Big East Football - Catch The Fever
Remember this time last year we were talking about breaking up the Big East because they were so pathetic? Nobody took them seriously. Unfortunately, the nature of sporting events is there has to be a winner and a loser. So the simple laws of mathematics means the Big East Conference had to have a conference champion. And when the meat of your conference consists of teams like Pitt, Syracuse, UConn, Cincinnati, and South Florida you're going to have some teams who feed on them and manage to put together deceivingly impressive records. And naturally you're going to have some people who take those deceivingly impressive records and extrapolate them into a belief that the Big East is a conference to be reckoned with. Today, that imbicile is ESPN's Joe Starkey.
Yes indeed. I was particularly impressed South Florida's 24-7 victory over 7-5 Conference USA powerhouse East Carolina. Or who could forget Cincinnati's thrilling 27-24 win over 7-5 Western Michigan? That was an ESPN instant classic if ever I saw one. I guess for the purposes of this article Notre Dame is officially NOT considered a member of the Big East. Oh, and if by "national spotlight" he means featuring their biggest conference games on Thursday nights on ESPN2, well then yeah ok.
None of the three plays a nonconference game against a team that was ranked at the end of last season.
Well yeah. When you play non-conference games against UNC, Ohio, and Howard and you're conference schedule features five patsies you're going to win a bunch of games. Does that mean you deserve to be lumped into the discussion with the Michigans, USCs, and Floridas of the college football world? Me thinks not.
Quick. Someone name me four guys not mentioned above who have a legitimate shot at being an All American this year. I thought so. Can anyone name me one guy not on West Virginia, Louisville, or Rutgers? No? Bueller?
Wow. There you have it. Going 4-3 in the Big East constitutes a "magical" season.
The fact is the Big East has no legitimacy. They lost it all when Miami, Virginia Tech, and Boston College packed their bags for the ACC. These teams that are contending for the Big East conference title now were the Purdues, NC States, and Texas Techs of the Big East a few years ago. Going 6-1 in the Big East is worthless now so Big East teams can only be judged by their non-conference schedules. If they choose to avoid the upper echelon of BCS schools, they do not deserve consideration for the BCS title.
0 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Uh oh
The Big East has gone from being the most underrated conference in the country to the most overrated in the span of about 8 months.
by speedomike02 on May 3, 2007 5:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ray Rice
...and if he can't turn it up, who are they going to look to in crunch time? Mike Teel? Good luck.
by Cpiritual27 on May 3, 2007 5:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thursday night games
Also, Big Ten supporters probably not to being throwing stones about top-heavy conference after last season.
by CW on May 3, 2007 7:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thursday Night Games
by BSD on May 3, 2007 8:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Almost happened
by speedomike02 on May 3, 2007 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's right
by BSD on May 3, 2007 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by Ben on May 3, 2007 9:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The ACC
by BSD on May 3, 2007 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty Shortsighted...
The reason the BE conference's OOC schedule has been so soft for the last few years is because three of the better teams left the conference. You know as well as I do that you can't schedule top quality teams in the space of one or two years in the future - that just does not happen. All the Big East teams have strengthened their OOC schedules by scheduling better teams as early as they can - they are not choosing to avoid anything.
And, it's interesting that your opinion of whether the three BE teams should have been rated in the top 15 at the end of last year differs from the Coaches poll, the sportswriters poll and the computer rankings. Give it a rest - it's not like just because the BE is getting some national recognition it sheds unfavorable light on the Big Ten somehow.
Do you really feel the need to act like the Big Ten bully? That somehow if another conference has an old rival in it you have to denigrate it? Give it a rest already.
by Reed on May 3, 2007 10:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So by your logic...
Mike's exactly right in what he says: the Big East MUST prove themselves. However, when you have Louisville losing to RU, RU losing to Cincy and WVU (both of whom were starting backup QB's), and WVU losing to Louisville and USF, it's pretty tough to justify that these are "great" teams. The weak OOC schedules do nothing to help this. Until proven otherwise, the Big East is still a lesser conference.
by Cpiritual27 on May 3, 2007 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't face reality....ban it.
Continue to insult teams that have Hiesman canidates when you have criminals, and decide who's better in your heads instead of on the field. It'll make you feel better than waking up and realizing you're no longer a top program, just an also-ran. Now I understand why it's called happy valley.
