9, 2012 9:04 PM EST reply actions  

It's competition...
Someday I’d like to see an analysis of why tuition increases always seem to far outpace inflation.

Part of a schools value is how smart the people are who are already there. In order to attract talent, you have to invest in the things that attract talent. New buildings look good to students, their parents, and professors who come on interviews.

The other factor is the incredible increase in how many people go to college now. There’s a huge bubble and the college-going population right now is immense. You might think more students would mean more money and no need to raise tuition. However, the demand for good schools remains high enough that plenty of talented people will pay to go there. The most qualified don’t pay. The most needy don’t pay (as long as they are qualified too). Among the rest of those who do pay, the rich would pay any price to get their children every advantage. And the middle class wants their children to have fewer struggles than they did (so they’ll take on ridiculous amounts of debt for the promise of that). Then students face the rest of that debt (but only after they graduate… not something you think about much as an 18yo kid). Besides the students options are what exactly? The only good option other than college is learning a trade because no one is doing that right now, but our culture teaches the smart kids they HAVE to go to college. College is now an institution in America for 18-21 year olds.

I thank my parents every day for talking me into going to PSU to get a very good degree for about $12,000/yr. I work everyday with people who have elite educations that they paid $35,000+/yr for and yet I started my “life” with 1/3 of their debt and in the same position. It would be a shame for PSU to lose the ability to provide that and it is a shame that more people don’t see the value in having something like this available in their state.

I get people are sensitive about the budget bloat, but the market is what it is. The state has to be willing to pay market value. Paying <5% of the budget is a mockery of what a state school is supposed to be… for all purposes we are already private… and that’s not PSU’s fault.

by BNittsDeMilo on Feb 10, 2012 12:03 AM EST up reply actions  

the bubble will burst and everyone will die

Larry Appleton
Is the Perfect reason not
To talk to Strangers

by WorldBFat on Feb 10, 2012 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

community college is a viable option for getting an education (at least in the basics) while avoiding the massive debt.

Of course, what you get with a degree from a prestigious university isn’t just the education, but also the connections and brand recognition that your education entails. Plus people just assume you are more intelligent and/or capable if you graduate from say an Ivy league school vs a community college. That probably holds true overall on average, but there are some really smart community college products, and some very dumb Ivy League grads.

What a lot of people fail to understand is that a lot of these infrastructure investments aren’t necessarily to lure the students (though that is one aim), but it is to lure the top researchers/professors in the fields (particularly the big money fields). With that comes the big grants, and also acts as an advertisement for the university for other professors and students.

by The JuggerNitt on Feb 11, 2012 11:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of Community Colleges

Speaking about my own that I teach at, we have been taking it upon ourselves to work with other state schools and larger schools within PA to ensure that our credits tranfer over nicely. Before schools like Penn State would not tranfer over some credit that studetns took at community colleges since they are not up to standard. Now we have almost complete transferability, which really helps the students who leave after their 2 years.

A few years ago there were a ton of students that were coming to our community college because they could save on cost and then have complete tranfer credit to a 4 year school. Those numbers have dropped a bit, since out admins have their heads in their collective asses and don’t know what marketing is used for and how to get these types of students again.

Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose - Janis Joplin

by AriesGD on Feb 11, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

The Community Colleges in Alabama have a lot of power.

They got a law passed in the legislature that the major state universities have to consider classes from community colleges equivalent to classes at the major universities at least for Core Curriculum classes. Some community colleges meet those standards, but many do not. We get people in our major with 3.5 GPAs from some community colleges who cannot write a sentence in proper English.

"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things." Joseph Vincent Paterno 1926-2012

by Paige2PSU on Feb 13, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Community Colleges in Alabama

I’d hope Auburn and Alabama have some power in the state…

Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?

by psuphysicist on Feb 14, 2012 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Honestly, not as much as K-12 and Junior Colleges.

K-12 has its own separate budget from everything else in the state.

"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things." Joseph Vincent Paterno 1926-2012

by Paige2PSU on Feb 20, 2012 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not going to rail on community college (or even for-profit colleges)...

because they generally serve people who are not likely to be served (or not served well) by traditional colleges and because education is generally a good thing…

But there is a qualitative and quantitative difference in terms of employability between someone holding a Harvard degree, a PSU degree, a degree from Millersville, and a degree from a community college. That is not a judgment of their actual on-job performance, but rather the perception of the value of that degree upon graduation. And if education is an investment, it has to pay off. Community college doesn’t have to get you as good of a job as a PSU degree if it was cheaper to get and could be gotten while still working full time. It still does have to get you something though… and I’d say the vast majority of people I know are graduating and not getting jobs that would be considered remotely in their field or “good jobs” of the type that have a clear path to advancement.

