What the hell is going on!
This is being reported by Rich Scarcella of the Reading Eagle. Somebody has some explaining to do! I've sent an email to every member of the Board of Trustees with the story asking for an explanation of just what in the world is going on. Seems like every time we turn around the story gets twisted in some perverse fashion and it's harder to tell who is telling the truth and who is not.
What amazes me is Emmert and Ray stood at the same podium and Emmert said the death penalty was on the table.
So did Emmert force Erickson in to signing the consent decree under the false threat of the death penalty being applied for 4 years? Sure sounds like it from what Ray is saying!