Black Shoe Diaries: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Nitt Picks Laughs With Glee

I mentioned the other day that Dontey Brown was conspicuously absent from the 2008 Spring Roster. It slipped past me that Travis McBride was also not on the list of players taking part this spring. Now we know why. Both players have transferred to Cal University of PA.

The recruiting class for California University's football team got a little stronger this week with the addition of six players, including two transfers from Penn State.
...
Among them is Travis McBride, a 6-1, 200-pound running back who played in the 2006 Big 33 Game and will arrive in California for the start of fall camp.

McBride, a graduate of McKeesport High School, originally committed to Penn State. He will have four seasons of eligibility and join a stable of running backs that include Daine Williams, Windell Brown and Brandon Lombardy.

Dontey Brown, a 6-2, 252-pound inside linebacker, also transferred from Penn State. Brown's brother, Kendrick, will be a senior defensive lineman next season at Cal. Dontey Brown will be counted on to ease the loss of the Vulcans' starting inside linebackers and top two tacklers from last year, Brian Mohr and Josh Zunic.

McBride had trouble cracking the two deep his entire career, and academic problems made it hard for him to earn Paterno's favor. If you recall, he did not make the trip with the team to the 2007 Outback Bowl for this reason. Brown also had trouble making the lineup, which is understandable when you're playing your whole career behind guys like Paul Posluszny, Dan Connor, and Sean Lee. His departure just prior to his final year of eligibility tells me Chris Colasanti is probably the leader to take over the middle linebacker spot.

We're Penn State. You're not supposed to talk about basketball in March

Just a little basketball related info to share. Jeff Rice from the CDT has an excellent article on how the PSU basketball program is shooting itself in the foot by scheduling too many out of conference cupcakes.

And when selection time rolls around, unless you had won your conference tournament, you had better have a solid RPI. In the last 10 years, the average RPI ranking of the last at-large team in the field has been 61. New Mexico (74 in 1999) and Air Force (70 in 2004) are the only teams in that span to make the field with a ranking worse than 65.

The average RPI of those 10 teams was .5647, a number very close to that of this year's last at-large team in, Oregon. The Ducks had an RPI of .5658, which put them 58th in the country.

Which brings us back to Penn State. The Nittany Lions finished the season at 15-16, with an RPI of .5061 and a ranking of 157. To catch Oregon's RPI, the Nittany Lions would have needed at least seven more wins.

If that sounds like a tall order, it is (would have been). No Penn State team has had 22 wins by Selection Sunday. The last to make the NCAA Tournament, the 2001 edition, was 19-12 after the Big Ten Tournament, but got in largely because of its impressive RPI ranking of 24.

And then there's this part, which is almost laughable.

Penn State, which has played 83 percent of its nonconference games under DeChellis at home or neutral sites, has looked into scheduling two-for-ones, with two games played at the Bryce Jordan Center, but isn't likely to add any one-for-twos, which could allow them to schedule better competition.

"We've got a season ticket base we've got to sell," DeChellis said. "We have to have so many home games."

In other words, don't expect to see Texas or Stanford or Georgetown in the BJC anytime soon.

So much like in football, the almighty dollar is winning out. We have to sell tickets, and since we don't sellout any of our home games we have to put more games on the schedule. Then scratch your head when your season ticket holders don't show up for your big game against Denver. It's one thing in football where you can wave the $300,000 carrot in front of a mid-level MAC team to come to Happy Valley to take a beating, but you'll never get any self respecting Div-I basketball team to schedule a 2-for-1 with Penn State.

If Curley and DeChellis want to build a good program they could do so, but it's going to take sacrifice. It's going to take money. Make a commitment to do whatever it takes to give the players and coaches whatever tools they need to have the best facilities in the country. Then put good teams on the schedule. Call Pitt and line up a ten year series. If Pitt wants to play six or seven of those games in Pittsburgh, do it. Schedule some tough competition, because these high school kids aren't dying to come to State College to play against Bucknell and Princeton.

The Wizard Hat Wearing Snake Oil Saleman Strikes Again

I'm sure the rest of you love watching the Michigan fan base squirm as much as I do. This week they are convinced the end is near as Justin Boren, a starting guard and center in all of Michigan's games in 2007 and an All Big Ten Honorable Mention recipient, has left the team leaving Michigan desperately thin on the offensive line with just three scholarship players to plug five spots. That's great, unless you're a Michigan fan, but what the Wolverines should find particularly troubling is Boren's comments about why he left.

"I regret leaving behind my friends and teammates, but I need to stand up for what I know is right. I wore the winged helmet with pride, whether we won or lost, whether things were going well or times were tough," Boren said.