My concern about higher education is that the more people who see this and who this happens to, the more people you could argue would be better off not going in debt. I KNOW I could be making more money right now and have no debt if I would have gone to trade school for welding or to work in a machine shop. I know my ceiling is lower that way, but I wouldn’t have to dig out of $40,000+ in debt (a low estimate for most major college tuition right now… with some schools wanting that for 1 year).

In short… it’s freakin’ crazy.

by BNittsDeMilo on Feb 13, 2012 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I know and experience exactly what your talking about

I think one aspect that is beginning to hamper people these days when looking for a job, and I am definetly speaking from experience, is that colleges have been expanding their degrees. Meaning that for every job these days there is a specific degree to go along with it. Therfore unless you have that specific degree, you need not apply. So if you want to change careers or anything of that sort, your now forced to go back to school and incure even more debt for the possibility of getting a new job.

Years ago, and not to long ago, degrees can be easily transferable for carerr paths, you can start out as one degree holder but have a career in somthing that you never intended, and no one thought anything differnet of it. I have been desperately trying to get a full time job for 4 years now in higher education. I am either to educated, or undereducated, never exactly educated. Even to be a academic advisor, I don’t have the correct degree, even though I do that daily while teaching my students, and many come to me asking my advise on their career paths. Yet when I apply for a position in this at a school, I do not have a degree in Higher Ed, so basically need not apply. I have talked to people who work in University HR, and told me I am more than qualified for the job, but don’t have the correct letters behind my name, so I will be overlooked when they sort through the job applicants.

So no matter where you go to school, the exact degree you get really will limit you , unless you know exactly what you want to do with your life. Heaven forbid you try and get a job doing something outside that major.

Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose - Janis Joplin

by AriesGD on Feb 13, 2012 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Cold meds?

Or hurry? Or rented fingers? :-)

Alea iacta est...

by PSUGuru on Feb 13, 2012 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Missing something?

What are you alluding to?

Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose - Janis Joplin

by AriesGD on Feb 13, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

there were a few typos, that's my guess

by the way, I think you should stake claim to “Carerr path: a career path one errs in choosing.”

by The JuggerNitt on Feb 13, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Ja,

I just found it humorous that you corrected somebody in another post and then seemingly went on a tear of your own…Karma and all that.

Alea iacta est...

by PSUGuru on Feb 13, 2012 11:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I mispell all the time

My fingers don’t agree with my brain often. I know this, so poke fun at others when they do it, just b/c I do it all the time.

Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose - Janis Joplin

by AriesGD on Feb 14, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I whole heartedly agree with this. I have a very specific degree, that is an extremely good degree, but I currently feel I am only able to market my abilities to a very narrow audience because I have no proof in anything other than what is written on one piece of paper. Why are we compelling 18/19 year old kids to make such a milestone decision as to what major they want to pick well before they probably know what they are getting themselves into. I wish I had known more before I had to make that decision.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 15, 2012 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

there is definitely correlation between the "tier" of school and the capabilities of their graduates

but I believe 100% (or maybe I should say 99% since I’ve already claimed in another thread how much I’m against absolutes) that an education is what the student makes of it. Outside of the prestige and connections one gets from attending those higher tier schools, I think the biggest factor is just how capable the student is (i.e. if you took the valedictorian from Harvard and went back in time and had him go to a community college, he’d still do just as well in life, again adjusting for the connections and brand prestige, which of course is impossible to actually do).

I also think that these higher tier schools have such good graduates more because they have the ability to accept a higher tier of student. Like in the above example, if you took the freshmen classes from both Harvard and a community college, and completely switched them around (so that the Harvard students were receiving a community college education and vice versa) that the Harvard standard students with the community college education would perform better than the community college standard students with the Harvard education.

Now, I do believe that for the most part the better schools will have better professors who can do a better job of teaching the material and challenging the students, but I just don’t think it has as much of an effect as people assume when they see the brand name and prestige. Of course I also am fairly confident in my ability to just pick up a textbook and (assuming I have already learned the prerequisite material) learn just as much as from a classroom.

