Penn St. Nittany Lions (5-2; 2-2 Big Ten East) vs Iowa Hawkeyes (5-1; 2-1 Big Ten West)
3:30 p.m. ET, October 27, 2018--ESPN
Beaver Stadium (Capacity: 106,579 / University Park, PA)
Tableizer using codebeautify.org
Penn State |
Value (Nat'l Rank) |
Value (Nat'l Rank) |
Iowa |
Advantage |
Rushing Offense (ypg) |
240.7 (13) |
79.6 (T - 2) |
Rushing Defense (ypg) |
Push |
Passing Offense (ypg) |
239.9 (58) |
178.6 (18) |
Passing Defense (ypg) |
 |
Pass Efficiency |
140.68 (54) |
117.06 (35) |
Pass Efficiency Defense |
Push |
Total Offense (ypg) |
480.6 (15) |
258.1 (3) |
Total Defense (ypg) |
Push |
Scoring Offense (ppg) |
42.6 (T - 9) |
14.1 (5) |
Scoring Defense (ppg) |
Push |
Rushing Defense (ypg) |
165.1 (74) |
165.4 (75) |
Rushing Offense (ypg) |
Push |
Passing Defense (ypg) |
226.9 (68) |
231.9 (68) |
Passing Offense (ypg) |
Push |
Pass Efficiency Defense |
113.34 (28) |
146.86 (40) |
Pass Efficiency |
Push |
Total Defense (ypg) |
392.0 (71) |
397.3 (75) |
Total Offense (ypg) |
Push |
Scoring Defense (ppg) |
22.0 (36) |
30.6 (56) |
Scoring Offense (ppg) |
Push |
Punt Return Defense (ypr) |
3.08 (T - 11) |
6.75 (85) |
Punt Return Yds |
|
Punt Return Yds |
10.61 (44) |
3.50 (14) |
Punt Return Defense (ypr) |
 |
Net Punting Yds |
38.97 (46) |
39.13 (44) |
Net Punting Yds |
Push |
Kickoff Return Yds |
26.83 (10) |
18.00 (T - 24) |
Kickoff Return Defense |
Push |
Kickoff Return Defense |
20.85 (70) |
30.89 (1) |
Kickoff Return Yds |
|
Turnover Margin |
+0.29 (T - 43) |
+.43 (T - 37) |
Turnover Margin |
Push |
Passes Had Intercepted |
3 (T - 10) |
9 (T - 15) |
Passes Intercepted |
Push |
Passes Intercepted |
7 (T - 34) |
7 (T - 84) |
Passes Had Intercepted |
|
Penalty Yds/Game |
51.00 (43) |
52.71 (49) |
Penalty Yds/Game |
Push |
Sacks |
3.57 (T - 3) |
.86 (T - 10) |
Sacks Allowed |
Push |
Sacks Allowed |
1.86 (T - 50) |
3.14 (T - 13) |
Sacks |
 |
Tackles for Loss (tpg) |
8.40 (T - 9) |
4.29 (T - 14) |
Tackles for Loss Allowed (tpg) |
Push |
Tackles for Loss Allowed (tpg) |
5.14 (T - 31) |
5.10 (T - 99) |
Tackles for Loss (tpg) |
|
Redzone Offense (%) |
97.0% (8) |
81.3% (T - 53) |
Redzone Defense (%) |
|
Redzone Defense (%) |
73.7% (T - 17) |
87.5% (T - 38) |
Redzone Offense (%) |
Push |
Redzone TD % |
81.82% |
68.75% |
Redzone TD % Defense |
|
Redzone TD % Defense |
68.42% |
65.63% |
Redzone TD % |
Push |
3rd Down Conv. % |
36.8% (92) |
36.8% (49) |
3rd Down Defense % |
 |
3rd Down Defense % |
32.8% (30) |
49.1% (11) |
3rd Down Conv. % |
Push |
4th Down Conv. % |
40.0% (T - 108) |
0.00% (T - 1) |
4th Down Defense % |
|
4th Down Defense % |
46.7% (T - 46) |
66.7% (T - 20) |
4th Down Conv. % |
 |
1st Downs |
160 (T - 49) |
108 (T - 8) |
1st Downs Allowed |
 |
1st Downs Allowed |
159 (89) |
144 (82) |
1st Downs |
Push> |
Time of Possession |
28 (103) |
33 (10) |
Time of Possession |
|
Strength of Schedule |
44 |
76 |
Strength of Schedule |
 |
Note:
All of the above rankings are taken directly from the NCAA except for strength of schedule, which is not ranked by the NCAA and instead taken from S&P+.
The Redzone TD% and Redzone TD% Defense are calculated by me and not ranked by the NCAA. Determining who has the advantage in these categories is strictly my arbitrary judgment.
Quick thoughts:
This feels like the worst matchup, statistically, all season.
Iowa’s strengths are Penn State’s strengths, for the most part - and weaknesses are against the weaknesses. So what does that portend for this week?
Well, likely not so much - Michigan State was the number one rush defense in the land before facing the Nittany Lions, and after the game their yards per game more than doubled. But they won the game.
If the Penn State coaches give the ball to Miles Sanders, he should be able to get his yards - but will that be enough? This is the best-coached-special teams PSU will have faced all year, and they need to be on guard. Here’s hoping they snap back at home before a tough matchup in Michigan.