"Michigan football was a family, built on mutual respect and support for each other from Coach Carr on down. We knew it took the entire family, a team effort, and we all worked together. I have great trouble accepting that those family values have eroded in just a few months. That same helmet, that I was raised on and proudly claimed for the last two years, now brings a completely different emotion to me, one that interferes with practicing and playing my best and mentally preparing for what is required.

"That I am unable to perform under these circumstances at the level I expect of myself, and my teammates and Michigan fans deserve, is why I have made the decision to leave. To those of you outside the program, the loyal Michigan fans and alumni, I know you will have trouble understanding, but I do want to thank you for your years of support. I wish my teammates the best and will always be proud to have been a part of Michigan football over the past two years."

Wow. The family values of the program have "eroded in just a few months." Sounds like Rich Rodriguez is a great guy afterall. This isn't at all suspicious after all of his other conduct in the past few months since taking the job. I don't want to be a know-it-all, but I said it before and I'll say it again: I hope Michigan is happy with their new coach. He may bring a lot of wins, but he isn't bringing much honor to their program.

Predictably, Michigan blogs laugh Boren off as a dumb fat kid that didn't want to work, but I find it hard to believe one ascends to the role of starting at guard and All Big Ten Honorable Mention for the Michigan Wolverines by loafing through practice. When you read this very well prepared statement you get the sense this is a very bright kid with a good head on his shoulders. You can't help but wonder if all of this was happening to Notre Dame, would Michigan fans be as tough on the kid, or would they just call Charlie Weis a colossal asshole?

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It's not *almost*
it is laughable that Penn State would try to schedule 2-for-ones in b-ball.  Who's going to come in December if it's not a good game?  Besides that, where is all the pressure coming from to make these kinds of schedules to load up with home games?  Is Curley making these decisions?  Spanier? The board of Trustees? Wealthy donors?  Who's making these decisions?

by Joe 96alum on Mar 28, 2008 12:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My guess
I bet is that the Big Ten conference has some kind of revenue sharing deal among the teams, and we have a certain dollar figure we have to raise as part of our agreement with the other teams in the conference. That puts pressure on us to sell tickets. If we can't sell out our games then the easiest thing to do is put more games on the schedule.

On top of that I'm sure Penn State has a certain dollar amount they want to hit to keep for themselves. Men's basketball is the only sport besides football that acutally makes money. As funny as it sounds, Penn State depends on the basketball team to support other sports at PSU. And nobody is about to suggest we cut other programs like field hockey, soccer, lacrosse, etc.

Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Mar 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playoffs?PLAYOFFS! Your asking about the Playoffs?
Who gives a damn what your RPI is when you can't play 500 ball against scrub competition?  It's like some a little leaguer worrying about how he's going to strike out David Ortiz in the World Series.  

You have to play 500 ball to get into any tournament. Once we miss the tournament because of our crappy RPI rather than our crappy team, we can start stressing about strength of schedule and RPI.  

What did you expect Curley to say? "We don't schedule anybody good because we stink and we need some wins early in the season."

For the Glory National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994,

by jesse. on Mar 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The Point
I think the point of the article was that we could have gone undefeated out of conference, 0.500 in the conference, and still not made the NCAA tournament. We're basically not even giving ourselves a chance.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Mar 28, 2008 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get the point
This year you may be right, but most seasons that's not the case. Further, let's cross that bridge when we get to it.  Pitt got their program going the exact same way, feast on scrubs in December, get your wins up, play decent ball in the league, make a run in the conference tournament.

I know the "Pitt way" may be distasteful, but it's tough to argue with the results.

For the Glory National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994,

by jesse. on Mar 28, 2008 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WINS
I totally agree.  I don't want to play Georgetown, and the other teams that were mentioned because they would DESTROY us!  Remember what Wisconsin did to us at home when Geary got hurt?  They beat us by over 20 points!  I don't want to go to a game and see us get beat like that.  I'd rather see us play Slippery Rock and get a win!  After that start conference games with a couple wins under our belt and ride that momentum! I'd love to see us playing better teams to get our RPI up, but at the same time, were we not looking for at least 15 wins this year to get into the NIT at least?   Take those cupcakes out and see how many wins we end up with.  
Josh

by PSULion on Mar 28, 2008 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NIT
The thing is I'm not even sure 15 wins could have got us in the NIT now that I look at it. There were something like 60 teams between us and the last team to get into the NIT in RPI.

I don't think we need to go out and put Duke and UNC on the schedule, but we need more teams like Virginia Tech, St. Joe's, and Seton Hall. Middle of the road teams in great conferences that we stand a chance to beat. We don't gain anything in RPI by playing Colgate and these lousy Patriot League teams. Wins and losses are important, but the RPI is becoming the key stat people look at to pick teams for the NCAA tournament. We're slow in adjusting to that.

Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Mar 28, 2008 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The key stat will always be wins.
Penn State left too many of them on the Court this year.

15 wins would not have gotten us into the NIT but 18 probably would have, RPI notwithstanding.  

Of course we could have a more difficult schedule, but if we did, how many more games might we have lost.  Assuming you trade a home game against Denver for a road game against West Virginia or Marquette (ie middle of the pack Big East teams).  What's the difference between 15-16 with an RPI in the 170's and 13-18 with an RPI in high 90's?  You're still watching the tournament on TV.

For the Glory National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994,

by jesse. on Mar 28, 2008 2:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not much
But there's a big difference if you're 15-16 with an RPI in the high 90's rather than the 170's.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Mar 28, 2008 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i'm with mike on this
we need to at least give ourselves a chance.  besides that, even if we are going to get smoked, at  least a game between us and Pitt, WVU, ect would put us on sportscenter.  95% of the country doesn't even know what our uniforms look like.

i've never been one for sandbagging, and the sad thing is how short sided Old Main is with this...yes, 2 for 1's are great, but you have the chance to triple BBall revenue with just a small increase in talent level, yet they refuse to even attempt to fix this (ie take a small hit for 2-3 years).

by Big 11th on Mar 28, 2008 3:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Pitt
I don't think Pitt will go home and home with us in basketball until we agree to do the same in football.
For the Glory National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994,

by jesse. on Mar 28, 2008 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe we can make a deal with Pitt
and have them go 3 for 1 in basketball and we get 2 for 1 in football.

Did anyone see the highlights of the Paterno presser on SportsCenter?  That was classic.  Eating pizza, conducting a presser, and proclaiming that he doesn't need a contract!

I am starting to think that this situation is either going to get very ugly or it has already been resolved behind closed doors for JoePa to say something like that.

Pat Devlin in '08

by Nick7 on Mar 30, 2008 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why bother?
Pitt is like an old girl friend that you idealize after they're gone. You know the one, the sex was good but the rest of the time she was a moody bitch.  Pitt's the same way, the games were fun, but you don't want those people in your life.

It's best to move on, it's not worth it.

For the Glory National Champions 1982, 1986, 1994,

by jesse. on Mar 31, 2008 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Awesome
You are the early favorite for best comment/response.
Pat Devlin in '08

by Nick7 on Mar 31, 2008 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I'm saying
What's better.

A) Selling 5000 tickets against Denver and 6000 tickets against Bucknell

B) Selling 14000 tickets against Texas (or some other nationally recognized team) and having one less home game

By reducing the number of games you increase demand for the tickets. Fill those limited number of games with a few big name teams and you'll drive up your ticket sales. You increase your chances of getting on national television. Put on a good showing and you gain respect nationally which helps recruiting. You're not going to get ACC type kids to come play for you when you play a Patriot League schedule.

Mike
Black Shoe Diaries

Hail to the Lion!

by BSD on Mar 28, 2008 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you just
say California University of PA?  The Harvard on the Mon!  Wow!

In all seriousness, for a Div II program, they play some pretty good ball.  They've had a decent year and most likely will continue to do so.

Perhaps a potential opponent; say for the 2015 schedule?  ;)

The Boren situation at Michigan is one reason why I'm concerned about JoePa's future (and his successor).  Not being privy to the "inside" situation; could it be possible that an outsider, similar to the likes of RR be hired as JoePa's replacement?  I seriously hope that it doesn't happen; however, I surmise that there is a chance that it is certainly possible.  Someone please prove me wrong!    

by unitboy on Mar 31, 2008 10:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Penn State Nittany Lions.
Start posting about the Nittany Lions »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Amish2_small
Michigan State photoshop thread
Cairo_small
HATE WEEK: Michigan State!
Lenny_small
What time is it?
Lenny_small
MMM FREAKING BOP
Small
Playcalling - Beating the Dead Horse

Recent FanPosts

Psu_gr4eatestb_waa_small
RANKING THE CONFERENCES
Lenny_small
[slightly half-assed] Preview of the ACC-Big Ten Challenge - "For ****'s sake, can we just win this thing?"
1_4404_small
TV Rankings Not Easily Found.....
Camedia_pics_048_small
Wrestling Update - 'Shadow Team' Division
Joepa_rival_small
Looking Forward....Backup QB most popular guy on Campus
Sutherland2_small
2009 in a Nutshell
Small
BCS Situation for PSU
Arialndfrompsu5_small
The Bacon Explosion
Shonufffullsize_small
Tailgate/Fundraiser today!!!
Talorbattlewallpaper2_1__small
Blame it on the ball?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Lioneye_edited_small BSD

Editors

Reporter_small Kevin HD

Image_small Run Up The Score

Official Partner of CBS Sports