I think the whole role of the classroom and teacher-student relationships is going to have to change in the (hopefully near) future. I was listening to NPR a couple weeks ago and they were talking about how lectures are pretty much outdated. They used to be important, especially before mass production of books, to convey information, but now it is stupidly easy to find any and all the information you want. What a professor should really be doing is engaging the students and facilitating their understanding of the material. Seriously, how many lectures consist of the professor basically just reciting the chapter of a book in powerpoint form? How useful is that? But I digress.

by The JuggerNitt on Feb 13, 2012 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

This...
They used to be important, especially before mass production of books, to convey information, but now it is stupidly easy to find any and all the information you want.

The internet destroyed what it means to be educated. Efficiently finding information is now more important than knowing information. And thinking critically about that information and coming up with brilliant new ways to use it is being “smart.”

And, if I’m being frank, this is why our K-12 educational system is falling behind… we haven’t adapted our teaching to this reality. Not to mention we spend too much time “managing” children rather than teaching them.

by BNittsDeMilo on Feb 14, 2012 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

True, but you also have to know something and have been trained to some extent so that you are able to test the information you are finding to know that it is accurate and true prior to thinking critically about it.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 15, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Shoot me an email

I have a video you’d probably be interested in watching. Too political to post on this site though.

We Are because You Were
Black Shoe Diaries

by Kyle_Martin on Feb 14, 2012 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Shirtless Putin washing his car?

"Goodnight, Gorbachev"
I say and kiss my pillow
In my bed alone

by WorldBFat on Feb 14, 2012 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Been there, seen that

Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose - Janis Joplin

by AriesGD on Feb 14, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it really easy for the University to go private?

Would we have to compensate the state for all of the funding we have received through the Land Grant Act, etc?

Personally, I see no real value in becoming a private school. I’m happy I went to a state-school; it’s part of the personality of the university, and a good part. Moreover, the desire to try to run away from the Sandusky scandal is understanding, but wrong-headed in my opinion. PSU needs to take a real hard look in the mirror and address the problems, regardless of the university’s status vis a vis the commonwealth. The PR problems of becoming private — and the way the university would be seen if they chose to do so — are worse than what we’re facing otherwise.

I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.

by spakajewia on Feb 10, 2012 10:52 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

The land grant question

is why we have lawyers – they’ll work it out. Especially if the state wants it to happen. And the original money (in the form of the “land grant”) came from the feds rather than the state. The Cornell model I mentioned above seems like one viable solution to those issues.

Humanum est pati.

by Smee on Feb 10, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

For those of us unfamiliar...

Would you mind expanding a little on what the Cornell model is? Obviously Cornell University, I got that. But what or how they did it?

Penn State... from the outside you can't understand it, and from the inside you can't explain it.

by tadhg on Feb 10, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

The down and dirty...

Cornell is a private university that also satisfies its status as the land grant university for the state of New York. You can get a general overview HERE and more detail on how it fulfills its land grant mission HERE.

Humanum est pati.

by Smee on Feb 10, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

And, going off-subject for a bit

If you like hiking gorges and waterfalls, within 10 miles of their campus are three state parks with AMAZING hikes: Taughannock (highest falls east of the Mississippi), Buttermilk, and Robert Treman.

Humanum est pati.

by Smee on Feb 10, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

The land was federal, but the states had the ability to give the value of the land

to universities of their choice. at least that’s my understanding. i’m sure i could look this up. but the present-day value of those holdings is no-doubt significant.

But besides the really hard logistics, which shouldn’t be dismissed, I fail to see the point.

Why become private? Could someone explain this to me clearly in 500 words or less?

I wouldn't trust old rooster me neither.

by spakajewia on Feb 10, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Because we want to be like Northwestern?

Nope, that’s not it…

Penn State... from the outside you can't understand it, and from the inside you can't explain it.

by tadhg on Feb 10, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I just thought it was worth asking if all the strings associated with being “public” are worth it if we don’t receive much financial benefit. I’m sure there are other benefits that are not financial, I just do not know what they would be. If we can keep tuition the same, or at least have direct control over revenue/tuition rates, without all the strings, would’t that be better? I’m not saying I’m right or wrong. Just interested in the discussion

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 10, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I second this

I don’t really see the benefits, save a reorg of the BoT.