Also insult teams that play soft non-con schedules while you play powerhouses Temple, FIU and UBuffalo. And the chronically overrated ND who's only wins are against the service schools.
Ignore all the rankings, records, and everything else than the rest of the world follows. Remember the Big11 is so good that it doesn't even have to follow rules of the universe, like math.
Reality out. Go back to self-delusion.
Hail to Pitt.
by Reality on May 4, 2007 4:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice Try Stuart
by BSD on May 4, 2007 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not Stuart
by PSU Nick on May 4, 2007 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is funny
by BSD on May 4, 2007 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's Trung
by PSU Nick on May 4, 2007 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
pay attention
"Nice...take a cheap shot at Pitt for a recruit re-opening his search... Meanwhile, the same week half a dozen of your players are getting charged with crimes.
I'm sure they'll hold off on punishing them as long as possible so they can play the whole next season. What a sham. On the brightside for you, I'm sure the judge in the kangaroo court out there is a PSU football ticket holder, condsidering there is nothing else to do.
"
Funny how reality played it out. You can ban this too, and any comment that you don't like. What a sham you have running here - most people would like to expose in open thought that which was wrong so as to prove it so; here, you try not to expose any opinion that is contrary to what you think, because it could hurt self-delusion.
No one would have to "hide" their identity if you allowed open thought and not just a penn state bandwagon site.
I won't post anymore. I am well aware this is a fantasy site, and any comment dealing with reality just can not be accepted...and you think honest comment and reality is "disrespectful."
In, the end,
12-0,
Never this decade,
Hail to Pitt.
by WakeUp on May 5, 2007 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stuart needs a hobby...
By the way, what is 12-0? Because to my recollection, PSU went 12-0 in 1994. When was the last time Pitt did this? Remember, 9-4 is a lot closer to 13-0 than 6-6 is. You embarrass yourself, and your joke of a team.
by Cpiritual27 on May 5, 2007 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You need help
by Galen on May 4, 2007 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems...
Also, no one is saying the BE is a great conference - it's not. Or, that the top BE teams are great teams - they are not either. But they are playing good football and apparently in the opinion of people that actually matter, they are BCS bowl worthy.
As for scheduling, PITT has signed a contract to play ND and other quality teams in future series, and has continually tried to schedule PSU (someone keeps throwing a wrench into that) so your comment that they are dodging OOC opponents isn't quite true.
by Reed on May 4, 2007 6:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Post
Every year we have teams ranked in the top 10 that have people question their schedule. Since we don't have a playoff system, each team is compared by their resume. A team that beats Texas and Michigan, like Ohio State, deserves more consideration than a team that plays UNC and Howard. And when Big Ten teams are playing good OOC teams that makes their conference wins look even better. That's all I'm saying. We can disect PSU's out of conference schedule if you want to do that, but the fact is Notre Dame is a respected program that kicked our butts and did go to a BCS Bowl this year, so don't conveniently leave that off the list of our OOC games. Before the Notre Dame series we played Nebraska. In a few years we'll be playing Alabama which could be pretty damn good by 2010 now that Nick Saban is there.
I stand by my contention. Until the Big East schedules other powerhouse BCS schools they do not deserve consideration for the championship. It would be a travesty if a 12-0 Rutgers went to the championship before an 11-1 Florida team with one loss in the SEC or an 11-1 Michigan team with one loss in the Big Ten.
by BSD on May 4, 2007 8:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OOC?
by Johnny on May 4, 2007 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And Notre Dame
by BSD on May 4, 2007 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The thing you're forgetting...
Now, I know the Big 10 has some bad teams, namely Northwestern, Indiana and Illinios. However, how much can you expect from a Northwestern team whose coach died in the offseason? I give them a legitimate 1-year pass.
Indiana and Illinois both look promising. Indiana has James Hardy, while Illinois has Juice Williams and Arrelious Benn. These teams are up-and-comers, must like USF was this year.
I'll take 3 out of 11 bad teams vs 3 (or 4) out of 8 any day!!
by Cpiritual27 on May 4, 2007 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just having some fun Mike....
by Johnny on May 4, 2007 11:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















