I am amazed how the media and even attorneys have the nerve to say the Paterno Report has "No new information" or "Nothing New In the Paterno Report". DUH.
67 pages on never seen material regarding this case from Clemente and 45 pages of never seen material from Dr. Berlin. Sure some of the information in Thornburg's report has been rehashed but where was Clemente's and Berlin's information ever been widely circulated and where is this information in the other reports criticizing the Freeh report? I have read all the reviews of the Freeh report that I can find and NONE of them have any of Clemente's or Berlin's information in them.
Reading between the lines of their denial
The media and these attorneys who thought it was an open and shut case now realize they have it completely wrong and are now deflecting by saying there is nothing "New" in the report. That's pure BS! I believe they are criticizing the report to save their worthless reputations because this would be the 3rd screw up in the last month or so where they would be shown to be incompetent. So now they have put their tails between their legs and have attacked the Paterno report as a "Craftily written report to restore the image of Joe Paterno". What a crock of BS. Its a report that gets it right and they are in denial.
Not like the media were right in the Tao or the Armstrong cases. Now here's another case where these people have been shown to be completely wrong.