Whittle your whiskey around like blazes, t'underin' Jaysus, do ye think I'm dead?

by psuphysicist on Feb 10, 2012 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure of many of the benefits...

but one is not receiving a double-whammy from state cuts every time the economy goes down. Down economies tend to not bother well-managed Universities and the towns they are situated in (this is why “Happy Valley” got its name) because people go to school MORE when the economy is worse. But each time the state pulls more funding because of budget shortfalls, PSU has to absorb that in an already shaky economy. And do state revenues ever return to their previous levels? I don’t have a historic record of that, but I don’t imagine our budget is only 5% state funded because they enjoy jumping right back in to support PSU when the money comes back. Instead the sentiment from politicians becomes, “Well, they seem to be doing pretty well without our funding…” We could be doing better with it.

But, at least if PSU were private (and assuming if had smart leadership), we wouldn’t get the rug pulled out from under us every time the state has to grab the “oh shit” handle.

Another benefit is the incorrect notion that private schools are better than public schools. Sorry… lots of people think that. Just ask anyone from Penn how much they cringe when someone says, “oh, you went to Penn State.” About as much as I cringe when it happens the other way around… but for different reasons.

The real solution to this problem, though, is to make sure the tax payers understand the value they get from PSU regardless of whether they send their children there. It is an economic engine across the entire state. It gets and keeps talented people in the state. It is a far better investment than more prisons, endless expenditures on PennDOT construction and maintenance sites (which should be privatized so there’s incentives to actually finish jobs on time and on budget), and any number of other social welfare projects (many of which would not be necessary if people were better educated). This wouldn’t be a topic for discussion if PSU’s funding level showed a commitment to actually supporting a first-rate school in the state.

by BNittsDeMilo on Feb 10, 2012 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm no expert in this, but a few benefits are

1. Prestige. Dumb as it may be, private universities get more respect than public ones do – even if they offer similar educations.

2. It would eliminate this constant need to increase tuition because of reduced funding. They could set a budget and know exactly how much they’ll be receiving each year (well, better than they do now). Note that I don’t think it will stop them from hiking tuition at will, but it would remove what has been their key excuse for doing so over the past 10 years.

3. It would ultimately force the issue of restructuring the board. Again, there’s no evidence it would be a better structure, but it’s a hope.

4. Someone mentioned this earlier, but I think Penn State’s (in state) tuition is somewhere in the neighborhood of 14k a year right now. As a public school, that is outrageous. But as a private school, that’s a pretty good value. Again, this benefit is really in perception only, as the actual education should be unchanged.

Are these reasons really good enough to cut ties with the State? I’m not so sure. But at this rate, I think it’s likely that Penn State won’t have a choice in a few years as they watch their funding get slashed yearly.

by ppfcpp on Feb 10, 2012 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm a mechanical engineer who had to move to Maryland after I graduated in 02

to get a job. I’ve always wanted to move back to PA, in part so that future children (my wife is due to have our first at the end of March) could go to PSU and pay in-state tuition. But if the cost of PSU becomes to great, I will absolutely NOT move back to PA. I’ll move to northern MD, or (god help me) VA. Particularly if I think my kid will want to follow in my footsteps for a STEM degree. PA/Pitt were really the only realistic options for those of us whose grades were good enough to get us into any engineering school in PA, but NOT good enough (and whose parents weren’t poor enough) to get significant scholarships at the private schools – none of which were actually better than PSU at the time.

So yes, Corbett needs to realize that he is actively chasing engineering talent out of PA. I, and many like me, will go where we our kids can get the best value for education, K-12 and higher.

by PSUEnrg02 on Feb 10, 2012 12:09 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

I started in MD, went to Penn State, and ended up in VA. Of the three I’ve lived in, VA is the best. It’s time for you to cross the river to the land of lower taxes and good colleges (minus Penn State of course). MD has nothing that VA doens’t have.

The majority of my engineering classmates left the state.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 10, 2012 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

The People's Republic of Maryland... sheesh...

Penn State... from the outside you can't understand it, and from the inside you can't explain it.

by tadhg on Feb 10, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I also graduated with an ME degree and moved to MD, but in '10.

Since there seem to be several engineers on here, did anyone else feel that the teaching abilities of a lot of the engineering professors at PSU right now is very poor? Most of my professors were brilliant, but absolutely unable to pass that knowledge on.

