This has already probably been posted before so sorry for the duplicate but instead of trying to find it in a previous post I'd rather just rant about it right now....
The NCAA has not filed a response yet to the lawsuit. NCAA president Mark Emmert - named as a defendant - declined comment on individual cases last month. ''I'm perfectly fine to have an opportunity for us to state our case and have it heard in a court of law, then we'll let a legal system do its work,'' Emmert said in Irving, Texas, at a Big 12 meeting on May 30.
Ummm.....isn't this the strategy that Shulz, Spanier, and Curley did in reference to the Freeh report.....but yet they automatically were accused, sentenced, and judged without defense or prior to their defense in the courts? And by no means am I a supporter or proponent less even a believer in their innocence but I RESPECT their right to at least defend themselves before I cast judgement or issue slander, defamation, or 8+ year long sanctions that tarnish a program, a coach's legacy, or the credibility of an institution.....and why the F*** do the BOT still have the audacity to also take the same position???? WTF!
I CANT BELIEVE THIS SH*T! OMG, I'm seriously having a hissy fit in my office. I want to find some cow dung and sling it onto Emmert's office door....office desk....dashboard....pillow....bowl of chocolate crunch cereal with whole grain oats and blueberries (he's a douche).....and of course into that massive orifice of his ( you decide which one because I think they're all the same)!