I got a great education, but I’d put that a lot more on my effort out of class (with other classmates) than on the help of my professors. Heck, there was usually at least oneclass every semester that was barely even worth going to because the teacher did nothing but read word for word from a powerpoint file that I could read myself online. I’d really like to see Penn State make a push to improve the teaching, rather than just the facilities that most undergraduates barely even see.

by ppfcpp on Feb 10, 2012 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

My experience with the professors was 50-50

Half LOVED teaching and had professional experience in industry and did a fantastic job of preparing us for “the real world.” The other half LOVED research and didn’t care at all about teaching. This might be difference because I was an AE and that department tends to be more practical. We had a ton of hands on experience that I didn’t see friends in other majors getting. That being said, I think they have room for improvement.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 12, 2012 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I've always wanted to move back to PA too...

but so many things about the State are not very progressive… and cuts to all levels of the education system doesn’t make me likely to bring myself back there to start my family closer to home (unless, of course, I can afford a private education for my child… just another way for the upper classes to separate from the middle and lower classes).

by BNittsDeMilo on Feb 10, 2012 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

You want value?

Move to DC. My understanding is that students who graduate from DC high schools (not sure if it has to be a public high school or not), can qualify for in-state tuition at any state university (so, PSU, UCLA, it doesn’t matter).

The only problem with the plan is that you actually would have to live in the District.

"I just want everyone in this situation to man the fuck up and accept some of the responsibility." SwHA

by kijana's acl on Feb 10, 2012 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe you just need to be a DC resident.

I don’t know if you even need to graduate from a DC school. But like you said, you still have to live in DC and have paid for 18 years of private school if you want your kid to be able to read before they go to college. That being said, living anywhere BUT the city might be a better financial decision as out of state tuition is still less than most private k-12 school tuition.

Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, We Are - Tennyson

by belbijou on Feb 12, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Apologies if any of you are "older Pennsylvanians"

but PA really ought to switch their lottery to a model that some other states have adopted… which is to use that money to support free in-state tuition at Universities. TN, when they set up their lottery did this (including tuition at privates like Vanderbilt for the kids with the grades to do it), and there are a lot of people there who decided to stay in state who would have otherwise left. They had GPA requirements that had to meet to maintain the scholarship, but otherwise they were getting a completely free education.

Allow kids to plant their roots in your state and you help stem some of the brain drain. Gives incentives for people to want to come back to the state to raise their families. Prevents your tax payer base from having to dig out from under crushing debt, which has to help the economy and get people to care less about having to pay taxes. None of these things are bad.

Not that helping older Pennsylvanians is bad, but it does sort of send the message that PA is a good place to die but not a good place to be born…

by BNittsDeMilo on Feb 13, 2012 6:26 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

plus, it will wind up still helping older Pennsylvanians

when there is a greater tax base to support them, plus better qualified people to take care of them

by The JuggerNitt on Feb 13, 2012 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Black Shoe Diaries. If you haven't already done so, create an account and get involved in the conversation.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar2_small
Sad News: 717's Own, Reading Rambler Passes On
154690_10100374022013820_13900087_66639438_4085030_n_small
Breaking Down Penn State's Inaugural D1 Hockey Schedule
At_the_foot_of_a_legend_small
My Obligatory Off-Season Book Post

Recent FanPosts

Hugh_griffith_small
Food for Thursday....The PA Pineapple Company
Psukoolaid_small
Suggestions for fun in Minneapolis?
1-joe-paterno_small
Please clarify your posting policy.
A_cullen_the_bug_small
JoePa & Esquire - and other stories
Jet_ski_jump__reef_central_avatar__small
Sandusky Jury Selection Begins June 5th
Small
Kameron Miles
Small
ESPN - reporting PSU considering schedule changes
Joepa1_small
Jimmy Johnson's worst loss

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE BLACK SHOE DIARIES STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Managing Editors

Zn_avatar_small Mike Pettigano

Img110_small Jeff Junstrom

Asst. Editors

6a00d8341c630a53ef0105369fb7ee970b-800wi_small Jared Slanina

Olmec_small Devon Edwards

Baller_small Eric Gibson

Mauti_small Cari Greene

Staff Writers

Iron_armor_small Galen

New4_good_small Nick Blonde

Turd_ferguson_psu_small Tim Aydin

On_the_way_to_grad_small Kyle_Martin

N53100510_31463067_5584_small Adam Collyer

Bus-fire-bikes_small Dan Vecellio

What-a-country-yakov_small bscaff

Small Keith Platt

Small TimHyland